• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:17
CEST 15:17
KST 22:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy0GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding0Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group E
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Korean words The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1432 users

Destiny VS sixJaxMaj0r Showmatch - Page 9

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 Next All
drgonzhere
Profile Joined November 2010
United States447 Posts
August 25 2011 03:30 GMT
#161
On August 25 2011 12:23 BlueHydra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 12:20 LicH. wrote:
On August 25 2011 12:16 BlueHydra wrote:
On August 25 2011 12:14 Jinivus wrote:
On August 25 2011 12:08 BlueHydra wrote:
LOL why are all these people talking about outclassing destiny? All major did was early timing pushes, give me a break. destiny won the macro game, which was the first, major saw he couldnt beat him in a macro game so he does early strong terran pushes that any zerg loses to, and if ur a zerg, you would know that any zerg can lose to them, just ask idra.

Lets say Major can only win with timing pushes, but Destiny can only win by turling to infestor/broodlord on shattered temple. I think we both know which takes more skill :/


Are you implying that late game TvZ takes less skill than early game timing pushes? i hope thats a joke..

Also, turtling? his play is hardly turtling. if thats turtling i dont know what you would call manas pvz.


if 2 base infestor broodlord isn't turtling then I don't know what is. You've obviously never played against destiny yourself


What do you suggest all zergs do before mutas are up, or broodlord/infestor?


You're kidding yourself if you think that Major needed to gimmick his way to a victory. Being 30+ supply up on a zerg BEFORE a timing hits? Give me a break man. And none of those early aggressions were all in at all, quite the opposite in fact. You just come across as a really ignorant fanboy making outlandish comments to the effect that Major couldn't beat Destiny in a macro game.

What more likely happened is that Major saw wholes in Destiny's early to midgame that he could exploit, and then he did.
Dictator for Life of the PuMa Fanclub/ DRG, PuMA, Sage, Puzzle, MMA Fighting!
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45441 Posts
August 25 2011 03:32 GMT
#162
On August 25 2011 12:07 PoopLord wrote:
Destiny loses and immediately gets placed against Tarson in 1v1 lol...


And he just stomped Tarson too ^^ That was an amaaaaaazing game
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
p0lyph0ny
Profile Joined July 2011
United States217 Posts
August 25 2011 03:36 GMT
#163
3-1 major haha

looks like my prediction was right
lulzury
Profile Joined February 2010
United States236 Posts
August 25 2011 03:48 GMT
#164
no gg = NO SKILL
SEn hwaiting!!!
OscarN
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Cape Verde292 Posts
August 25 2011 03:51 GMT
#165
Let me guess, destiny did a infestor two base, all four games?
sashamunguia
Profile Joined February 2011
Mexico423 Posts
August 25 2011 03:54 GMT
#166
nicely done by major, I really hope to see them once again, but this time, having more macro games :/
"only the need for meaning changes how you feel about what you see" "he who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life" "being a Rebel is as stupid as to be completely Obedient"
LicH.
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
China235 Posts
August 25 2011 03:58 GMT
#167
On August 25 2011 12:51 OscarN wrote:
Let me guess, destiny did a infestor two base, all four games?


*tried to do two base infestor :D
Frozenserpent
Profile Joined September 2007
United States143 Posts
August 25 2011 04:04 GMT
#168
On August 25 2011 12:03 BlueHydra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 12:02 Ghoststrikes wrote:
I didn't see game 1, but + Show Spoiler +
Major totally outclassed destiny in games 2-4


Outclass? he just did early game pushes that every zerg has trouble with.


It's true that terran early game all-in pushes can be very hard to deal with, but that wasn't the case here. These pushes were simply not all-in whatsoever. If destiny had a good defense, major simply would have slowly retreated back, and have a good economy behind it.

Let's look at the games.

In those games, he typically got his 3rd up and running while he pushed out. Major gets his 3rd up and running before Destiny gets a secure 3rd.

