• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:19
CEST 18:19
KST 01:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down10ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League53Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.166
StarCraft 2
General
REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16 No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released Do we even care about balance? [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos Rollback Netcode in Brood War BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[BSL23] RO24 Group Stage KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 [ASL22] Grand Finals [$1250] International ShieldBattery League
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7179 users

[GSL] 2012 Season 2 Code S Ro32 Group E - Page 97

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 95 96 97 98 99 102 Next
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
April 14 2012 09:50 GMT
#1921
On April 14 2012 18:43 dabom88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..

Because he played terribly. You can't possibly say those games DRG lost were because of a balance issue if you watched them.

"..but the broader picture tells a different story.."

I was arguing against a particular used to dismiss any balance-concerns.
AsnSensation
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany24009 Posts
April 14 2012 09:52 GMT
#1922
especially considering that DRG went down against terran
roym899
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany426 Posts
April 14 2012 09:54 GMT
#1923
Tbh for me it seems like as if it is much harder to kick off a constant and stable playstyle which, when executed correctly, can constantly beat high level players. Look at Terran:

Against Protoss they can play Bio very cost efficiantly with their Micro. The good thing is that good forcefields can couter good micro which makes this matchup very intense and well balanced imho.
Against Zerg they can Drop soo cost efficiantly. Zerg won't be able to push out while getting dropped at serveral expansions. Currently it seems like it is pretty much impossible for Zerg to be one expo ahead, as the Terrans can get away with such greedy playstyles because of drops. Another factor is the impossibility of Zerg to attack into a good Siegeline without Broodlords. Every Zerg army get melted down by a defensive Terran.
I'm not saying it is impossible for Zerg to win this matchup but it's impossible to win it constantly. Because you are reluctant on mistakes by the Terran, like sieging to late or not repairing the PF fast enough.

Protoss has a little bit harder time. As I said PvT is quite balanced. I would say the same thing for PvZ. Although Zerg have a hard time currently, as Protoss began to figure out how to beat DRG/Stephano Style. I think it will be very interesting to see how this matchup will evolve. The thing is that there is NO Zerg Style again which can, when properly executed beat high-level protosses constantly. But the same thing can be said for Protoss in the matchup as it seems like that if two players of the same skill meat it ends up in BL/Infestor versus Archon Toilet. Whole matchup depends on 2-4 seconds in which the vortex gets thrown down or not thrown down. That makes the lategame very close, but also a bit coinflippy as you sometimes just CAN'T avoid the vortex to get most of your BL's or the Neural Parasite to get your mothership. Of course it can be said that the MU is quite balanced then, but it's quite bad that it has quite a luck factor in the lategame.

Zerg currently has the hardest time in pro play. The reasons for this I explained in the 2 paragraphs before this. In addition to that the mirror matchup TvT is the one less luck based. ZvZ and PvP are quite similiar are I think although my knowledge of PvP is a lil bit off tbh.

Well that's atleast the feeling I have of current balance. Of course this doesn't matter at all in ladder. But in tournements it seems like Zerg is the weakest race. And the fact that they "don't play well" isn't a result of the lack of skill they have but more of a lack of possibilities they have in some parts of the game. There is just NO playstyle Zerg can pull of so that the luck factor is as small as Terran can get it.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
April 14 2012 09:56 GMT
#1924
On April 14 2012 18:03 Asha` wrote:
So R16 =

7P (out of 10)
7T (out of 15)
2Z (out of 7)

1 bad season. Protoss has put up with 6-7 of that kind of representation. Welcome to club You have a ways to go before you can really feel disenfranchized.
MC for president
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
April 14 2012 10:00 GMT
#1925
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..


If DRG plays like he did in Ro32 code S then he wont make it back to code S. Having to play well to win isnt circle logic its just common sense. One of the problems that zerg has now is the problem protoss had a few seasons ago and that was that the current feild of protoss was not as good as the protoss who were up and coming. The current zergs in code S are July who has good ZvT okay ZvP and BAD and Leenock who is good at all matchups except ZvP. These zergs have been in code S consistantly and have stayed in Code S consistantly but in reality there just arent as many Code S zergs.

