EPT[TSL4] Qualifier 11 - EU/NA #8 - Page 39
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
| ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:21 tree.hugger wrote: I don't understand how, when both players choose low econ play, everyone looks upon it as an example of bad play. That was a pretty good game played by both players, definitely some decision making mistakes made, but none that made no sense given the context. Sometimes I think we're expecting way too much from the players, there's a fog of war, remember. eh, the attack from killer, leading with his mutas into marine/thor, I can't say that was a good game by both players. Killer really should have ran over but nearly threw it away because of that attack | ||
|
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
This really scares me :x | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8094 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=328972 | ||
|
hitpoint
United States1511 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:16 IshinShishi wrote: There's a big difference in the sense that it's even questionable to call a strategic decision like that a mistake and killer didn't just have poor engagements, he played like shit compared to beasty on many fronts. I think if you invest a lot in a plan which doesn't work and doesn't transition well into a late game...that's a pretty big mistake. Maybe his "strategic decision" was very good and his execution was poor, or maybe his execution was good and his strategy was terrible. Either way he was left in a terrible economic position against a hive tech zerg who recovered some of his economy. He probably deserved to lose. | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:24 Witten wrote: Beasty is making ravens. Looks like I have a new favorite foreign Terran player, even if this fails completely. Go watch some of Empire.Happy's games | ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
| ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:21 tree.hugger wrote: I don't understand how, when both players choose low econ play, everyone looks upon it as an example of bad play. That was a pretty good game played by both players, definitely some decision making mistakes made, but none that made no sense given the context. Sometimes I think we're expecting way too much from the players, there's a fog of war, remember. Personally, I just thought Killer's mechanics, execution and army control seemed very poor in that game. I usually don't feel knowledgable enough to judge a progamer's decision making, so I thought Beasty played quite well in that game. I think the doomdrop into the main ultimately cost him too much, but I wouldn't call it a terrible decision, it had the potential to work well. | ||
|
OMGaZERGling
Canada44 Posts
| ||
|
ibo422
Belgium2844 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
gooooo beasty | ||
|
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:26 OMGaZERGling wrote: I dont like Ret and Idra casting combo. both of their voices are to passive making it kinda boring. At least they know what they're talking about, unlike some people, cough *HUSKY and HD* cough | ||
|
Warpish
834 Posts
Yes. An airforce of Ravens and a seeker missile feast. ^^ | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
Or Bomber even. High caliber player who usually like ravens lategame. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:26 ibo422 wrote: Why on earth are you going mass ravens beasty?? .. //o\\ You've never watched some of Empire.Happy's late TvZ games have you? | ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:26 OMGaZERGling wrote: I dont like Ret and Idra casting combo. both of their voices are to passive making it kinda boring. I love it. So chilled. | ||
|
Zambrah
United States7107 Posts
| ||
|
vol_
Australia1608 Posts
| ||
| ||