Suppose Destiny destroys the push, but trades resources at a 4:5 ratio. IE Destiny loses 4000 resources worth of units for every 5000 major loses in his push. What would the situation be then?
Destiny would actually still be drastically behind. Major had 74 workers at the end of the last game. 74 is pretty much the most amount of workers you would ever want at once, especially as terran. Meanwhile, Destiny had far, far less workers.

Those pushes were very regular pressure pushes in a typical TvZ build. They are fundamental to playing TvZ in a heavy macro style. But, in those games, they ended the game.

It's not because Destiny is so bad he can't handle regular pressure builds. It's because Destiny was already far, far behind by the time the pushes came out. Destiny would need to crush that push in order to have a good chance to win the game.

So let's examine what happened earlier in the games, that caused Major to be at such an overwhelming advantage.

Specifically, let's look at the last build that Major does, which I am quite familiar with on both sides of the coin. Major opens with a hellion expand, which is a very good opening. In fact it's one of my favorite TvZ openings. You see, there are many different kinds of hellion openings for T. We've seen the Slayers terrans favor blue flame hellion openings with drop. There are bfh hellion openings with a heavy count of bfh. These builds typically try to inflict massive amounts of drone damage. At the very least, they need to inflict a decent amount of economic damage or force a large enough response to make the opening worth it.
The reactor hellion opening, however, is a different breed. What typically happens is you build 2-6 hellions, which you will send out, and while they are out, you are getting your 2nd up and running. The CC is actually rather fast. An important trait about this build is that there isn't a heavy commitment that must be paid for with drone blood. So you build 4-6 hellions. Even if you just snipe a single drone, you are really in a good position. You are not behind if you fail to do economic damage, provided that you do not lose those hellions for free. Those 4-6 hellions are the price for map control. You will restrict creep spread past their nat. You will prevent their lings from having free reign over the map. You will force some kind of response, whether it is a spine crawler or more lings. In fact, without the spine crawler, you can probably pick off a few lings for free. Any economic damage you inflict is merely extra. The important point is to not commit your hellions unless you think you have a good chance of inflicting damage.
And that was the position Major found himself in game 4. One big mistake Destiny was timing. He did build a spine crawler, but he didn't have a 2nd queen out, and in addition, the spine crawler was a few seconds too slow. Furthermore, he had a rather low initial ling count. A great way to deal with a reactor hellion is to have a one spinecrawler up, and a handful of speedlings and a queen along with it. Destiny only had 1 queen, and it was at his main. His lings, which, iirc, was something like 2 pairs, isn't enough to stop a hellion runby. A ling/spinecrawler defense against hellion runbies works by zoning them out. They can't attempt a runby because it becomes incredibly risky. Just a handful of lings will trap the hellions, impeding their movements. Just a couple seconds of delaying the hellions will do enough damage to the runby hellions to render them very manageable and simple to deal with.
Roaches were used by Destiny in previous games, and may seem like an obvious solution, but roaches aren't the ideal counter, and, in fact, I think they're quite a poor counter. If you make 2 roaches to fend off 4 hellions, you're investing 200 minerals in a roach warren, AND 200 resources of roaches, which is equivalent to the 400 resources sunk in hellions, but you don't get any map control with those roaches, and hellions add more to terran midgame than zerg adds to zerg midgame. Another aspect to keep in mind is that to get the 2 roaches out for the hellion timing, you have to have the roach warren building rather early. At that stage of zerg's economy, the bottleneck for drone production is minerals. In fact, many zergs get an early creep tumor around that time because they have excess larva if they have 2 queens and 2 hatches. Wait just a bit longer, and it isn't so bad to throw down a last minute spine crawler.
Destiny, you see, doesn't have a "standard" ZvT opener. The standard openers involve a fast zergling speed upgrade. This makes it much easier to deal with hellion and marine pressure. This also gives zerg an advantage in map control. This is because Destiny doesn't have a standard style of ZvT. As we all know, he likes heavy infestor play. He wants to get to the infestor phase as soon as possible, and it is there that he can be comfortable enough to get his 3rd, harass, inflict damage, defend, tech, and get set up for the fast broodlord/infestor push.