We are talking about close to 50 people who really deserve to be or are around the skill level to be in code S and probably around 30-35 current players who had a chance at Ro16 and probably only around 15-20 players who even have skill level to make a run at a championship. When you are dealing with such numbers you are likely to see some descripancy between the races. For example about a year ago the only protoss who was even close to championship calibur was MC. Everyone else was lightyears behind him in terms of both micro and his ability to take safe risks that dont look safe but when you try to cheese him he holds. Now several protoss have reached his level and because of that the chance at a protoss championship is higher.

From someone who watched BW for years I dont accept one race being harder than other as a reason that you can not win when you had to deal with a lot more just to deal with the games technical limitations I will say.
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
April 14 2012 10:02 GMT
#1926
On April 14 2012 18:50 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:43 dabom88 wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..

Because he played terribly. You can't possibly say those games DRG lost were because of a balance issue if you watched them.

"..but the broader picture tells a different story.."

I was arguing against a particular used to dismiss any balance-concerns.


Particulars are how you find balance issues. Balance is dependent on both maps and builds and one must use individual games that are BOTH played at a high level to determine if there is in fact an issue.
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
April 14 2012 10:02 GMT
#1927
On April 14 2012 18:56 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:03 Asha` wrote:
So R16 =

7P (out of 10)
7T (out of 15)
2Z (out of 7)

1 bad season. Protoss has put up with 6-7 of that kind of representation. Welcome to club You have a ways to go before you can really feel disenfranchized.

3, 5, 3, 3, 2 last 5 ro16 in code S
DrPandaPhD
Profile Joined November 2011
5188 Posts
April 14 2012 10:03 GMT
#1928
Zerg as a race need something to "get back in the game" type of ability. If a terran/toss falls behind they can drop allover and do damage to catch back up again. A zerg doesn't really have the same tools which makes it hard for them to comeback into a game after they have taken damage. A toss can also use blink to pick off something and run away to safety.

Zerg had mutalisks to do damage, but the problem is that they have been used since beta and the top pros now how to deal with them with ease now, which makes it difficult for them to work

Nydus worm would be a good solution to this if it wouldn't die to 3 workers, being uncancel-able and do the biggest scream allover the map. I don't see why Nydus worm has to be so bad compared to medivacs / warp-prism. Zerg drops almost A LOT more all-in than a toss/terran drop. Because the zerg has to drop more units than the other races to do equal damaage (that's how the swarm race works basically)
리노크 👑
HQuality
Profile Joined October 2009
2682 Posts
April 14 2012 10:04 GMT
#1929
please no zerg whine again))
they lost because they was playing quite worse then opponents. Not like it's 1-1-1 and noone knows how to stop it 4wgp in pvp earlier etc etc
No carpal tunnel no skill
DrPandaPhD
Profile Joined November 2011
5188 Posts
April 14 2012 10:04 GMT
#1930
On April 14 2012 18:56 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:03 Asha` wrote:
So R16 =

7P (out of 10)
7T (out of 15)
2Z (out of 7)

1 bad season. Protoss has put up with 6-7 of that kind of representation. Welcome to club You have a ways to go before you can really feel disenfranchized.


Do your research before you say 1 bad season please :/
리노크 👑
gedatsu
Profile Joined December 2011
1286 Posts
April 14 2012 10:04 GMT
#1931
In four GSL code S groups over four consecutive days, three groups were won by Startale players and one group was won by a Quantic player. I think this calls for some cake at the STQ house.
Belha
Profile Joined December 2010
Italy2850 Posts
April 14 2012 10:05 GMT
#1932
On April 14 2012 18:00 LimitSEA wrote:
Two zergs in Code S. Jesus, this is just sad.


Why this never happened to terran -.-"
Chicken gank op
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
April 14 2012 10:06 GMT
#1933
On April 14 2012 19:05 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:00 LimitSEA wrote:
Two zergs in Code S. Jesus, this is just sad.


