|
ffs creator........... wanted to see a actual game of mech vs protoss on this level
|
On November 05 2012 20:45 Laryleprakon wrote:
Mech TvP
This is something to be excited for!!!
yeah so hyped for that 6gate right?
|
3 Siege Tank shots (the tank that popped out during the attack) wasted on the neutral supply depot. Think Bbyong was dead already at that point, but losing 3 volleys in such an all-or-nothing situation...
|
Group E
DongRaeGu: 100.000%
Creator: 54.596%
Mvp: 44.159%
Bbyong: 1.245%
|
On November 05 2012 20:47 TheBB wrote:
Group E
DongRaeGu: 100.000%
Creator: 54.596%
Mvp: 44.159%
Bbyong: 1.245%
Going mech vs protoss 1% chance 
|
lol Tasteles throwing a few hits at Artosis mech love ^^
|
|
|
On November 05 2012 20:47 Chill Penguin wrote:
So sad, I don't think I've seen true Mech against Toss in sooooooooo long.
MKP went mech vs some barcode toss yesterday when he was streaming. Toss did an insane amount of damage early on and mkp probably thought that going mech was the only way he could make a game out of it. Suddenly the protoss went carriers, lost damn near all his shit and mkp just rolled over him lol.
|
On November 05 2012 20:45 Maloreon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:44 vthree wrote:On November 05 2012 20:42 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:41 pmp10 wrote:On November 05 2012 20:39 Noocta wrote:On November 05 2012 20:37 Severian wrote:On November 05 2012 20:34 Noocta wrote:On November 05 2012 20:32 Severian wrote:
Is everyone complaining forgetting that MVP built 20 pretty useless tanks then sent them to their deaths with nothing but a few infestor kills to show for it, leaving his final army much smaller? Mvp actually got a lot done with his tank raids. The obs didn't catch all of it, but he made the BLs fly everywhere but at his base for a long time, and he killed a base + the greater spire On November 05 2012 20:34 Wildmoon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:32 Severian wrote:
Is everyone complaining forgetting that MVP built 20 pretty useless tanks then sent them to their deaths with nothing but a few infestor kills to show for it, leaving his final army much smaller? It's his tanks that bought time for him to mass air. Ok, I should've put it another way: everyone's acting like MVP had a 200-supply zerg-killing army of doom, whereas in reality it was like 8 Ravens, 15 Vikings and almost nothing else. Yeah, if he had've won the air battle because omg seeker missile so awesome~ he might've held off that attack for a bit, but there was no way he could actually win with that army. Flash will be doing this next year and you will feel pretty stupid. Thanks though. Oh yeah, ofc Mvp was dead. His sky army was too small to win the game, people thinking he had a chance are desulionnal. That's not the point. Even if he had 150 supply army the rest of it would have to be in ground units to defend against the tech switch. Uhh no. If they were even economically and Terran plays right he should crush a weak Roach army with a few tanks and some Banshees. Seriously a well crafted Terran army CAN do this, just nobody is even trying. Makes me sad. Yes, the best terrans in the world cannot do it but some TL poster has the solution!!! Flash will be doing this next year and you will feel pretty stupid then. Whatever though, someone tries a suggestion, Terrans are too negative these days.
Flash will just win with bio ^_^
|
On November 05 2012 20:45 NicksonReyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:43 Vorenius wrote:On November 05 2012 20:29 Maloreon wrote:
Buff Ravens already (saying this as a Zerg). Reduce cost of HSM, make raven buildable from no tech lab imo. I'd love what that would do to the metagame. That would simply make Ravens the terran equivelant of Infestors. Balancing OP with more OP will just cause more terrible terrible damage. Balancing OP with more OP was how BW was balanced lol. Nerfing sucks, buffing rocks! Make everything OP!
Wrong forum. This is SC2.
|
|
|
I won't join the balance whine, but Zergs need to stop saying dumb shit like 'build ravens', because it isn't helpful to anyone.
|
On November 05 2012 20:47 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:44 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:41 brofestor wrote:On November 05 2012 20:39 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:37 figq wrote:
I only wonder that people choose *this* game to make comparisons between late game armies. In this game zerg won significant economic advantage much earlier before late game, and just pressed it methodically. EXACTLY. And yet despite how close it was with MVP being miles behind, no Terrans are doing this style correctly: 1. BFH to get a lead. 2. FULL TURTLE with tanks and turrets, PF's, unbreakable. 3. Mass Thor, Viking, Raven, Ghost combo. 4. SMASH! with you and your 3 measly bases? zerg would have all the other bases and his creep would spread to your doorstep, and he can remax his army many times over and yeah MVP shld have 11/11 at least once. why he didnt do that. You can easily turtle 4-5 base and get any units you want watch Hack vs. Zerg from up/downs. Anyway, its the same thing that Zerg do right now turtle to make perfect army that one shots all other armies. Economy is important but even if Zerg has the whole map if you craft the right army you can and will win. I believe! Didn't Hack lose to both zergs in his U&D group (Hyun and B4)?
