|
On July 23 2012 03:39 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:38 OtoshimonoU wrote: How about we get rid of double elimination? People like exciting loser's bracket runs like Squirtle at IPL4 and First is doing a good job gaining fans right now
Then they should stop complaining about extended series... You can't have both.
|
You don't need the extended series rule in a double elimination tournament.
The advantage can always be the fact that each player gets two lives. If the same players meet a second time- one player through the winner's bracket and one player through the loser's bracket- they can just play out completely separate BoXs starting at 0-0 where the previous winner still has an extra life (and so has to lose two full sets to lose) whereas the previous loser only has one life left (and so once he loses one set, he's out for good).
Both the "extra life" award and the "extended series" award are current advantages for the winners and disadvantages for the losers in many double elimination tournaments (e.g. MLG). Both don't need to be implemented though. Keeping them consistent throughout a tournament is important for fairness, but if the quantity and quality of advantages becomes too great for the winners, it may become less of a double elimination tournament, and more of a "single + a miracle" tournament. Many players and spectators still would like to see a competitor have a chance at coming back, despite one bad match. At the end of the day though, it's up to the creators of the tournament to decide on what rules they want to implement.
|
United States97276 Posts
On July 23 2012 03:41 OtoshimonoU wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:39 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:38 OtoshimonoU wrote: How about we get rid of double elimination? People like exciting loser's bracket runs like Squirtle at IPL4 and First is doing a good job gaining fans right now Then they should stop complaining about extended series... You can't have both. People are going to complain about everything I've accepted extended series for what it is
|
On July 23 2012 03:35 Robson13 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:33 Yaki wrote:On July 23 2012 03:32 Kurumi wrote: I was away for like 10 minutes and it's already Game 4? What happened?! extended series This ISN'T extended series. This is normal double elimination rules.
This. Thanks!
On July 23 2012 03:36 Yaki wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:35 Robson13 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:33 Yaki wrote:On July 23 2012 03:32 Kurumi wrote: I was away for like 10 minutes and it's already Game 4? What happened?! extended series This ISN'T extended series. This is normal double elimination rules. they started the series at 2-1, how is that not extended series ????
The issue with extended series fairness has always been MLGs use of it when two players meet in LB, ie both having lost an equal amount of matches. When LB meets WB it's just normal double elimination rules.
|
On July 23 2012 03:37 skrotcyk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:34 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:29 Darpa wrote:On July 23 2012 03:25 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:22 yeint wrote:On July 23 2012 03:21 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:20 yeint wrote:On July 23 2012 03:17 FairForever wrote:On July 23 2012 03:15 Darpa wrote:On July 23 2012 03:14 tree.hugger wrote: [quote]Ironically, the only positive of extended series is actually that it is fair. Pretty much this, its gives the person who won an advantage and the person who lost a disadvantage, how is that no fair. You don't understand what fair means. It's fair but it's stupid. Saying that the person who lost the match starts with a 2-0 advantage in the extended series (instead of the winner) is also fair. But it's also stupid. What? No, that's NOT fair. It's fair to give an advantage to the player who already beat the guy once, it's not fair to do the opposite. If player A and player B meet in round 7, and player B loses, it's decidedly unfair to let player B get a clean slate in round 3 if they meet again. The only problem with extended series is that it makes for terribad finals. You don't understand what fair means. It's still fair. I hate Extended Series and hope they get rid of it. Just tree.hugger based his post on semantics (the word "fair"), and none of you understand. Trust me, my name has the word "fair" in it, I know what it means. I wish my name had "facedesk" in it, because it's what I'm doing right now. I understand what you said, and I agree that's why they should get rid of extended series. Because it's stupid. But extended series is technically, as tree.hugger said, fair. Each player has an equal opportunity to be advantaged by the rule as disadvantaged. Unfair would be something like Idra starting with a 1-0 lead in every series, or if the bracket was configured in such a way that, prior to any games being played, certain individuals were more likely to start with an extended series lead than a deficit (which is not the case at all). So, the rule is actually fair. you just spent your last three posts telling us we didnt know what fair was.... and now your switching and saying its stupid but fair... well played. Read again. Go back to my history - I've never liked the Extended Series rule. But it is technically fair, by the definition of fair. Read this for a definition of fair http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091217130340AAs0gh2And tell me how extended series is not fair. The issue is that people are saying "how is it fair? The one who lost the original series is less likely to win the subsequent one" ^ That is true. But the tournament structure is fair because prior to anyone winning or losing, all results are equally likely. links fact definition from yahoo questions ROOOOOOOOOOOFLLOLLLLLOLOLLLLLLOOOOOOL
lol, someone doesn't even bother to understand basic mathematics I see. I'm just explaining how the rule is technically fair. No one with any common sense actually likes the extended series rule.
|
Oz's play is really inspiring this tournament but I can't root against Alicia not to take second place >.<
|
On July 23 2012 03:41 OtoshimonoU wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:39 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:38 OtoshimonoU wrote: How about we get rid of double elimination? People like exciting loser's bracket runs like Squirtle at IPL4 and First is doing a good job gaining fans right now Then they should stop complaining about extended series... You can't have both.
