• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:23
CEST 05:23
KST 12:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
BW caster Sayle BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [ASL20] Semifinal B
Strategy
[I] TvP Strategies and Build Roaring Currents ASL final [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1769 users

[D] PvZ - FFE vs 1 gate expo - Page 3

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
kineSiS-
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Korea (South)1068 Posts
August 10 2011 16:21 GMT
#41
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds. Both these openings have their advantages and disadvantages, and both can work (pretty much PvZ's 2 best openers right now).

Also let me preface this by saying that I don't have too much experience with 1 gate FE. My initial experience with 1 gate FE is that while sometimes it can force the zerg to be more cautious with your earlier aggressive potential, many zergs still treat it as any other fast expansion and just drone up like they do against FFE, and then you're just economically behind with no gain. But I could just be playing it wrong so I won't comment too much on 1 gate FE vs FFE.

Instead let share my thoughts on misconceptions with FFE and how to FFE more effectively.

1. The most optimal followup/transition is stargate play. This is false. Many other builds can pressure, provide safety, and provide scouting just as well as stargate play. For example, remember half a year ago when you can play super standard and follow up a 3 gate expand with robo play? You can still do this with a FFE. There's no need for "gimmicky" tech builds like stargate or DTs or blink. Get a robo instead of stargate, and get gateways relatively faster and start making sentries. Then you'll have a fast obs for scouting, and lots of sentries for defense, then you can move into the map with your gateway/robo army and put pressure on the zerg with a regular ground army. If the zerg mass drones on 3 bases and techs slow and only has ling/roach, that has a really difficult time dealing with a 10+ sentry army.

2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.

3. 6 gate attacks come too late to be effective, are easy to scout/counter, and are gimmicky/all-in. Yes, I agree that a standard 6 gate with some sentry/stalker/zealot is not that great. But I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.

So to sum up, I'm in favor of bigger gateway armies in the beginning, and slower teching. Whether this is a 1 robo 5 gate army, a fast 6 gate army, a fast blink army, or a stargate > 6 gate army, this allows you to punish the zerg if he drones too hard, or back off and establish your own 3rd safely if you choose.

EDIT: A note about taking 3rds as Protoss: don't expect to take your 3rd as fast as the zerg can and be able to safely defend it. This isn't possible. The zerg WILL have an eco advantage in the mid game when his 3rd is set up and safe and you realize you can't kill it with your gateway army. It's ok. You're not behind - as long as you play smart and don't suicide your army, the zerg will have a difficult time in stopping you from getting your own 3rd, and then a 3 base protoss can be pretty scary.


Zerg will have an economic advantage the majority of the game if you Forge Fast Expand as you can't put pressure early enough to prevent him from spamming D.

Obviously if you play smart and don't suicide your army technically you're not behind, but there needs to be some sort of timing attack in terms of harassment or pressure because that economic advantage will lead to an intense growth of their army. This is obvious as they have larvae injection. I have no real opinion on any matchup and whether it is balanced or not as the metagame/strategies have not been developed enough.
rsvp
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States2266 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 16:53:53
August 10 2011 16:49 GMT
#42
On August 11 2011 01:21 kineSiS- wrote:
Obviously if you play smart and don't suicide your army technically you're not behind, but there needs to be some sort of timing attack in terms of harassment or pressure because that economic advantage will lead to an intense growth of their army.


Wtf, did you not comprehend my post at all? All of my suggestions about transitions after FFE are about gateway timing attacks (at "non-traditional" timings - such as 8 min 6 gate +1 zeal), with the addition of the fact that these attacks don't have to be all-in and you can either expand behind them or back off and expand safely

On August 11 2011 01:21 kineSiS- wrote:.I have no real opinion on any matchup and whether it is balanced or not as the metagame/strategies have not been developed enough.


Ow, my brain hurts from reading this sentence.

1) Don't comment if you don't have an opinion.
2) No one is talking about balance here. Don't even mention it.
3) Learn what metagame means before using it.
Celerios
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada65 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 17:46:11
August 10 2011 17:24 GMT
#43
I have pretty much the same problem than the OP with the FFE build. I'm using this build everytime I can, but Z players learned to deal with by taking their third really fast.
Taking a fast third is hard too, because the opponent can just mass up Roaches / Flings and crush your little army ( Fast stargate into colossi / third let you with very few units for a long time... ) or delay your expansion.
I feel like that putting pressure on zerg is crucial on the early stage of the game, just because forcing him to make a unit instead of a drone at the 5 mn Mark is way more efficient than doing it at 10mn.

I'm currently working on a FFE build into 6 gate with hallucinated zealot +1 (you get 2 of them per hallucination) which is going pretty well for the moment.

