|
On November 14 2011 20:51 Allwars wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2011 20:50 ElusoryX wrote: this is so sad.. perfect protoss play against zerg still not enough..
edit: just like what sase said last time perfect play? ive never seen naniwa make as many mistakes as he did in this game. seriously.
... lol he played pretty damn well, compared to noupgradesLUCKYracepick
|
On November 14 2011 20:50 Plexa wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2011 20:49 bittman wrote:On November 14 2011 20:48 Plexa wrote:He really needed to tech to VR there, too many BLS VR tech was definitely a requirement, especially with the muta count down. For people who don't get it, Lucky was stuffing his army full of mineral/gas by making banes from zlings, and morphing BLs. Naniwa needed to do the same but by using higher tech units. By staying on Stalkers his army was worth a lot less than lucky's and also was a lot weaker. He did everything right that game EXCEPT pump his army full of resources to make a scary lategame army.
Nani had pretty much the perfect comobo for someone without stargate against BL. You need mass stalker, theres absolutley no other way to beat BLs.
|
You guys forget that Zerg had better economy (as is usual for Zerg) or something? Naniwa was on three bases. He couldn't afford a high-tech army of the same size after losing one.
|
rofl what the fuck am I watching...
|
Lost to 15 lings
|
Wow this is disappointing....
|
1 gate expand is the worst protss expansion build ever.
|
On November 14 2011 20:51 SuperStyle wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2011 20:49 Plexa wrote:On November 14 2011 20:48 Kiarip wrote: Killing 3 zerg bases is np when you have broodlords It's np when the P army consists of really really weak units. Without VR/Mothership/something expensive you just can't deal with that many BLs Weak ? colossus, archons, HT and far far ahead in upgrades, how is that weak ? only other t3 unit he was missing is carrier which is shit. What the guy you quote said is true and you know it.
Why was he making colossi against a Z who opened Mutas? I'm not a protoss, but I feel like those resources spent on collosi would have been more beneficial if they'd been 2 stargates to make VRs and eventual Mothership for the toilet.
|
lol.....he screwed up....
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
Naniwa's stream coming true.
|
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:53 Akhee wrote:Show nested quote +On November 14 2011 20:52 Plexa wrote:On November 14 2011 20:51 SuperStyle wrote:On November 14 2011 20:49 Plexa wrote:On November 14 2011 20:48 Kiarip wrote: Killing 3 zerg bases is np when you have broodlords It's np when the P army consists of really really weak units. Without VR/Mothership/something expensive you just can't deal with that many BLs Weak ? colossus, archons, HT and far far ahead in upgrades, how is that weak ? only other t3 unit he was missing is carrier which is shit. What the guy you quote said is true and you know it. Note how Naniwa was crushing when he had Colossus/Templar/Archons etc... Then when he lost them all, he only made stalkers - THAT was the problem. the problem is not making stalkers, the problem is having time to make anything else :\\\ He wasn't prepared to make anything else, that's the mistake he made. And the mistake many many many protoss players make I've made it enough times to know! Even adding a mothership gives you so much more viability against BL heavy compositions.
Nani playing 1gate expo - lucky pressuring with lings - sneaks lings in and sees everything.... nani FFs his units on ramp while other lings attacking nexus...
nani losing all his units due to TERRIBLE TERRIBLE FFS
has like 10 speedslings in main atm
|
|
|
Oh my god, Naniwa tilting hard.... damnit whyyyyyyyy
|
Not like this. NaNiwa, not like this.
|
|
|
Foreigners representing yo.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Nanis stargate gets unpowered, this is very much over
|
|
|
|