data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
[Code A] RO48 Day 3 2012 GSL Season 5 - Page 71
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
MrKn4rz
Germany2153 Posts
![]() | ||
Gingerninja
United Kingdom1339 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:44 Flonomenalz wrote: How would you expect any sort of bonjwa to emerge in just 2 years? It's incredible MVP/Nestea even won as much as they did, considering Code S format. They played a lot less games in the Kespa formats. In SC2 the top players play many more games and still have the same win ratio's as the top BW players had. It's just spread over more tournaments and a shorter period of time. | ||
Talionis
Scotland4085 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:45 sharkie wrote: I agree. While I applaud Flash for trying to 14cc almost every game I dont understand why his opponents never go for early aggression or early game all ins. He's been 4gated by multiple players a lot of times, and he always holds it off with ease no matter what he does. Proxy robo would be nice though. | ||
Severus_
759 Posts
Damn i guess since i linked last time everybody has it now. | ||
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
synapse
China13814 Posts
| ||
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Jehct wrote: Incredibly rigorous schedules, combined with a lack of OSL/team league in the earlier days (where MVP/MC would have unquestionably dominated), means we probably won't see a bonjwa. And shit, the days of the bonjwa might be over all-together. Even in the later days of BW no one looked dominant (though given more time after his surgery Flash may have). The scene is bigger and competition is fierce so you have 4-5 giants instead of one untouchable player; not a bad thing. Thank you. | ||
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Jehct wrote: Incredibly rigorous schedules, combined with a lack of OSL/team league in the earlier days (where MVP/MC would have unquestionably dominated), means we probably won't see a bonjwa. And shit, the days of the bonjwa might be over all-together. Even in the later days of BW no one looked dominant (though given more time after his surgery Flash may have). The scene is bigger and competition is fierce so you have 4-5 giants instead of one untouchable player; not a bad thing. I never understood why people liked having 1-2 godlike players where you basically didnt even have to watch the tournament to know who was going to be in the finals. | ||
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
![]() | ||
zefreak
United States2731 Posts
| ||
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
Kinda inaccurate, though. There's an option that doesn't lead to an all in. | ||
Malinor
Germany4719 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Hider wrote: I agree generally, though that was more than just a small misstep. Yeah, I guess you guys are right. That was a huge misstep that probably deserved to lose instantly. I just wish sometimes that when 2 large armies meet, the fight wouldn't be so onesided by positioning alone (on an open field that is, not talking about cliffs or defenders advantage). | ||
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Jehct wrote: Incredibly rigorous schedules, combined with a lack of OSL/team league in the earlier days (where MVP/MC would have unquestionably dominated), means we probably won't see a bonjwa. And shit, the days of the bonjwa might be over all-together. Even in the later days of BW no one looked dominant (though given more time after his surgery Flash may have). The scene is bigger and competition is fierce so you have 4-5 giants instead of one untouchable player; not a bad thing. But it was due to poor play. In last years of BW its not like competition rised up to the TBLS its rather TBLS started to suck randomly at increasing ratio. | ||
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Sapphire.lux wrote: Yeah, coz he was rubbish in non-coin flippy games like BW. So when Flash wins, it is skill and not coin flippy and when he loses, it is coin flippy? | ||
Coolhwip
Sweden1381 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 thepuppyassassin wrote: Anyone have a problem with keeping dps the same and doubling the hit points of every unit? Sometimes I feel like even the best players, once they get caught out of position, can't micro fast enough to ever hope to rectify the situation. In a lot of these instances, a third of your stuff is dead before you even have time to think. That would probably create chaos in ways we could never predict. | ||
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:48 zefreak wrote: Jesus these L/R threads are shit now that its back to SC2 vs BW nonsense.. from regular posters as well. It's really annoying to read. | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 synapse wrote: Question-do these stats take into consideration the games that were just won/lost in the series? They do in the sense that a 2-0 is now impossible for either player, but they do not in the sense that I update the probability of a player winning a given set. It's on the to-do list... sort of. At least on the to-think list. | ||
Taipoka
Brazil1224 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:46 Hider wrote: I agree generally, though that was more than just a small misstep. Maybe cause your army should walk holdind each other hands, and a misstep when done is done with all your army... GG | ||
sharkie
Austria18310 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:48 zefreak wrote: Jesus these L/R threads are shit now that its back to SC2 vs BW nonsense.. from regular posters as well. It doesn't help that staff is joining these discussions :p | ||
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On November 22 2012 20:48 zefreak wrote: Jesus these L/R threads are shit now that its back to SC2 vs BW nonsense.. from regular posters as well. LR threads are pretty much never good unless they derail completely | ||
| ||