Why this never happened to terran -.-"


Probably because a ridiculous amount of most teams high level playesr are terran. With the exception of oGs and Zenex I think all 8 other teams have a high level terran not to mention that now multiple foreign teams are getting high level terrans.
roym899
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany426 Posts
April 14 2012 10:09 GMT
#1934
On April 14 2012 19:06 Adreme wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 19:05 Belha wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:00 LimitSEA wrote:
Two zergs in Code S. Jesus, this is just sad.


Why this never happened to terran -.-"


Probably because a ridiculous amount of most teams high level playesr are terran. With the exception of oGs and Zenex I think all 8 other teams have a high level terran not to mention that now multiple foreign teams are getting high level terrans.
But the question is WHY are there so many more Top Terrans then Top Zergs and Protosses since the Release of the game? In the ladder the races are splitted very equally.
dabom88
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3483 Posts
April 14 2012 10:09 GMT
#1935
On April 14 2012 18:50 m0ck wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:43 dabom88 wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..

Because he played terribly. You can't possibly say those games DRG lost were because of a balance issue if you watched them.

"..but the broader picture tells a different story.."

I was arguing against a particular used to dismiss any balance-concerns.

It makes no sense to say you're arguing "broadly" and then try to use a specific instance that doesn't support your argument.
You should not have to pay to watch the GSL, Proleague, or OSL at a reasonable time. That is not "fine" and it's BS to say otherwise. My sig since 2011. http://www.youtube.com/user/dabom88
Adreme
Profile Joined June 2011
United States5574 Posts
April 14 2012 10:12 GMT
#1936
On April 14 2012 19:09 roym899 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 19:06 Adreme wrote:
On April 14 2012 19:05 Belha wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:00 LimitSEA wrote:
Two zergs in Code S. Jesus, this is just sad.


Why this never happened to terran -.-"


Probably because a ridiculous amount of most teams high level playesr are terran. With the exception of oGs and Zenex I think all 8 other teams have a high level terran not to mention that now multiple foreign teams are getting high level terrans.
But the question is WHY are there so many more Top Terrans then Top Zergs and Protosses since the Release of the game? In the ladder the races are splitted very equally.


The top players will all probably say one of two things if you ask them, either
"I picked terran at the start of the game when terran was very strong"
or something along the lines of
"I idolized Nada/Boxer"
MCDayC
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom14464 Posts
April 14 2012 10:13 GMT
#1937
Nooooo Nestea!!!
Everyone is saying he played awful, so I guess he deserved it, but I just really him to return to god mode again, he looked close at IPL.
VERY FRAGILE, LIKE A BABY PANDA EGG
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-14 10:21:03
April 14 2012 10:14 GMT
#1938
On April 14 2012 19:02 Adreme wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:50 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:43 dabom88 wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..

Because he played terribly. You can't possibly say those games DRG lost were because of a balance issue if you watched them.

"..but the broader picture tells a different story.."

I was arguing against a particular used to dismiss any balance-concerns.


Particulars are how you find balance issues. Balance is dependent on both maps and builds and one must use individual games that are BOTH played at a high level to determine if there is in fact an issue.

I completely disagree. Your memory and judgement of particular matches are so subjected to your beliefs (bias) that they mean almost nothing when held up against statistics. Imbalance exist in statistics, not in particulars. Particulars are stories, and they can be used to mean (almost) anything.

They can be useful in the exploration of the reason for (im)balance, however.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
April 14 2012 10:15 GMT
#1939
On April 14 2012 18:10 Ventor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:06 Zealot Orgy wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:04 SeaSwift wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:03 Fortuna.424 wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:02 GreyKnight wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:01 Fortuna.424 wrote:
At the time Mc expanded, Nestea could have just got 40 roaches with 40 lings in production and crushed him,
dont know why hes using this useless Hydra stile on a map this large that they need like centurys to walk over.


I doubt this, MC had a high sentry count. he would not break through in time before MC's tech units kicked in.

