|
On July 23 2012 03:54 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:53 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:52 Broodwurst wrote:On July 23 2012 03:50 -TesteR- wrote:On July 23 2012 03:49 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:48 -TesteR- wrote:On July 23 2012 03:47 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:46 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:44 yeint wrote:
Fairness is a value judgment, you can't claim that something is "mathematically fair".
Yes, rules need to be mathematically consistent, but consistency alone doesn't constitute fairness. But it's still fair in that it applies to everyone equally. Good to hear that there's no such thing as imbalance, since units apply to everyone evenly. We can finally shut down all balance arguments! Only applies to mirror match ups! Mirror matches prove total balance, duh. Zergs have to deal with Broodlords, so how can T or P complain about broods? Zergs have broodlords to deal with broodlords, T or P does not. Broodlord vs Broodlord must be an interesting fight. It's absolutely hilarious to watch. It happened once that I can remember. I believe it was Sheth vs Morrow(morrow played zerg in this case obviously) mined out crossfire max zerg vs max zerg and it was just brood lords sending out more broodlings to fight the other broodlings over and over
The solution to extended series: Starcraft penalty shootout. Both players start in the middle of the map with the same amount of buildings and broodlords.
|
On July 23 2012 03:58 ACrow wrote:
Anyone think it's unfair that Alicia get's the red lighting? Makes him look like a villain. That's very unfair technically.
applies evenly to all players put in that booth, clearly fair
|
|
|
Wow if Alicia loses this......I don't get why he kept moving his bigger army back from Oz.
|
On July 23 2012 03:59 Broodwurst wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:54 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:53 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:52 Broodwurst wrote:On July 23 2012 03:50 -TesteR- wrote:On July 23 2012 03:49 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:48 -TesteR- wrote:On July 23 2012 03:47 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:46 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:44 yeint wrote:
Fairness is a value judgment, you can't claim that something is "mathematically fair".
Yes, rules need to be mathematically consistent, but consistency alone doesn't constitute fairness. But it's still fair in that it applies to everyone equally. Good to hear that there's no such thing as imbalance, since units apply to everyone evenly. We can finally shut down all balance arguments! Only applies to mirror match ups! Mirror matches prove total balance, duh. Zergs have to deal with Broodlords, so how can T or P complain about broods? Zergs have broodlords to deal with broodlords, T or P does not. Broodlord vs Broodlord must be an interesting fight. It's absolutely hilarious to watch. It happened once that I can remember. I believe it was Sheth vs Morrow(morrow played zerg in this case obviously) mined out crossfire max zerg vs max zerg and it was just brood lords sending out more broodlings to fight the other broodlings over and over The solution to extended series: Starcraft penalty shootout. Both players start in the middle of the map with the same amount of buildings and broodlords.
Hope they're not terran buildings
|
How the hell is Oz alive? SO GOOD! I mean he isn't really far behind either.
|
Come on Alicia. Please win this!
|
if alicia tosses this. god.
|
|
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
|
Dark shrine against robo tech? What?
|
On July 23 2012 04:01 yeint wrote:
Dark shrine against robo tech? What?
Archons do pretty good against immortals and dts are going to force observers to delay further robo units, if not kill outright.
|
On July 23 2012 03:59 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:58 ACrow wrote:
Anyone think it's unfair that Alicia get's the red lighting? Makes him look like a villain. That's very unfair technically. applies evenly to all players put in that booth, clearly fair
That's not true.
2. The higher seeded Player must play as the Red team and the lower seeded Player must play as the Blue team. The highest seed is 1.
I assume that also is for lighting.
|
Alicia... do okay.. please.. I need you to win silver in this tournament.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 23 2012 04:01 yeint wrote:
Dark shrine against robo tech? What?
"DTs are always the answer" - Inca
|
On July 23 2012 04:02 Dfgj wrote:Archons do pretty good against immortals and dts are going to force observers to delay further robo units, if not kill outright.
Plus he has blink and his own observer so he can snipe it and just win.
|
On July 23 2012 04:00 Koesader wrote:
Heh random bo win
I think Oz could've held a lot better if he played the forcefield without letting Alicia's stalker get up.
wtf is Alicia doing... he had a lead and now is going DT? This could go awry
|
United States97276 Posts
wow the probe difference is ridiculous
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
|
On July 23 2012 04:02 Roxor9999 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:59 Dfgj wrote:On July 23 2012 03:58 ACrow wrote:
Anyone think it's unfair that Alicia get's the red lighting? Makes him look like a villain. That's very unfair technically. applies evenly to all players put in that booth, clearly fair That's not true. 2. The higher seeded Player must play as the Red team and the lower seeded Player must play as the Blue team. The highest seed is 1. I assume that also is for lighting.
Surely both players had an equal chance to the highest seed, hence fair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