No Hack won against the Kespa Zerg doing the build I'm talking about, AFTER failing a 2 rax (huge economic lead for the Zerg). Granted the Zerg did not play perfect, but neither did Hack... and I can guarantee 100% no one in here is as good as Hack... so it is possible to do this.
|
On November 05 2012 20:48 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:45 NicksonReyes wrote:On November 05 2012 20:43 Vorenius wrote:On November 05 2012 20:29 Maloreon wrote:
Buff Ravens already (saying this as a Zerg). Reduce cost of HSM, make raven buildable from no tech lab imo. I'd love what that would do to the metagame. That would simply make Ravens the terran equivelant of Infestors. Balancing OP with more OP will just cause more terrible terrible damage. Balancing OP with more OP was how BW was balanced lol. Nerfing sucks, buffing rocks! Make everything OP! Wrong forum. This is SC2.
Wrong forum. This is LR thread.
|
On November 05 2012 20:48 Cereb wrote:
lol Tasteles throwing a few hits at Artosis mech love ^^
haha yeah, still remember Artosis vs Incontrol on SOtG over mech TvP
|
On November 05 2012 20:49 andaylin wrote:
tvp mech imba.
Attacking Neutral Supply Depots when being all-in'd stronk.
|
On November 05 2012 20:48 Laryleprakon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:45 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:44 vthree wrote:On November 05 2012 20:42 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:41 pmp10 wrote:On November 05 2012 20:39 Noocta wrote:On November 05 2012 20:37 Severian wrote:On November 05 2012 20:34 Noocta wrote:On November 05 2012 20:32 Severian wrote:
Is everyone complaining forgetting that MVP built 20 pretty useless tanks then sent them to their deaths with nothing but a few infestor kills to show for it, leaving his final army much smaller? Mvp actually got a lot done with his tank raids. The obs didn't catch all of it, but he made the BLs fly everywhere but at his base for a long time, and he killed a base + the greater spire On November 05 2012 20:34 Wildmoon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:32 Severian wrote:
Is everyone complaining forgetting that MVP built 20 pretty useless tanks then sent them to their deaths with nothing but a few infestor kills to show for it, leaving his final army much smaller? It's his tanks that bought time for him to mass air. Ok, I should've put it another way: everyone's acting like MVP had a 200-supply zerg-killing army of doom, whereas in reality it was like 8 Ravens, 15 Vikings and almost nothing else. Yeah, if he had've won the air battle because omg seeker missile so awesome~ he might've held off that attack for a bit, but there was no way he could actually win with that army. Flash will be doing this next year and you will feel pretty stupid. Thanks though. Oh yeah, ofc Mvp was dead. His sky army was too small to win the game, people thinking he had a chance are desulionnal. That's not the point. Even if he had 150 supply army the rest of it would have to be in ground units to defend against the tech switch. Uhh no. If they were even economically and Terran plays right he should crush a weak Roach army with a few tanks and some Banshees. Seriously a well crafted Terran army CAN do this, just nobody is even trying. Makes me sad. Yes, the best terrans in the world cannot do it but some TL poster has the solution!!! Flash will be doing this next year and you will feel pretty stupid then. Whatever though, someone tries a suggestion, Terrans are too negative these days. Flash will just win with bio ^_^
Well true, but he will win with everything. I do think he's going to show some broken Terran end-game armies though. He's already looking so good.
|
On November 05 2012 20:45 NicksonReyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:43 Vorenius wrote:On November 05 2012 20:29 Maloreon wrote:
Buff Ravens already (saying this as a Zerg). Reduce cost of HSM, make raven buildable from no tech lab imo. I'd love what that would do to the metagame. That would simply make Ravens the terran equivelant of Infestors. Balancing OP with more OP will just cause more terrible terrible damage. Balancing OP with more OP was how BW was balanced lol. Nerfing sucks, buffing rocks! Make everything OP!
Dustin Browder DID buff rocks as you said.
|
On November 05 2012 20:49 Maloreon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 20:47 vthree wrote:On November 05 2012 20:44 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:41 brofestor wrote:On November 05 2012 20:39 Maloreon wrote:On November 05 2012 20:37 figq wrote:
I only wonder that people choose *this* game to make comparisons between late game armies. In this game zerg won significant economic advantage much earlier before late game, and just pressed it methodically. EXACTLY. And yet despite how close it was with MVP being miles behind, no Terrans are doing this style correctly: 1. BFH to get a lead. 2. FULL TURTLE with tanks and turrets, PF's, unbreakable. 3. Mass Thor, Viking, Raven, Ghost combo. 4. SMASH! with you and your 3 measly bases? zerg would have all the other bases and his creep would spread to your doorstep, and he can remax his army many times over and yeah MVP shld have 11/11 at least once. why he didnt do that. You can easily turtle 4-5 base and get any units you want watch Hack vs. Zerg from up/downs. Anyway, its the same thing that Zerg do right now turtle to make perfect army that one shots all other armies. Economy is important but even if Zerg has the whole map if you craft the right army you can and will win. I believe! Didn't Hack lose to both zergs in his U&D group (Hyun and B4)? No Hack won against the Kespa Zerg doing the build I'm talking about, AFTER failing a 2 rax (huge economic lead for the Zerg). Granted the Zerg did not play perfect, but neither did Hack... and I can guarantee 100% no one in here is as good as Hack... so it is possible to do this.
That game is a pretty bad example, zerg sat and waited with a maxed army for so long. I agree that style has potential tho.
|
Guys stop complaining. DRG just played better every single game. Blizzard probably wont change WoL so just deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
