|
On May 03 2012 14:13 Ausfailia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 11:46 Ldawg wrote: I am not certain if anyone shares the same sentiment regarding cheese, but what I really dislike seeing often in series is "early cheese" (since there is not clearcut definition) such as proxy rax, early pools, four gates, etc. It does not matter what race is doing it or who the player is, I instantly just writhe on the inside. "Cheeses" such as 7 gates, delayed banshees (which I have seen obliterate protoss going for early 3 base), etc. do not really annoy me.
Above all, the fact that I can look at the VOD time for a given PvT and make an almost consistently correct prediction on who won based on the duration of the VOD, kills me. I find myself doing it almost subconsciously in every PvT I see on GOM and did it starting with game 2 of Naniwa vs MVP. It's frustrating as hell because before I even know it, I've already seen the duration of the VOD and essentially spoiled it for myself. Game 2 less than 15 minutes? MVP wins, and I was correct, Game 3 somewhere around 15 minutes? Expected Nani to win and he did. Same for game 4, VOD under 15 minutes, expected MVP to win and he did.
It most certainly is a complex balancing issue, but I hope either the meta game or Blizzard fixes this almost perfect correlation between game duration and which race wins in PvT. How thinly do you want to veil your balance whining?
I will ask the same question of you, if you think I am balance whining in regards to a race, which side am I on? My comments were not in reference to a particular race or unit, but in regards to the length of game/winning race relationship in PvT.
|
i actually really like people cheesing in tournaments, keeps the metagame in check and stops people from being too greedy
|
was great to see mvp smash some nerds face. GSL trophy nr4 incoming!
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On May 02 2012 19:45 Soma.bokforlag wrote: i think most of us are really sad because we lost the opportunity to see what could have been a really great series. this series, even though mvp playing better and winnig fairly, does in no real way show who is the better player.
i dont know how big part nerves played, but its always sad to see a player you know can performe at a high level play relativelty poorly.
everyone who has seen naniwas games in code a and his great games at mlg knows it wasnt just bad luck or his opponents being much better. he has a nerve-issue when playing in korea and all the non-naniwa-haters would have hoped that issue would have been resolved by now.
seeing the games today though, i dont think anyone (besides the pople creating accounts to bash naniwa (seriously guys? how old are you?)) felt we saw naniwa perform up to those standards today Dealing with this shit is a skill too tho, as much as I sometimes wish it wasn't (my biggest weakness by faaaaaar).
You can't look at a macro game, see he played it awesomely, and then watch him get utterly wrecked by some cheese and conclude he's underperforming when dieing to the cheese... Could also be that his macro game is just much better than his cheese defense etc.
|
On May 03 2012 23:29 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2012 19:45 Soma.bokforlag wrote: i think most of us are really sad because we lost the opportunity to see what could have been a really great series. this series, even though mvp playing better and winnig fairly, does in no real way show who is the better player.
i dont know how big part nerves played, but its always sad to see a player you know can performe at a high level play relativelty poorly.
everyone who has seen naniwas games in code a and his great games at mlg knows it wasnt just bad luck or his opponents being much better. he has a nerve-issue when playing in korea and all the non-naniwa-haters would have hoped that issue would have been resolved by now.
seeing the games today though, i dont think anyone (besides the pople creating accounts to bash naniwa (seriously guys? how old are you?)) felt we saw naniwa perform up to those standards today Dealing with this shit is a skill too tho, as much as I sometimes wish it wasn't (my biggest weakness by faaaaaar). You can't look at a macro game, see he played it awesomely, and then watch him get utterly wrecked by some cheese and conclude he's underperforming when dieing to the cheese... Could also be that his macro game is just much better than his cheese defense etc.
Exactly. I don't particularly like Naniwa, but he definitely showed that he was strong in a macro game. However, his cheese defense was NOT strong, and that's why he lost. MVP cheesed because of this; he was probably pretty certain that Naniwa was weaker versus cheese than in a macro game and exploited that. You can be impeccable in one area of the game and weak in another, and that's what we saw from Naniwa. Perhaps it was just a bad game or two, but in those two games he didn't look particularly strong at defending MVP's cheese.
|
Mvp's macro is likely much better than NaNiwa, as we've seen countless times when he's played his fabled late-game, that's what he's ALWAYS been good at. I don't know why people are comparing them like this; just because Mvp found a weakness in NaNiwa's builds and playstyle and exploited it does not mean that his macro is not as good as NaNiwa's.
TvP at the moment is pretty goddamn crappy (TaeJa and SuperNoVa today just got destroyed, and there is now only 1 Terran left in the GSL), I've respected Mvp's play for a long time, mostly for his solid mechanics and unparalleled decision making, and the fact that he can add in cheeses like these and executing them so well just makes his style all that more intelligent.