You notice, in the games before the last game, Destiny delayed his zergling speed upgrade. There are a few very good reasons why standard ZvT involves a rather fast speed upgrade. For one, marine stutter step micro makes marines very efficient against slow zerglings. With speed upgrade, marines don't become super efficient against zerglings again until the unit counts gets bigger or until stim is available. Heavy marine pressure has very little risk for the terran player if the zerg has no speed upgrade. The zerg can't punish the terran for poking in with the marines, and the terran can poke in and get free units this way, unless zerg invests in a couple spines.
And there are other good reasons for faster ling speed, such as reapers and hellions. Naturally, Major, who's regularly employed reaper and hellion openings in the past, sought fit to punish Destiny for this hole in his early game.
The hellions and the reapers are not unusual builds. They would do quite fine against a standard ZvT build, even when the zerg player is fully prepared. If zerg gets late speed, however, they suddenly become very, very deadly. This explains a lot of why Destiny lost games 2 and 3. And the thing that absolutely convinced Destiny that he had to change his opening build game 4, was that Major didn't need to sacrifice anything significant for that capability. He was playing a TvZ build that is very solid and will match up just fine against a solid ZvT build.
So Destiny had to adjust game 4 and get his speed upgrade earlier. However, his timings for the lings was a bit off and he took a lot of damage, putting him at a disadvantage.
Major followed up his highly successful hellion harass with single banshee harass. This follow up is fairly popular and is rather macro oriented. The idea is that there is no tech cost for the banshee; everything necessary for banshee production is already there. The tech lab is going to be used for stim. The starport is going to be used for medivac production. But if you use the starport and the techlab for a short period, you only need to spend 150/100 for a banshee. This is 250 units of resources. A standard TvZ build doesn't need a heavy gas count at this period, so the gas cost isn't significant. The banshee goes out and can guarantee a couple of drone kills without dying. It is just a very minor harass, typically. The idea is that scv production is limited compared to zerg drone production. Shaving a couple drones here and there will add up, keeping the terran at an ok position against the zerg. Shave a bit more than needed with some good maneuvering and tactics, and then you're looking at a slight economic advantage against zerg. Furthermore, the single banshee isn't bad later on. It can continue harassment until mutalisks come out. If you keep it around, it does some nice dps, and it can delay a 3rd for a little bit.
Banshee comes in, and Destiny only has one queen, with no creep spread between the main and nat. ZvT builds typically involve hatch-first with 2 early queens. You get enough energy to drop one creep tumor before you need to spend the rest of the energy for larva injects. That one creep tumor will make its way from the main, connect the natural, and then make its way out or, more usefully, connect creep towards a potential 3rd. For a map like tald'arim, you can get a nice creep spread to the 3rd by the time you want to take it, making it safer against harass.
That main-to-nat creep connection is specifically for queens to defend against drops and banshees. Queens are actually very good AA units. Banshee harass and drop harass can be very deadly and difficult to deal with without this creep spread.
Destiny had only one queen at his main, and no creep spread. That banshee harass turned from what typically is just minor, but steady harass, into something more significant. Along with all the drones lost to the hellions, the damage done by the banshee was devastating. By this time, it was Major's game to lose. So long as he didn't make any critical mistake, or get massively outplayed in some way, he was going to win the game.

Major's push was just him playing as he is supposed to. If it got defended, he would have several more shots left available.
ROOTheognis
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States4482 Posts
August 25 2011 04:47 GMT
#169
Whoa. Pretty long write-up ._.

What was the final score btw?
If you avoid your weakness, it will remain your weakness. www.twitter.com/#!/rootheognis Follow me!
MechKing
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3004 Posts
August 25 2011 05:21 GMT
#170
On August 25 2011 13:47 YoiChiBow wrote:
Whoa. Pretty long write-up ._.

What was the final score btw?

