|
Arguing and whining in this thread will be met with the hammer. Please enjoy the games and keep this thread on track! |
On April 25 2011 05:35 Euronyme wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:33 ArghUScaredMe wrote:On April 25 2011 05:32 Logo2010 wrote: Forget Zerg remax, Protoss Remax owns On super late game, the scope of protoss design is much better. Zerg spends 450 gold on Hatchery + Queen to get larvae Protoss can get 3 warpgates with same money, warp anywhere on map. Stop the f*cking whining. Warp gates can't make 25 units at a time. Calm down. He's not whining. He making an observation. You have to realize that warpgates give toss a late game advantage, so as zerg/terran you have to plan accordingly
|
|
Artosis droppin knowledge <3
|
I just feel like thorzane was winning the exact fights boxer is losing today. Maybe medivac drop micro is better than I thought
|
You have to admit that Hasu really made very good decisions, had complete map control half the time and good gamesenses so boxer never did any good drops. Its obvious Boxer has more fans than Hasu but he´s a really good player too.
|
On April 25 2011 05:36 Namu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:34 Sadistx wrote:On April 25 2011 05:32 jwp36 wrote: Why aren't Ts getting Ravens late game? Would have nullified DT harass and PDD for Stalkers.. Dunno. More T's should do that since going MMM/Viking leaves u with a lot of gas left over. He coulda had 5-8 ravens easily and more medivacs to boot. there are these things called hts, and they have this ability called feedback did you not see Boxer's ghost cloak emp? that leaves ravens a safe domain for pdd
|
On April 25 2011 05:35 OddBone wrote: These games seem alot more medicore than the other Ro8 ones.
Anyone else agree?
Disagree. We're seeing a very strong macro style from both players. Naniwa versus CrunCher was worse.
|
On April 25 2011 05:36 Namu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:34 Sadistx wrote:On April 25 2011 05:32 jwp36 wrote: Why aren't Ts getting Ravens late game? Would have nullified DT harass and PDD for Stalkers.. Dunno. More T's should do that since going MMM/Viking leaves u with a lot of gas left over. He coulda had 5-8 ravens easily and more medivacs to boot. there are these things called hts, and they have this ability called feedback Poop out all your energy with PDD/auto-turrets before HT's get in feedback range and you still get the detection :D
|
|
On April 25 2011 05:34 Denzil wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:33 Sabu113 wrote:On April 25 2011 05:31 Beef Noodles wrote: That's such an amazing display of a simple fact. As the game goes SUPER LATE game, and the map is HUGE. How does a terran compete with warpgate mobility if they are maxed and taking out far expansions?
I am a zerg btw The warpgate mobility had little to nothing to do with it. There wasn't even a proxy close for the mass gates teleport ability to come into play. Over stimming and possibly slightly better emps would have helped boxer take the game. Slightly better than hitting ALL the Templar twice?
As zergs have been forced to note, stalker balls can and will kill you too. He didn't land (atleast his final) emps on the main army. It's equivalent to a toss always feedbacking rather than storming. The emps would have significantly softened up the army.
Edit: Really surpised atleast in the late game we don't see more raven darkswarm use.
|
Looking likely that it's all euro players in the final. + Show Spoiler +Not to take anything away from those players, but the least effected by lag region has the best representation. I wish someday that starcraft 2 becomes big enough that this tournament is played on lan (lol LAN, the least likely part of this dream)
|
I really hope Boxer forgets the Drop Idea its not gonna work against someone who expects it and prepares for it specific
|
Please remove your balance whine from my LR thread. Thank you.
GO BOXER!
|
On April 25 2011 05:30 sushiman wrote: Lots of extra CC's, but not floating them to expos? Wtf?
Boxer is on the take. Only reasonable explanation.
Emperor can't go 0-3!
|
4 out of 4 are europeans, 2 out of 4 are swedish.
awesome
|
I just realized if Hasu wins this, then there will be only former War3 players in the RO4!
|
On April 25 2011 05:37 Beef Noodles wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:35 Euronyme wrote:On April 25 2011 05:33 ArghUScaredMe wrote:On April 25 2011 05:32 Logo2010 wrote: Forget Zerg remax, Protoss Remax owns On super late game, the scope of protoss design is much better. Zerg spends 450 gold on Hatchery + Queen to get larvae Protoss can get 3 warpgates with same money, warp anywhere on map. Stop the f*cking whining. Warp gates can't make 25 units at a time. Calm down. He's not whining. He making an observation. You have to realize that warpgates give toss a late game advantage, so as zerg/terran you have to plan accordingly All-in before the game gets to late-game?
|
On April 25 2011 05:34 Lennon wrote: I'm cheering for Hasu. I feel like the only one.
I'm going with you. Dont care about Protoss OP qq. He deserved the wins. Boxer just overstimmed his Marauders heavily. No chance to win with 70 red Marauders with only 2 Medivacs. Stop crying.
|
On April 25 2011 05:36 Golgotha wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 05:35 Euronyme wrote:On April 25 2011 05:33 ArghUScaredMe wrote:On April 25 2011 05:32 Logo2010 wrote: Forget Zerg remax, Protoss Remax owns On super late game, the scope of protoss design is much better. Zerg spends 450 gold on Hatchery + Queen to get larvae Protoss can get 3 warpgates with same money, warp anywhere on map. Stop the f*cking whining. Warp gates can't make 25 units at a time. unless you have 25 warpgates lol lol
exactly. 150gx25 and you can remake half of your army in an instant. Anywhere. Literally.
Zerg still max faster but compared to toss, not that much faster. Why toss are the race benefiting the most of these large maps.
|
What I don't get: if you're maxed and have the money to spare, why don't do some medivac harass? If he kills it, you can remake em quickly? Better than just waiting for the engagement...
|
|
|
|