EPT[IEM] Sao Paulo - Day (insert number) - Page 32
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
Bommes
Germany1226 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:46 gh0un wrote: Apparently terran is supposed to be able to harass zerg after losing their whole army, is that what you are trying to say? I wasnt talking about the whole army, I was talking about losing the tanks, just as you are talking about losing the mutalisks. Just stop the discussion please, it gets silly. edit to your edit: Losing mutalisks doesnt equal losing the game either, so whats your point. Losing tanks can LEAD to losing the game if you are right at the zergs base in a crucial push and the zerglings/banelings just demolish the rest of your army. Losing tanks is very similar to losing mutalisks, its very situational on how it affects the outcome of the game. | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
| ||
|
jojo311
Australia903 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3813 Posts
| ||
|
JayJay_90
Germany1632 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:49 Grovbolle wrote: Koreans > foreigners. Hello Captain Obvious  | ||
|
Rhedsa
Costa Rica594 Posts
| ||
|
qwaykee
Norway268 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:43 Shikyo wrote: Yeah I think that's by far the biggest problem with the game Anyway my impression from robert simpson has been "good voice and pretty good casting but doesn't know much", let's see how it really is Yeaaaaah, how would he dare to be a BAD caster. GRRRR we'll wait with our pitchforks ready to jump! Imo: Good voice = ten times more enjoyable than catz+jp+++. A good voice is everything, especially to newcomers and casuals. | ||
|
ceaRshaf
Romania4926 Posts
| ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:49 Grovbolle wrote: Koreans > foreigners. That was pretty onesided Completely true. But do we really need to declare that after every random bo win? | ||
|
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
| ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:49 Grovbolle wrote: Koreans > foreigners. That was pretty onesided while this is obviously true - juding that from one game is pretty impressive to me, since that sounds like you didnt know that before | ||
|
zocktol
Germany1928 Posts
Darkforce seems really out of shape and now this map that seems relatively hard in ZvT. Makes me sad | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:46 gh0un wrote: Apparently terran is supposed to be able to harass zerg after losing their whole army, is that what you are trying to say? Because you know exactly that that wasnt the point, point was that terran doesnt outright loses if he loses his tanks in the middle of the map, they just lose the ability to actively do something against zerg. Playing defensively from there works quite well, just watch some Kas games. If a zerg loses his mutalisks in the middle of the map while terran moves out, there is no playing defensive if he is knocking at your door. Your statement that terran cant harass at all after losing tanks, basically confirms that you yourself believe that losing tanks doesnt equal losing the game. It only equals losing the ability to harass, it just came out of your mouth. You're arguing for the sake of arguing now, we're completely out of the subject of the main point which was that missclicking or getting caught unsieged and losing all your tanks was as bad as doing the same with mutas. Without tanks, I don't think a good simcity is enough to save you from a mega lingbling wave. You just want to win the argument, but if you don't realize that both are critical mistakes then there's nothing to argue, your bias is too strong and this will go nowhere (this is already nowhere in fact and I shouldn't even post this). | ||
|
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:49 Grovbolle wrote: Koreans > foreigners. That was pretty onesided Since when DarkForce = foreigners? dKiller player really well, don't put them in the same boat. | ||
|
gh0un
601 Posts
On February 09 2012 00:47 Bommes wrote: I wasnt talking about the whole army, I was talking about losing the tanks, just as you are talking about losing the mutalisks. Just stop the discussion please, it gets silly. edit to your edit: Losing mutalisks doesnt equal losing the game either, so whats your point. Losing tanks can LEAD to losing the game if you are right at the zergs base in a crucial push and the zerglings/banelings just demolish the rest of your army. Losing tanks is very similar to losing mutalisks, its very situational on how it affects the outcome of the game. You subconciously agreed with me, so i dont see why you are beating a dead horse now, as far as i am concerned the discussion is over. | ||
| ||