+ Show Spoiler +
3-1 major
Kalent
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada253 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 05:44:10
August 25 2011 05:42 GMT
#171
+ Show Spoiler +
t's true that terran early game all-in pushes can be very hard to deal with, but that wasn't the case here. These pushes were simply not all-in whatsoever. If destiny had a good defense, major simply would have slowly retreated back, and have a good economy behind it.

Let's look at the games.

In those games, he typically got his 3rd up and running while he pushed out. Major gets his 3rd up and running before Destiny gets a secure 3rd.

Suppose Destiny destroys the push, but trades resources at a 4:5 ratio. IE Destiny loses 4000 resources worth of units for every 5000 major loses in his push. What would the situation be then?
Destiny would actually still be drastically behind. Major had 74 workers at the end of the last game. 74 is pretty much the most amount of workers you would ever want at once, especially as terran. Meanwhile, Destiny had far, far less workers.

Those pushes were very regular pressure pushes in a typical TvZ build. They are fundamental to playing TvZ in a heavy macro style. But, in those games, they ended the game.

It's not because Destiny is so bad he can't handle regular pressure builds. It's because Destiny was already far, far behind by the time the pushes came out. Destiny would need to crush that push in order to have a good chance to win the game.

So let's examine what happened earlier in the games, that caused Major to be at such an overwhelming advantage.