Anyway, fact is NaNiwa = foreigner, Mvp = Korean >> Mvp gets mass hate because he beat the foreigner with 2 cheese builds.
|
Why are you haters whining? It's Professional Gaming, as in it's their job. They play to win, not to entertain fans. Do you really think that GOM would give Mvp money just because they recieved more views because Mvp was playing entertaining games?
|
did they do a pre-game show with chae and engine for this one?
|
On May 04 2012 00:52 Skwid1g wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 23:29 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On May 02 2012 19:45 Soma.bokforlag wrote: i think most of us are really sad because we lost the opportunity to see what could have been a really great series. this series, even though mvp playing better and winnig fairly, does in no real way show who is the better player.
i dont know how big part nerves played, but its always sad to see a player you know can performe at a high level play relativelty poorly.
everyone who has seen naniwas games in code a and his great games at mlg knows it wasnt just bad luck or his opponents being much better. he has a nerve-issue when playing in korea and all the non-naniwa-haters would have hoped that issue would have been resolved by now.
seeing the games today though, i dont think anyone (besides the pople creating accounts to bash naniwa (seriously guys? how old are you?)) felt we saw naniwa perform up to those standards today Dealing with this shit is a skill too tho, as much as I sometimes wish it wasn't (my biggest weakness by faaaaaar). You can't look at a macro game, see he played it awesomely, and then watch him get utterly wrecked by some cheese and conclude he's underperforming when dieing to the cheese... Could also be that his macro game is just much better than his cheese defense etc. Exactly. I don't particularly like Naniwa, but he definitely showed that he was strong in a macro game. However, his cheese defense was NOT strong, and that's why he lost. MVP cheesed because of this; he was probably pretty certain that Naniwa was weaker versus cheese than in a macro game and exploited that. You can be impeccable in one area of the game and weak in another, and that's what we saw from Naniwa. Perhaps it was just a bad game or two, but in those two games he didn't look particularly strong at defending MVP's cheese.
Of course he's good in macro games when he always opens greedy.
Truly great macro play is safe builds into late game, not Naniwa's nexus first with no scouting into 2 base all in he falls back on so often.
|
On May 04 2012 08:16 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2012 00:52 Skwid1g wrote:On May 03 2012 23:29 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On May 02 2012 19:45 Soma.bokforlag wrote: i think most of us are really sad because we lost the opportunity to see what could have been a really great series. this series, even though mvp playing better and winnig fairly, does in no real way show who is the better player.
i dont know how big part nerves played, but its always sad to see a player you know can performe at a high level play relativelty poorly.
everyone who has seen naniwas games in code a and his great games at mlg knows it wasnt just bad luck or his opponents being much better. he has a nerve-issue when playing in korea and all the non-naniwa-haters would have hoped that issue would have been resolved by now.
seeing the games today though, i dont think anyone (besides the pople creating accounts to bash naniwa (seriously guys? how old are you?)) felt we saw naniwa perform up to those standards today Dealing with this shit is a skill too tho, as much as I sometimes wish it wasn't (my biggest weakness by faaaaaar). You can't look at a macro game, see he played it awesomely, and then watch him get utterly wrecked by some cheese and conclude he's underperforming when dieing to the cheese... Could also be that his macro game is just much better than his cheese defense etc. Exactly. I don't particularly like Naniwa, but he definitely showed that he was strong in a macro game. However, his cheese defense was NOT strong, and that's why he lost. MVP cheesed because of this; he was probably pretty certain that Naniwa was weaker versus cheese than in a macro game and exploited that. You can be impeccable in one area of the game and weak in another, and that's what we saw from Naniwa. Perhaps it was just a bad game or two, but in those two games he didn't look particularly strong at defending MVP's cheese. Of course he's good in macro games when he always opens greedy. Truly great macro play is safe builds into late game, not Naniwa's nexus first with no scouting into 2 base all in he falls back on so often.
Did you watch the games? Naniwa scouted both the proxy 2 rax and did the best scouting he could against the 3rax all in. As Artosis pointed out, he played the best he could with the information he had, but mvp was just too sneaky in hiding the other squad of marines.
|
On May 03 2012 11:07 zEnVy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 10:52 tranmillitary wrote: People are crying over split milk. Naniwa deserves to lose if he plays so greedy. He should say no rush 15 mins next time, as most swedes here want. anyone hittin naniwa before 9 mins is an automatic cheeser.
Why don't someone let me go double nexus and wait til i build my collos/templer deathball, and we'll play. That's like saying lets give zerg 15 BL, 10 infestors, 5 queens, and mass banes before you attack.
Naniwa plays greedy as hell and he deserves to be punished. you guys seem to want everyone to go deathball vs deathball. and even then, people complain that deathball is boring. no one is ever satisfied. Nani went nexus first one game, you want MVP to let him build up a huge army before attacking??? people are seriously in need of help here There is a massive difference between attacking early and applying pressure and proxying your buildings halfway across the map and pulling all your SCVs. Doesn't make it any less legitimate, he said it in his interview, he knew Nani plays a very greedy style, so he decided to exploit a blatant weakness in his opponent's game. You can't expect to face only opponents who play to your strengths, you need to be prepared to face this kind of thing, it's a basic requirement for winning in starcraft. MVP was smarter, he played a game he knew would go in his favor because he studied naniwa and correctly learned that he wasn't covering his early game weakness. A pro SC player doesn't go into a long series unprepared. Naniwa should have known MVP was going to prepare for that, maybe he even expected him to try these things, but his play was too rigid and unable to adapt, hence he lost to early game strategies and all-ins.
What I don't understand is how people can consider cheese as some sort of dishonorable strategy, like it was some kind of insult. WTF, cheese isn't outside the SC2 rulebook as far as I know, it's a viable, defendable, perfectly reasonable strategy in some matchups, every player needs to know how to defend these type of strategies, it's part of the game, how the hell can people say they "lose respect" for a player when they execute these things? That's beyond ridiculous and childish, I'm guessing you people aren't all 5-year olds, right? Right?
|
On May 03 2012 04:30 udgnim wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 04:23 jw232 wrote: Why does the recommended games poll list 5 games for both matches when Naniwa/Mvp only went to 4 games and Parting/Oz only went to 3 games? to prevent spoiling match results Already in a spoiler tag... kinda redundant
|
OH YEAH SQUIRTLE!!! use water gun atk!!
|
|
|
|