| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Obligatory public note for all large tournament threads: The following is a list of behaviors that will get immediate bans: 1. Whining about stream 2. Bashing other games 3. Flaming other users 4. Bashing players 5. Complaining about imbalance. It is in no way complete. Keep in mind that there's a difference between pointing out that the SC2 and CoD streams were switched and whining about it (same thing on pointing out/asking about stream lag and whining about it, etc.). Also, just because you post something and aren't immediately banned for it doesn't mean you won't get caught. We'll be going through this thread very carefully. That being said, enjoy today's games! Time stamp: page 12, 6:54. | ||
|
dcsoda
United States583 Posts
On August 27 2011 14:18 poorcloud wrote: Did you watch the Huk vs Nada games? Looked way worse than some of the Code A games i seen. Nada has stagnated since like a few months ago. Yeah I did watch. I think the games were fine. What does it matter if some Code A games were better played? | ||
|
FighterHayabusa
United States90 Posts
On August 27 2011 14:30 doffe wrote: Thats an absolutely horrid argument. You cant disregard actual resluts in favor of mathematics simply cause the results doesnt account for the skillvl of the players. Id say it does just that alot better then math does since math does so not at all. To account for gameplay we though need to do some asumptions, most of all we must asume that the top tier of each race has close to the same skillpotential. I dont think this is far fetched at all. Its pretty damn likely to be the fact considering most players actually tried out all races before deciding. Math leaves a TON of things out that are 100% necessery to bring to the table in these discussions. Id say that math is the absolute worst way of all to use to look into SC2 balance. Sure, what you adjust to balance the game are pure numbers but how you actually come to the conclusion that these things are unbalance are purely based on how they actually play out. I will leave this now and you should take further complaints to the real balance threads and not in the LR threads. and if you do so please actually back your claims up with the magical numbers you claim to have. I have yet to seen an actual fact from you. And I to urge you to play terran against a mutalisking zerg to see how incredibly hard it can be to defend against it while not being utterly outmacroed. Sure, my Z is better then my T but I definitly think harassing with mutas is way easier then defending against the same. This is where you are wrong and even admit it: Assuming that each race has the same skill potential has not been proven, and there can definitely be arguments made both for and against that statement. | ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
On August 27 2011 14:52 FighterHayabusa wrote: This is where you are wrong and even admit it: Assuming that each race has the same skill potential has not been proven, and there can definitely be arguments made both for and against that statement. Yeah, it hasn't been proven that each race has the same skill potential, but that doesn't mean shit because once again... it hasn't been proven that each race has the same skill potential or different skill potential. You're not making any real argument, you've just been saying random shit and saying you have math and statistics to back you up but I guess they're super top secret statistics. Your approach to the game is your problem, units aren't always directly comparable which is why approaching it from a gameplay and situational perspective, with numbers thrown in here and there makes more sense, and this is what Blizzard does, and this is why I sit here and enjoy what appears to be a fair game. Now, if you think it's unfair, go to the designated balance discussion thread and explain why instead of pretending you have some masterful insight that you're sitting on. | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
EnderCraft
United States1746 Posts
| ||
|
GTPGlitch
5061 Posts
On August 27 2011 15:14 EnderCraft wrote: Just wanted to say I love the K[9] duo! In terms of hype during a match, I think they actually do it better >.> haha, dog days on the blue stream ^^ on topic i'm sad that nada didn't do so good... i wish he could go into koreandomination mode ;< I liquibet him over huk but noooo D: Anyone know how qxc is doing in bracket? | ||
|
MechKing
United States3004 Posts
On August 27 2011 15:17 Active.815 wrote: haha, dog days on the blue stream ^^ on topic i'm sad that nada didn't do so good... i wish he could go into koreandomination mode ;< I liquibet him over huk but noooo D: Anyone know how qxc is doing in bracket? He got 2-0'd by Noblesse in ro4 | ||
|
adcannon
United States6 Posts
GLHF | ||
blahz0r
3030 Posts
On August 27 2011 15:45 adcannon wrote: I think they will be announced impromptu at the start of the day. That's what they did in the past MLGs so I assume it will be the same.Is there any way of knowing which stream a specific bracket match will be on, or what time? I know they start at 11 (10 my time) and am hoping to catch the KawaiiRice match. Anyone know which stream its going to be on, or is it yet to be determined. Thanks. GLHF | ||
|
adcannon
United States6 Posts
 . Ive just started following competitive SC2 and MLG over the past 6 months and it seems I have to work every single MLG weekend, T.TThanks blahz0r | ||
|
Iggnite
Canada288 Posts
| ||
|
Troopi
Denmark383 Posts
edit: found it :p | ||
|
Elurie
4716 Posts
On August 27 2011 16:20 Troopi wrote: Question may have been asked already :/ But is there a chance to see Idra <-> Sjow again right now? Its was to late here when it took place (6am). Yep. The re-broadcast is up, just click on the stream link in the OP, and on the player, click/move the time to about 3/4 way through (sorry don't know the exact hour/minute). edit: around 06:38:21 | ||
|
keioh
France1099 Posts
On August 27 2011 13:11 Obscenity wrote: Anyone who thinks 50 mineral units should do that much damage is delusional. Idra played those games masterfully from start to finish, dominated the map, and lost to some scumbag who could build barracks and hit A. At first I was like "yeaaaah trollin' them up". Then I lol'd. But then I also remembered the absurd stubborness of idra fanbois and I was sad for you. | ||
|
Garfunko
Canada121 Posts
On a positive note, KIWI is destroying out there.. 3-0? | ||
|
Daimai
Sweden762 Posts
It stops after a bit of time and shows me an MLG icon. It's on all qualities (although it seems to stop faster on a higher quality). It cant be my internet, just made a speedtest and got 87 mbit on DL and 9 mbit on UL, so its fine and should be able to watch ultra w/o problems. | ||
|
Andamanen
Netherlands915 Posts
| ||
|
xHassassin
United States270 Posts
If so, where? Do I need a MLG subscription? Also what happened to free HD? | ||
|
hubson
Sweden93 Posts
| ||
|
TheLight
Australia410 Posts
On August 27 2011 21:45 xHassassin wrote: Are vods out yet? If so, where? Do I need a MLG subscription? Also what happened to free HD? If you have a subscription (I think you need one), you can go to mlgpro.com and skip forwards or backwards in the time bar. When todays broadcast starts, you will have to wait until after the tournament to get the VODs for yesterday. How to get a free silver subscription: http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/jrkt4/hot_pockets_is_giving_away_free_one_month_silver/ | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
OSC
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
