EPTOn August 09 2012 21:48 Fody03 wrote:
you can follow the Naniwa-Incontrol drama on Twitter
you can follow the Naniwa-Incontrol drama on Twitter
Whats this about? I do love some good drama
[WCS KR] WR1 D4 - Page 76
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Nekovivie
United Kingdom2599 Posts
Whats this about? I do love some good drama | ||
|
8mmspikes
United States1704 Posts
 ) and give him some love! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359270#1 | ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:51 opterown wrote: it was on stream they ones that they would show :D Looking at http://www.gomtv.net/schedule/index.gom it's only 3 matches as well. They are maybe updating it. Oh well, crazy if Leenock has to play again tomorrow, even if it is on the same terms as roro. 1 Day preparation for both is fair but unusual | ||
|
snafoo
New Zealand1615 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:52 DarkLordOlli wrote: Unconventional but possible. I still think it's greedy to ever skip a zealot vs 3 hatch, dunno. I personally like to be prepared against anything that's possible. People have been canceling hatches on me a few times. So terran should never 14cc against zerg? Zerg should never hatchfirst without scouting the whole map for proxy 2rax(alot dont - even in tournaments) etc etc. There's so many risky openers pro players do simply because the response to kill them is extremely unlikely to blindly occur... | ||
|
RandomRice
United States303 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:53 Toadvine wrote: Pretty sure MC could've seen more than 6 lings if he just moved out with a probe. That's enough to prompt a full wall-off, or at least it should be. Leenock had his inital 4-6 lings parked outside MC's nat. If he spots a scout move out he can easily move his huge ling mass out of the scouting path | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:45 Toadvine wrote: All of you "WHY NOT BUILD ZEALOT SO GREEDY" guys are completely ignorant. :/ He could have simply completed his wall with a pylon and been fine. He lost because it didn't even occur to him that what Leenock did was even possible. It's a one shot cheese that will never work again. You do realize walling off a Pylon costs 100 minerals right? Those same 100 minerals that would cost to make a Zealot... | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:55 DrakeFZX3 wrote: You do realize walling off a Pylon costs 100 minerals right? Those same 100 minerals that would cost to make a Zealot... but you get the wall up instantly to block the zerglings etc | ||
|
RandomRice
United States303 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:55 DrakeFZX3 wrote: You do realize walling off a Pylon costs 100 minerals right? Those same 100 minerals that would cost to make a Zealot... whats your point? the pylon block would be a instawin vs slow ling runby but you wouldnt build it if you didnt have to | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:48 Fody03 wrote: you can follow the Naniwa-Incontrol drama on Twitter What the hell did happen? | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:57 opterown wrote: but you get the wall up instantly to block the zerglings etc True, but MC cut a corner and paid for a dearly. I'd rather he make that Zealot rather than dumping 100 minerals into a Pylon which he'd later destroy anyway. | ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:55 DrakeFZX3 wrote: You do realize walling off a Pylon costs 100 minerals right? Those same 100 minerals that would cost to make a Zealot... ... Do you really not understand the difference between always building a Zealot and reactively building a pylon in the rare occasion when it's required? | ||
|
Gevna
France2332 Posts
That looks ugly from a viewer point of view, but that was beautiful play by Leenock. | ||
|
RandomRice
United States303 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:58 Toadvine wrote: ... Do you really not understand the difference between always building a Zealot and reactively building a pylon in the rare occasion when it's required? Seriously, my mind is blown by the comments regarding this game.. | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:57 RandomRice wrote: whats your point? the pylon block would be a instawin vs slow ling runby but you wouldnt build it if you didnt have to My point is, MC cut a corner and paid for it. Trying to stem a tide by MAYBE getting a pylon wall down if those lings aren't even in the space where building a Pylon would wall it off (that's a big WHAT IF) is too big a gamble. | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On August 09 2012 21:58 Toadvine wrote: ... Do you really not understand the difference between always building a Zealot and reactively building a pylon in the rare occasion when it's required? I do. Do you not understand the amount of lings in the SPACE where the Pylon would wall off would prevent that? You're basing this Pylon walloff on the scenario where Lings aren't even in the space where you could wall it off. But they were there instantaneously when they rolled right in and took down the cannon. You're playing a big WHAT IF here. I'm playing the build a Zealot and play it standard and safe. | ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On August 09 2012 22:00 DrakeFZX3 wrote: My point is, MC cut a corner and paid for it. Trying to stem a tide by MAYBE getting a pylon wall down if those lings aren't even in the space where building a Pylon would wall it off (that's a big WHAT IF) is too big a gamble. yeah, of course. MC knew that he was cutting a corner, but that corner might be the extra 5 seconds that his 8gate hits earlier just before 20 lings pop or something :D calculated risk that didn't work this time | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
장민철 @sk__mc FML | ||
|
RandomRice
United States303 Posts
On August 09 2012 22:03 AxionSteel wrote: hahahaha, I think anyone who loses to the slow ling runby would have the same reaction | ||
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
I'm never LBing against Leenock again, MC or not... I don't remember when was the last time I got a correct LB when I bet against Leenock. | ||
|
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
These type of strategy will almost never ever work in high level play Slow-Ling all-in.lollll MC got bopped. I guess Leenock is one of the few who can make shit like this work (Reminiscent of 6 pool against Alive when Alive 1 rax FE) MC got too greedy and did not scout properly. Pretty embarassing to lose to such thing actually. | ||
| ||