Specifically, let's look at the last build that Major does, which I am quite familiar with on both sides of the coin. Major opens with a hellion expand, which is a very good opening. In fact it's one of my favorite TvZ openings. You see, there are many different kinds of hellion openings for T. We've seen the Slayers terrans favor blue flame hellion openings with drop. There are bfh hellion openings with a heavy count of bfh. These builds typically try to inflict massive amounts of drone damage. At the very least, they need to inflict a decent amount of economic damage or force a large enough response to make the opening worth it.
The reactor hellion opening, however, is a different breed. What typically happens is you build 2-6 hellions, which you will send out, and while they are out, you are getting your 2nd up and running. The CC is actually rather fast. An important trait about this build is that there isn't a heavy commitment that must be paid for with drone blood. So you build 4-6 hellions. Even if you just snipe a single drone, you are really in a good position. You are not behind if you fail to do economic damage, provided that you do not lose those hellions for free. Those 4-6 hellions are the price for map control. You will restrict creep spread past their nat. You will prevent their lings from having free reign over the map. You will force some kind of response, whether it is a spine crawler or more lings. In fact, without the spine crawler, you can probably pick off a few lings for free. Any economic damage you inflict is merely extra. The important point is to not commit your hellions unless you think you have a good chance of inflicting damage.
And that was the position Major found himself in game 4. One big mistake Destiny was timing. He did build a spine crawler, but he didn't have a 2nd queen out, and in addition, the spine crawler was a few seconds too slow. Furthermore, he had a rather low initial ling count. A great way to deal with a reactor hellion is to have a one spinecrawler up, and a handful of speedlings and a queen along with it. Destiny only had 1 queen, and it was at his main. His lings, which, iirc, was something like 2 pairs, isn't enough to stop a hellion runby. A ling/spinecrawler defense against hellion runbies works by zoning them out. They can't attempt a runby because it becomes incredibly risky. Just a handful of lings will trap the hellions, impeding their movements. Just a couple seconds of delaying the hellions will do enough damage to the runby hellions to render them very manageable and simple to deal with.
Roaches were used by Destiny in previous games, and may seem like an obvious solution, but roaches aren't the ideal counter, and, in fact, I think they're quite a poor counter. If you make 2 roaches to fend off 4 hellions, you're investing 200 minerals in a roach warren, AND 200 resources of roaches, which is equivalent to the 400 resources sunk in hellions, but you don't get any map control with those roaches, and hellions add more to terran midgame than zerg adds to zerg midgame. Another aspect to keep in mind is that to get the 2 roaches out for the hellion timing, you have to have the roach warren building rather early. At that stage of zerg's economy, the bottleneck for drone production is minerals. In fact, many zergs get an early creep tumor around that time because they have excess larva if they have 2 queens and 2 hatches. Wait just a bit longer, and it isn't so bad to throw down a last minute spine crawler.
Destiny, you see, doesn't have a "standard" ZvT opener. The standard openers involve a fast zergling speed upgrade. This makes it much easier to deal with hellion and marine pressure. This also gives zerg an advantage in map control. This is because Destiny doesn't have a standard style of ZvT. As we all know, he likes heavy infestor play. He wants to get to the infestor phase as soon as possible, and it is there that he can be comfortable enough to get his 3rd, harass, inflict damage, defend, tech, and get set up for the fast broodlord/infestor push.
You notice, in the games before the last game, Destiny delayed his zergling speed upgrade. There are a few very good reasons why standard ZvT involves a rather fast speed upgrade. For one, marine stutter step micro makes marines very efficient against slow zerglings. With speed upgrade, marines don't become super efficient against zerglings again until the unit counts gets bigger or until stim is available. Heavy marine pressure has very little risk for the terran player if the zerg has no speed upgrade. The zerg can't punish the terran for poking in with the marines, and the terran can poke in and get free units this way, unless zerg invests in a couple spines.
And there are other good reasons for faster ling speed, such as reapers and hellions. Naturally, Major, who's regularly employed reaper and hellion openings in the past, sought fit to punish Destiny for this hole in his early game.
The hellions and the reapers are not unusual builds. They would do quite fine against a standard ZvT build, even when the zerg player is fully prepared. If zerg gets late speed, however, they suddenly become very, very deadly. This explains a lot of why Destiny lost games 2 and 3. And the thing that absolutely convinced Destiny that he had to change his opening build game 4, was that Major didn't need to sacrifice anything significant for that capability. He was playing a TvZ build that is very solid and will match up just fine against a solid ZvT build.
So Destiny had to adjust game 4 and get his speed upgrade earlier. However, his timings for the lings was a bit off and he took a lot of damage, putting him at a disadvantage.
Major followed up his highly successful hellion harass with single banshee harass. This follow up is fairly popular and is rather macro oriented. The idea is that there is no tech cost for the banshee; everything necessary for banshee production is already there. The tech lab is going to be used for stim. The starport is going to be used for medivac production. But if you use the starport and the techlab for a short period, you only need to spend 150/100 for a banshee. This is 250 units of resources. A standard TvZ build doesn't need a heavy gas count at this period, so the gas cost isn't significant. The banshee goes out and can guarantee a couple of drone kills without dying. It is just a very minor harass, typically. The idea is that scv production is limited compared to zerg drone production. Shaving a couple drones here and there will add up, keeping the terran at an ok position against the zerg. Shave a bit more than needed with some good maneuvering and tactics, and then you're looking at a slight economic advantage against zerg. Furthermore, the single banshee isn't bad later on. It can continue harassment until mutalisks come out. If you keep it around, it does some nice dps, and it can delay a 3rd for a little bit.
Banshee comes in, and Destiny only has one queen, with no creep spread between the main and nat. ZvT builds typically involve hatch-first with 2 early queens. You get enough energy to drop one creep tumor before you need to spend the rest of the energy for larva injects. That one creep tumor will make its way from the main, connect the natural, and then make its way out or, more usefully, connect creep towards a potential 3rd. For a map like tald'arim, you can get a nice creep spread to the 3rd by the time you want to take it, making it safer against harass.
That main-to-nat creep connection is specifically for queens to defend against drops and banshees. Queens are actually very good AA units. Banshee harass and drop harass can be very deadly and difficult to deal with without this creep spread.
Destiny had only one queen at his main, and no creep spread. That banshee harass turned from what typically is just minor, but steady harass, into something more significant. Along with all the drones lost to the hellions, the damage done by the banshee was devastating. By this time, it was Major's game to lose. So long as he didn't make any critical mistake, or get massively outplayed in some way, he was going to win the game.

Major's push was just him playing as he is supposed to. If it got defended, he would have several more shots left available.


