EPT[GSL] Ro32 Day 2 - Page 52
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ancient.eu
Romania621 Posts
| ||
|
YyapSsap
New Zealand1511 Posts
| ||
|
Artisan
United States336 Posts
| ||
GTR
51461 Posts
On October 25 2010 20:05 KingRajesh wrote: Why is Nada called the Tornado Terran? because back in his first 'prime', he had developed a strategy which would eventually be known as the 'tornado push' because he would just demolish you with mass tank/vulture. | ||
|
DragoonPK
3259 Posts
| ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On October 25 2010 20:05 BeMannerDuPenner wrote: exactly the other way round. TvT is the by far most dynamic and cool mirror to watch. PvP can produce decent games if it doesnt end in either a cheesefest or "LOLO I HAS ONE COLLOSUS MORE I WIN". zvz is only fun to watch when it gets to lategame (and only if one of the guys gets mutas) else its either baneling play (yeye high skill.whatever terrible to watch) or mass roach/infestor play. agreed. early on i hated TvT in sc2, but it's such a dynamic matchup. | ||
|
Kagami-sama
460 Posts
Tasteless said it, not me. So yes, they did hire Tasteless. =P | ||
|
Firereaver
India1701 Posts
On October 25 2010 20:06 TimeOut wrote: They didn't list JD.  And Flash....Fail...But moving on...NADAAAAAAAAAA. | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
omg loled so hard | ||
|
chongu
Malaysia2586 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17268 Posts
On October 25 2010 20:05 KingRajesh wrote: Why is Nada called the Tornado Terran? http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Nada http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/players/147_NaDa Research ftw. Lee Yun-Yeol also had a distinctive style in the Terran vs. Protoss match-up called Tornado Terran. It mainly consisted of harassing his opponent with Vultures while macroing, and finally emerging with a large number of Siege Tanks that would destroy the opponent's expansions and army in quick fashion. | ||
|
Sandster
United States4054 Posts
| ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
| ||
|
TedJustice
Canada1324 Posts
| ||
|
RHMVNovus
United States738 Posts
This requires emphasis. Being completely able to follow that game, I thoroughly enjoyed that display of micro. If you don't play Zerg and don't understand how Zerg works, you're less likely to enjoy it. Not understanding the MU is inherently bad, but nor is the MU inherently bad to watch. | ||
|
abrasion
Australia722 Posts
On October 25 2010 20:05 VikingKong wrote: He has a legitimate complaint though. You can't expect every spectator to play zerg and understand the matchup at an intimate level, and for those that don't, ZvZ can be really boring. I'm a terrible player but I can spot good play in TvT, PvP and all the cross matches but that ZvZ was just a mess to me, honestly - not trying to hate here but I totally agree with the guy - of all the matchups I can't tell peoples skill in a ZvZ if it's like those last 2 - just not even entertaining. I hope it evolves beyond that. | ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
| ||
|
Xax
475 Posts
| ||
|
Aylear
Norway3988 Posts
| ||
|
Kagami-sama
460 Posts
| ||
| ||
