EPT[Code S] RO16 Group A WCS Korea Season 1 2013 - Page 95
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
| ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12387 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:16 DamageControL wrote: It's 5/6...so it'll sound like it. But it will likely also be 5/8 which is less dominating. PartinG isn't kespa, and anyway we really shouldn't care where people come from as long as they show good games... No idea why we would. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:20 Nebuchad wrote: PartinG isn't kespa, and anyway we really shouldn't care where people come from as long as they show good games... No idea why we would. parting is kespa, he's just not an elephant | ||
|
revoN
Japan804 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:14 Shellshock1122 wrote: I'm sure by next season they'll have 9 players in the ro8 somehow If you count Parting then yes | ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:20 Scarecrow wrote: That SH game makes me worry about the future of the mu. Sure you can go for the super late ultimate protoss army (MS, carrier, tempest, collossus, templar, void w. oracle spotter) but for the viewer it'll be the equivalent of watching a hero jungle till 25 for perfect items. These games make me happy being a Terran ^.^ | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:15 YoungTyTy wrote: I actually like extended series, but there really is no perfect system. They all have their own faults and people can get the short stick sometimes You already lost a match and have to win 2 more bo3 to get through your group. Thats your 'punishment' for losing the first set. Extended series continues and punishes you if you meet your opponent again. Now you have won a series and lost a series, as well as your opponent, in which world is it fair that you now have to beat him in bo7 when he has to beat you in a bo3? | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12387 Posts
Pretty sure when people start these kespa wars they're refering to the elephants, no? If not it makes even less sense. | ||
|
DeCoder
Finland236 Posts
| ||
|
Charlie.Sheen
662 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:21 Nebuchad wrote: Pretty sure when people start these kespa wars they're refering to the elephants, no? If not it makes even less sense. Just to make eSF fans mad, that's the whole purpose. Sense is out of the window long time ago in TL. | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:23 Charlie.Sheen wrote: Just to make eSF fans mad, that's the whole purpose. Sense is out of the window long time ago in TL. yeah i don't think there are that many actual kespa fans, more esf baiters | ||
|
Thrillz
4313 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:23 DeCoder wrote: I don't buy into this Bogus hype (pun intended). Just don't let him get up to three bases uncontested and you're good. You could say that about everyone. And I'd say his hype is pretty justified. | ||
|
Brett
Australia3822 Posts
| ||
|
EpiK
Korea (South)5757 Posts
If he's not purebreed kespa, hes not kespa. Parting's blood is tainted by startale | ||
|
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:25 opterown wrote: yeah i don't think there are that many actual kespa fans, more esf baiters The point of being a "KeSPA" fan (as the organisation thing) eludes me... | ||
|
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:26 EpiK wrote: If he's not purebreed kespa, hes not kespa. Parting's blood is tainted by startale I'd have my blood tainted by Startale any day man... | ||
|
heartagram
178 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:21 Nebuchad wrote: Pretty sure when people start these kespa wars they're refering to the elephants, no? If not it makes even less sense. I think it's just to point out that the players with stricter practice schedules and more vigorous training are performing better than the rest, and that it was absurd to not think those players would eventually surpass ESF. | ||
|
BaaL`
297 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:15 YoungTyTy wrote: I actually like extended series, but there really is no perfect system. They all have their own faults and people can get the short stick sometimes Well I would say the only downside of current GSL system is that the initial match set-up matters quite a bit. If you are against the favorite, you have quite a big disadvantage. For example let's say players are 1-4, with 1 being the best etc. Games could be: 2 > 3 score 2-0 1 > 4 1 > 2 3 > 4 3 > 2 score 2-1 (this would be the only ''upset'', but could easily go this way if 2 and 3 are not far apart) 1 and 3 advance even though 2 went 3-2 in total in their games. This feels pretty unfair towards player 2, he did play better in their matches overall than player 3 after all. This is supposed to be compensated by player 2 losing in the winner's match, while player 3 won in the loser's match, BUT obviously winner's match should be a lot harder to win than loser's match. Still it would also not be fair to extend the series, for example starting from 2-0 and doing a best of 5. Both players have won 1 series and lost 1 series so far, so this approach would IMO favor player 2 too much. Maybe player 2 should get a 1 map advantage only if he won 2-0 in the initial series, but that's getting a bit convoluted. | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
WCS AM RO32 Group B - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18434081 WCS KR Code A R2 - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18511070 threads for tomorrow! | ||
|
Clefairy
1570 Posts
| ||
|
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On May 07 2013 22:28 Clefairy wrote: Sucky group. Goddamn idiots in Group B ruined this season! Wait for the GumiHo + 3 Zergs group ! This should be fun ! | ||
| ||