Been a while since I've seen a quality post about a series in the SC2 forums.

Major's just a levels above Destiny. Major's one of the notable foreign progamers, famous for practicing hard and his mechanics, whereas Destiny, although his stream and playstyle is entertaining, is just a high-level ladder player and haven't shown important results in major tournaments yet. While I think Destiny could improve to become a major player in tournaments, he still needs more refinement IMO.
Korean-Canadian who spends way too much time on Afreeca
wats0n
Profile Joined July 2011
United States509 Posts
August 25 2011 05:50 GMT
#172
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.
nvs.
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada3609 Posts
August 25 2011 05:52 GMT
#173
I figured it was pretty obvious Major was a better player than Destiny. gg wp etc.
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
August 25 2011 05:59 GMT
#174
On August 25 2011 14:50 wats0n wrote:
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.


All he said is that his build is solid.

He's saying his build doesn't have BO losses, which I think is the correct assumption to have when you're coming up with your own strategy. You want to try to adapt based on what you can scout, you don't want to throw out an entire build immediately just because you found a certain variation hard. You want to be able to find a way to compete with that variation in the realm of still using your strategy.

Actually what YOU'VE said is the antithesis of strategy. Strategy is all about trying to solve the game, which implies that there's 1 best way to play, and you can play that way every single game, like a float chart that may have variations based on what your opponent is doing, but it's still the same flow chart, and for this you obviously need to scout.

What you're talking about isn't strategy it's just a game of rock paper scissors.
firehand101
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Australia3152 Posts
August 25 2011 06:03 GMT
#175
Destiny;s problem with his build is that it doesn't get the infestor out for a while, which is one of the only two units that can handle large clumps of marines. The other ofcourse is the baneling, but with his infestor build he doesnt get them and so is vulnerable to early marine agression, because all he has are 1/1 lings, and usually the attack hits before the upgrades finish
The opinions expressed by our users do not reflect the official position of TeamLiquid.net or its staff.
LicH.
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
China235 Posts
August 25 2011 06:03 GMT
#176
On August 25 2011 14:59 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 14:50 wats0n wrote:
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.


All he said is that his build is solid.

He's saying his build doesn't have BO losses, which I think is the correct assumption to have when you're coming up with your own strategy. You want to try to adapt based on what you can scout, you don't want to throw out an entire build immediately just because you found a certain variation hard. You want to be able to find a way to compete with that variation in the realm of still using your strategy.

Actually what YOU'VE said is the antithesis of strategy. Strategy is all about trying to solve the game, which implies that there's 1 best way to play, and you can play that way every single game, like a float chart that may have variations based on what your opponent is doing, but it's still the same flow chart, and for this you obviously need to scout.

What you're talking about isn't strategy it's just a game of rock paper scissors.


Ever played a game called poker? Strategy and chance coexist my friend.
jenzebubble
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 06:11:17
August 25 2011 06:10 GMT
#177
On August 25 2011 14:59 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 14:50 wats0n wrote:
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.


All he said is that his build is solid.

He's saying his build doesn't have BO losses, which I think is the correct assumption to have when you're coming up with your own strategy. You want to try to adapt based on what you can scout, you don't want to throw out an entire build immediately just because you found a certain variation hard. You want to be able to find a way to compete with that variation in the realm of still using your strategy.

Actually what YOU'VE said is the antithesis of strategy. Strategy is all about trying to solve the game, which implies that there's 1 best way to play, and you can play that way every single game, like a float chart that may have variations based on what your opponent is doing, but it's still the same flow chart, and for this you obviously need to scout.

What you're talking about isn't strategy it's just a game of rock paper scissors.


Wait, what? What RTS has ever had one single flow chart? You don't play the game, you play your opponent. Destiny's goal is to get infestors out at around the 11:30 mark. Failing that, he loses. Nothing about his play style points to this multi-tiered, layered, play style that you are suggesting. Destiny's build is extremely greedy. He tries to skip to the mid-late game to make up for short coming in his own ability.
"It's like waxing your balls, it hurts like a biiiitch but after they are silky smooth...." -Kennigit
wats0n
Profile Joined July 2011
United States509 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 06:13:48
August 25 2011 06:11 GMT
#178
On August 25 2011 14:59 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 14:50 wats0n wrote:
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.


