[GSL] Nov Code A RO48 D2 - Page 111
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
![]()
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
Newbistic
China2912 Posts
| ||
whirlpool
2788 Posts
| ||
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 poorcloud wrote: You need insane amount of archons + stalkers + colossus to combat a resource intensive army like that. Not mass stalkers alone. We need to see more protosses do this. yes, this is the same thing naniwa did the last time these guys played. and he could've definitely done something besides engaging head on like that. it just doesn't work... | ||
Akhee
Brazil811 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Plexa wrote: Note how Naniwa was crushing when he had Colossus/Templar/Archons etc... Then when he lost them all, he only made stalkers - THAT was the problem. the problem is not making stalkers, the problem is having time to make anything else :\\\ | ||
Yang Wenli
United States2283 Posts
| ||
tuestresfat
2555 Posts
| ||
emjaytron
Australia544 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Rebs wrote: thats why.. imagine 3-3 sentrys against 0-0 marauders. sentries would rape them lol | ||
Miraju
Germany235 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:51 Hierarch wrote: Archon/stalker/voidray and you won't even break a sweat hahaha you need to remember you cant produce 10 voids at once hahaa | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:51 SuperStyle wrote: Weak ? colossus, archons, HT and far far ahead in upgrades, how is that weak ? only other t3 unit he was missing is carrier which is shit. What the guy you quote said is true and you know it. collosii totally hardcounter broodlords, it wasnt as much about how strong or weak the units are in themselves then they were to the comp that lucky massed. | ||
hysterial
United States2044 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Qikz wrote: Now you know how Terrans feel against Broods. :p Ghosts? Vikings? You already have reactored starport you can start that production way easier. | ||
KristianJS
2107 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Qikz wrote: Now you know how Terrans feel against Broods. :p Hah, true, but I hear Ghost Snipe is pretty good ![]() | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Plexa is here, or I would consider joining in ![]() Wish he did get Stargates out though after his 4th was up. He was the BLs coming, but didn't react the best way imo | ||
corpsepose
1678 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Bocian wrote: Lucky denied early aggression very well, he harassed a lot and didn't lose to many units (once he flew mutas next to the stalkers) and his positioning during the big fights was really good. It's really not that easy. yeah i really really liked what lucky did that game for the most part. there were a couple questionable moments, mostly weird baneling related mishaps, but i just really dig the way he played zvp that game, i wasnt expecting much from him cuz i wasnt that impressed with him at ipl, but damn this guy could be sick with enough practice. | ||
Mainland
Canada551 Posts
But in hindsight, Nani's best chance in that game would've been to A-move into that natural and main as the BLs were morphing IMO. Ideally, he would've been able to push like 3/4 into the completion of greater spire. | ||
blacksheepwall
China1530 Posts
| ||
RowdierBob
Australia13007 Posts
| ||
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
Haydin
United States1481 Posts
On November 14 2011 20:52 Plexa wrote: Note how Naniwa was crushing when he had Colossus/Templar/Archons etc... Then when he lost them all, he only made stalkers - THAT was the problem. He also only had 1 group of templars that game, really. He didn't have any building up energy until he was retreating, some time after his archives was done. And during the course of the big battle at the end, he didn't make any additonal HTs | ||
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
| ||
| ||