Actually, I'm asking myself if faking a entire army with hallucination between 5 - 10 mn mark (working on it :D) wouldn't be super effective to force units with 0 risk or send the fake at the natural and the real one at the third if scouted... (hallucination is underestimated IMHO, if anyone is interested, i can upload a replay!).

I'm not poor... my macro is just good.
iChau
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 17:46:46
August 10 2011 17:43 GMT
#44
On August 10 2011 19:09 Lazzi wrote:
I think the best way right now to play it is ffe into stargate . You make the stargate before you researching warpgate and you apply preasure while teching to collo and trying to get a third . In worst case you will do no dommage but force more queen and spine and in the best case you can get the third base . However , the really important think is to not loose his voidray even if you don't do any dommages because if you loose it , you can't make anymore preasure and the Z we'll feel way fore comfortable.


That's so dangerous. I used to do it, but it is soooo risky. Basically what you're doing is tech, then tech some more, than expand. If he gets some queens to defend, and just builds a massive army off of his economy, he will be able to kill you because you invested too much into tech and economy.


On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds. Both these openings have their advantages and disadvantages, and both can work (pretty much PvZ's 2 best openers right now).

Also let me preface this by saying that I don't have too much experience with 1 gate FE. My initial experience with 1 gate FE is that while sometimes it can force the zerg to be more cautious with your earlier aggressive potential, many zergs still treat it as any other fast expansion and just drone up like they do against FFE, and then you're just economically behind with no gain. But I could just be playing it wrong so I won't comment too much on 1 gate FE vs FFE.

Instead let share my thoughts on misconceptions with FFE and how to FFE more effectively.

1. The most optimal followup/transition is stargate play. This is false. Many other builds can pressure, provide safety, and provide scouting just as well as stargate play. For example, remember half a year ago when you can play super standard and follow up a 3 gate expand with robo play? You can still do this with a FFE. There's no need for "gimmicky" tech builds like stargate or DTs or blink. Get a robo instead of stargate, and get gateways relatively faster and start making sentries. Then you'll have a fast obs for scouting, and lots of sentries for defense, then you can move into the map with your gateway/robo army and put pressure on the zerg with a regular ground army. If the zerg mass drones on 3 bases and techs slow and only has ling/roach, that has a really difficult time dealing with a 10+ sentry army.

2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.

3. 6 gate attacks come too late to be effective, are easy to scout/counter, and are gimmicky/all-in. Yes, I agree that a standard 6 gate with some sentry/stalker/zealot is not that great. But I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.

So to sum up, I'm in favor of bigger gateway armies in the beginning, and slower teching. Whether this is a 1 robo 5 gate army, a fast 6 gate army, a fast blink army, or a stargate > 6 gate army, this allows you to punish the zerg if he drones too hard, or back off and establish your own 3rd safely if you choose.

EDIT: A note about taking 3rds as Protoss: don't expect to take your 3rd as fast as the zerg can and be able to safely defend it. This isn't possible. The zerg WILL have an eco advantage in the mid game when his 3rd is set up and safe and you realize you can't kill it with your gateway army. It's ok. You're not behind - as long as you play smart and don't suicide your army, the zerg will have a difficult time in stopping you from getting your own 3rd, and then a 3 base protoss can be pretty scary.



Thank you for this wonderful post.
us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1688911/1/SaniShahin/ | http://teamenvy.net/
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 17:51:09
August 10 2011 17:50 GMT
#45
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds. Both these openings have their advantages and disadvantages, and both can work (pretty much PvZ's 2 best openers right now).

Also let me preface this by saying that I don't have too much experience with 1 gate FE. My initial experience with 1 gate FE is that while sometimes it can force the zerg to be more cautious with your earlier aggressive potential, many zergs still treat it as any other fast expansion and just drone up like they do against FFE, and then you're just economically behind with no gain. But I could just be playing it wrong so I won't comment too much on 1 gate FE vs FFE.

Instead let share my thoughts on misconceptions with FFE and how to FFE more effectively.

1. The most optimal followup/transition is stargate play. This is false. Many other builds can pressure, provide safety, and provide scouting just as well as stargate play. For example, remember half a year ago when you can play super standard and follow up a 3 gate expand with robo play? You can still do this with a FFE. There's no need for "gimmicky" tech builds like stargate or DTs or blink. Get a robo instead of stargate, and get gateways relatively faster and start making sentries. Then you'll have a fast obs for scouting, and lots of sentries for defense, then you can move into the map with your gateway/robo army and put pressure on the zerg with a regular ground army. If the zerg mass drones on 3 bases and techs slow and only has ling/roach, that has a really difficult time dealing with a 10+ sentry army.

2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.