Actually what YOU'VE said is the antithesis of strategy. Strategy is all about trying to solve the game, which implies that there's 1 best way to play, and you can play that way every single game, like a float chart that may have variations based on what your opponent is doing, but it's still the same flow chart, and for this you obviously need to scout.

What you're talking about isn't strategy it's just a game of rock paper scissors.


What? All the plans that you take to arrive at victory is strategy. You can use plans that are inherently disadvantaged against other plans and that doesn't mean there was no strategy. What you said makes no sense.

If you make a conscious decision beforehand to go for lategame then that's your strategy. The opponent risks losing if he doesn't beat you early and you risk losing early game. That's what strategy is all about. One build that is predetermined to win because it's leveled up so far is not strategy at all.

And this is also not taking into consideration builds that allow for adaptability to early game scouting or deciding your build based upon scouting. Destiny's build is predetermined. Again, that's not strategy.

He should be strategically sacrificing resources to gain information and make tactical decisions to improve his position in the fight.
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-25 06:27:51
August 25 2011 06:21 GMT
#179
On August 25 2011 15:10 jenzebubble wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 14:59 Kiarip wrote:
On August 25 2011 14:50 wats0n wrote:
I don't think that I've ever heard more asinine comments from a "pro" than what I heard on Destiny's stream tonight.

He said that he doesn't think that he should go one build and his opponent can go one build and he automatically loses because of the build choice. Um...are you serious? That's what a strategy game is. Why does he think that players have to know multiple builds? This isn't an RPG where you level up one build and grow it continuously and the person with the best build wins. Wagering chances and incorporating scouting is all part of STRATEGY. What he's describing is the antithesis of strategy.

He said that with his infestor build (the only build he every really does) he could win every time if he had maphack against the terran. Um...the ability to ingame transition on the fly and scout is all part of the build you do. You have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of everything and the revelation that your LATEGAME build could win if you knew what kind of early game exploit he is going to punish you with is pretty fucking obvious.


All he said is that his build is solid.

He's saying his build doesn't have BO losses, which I think is the correct assumption to have when you're coming up with your own strategy. You want to try to adapt based on what you can scout, you don't want to throw out an entire build immediately just because you found a certain variation hard. You want to be able to find a way to compete with that variation in the realm of still using your strategy.

Actually what YOU'VE said is the antithesis of strategy. Strategy is all about trying to solve the game, which implies that there's 1 best way to play, and you can play that way every single game, like a float chart that may have variations based on what your opponent is doing, but it's still the same flow chart, and for this you obviously need to scout.

What you're talking about isn't strategy it's just a game of rock paper scissors.


Wait, what? What RTS has ever had one single flow chart? You don't play the game, you play your opponent. Destiny's goal is to get infestors out at around the 11:30 mark. Failing that, he loses. Nothing about his play style points to this multi-tiered, layered, play style that you are suggesting. Destiny's build is extremely greedy. He tries to skip to the mid-late game to make up for short coming in his own ability.




That's a guide to becoming a terrible player that doesn't have understanding of the actual game.


If you want to do a strategy you try to make it work against different variation. A strategy IS a flow chart. There's a bunch of strategy games that are solved that have flow charts or algorithms to winning.

Understanding the game means that you know what leads to what in a certain situation.

Obviously SC2 is a complicated game and not solved, maybe not solvable, but when you're developing your own strategies and play style you're attempting to solve the game. When Destiny says that his strategy doesn't straight up lose to some other strategy he's saying that his position is winnable, meaning that it's a solid playstyle that doesn't rely on coinflips.

Ever played a game called poker? Strategy and chance coexist my friend.


