EPT[TSL4] Qualifier 11 - EU/NA #8 - Page 38
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Derrida
2885 Posts
| ||
|
dizzy101
Netherlands2066 Posts
On July 05 2012 06:03 Cheebah wrote:It amazes me how Teamliquid still managed to add a special flavor to TSL. It doesn't matter how many other tournaments are going on these days, there's always a reason to watch TSL. 100% agreed. I guess it shows that when care is invested in a product, there's something intangible that makes the result more special. A stark contrast with some other organizations that just seem to throw content at the screen to see what sticks. Can't wait for quals to be over and the real thing to start | ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
| ||
|
hitpoint
United States1511 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:10 IshinShishi wrote: You realize that's not bad play but a strategical choice to avoid the late game right? What's the difference? It's a decision that caused him to lose. Making bad decisions isn't different from making other mistakes, like Killer's poor engagements. | ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
| ||
happyness
United States2400 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:09 Scufo wrote: Classic case of Infestor/Brood Lord/Corruptor steamrolling everything. That has to be so frustrating for Beasty... No not really classic at all. Both players played poorly, and as much as I think Killer didn't deserve that win, Beasty really didn't either On July 05 2012 07:10 IshinShishi wrote: You realize that's not bad play but a strategical choice to avoid the late game right? It was still a poor timing. Getting a bunch of tech with a 2 base all in timing is a poor strategical choice. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
| ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:13 hitpoint wrote: What's the difference? It's a decision that caused him to lose. Making bad decisions isn't different from making other mistakes, like Killer's poor engagements. There's a big difference in the sense that it's even questionable to call a strategic decision like that a mistake and killer didn't just have poor engagements, he played like shit compared to beasty on many fronts. | ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
| ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:16 Witten wrote: Game two was an awful awful game by both players, really shouldn't ever be looked at as an example of balance. Both players wanted to lose that game with all their hearts. This. I think TvZ is imba for zerg at the moment, but this game is not an example of it. | ||
|
Warpish
834 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 123474
292 Posts
| ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:16 Witten wrote: Game two was an awful awful game by both players, really shouldn't ever be looked at as an example of balance. Both players wanted to lose that game with all their hearts. I don't understand how, when both players choose low econ play, everyone looks upon it as an example of bad play. That was a pretty good game played by both players, definitely some decision making mistakes made, but none that made no sense given the context. Sometimes I think we're expecting way too much from the players, there's a fog of war, remember. EDIT: I guess by low econ, I mean Beasty. | ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
| ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:19 Warpish wrote: The new TvZ openings: Banshees and 2 Rax. Reactor Hellions into Triple OC + Double Ebay + Banshee is pretty old, nothing super groundbreaking at least | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:21 tree.hugger wrote: I don't understand how, when both players choose low econ play, everyone looks upon it as an example of bad play. That was a pretty good game played by both players, definitely some decision making mistakes made, but none that made no sense given the context. Sometimes I think we're expecting way too much from the players, there's a fog of war, remember. Playing low economy by not spending your money ? Comon dude, Killer is stock pilling 1k+ mineral and 500+ gas ALL Game. | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On July 05 2012 07:21 tree.hugger wrote: I don't understand how, when both players choose low econ play, everyone looks upon it as an example of bad play. That was a pretty good game played by both players, definitely some decision making mistakes made, but none that made no sense given the context. Sometimes I think we're expecting way too much from the players, there's a fog of war, remember. There was a bigass bank for KiLLeR, something like 2k minerals at one point in the game I really like Beasty mixing in Ravens earlier on than usual | ||
| ||
