|
On June 02 2013 02:38 teddyoojo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:35 opterown wrote:On June 02 2013 02:34 teddyoojo wrote: u ppl seem to think moonglade was far ahead? he was he traded alot of army for workers, while leaving ryung on 3 orbitals and a much bigger army which allowed ryung to put alot of pressure on moonglade what forced moonglade to waste alot of units to keep his forth which he needed because he fucked up and lost his third and alot of workers from 1 drop. if he didnt lose his third or drones he wouldve won. also after he defended the aggression on his forth, he was far ahead. but before that he wasnt really far ahead He had his 5th base down before Ryung got 30 workers, that's a solid economic advantage and he had the 20 army supply lead anyways
|
On June 02 2013 02:37 Dinotramp wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:37 hitpoint wrote:On June 02 2013 02:35 Tppz! wrote: that was moonglades game to loose. sadly he did loose. What did he loose? HIs play was not tight.
Yeah! tighten up Moonglade!
|
One of the worst moves was when Moonglade sent his entire ultra/bane/ling ground army to deal with 1 drop at his third, while sending his mutas to do some harass on Ryung's third, Ryung just pushed Moonglade's fourth and killed it off right away.
I always cringe when I see pro zergs not splitting their army. All you really need to deal with a drop is like maybe 12~15 lings and a couple of banelings. Don't need to commit your entire army...
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Moonglade sends out the kangaroo.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 02 2013 02:38 teddyoojo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:35 opterown wrote:On June 02 2013 02:34 teddyoojo wrote: u ppl seem to think moonglade was far ahead? he was he traded alot of army for workers, while leaving ryung on 3 orbitals and a much bigger army which allowed ryung to put alot of pressure on moonglade what forced moonglade to waste alot of units to keep his forth which he needed because he fucked up and lost his third and alot of workers from 1 drop. if he didnt lose his third or drones he wouldve won. also after he defended the aggression on his forth, he was far ahead. but before that he wasnt really far ahead nono after the big runby it aws 66 to 18 workers and glade was also up in army supply
|
On June 02 2013 02:37 4ZakeN87 wrote: Well Moonglade had that game.. if he had attacked the third it would have been over :/ A lot of people say that, but I really doubt he could spare units without loosing his 4th. I mean the rines were 3-3 vs 2-2, so sling runby wont really do well against a few rines.
Imo he lost the game on drop defense, not on lack of runbys.
|
On June 02 2013 02:38 govie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:35 FinBenton wrote: Moonglade just couldnt deal with drop play, like any of it, every single drop killed a base or mineral line and moonglades much superior army always in a wrong place TT not really. I think he underestimated the armysize of ryung after that scv-slaughter. He wanted to tech fast to ultras to seal the win, but ruyngs army was still very large. There wasnt much he could do different except using the mutas for drops and the groundarmy for defence. After the slaughter of scv's he was behind in armysupply alot.
Eh, thats debatable. I think its more about the 4th base on that map. He can't allow Ryung to get too comfy up the ramp, because he'll slowly push down/above the mineral line and deny everything. I think army's were even but marine/widow mines just trade really well in that high ground position.
|
|
really thought MLG would step it up for finals...
|
So far it seems just like a normal production.. =/
|
3 Axiom players, Snute and Moonglade for the 5 Season Finals spots please. Put HerO as a backup.
|
On June 02 2013 02:26 Whatson wrote: This is over already, the casters are just trying to hype
sorta deserved a quote on that one!
|
Moonglade inspired by the gsl finals. All-ins incoming data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Actually hope he does all-in a couple of times
|
This commentary is so redundant... we know who they've played previously
|
On June 02 2013 02:41 ronpaul012 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:38 govie wrote:On June 02 2013 02:35 FinBenton wrote: Moonglade just couldnt deal with drop play, like any of it, every single drop killed a base or mineral line and moonglades much superior army always in a wrong place TT not really. I think he underestimated the armysize of ryung after that scv-slaughter. He wanted to tech fast to ultras to seal the win, but ruyngs army was still very large. There wasnt much he could do different except using the mutas for drops and the groundarmy for defence. After the slaughter of scv's he was behind in armysupply alot. Eh, thats debatable. I think its more about the 4th base on that map. He can't allow Ryung to get too comfy up the ramp, because he'll slowly push down/above the mineral line and deny everything. I think army's were even but marine/widow mines just trade really well in that high ground position.
As soon he got the third back, he didn't need the fourth against an opponent that lost so many workers, better just sacrificing it. I guess if anything, he overestimated Ryung's economy after his bust.
|
Blue Flame? Is this 2011 already?
|
He was in Code A though, when he switched regions. He fell down last season.
|
not seen two fac blue flame for a while <3 a lot of queens thou
|
On June 02 2013 02:43 nkr wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 02:26 Whatson wrote: This is over already, the casters are just trying to hype sorta deserved a quote on that one! to be fair i didn't think ryung would come back from this , moonglade proved me wrong
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
there are a fair few players with more impressive runs than that though
|
|
|
|