Poker is a game of mathematics and mind games. You can say mind game is part of strategy but ti isn't. Mind game is meta-game. A strategy is in-game plan. they're the absolute opposites.


What? All the plans that you take to arrive at victory is strategy. You can use plans that are inherently disadvantaged against other plans and that doesn't mean there was no strategy. What you said makes no sense.

If you make a conscious decision beforehand to go for lategame then that's your strategy. The opponent risks losing if he doesn't beat you early and you risk losing early game. That's what strategy is all about. One build that is predetermined to win because it's leveled up so far is not strategy at all.

And this is also not taking into consideration builds that allow for adaptability to early game scouting or deciding your build based upon scouting. Destiny's build is predetermined. Again, that's not strategy.

He should be strategically sacrificing resources to gain information and make tactical decisions to improve his position in the fight.


...

A large portion of his game-plan is predetermined but that's caz he believes it's strong. First of all I doubt it's completely predetermiend because if terran goes supply CC supply CC I'm sure he will adapt into just killing his opponent.


A lot of terrans will go supply-rax before they even scout their opponent, and it's considered just a standardly solid way to play that you don't need to sacrifice anything in order to see what your opponent is doing in order to justify this decision. As the game gets moer figured out larger and larger portions of play become less reliant on scouting and more set-in-stone-solid, destiny thinks that his opening with investment for the late-game is a solid way to play. I think if he's come a long way in being able to defend this it's completely illogical for him to all of a sudden throw it out of the window because he lost a single series. It's still very much possible for him to go back and see what he needs to do differently, and still have a good game against early aggression builds that he previously lost to.

That's strategy. What you were talking about isn't it's meta-gaming and it's only a good idea when you already have a good understanding of the game, or you know you have no chance to beat your opponent straight up.
Maghetti
Profile Joined May 2008
United States2429 Posts
August 25 2011 06:23 GMT
#180
On August 25 2011 12:58 LicH. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2011 12:51 OscarN wrote:
Let me guess, destiny did a infestor two base, all four games?


*tried to do two base infestor :D

From what I see with that style it really is similar to the protoss deathball that was murdering zergs for awhile. If you can get the near perfect zerg army of infestors and broodlords up you have a pretty sick good army, but there is no way the way destiny does it will work. You have to step by step move towards that army starting with armies of other units, expanding, etc, else you get killed by timing pushes. No one should ever play a pure macro game against destiny style, you should always smash it in the beginning because it is gimmicky, reckless, and weak to early pushes. The style only really seems to work when opponents are not used to it IMO or destiny pulls a miracle defense.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
#4
RotterdaM645
TKL 264
IndyStarCraft 135
SteadfastSC135
Rex111
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 645
TKL 264
Lowko247
IndyStarCraft 135
SteadfastSC 135
ProTech117
Rex 111
Codebar 81
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5843
Bisu 3325
Jaedong 1856
Horang2 1404
Shuttle 840
Hyuk 606
Larva 522
Soma 499
Mini 438
Stork 394
[ Show more ]
actioN 313
Rush 296
Light 279
Snow 261
ggaemo 224
EffOrt 208
Aegong 198
ZerO 168
Leta 108
Pusan 89
hero 80
PianO 80
Bale 62
scan(afreeca) 60
Hyun 59
ToSsGirL 49
Barracks 46
Sharp 43
sSak 32
Backho 30
910 27
Shine 23
Shinee 22
soO 20
HiyA 20
Terrorterran 16
Rock 12
SilentControl 11
GoRush 11
JulyZerg 9
Icarus 6
Dota 2
Gorgc6784
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2707
fl0m1520
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King132
Other Games
singsing2281
Liquid`RaSZi1179
B2W.Neo913
hiko506
crisheroes425
DeMusliM250
XaKoH 175
ArmadaUGS54
Livibee52
ZerO(Twitch)23
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL17842
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 15
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HappyZerGling 60
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1910
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
10h 43m
The PondCast
20h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 10h
WardiTV Team League
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
BSL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Team League
3 days
OSC
3 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.