What? Why not?
Extended series is normally not used in double elimination.
|
|
|
On July 23 2012 03:38 Robson13 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:36 Dodgin wrote:On July 23 2012 03:35 Robson13 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:33 Yaki wrote:On July 23 2012 03:32 Kurumi wrote: I was away for like 10 minutes and it's already Game 4? What happened?! extended series This ISN'T extended series. This is normal double elimination rules. Eh? Alicia started up 2-1, It's extended series. Alicia came from the upper bracket, Oz from the lower bracket so Alicia gets an advantage
This is actually not as good for Alicia as a normal double elim format would be, Oz would have to win 4 games and Alicia would have to win two, while Oz has to win 3 in this scenario.
On July 23 2012 03:41 OtoshimonoU wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:39 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:38 OtoshimonoU wrote: How about we get rid of double elimination? People like exciting loser's bracket runs like Squirtle at IPL4 and First is doing a good job gaining fans right now Then they should stop complaining about extended series... You can't have both.
Wow I wonder how every other tournament in existence that uses Double Elimination survives without extended series then.
|
Fairness is a value judgment, you can't claim that something is "mathematically fair".
Yes, rules need to be mathematically consistent, but consistency alone doesn't constitute fairness.
|
On July 23 2012 03:43 polyphonyEX wrote: Oz's play is really inspiring this tournament but I can't root against Alicia not to take second place >.<
Yeah, I've been rooting against Oz ever since he talked about skill in PvP. Wish Karma was more of a bitch.
|
15m and just take the 2nd base god damn pvp is so boring
|
On July 23 2012 03:43 Crushinator wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 03:41 OtoshimonoU wrote:On July 23 2012 03:39 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 23 2012 03:38 OtoshimonoU wrote: How about we get rid of double elimination? People like exciting loser's bracket runs like Squirtle at IPL4 and First is doing a good job gaining fans right now Then they should stop complaining about extended series... You can't have both. What? Why not? Extended series is normally not used in double elimination. In fact i cannot name another tournament using it. Atleast in eSports... although i'm not really following NA tournaments.
|
On July 23 2012 03:31 n0ise wrote: all this talk about extended series when mlg could basically get away with almost anything right now is pretty pointless
they did questionable stuff, it worked for them, 2-3 years in it's kinda past the open-discussion stage
People will continue to complain about things they feel make tournaments worse. For example MLG still uses head to head in pool play vs total group mapscore ( there was a fuss about this last year where select beat everyone in his group but drg and had a better mapscore. drg beat everyone in the group but i think.. trickster? and had a slightly worse mapscore. by most tournament rules Select wins the group but mlg used head to head which is dumb when you're in a group stage that big. Hell huk was bitching about this only a couple months ago when it almost screwed him over ( but then heart went on to beat everyone anyways so it didn't matter. ) It doesn't matter how long people have been getting away with bad ideas, people should be allowed to voice concerns over it for as long as it effects them.
Gogo Alicia, you can do this , just be careful.
|
Holy smoke just looked at brackets now... First! What a beast! Did he chug 1L of red bull before his loser's bracket run or what?
|
I'm liking how Apollo and Artosis works together, nice commentary.
|
On July 23 2012 03:44 yeint wrote: Fairness is a value judgment, you can't claim that something is "mathematically fair".
Yes, rules need to be mathematically consistent, but consistency alone doesn't constitute fairness.
No, mathematical fairness is not a value judgement.
The extended series rule is stupid because it rewards something that should not be rewarded (winning before losing as opposed to losing before winning). But it's still fair in that it applies to everyone equally.
It's as fair as the Dreamhack Coin Toss tournament: - everyone is as likely to benefit from this inept rule as be disadvantaged by it. The only thing not fair about the Coin Toss tournament was Bischu's placing in the bracket - otherwise the tournament was 100% fair.
|
On July 23 2012 03:45 mikedebo wrote: Holy smoke just looked at brackets now... First! What a beast! Did he chug 1L of red bull before his loser's bracket run or what? He called Squirtle for advice
|
On July 23 2012 03:45 mikedebo wrote: Holy smoke just looked at brackets now... First! What a beast! Did he chug 1L of red bull before his loser's bracket run or what? IM is sponsored by Burn energy drink and Coca Cola.
|
Ok let's say it's fair because every player has the same chance to benefit from this rule but it's unfaire because one can lose 2 bo3 (it's equivalent) & still be in.
|
|
|
|
|
|