Well, Stephano does this every time.


And Stephano has never won a map against MC.


And Stephano and MC never faced since when Stephano started doing that.

hate is in the air

MC 2-0'd stephano at the beginning of this year. MC would dominate Stephano even harder than he did nestea. Stop being a fanboy and ignoring statistics. I swear, it seems like every foreigner is trying to live vicariously through their favorite foreigner players.

MC is arguablly the best player in the world (check his bank account) and by far best PvZ it wouldnt even be close. We'll see soon enough at fightclub though where they face off. Stephano is good vs European Protoss but MC is a whole nuther ball of wax.
MC for president
m0ck
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
4194 Posts
April 14 2012 10:18 GMT
#1940
On April 14 2012 19:09 dabom88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 14 2012 18:50 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:43 dabom88 wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:36 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:31 windsupernova wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:30 m0ck wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:24 HaXXspetten wrote:
On April 14 2012 18:22 FakeDeath wrote:
Time to create the sad zergling page?

Nah. The Sad Zealot was created during the 1/1/1 era, whereas this time, like it or not, the reason there are so few zergs in the Ro16 is because there were not very many in the Ro32, and most of the ones who were there quite simply didn't play good enough to advance. (Like both DRG & NesTea way underperformed and deserved to get dropped down)

Was that the reason last season as well? And the season before that, and the one before that? This is circular logic, the zergs don't advance because they don't play well, again and again, season after season. Why do you think that is, that zergs continually don't 'play well'. Could it have something to do with the way the race plays compared to the other two? And be reflective of an issue of balance?


But Zergs won last GSL......

Yes, zergs can win, we're talking probabilities here, but the broader picture tells a different story. The champion of last season now plays the first round of code A, after all..

Because he played terribly. You can't possibly say those games DRG lost were because of a balance issue if you watched them.

"..but the broader picture tells a different story.."

I was arguing against a particular used to dismiss any balance-concerns.

It makes no sense to say you're arguing "broadly" and then try to use a specific instance that doesn't support your argument.

I'm saying, statistics of results tells us that there is an issue of balance. I'm saying, a tournament win does nothing to change that. I don't see how DRG falling to code A undercuts that argument.
Prev 1 95 96 97 98 99 102 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 281
UpATreeSC 56
Codebar 37
Classic 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36275
Calm 4302
Bisu 2585
EffOrt 699
Shuttle 597
firebathero 594
Light 436
Rush 349
Stork 325
Soma 260
[ Show more ]
Snow 212
ZerO 187
Soulkey 139
hero 127
Hyuk 120
Dewaltoss 108
ProTech63
Sharp 61
ggaemo 50
910 46
Hyun 46
Mong 43
PianO 42
Movie 41
Barracks 37
Killer 32
Trap 26
sorry 25
HiyA 23
Sacsri 21
Shinee 19
Hm[arnc] 17
Yoon 16
Terrorterran 16
soO 12
Shine 11
Free 9
Dota 2
Gorgc11019
qojqva2422
Fuzer 132
League of Legends
Reynor64
Counter-Strike
fl0m1007
byalli762
edward0
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr76
Other Games
singsing1875
B2W.Neo1045
Beastyqt821
ceh9491
crisheroes258
mouzStarbuck253
Liquid`VortiX186
XaKoH 181
Liquid`LucifroN52
C9.Mang051
Chillindude18
ZerO(Twitch)18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 1
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 67
• LUISG 26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix13
• iopq 12
• Pr0nogo 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4877
League of Legends
• Nemesis1770
• Jankos1526
• TFBlade650
Other Games
• Shiphtur697
• WagamamaTV268
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 41m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
18h 41m
Harstem vs Zoun
Harstem vs GgMaChine
GgMaChine vs Lambo
Harstem vs Lambo
GgMaChine vs Zoun
Lambo vs Zoun
OSC
21h 41m
FEL
1d 16h
Patches Events
1d 20h
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
[ Show More ]
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-20
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
IPSL Winter 2026-27
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.