EPT[GSL March] Code S Ro32 Day 4 - Page 60
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Buff345
United States323 Posts
| ||
|
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:56 Jungosi wrote: MKO vs. Kyrix or Morrow vs. White-RA AAAAAH!!!! Such a hard decision You need a 2nd monitor dude. | ||
|
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Does anyone know what GSL points mean for the players? More points is better | ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7799 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Does anyone know what GSL points mean for the players? I'm pretty sure it's just an e-peen meter. | ||
|
Mythito
Canada230 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:56 BeMannerDuPenner wrote: no offense but if you judge how interesting a matchup is just by the units used then you arent qualified to comment on it. how is that not a valid way to judge a matchup? he's saying there isn't any variety.. no variety makes something boring | ||
|
ihasaKAROT
Netherlands4730 Posts
I need a third, im sposed to be working :s Damn u timezones! | ||
|
Xswordy
United Kingdom425 Posts
| ||
|
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Does anyone know what GSL points mean for the players? I think top 8 in points get to pick their group and first pick the 2nd player in the group? Edit: Possibly just RO8 from previous season but I don't know. | ||
|
andrea20
Canada441 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Does anyone know what GSL points mean for the players? At the end of the season, the top 10 players in points will be invited to the "Blizzard Cup" which is a KOTH-style tournament. | ||
|
cordlc
United States360 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 Kamais_Ookin wrote: Does anyone know what GSL points mean for the players? They allowed the code S seed after the 3 open GSL, and I guess they'll be used for the "world championship" or something like that, the best 8 or 16 players, don't remember exactly. | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:56 BeMannerDuPenner wrote: no offense but if you judge how interesting a matchup is just by the units used then you arent qualified to comment on it. and here I though that what you find interesting in a game was more or less subjective, not something that was down to a set of standards. | ||
|
Rabes
United States46 Posts
Tell me I wasn't the only one who saw this | ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:58 StUfF wrote: It was a very good timing. He needed to get those fungals to give his Ultras time to get out and into the wide area. He would have lost if he waited for P ball to walk into his base/cliff area, and he took a risk to get those fungals off ( if AnyPro wasn't paying attention or was on move command) the ultras could have gotten onto open ground and the fight would have been much closer. Yes cause walking to infestors, collosi side first into a toss deathball with ZERO support is always such a great play | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
 | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
ETA: No, wait, he 14 CC'd | ||
|
Xolo
Canada107 Posts
Isn't Barracks first more economical just because you get orbitals faster? | ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:56 furymonkey wrote: Did you not see what happened? Two infestors came in from the left by itself, trying to fungal protoss deathball with no support. I think he tried to do that to delay the toss instead of creating a good engagement, either way no one can say FD played well, because he didn't. So the zerg must sacrifice 40 supply to get off a fungal growth now? | ||
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
On March 01 2011 19:56 ItsMeDomLee wrote: Even fucking Secret understands that Zerg are in trouble. When addressing Kyrix, "Please be the hope of the Zerg!!" I laughed pretty hard at this, one cookie to you! | ||
|
Aus.Force
Australia1278 Posts
| ||
| ||