3. 6 gate attacks come too late to be effective, are easy to scout/counter, and are gimmicky/all-in. Yes, I agree that a standard 6 gate with some sentry/stalker/zealot is not that great. But I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.

So to sum up, I'm in favor of bigger gateway armies in the beginning, and slower teching. Whether this is a 1 robo 5 gate army, a fast 6 gate army, a fast blink army, or a stargate > 6 gate army, this allows you to punish the zerg if he drones too hard, or back off and establish your own 3rd safely if you choose.

EDIT: A note about taking 3rds as Protoss: don't expect to take your 3rd as fast as the zerg can and be able to safely defend it. This isn't possible. The zerg WILL have an eco advantage in the mid game when his 3rd is set up and safe and you realize you can't kill it with your gateway army. It's ok. You're not behind - as long as you play smart and don't suicide your army, the zerg will have a difficult time in stopping you from getting your own 3rd, and then a 3 base protoss can be pretty scary.


Could you sometime write a guide outlining how to FFE? There's lots of scattered posts all around, none of which seem to agree on build order or how to react to scouting or what maps are better to nexus first or forge at whatever on. I can usually scrape by with a "forge fast expand", my problem is i feel SO clunky transitioning into whatever out of it. You'd be my favorite if you could throw some light on the topic :D
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 10 2011 18:04 GMT
#46
On August 11 2011 02:50 See.Blue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds. Both these openings have their advantages and disadvantages, and both can work (pretty much PvZ's 2 best openers right now).

Also let me preface this by saying that I don't have too much experience with 1 gate FE. My initial experience with 1 gate FE is that while sometimes it can force the zerg to be more cautious with your earlier aggressive potential, many zergs still treat it as any other fast expansion and just drone up like they do against FFE, and then you're just economically behind with no gain. But I could just be playing it wrong so I won't comment too much on 1 gate FE vs FFE.

Instead let share my thoughts on misconceptions with FFE and how to FFE more effectively.

1. The most optimal followup/transition is stargate play. This is false. Many other builds can pressure, provide safety, and provide scouting just as well as stargate play. For example, remember half a year ago when you can play super standard and follow up a 3 gate expand with robo play? You can still do this with a FFE. There's no need for "gimmicky" tech builds like stargate or DTs or blink. Get a robo instead of stargate, and get gateways relatively faster and start making sentries. Then you'll have a fast obs for scouting, and lots of sentries for defense, then you can move into the map with your gateway/robo army and put pressure on the zerg with a regular ground army. If the zerg mass drones on 3 bases and techs slow and only has ling/roach, that has a really difficult time dealing with a 10+ sentry army.

2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.

3. 6 gate attacks come too late to be effective, are easy to scout/counter, and are gimmicky/all-in. Yes, I agree that a standard 6 gate with some sentry/stalker/zealot is not that great. But I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.

So to sum up, I'm in favor of bigger gateway armies in the beginning, and slower teching. Whether this is a 1 robo 5 gate army, a fast 6 gate army, a fast blink army, or a stargate > 6 gate army, this allows you to punish the zerg if he drones too hard, or back off and establish your own 3rd safely if you choose.

EDIT: A note about taking 3rds as Protoss: don't expect to take your 3rd as fast as the zerg can and be able to safely defend it. This isn't possible. The zerg WILL have an eco advantage in the mid game when his 3rd is set up and safe and you realize you can't kill it with your gateway army. It's ok. You're not behind - as long as you play smart and don't suicide your army, the zerg will have a difficult time in stopping you from getting your own 3rd, and then a 3 base protoss can be pretty scary.


Could you sometime write a guide outlining how to FFE? There's lots of scattered posts all around, none of which seem to agree on build order or how to react to scouting or what maps are better to nexus first or forge at whatever on. I can usually scrape by with a "forge fast expand", my problem is i feel SO clunky transitioning into whatever out of it. You'd be my favorite if you could throw some light on the topic :D


Second. I would love a GM player or Pro to lay out the specific timings of FFE into SG, DT and #gatepush. I understand these in concept, but in pratice, I'm terrible at them.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KimJongChill
Profile Joined January 2011
United States6429 Posts
August 10 2011 18:09 GMT
#47
When i ffe, i find that it is hard to take a third less you have a good way to pressure the zerg to cover the expansion. Blink play can be good, but it can die really fast to roach/hydra spam off 2 base, so I guess scouting is also an issue.
MMA: U realise MMA: Most of my army EgIdra: fuck off MMA: Killed my orbital MMA: LOL MMA: just saying MMA: u werent loss
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
August 10 2011 18:19 GMT
#48
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds.


First of all, I don't "struggle", I'm blue therefore awsome by definition

Joking aside:
2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.


Do you have any (preferably pro)-replays of this? You really got me with that because yes, I'm one of the classic MC-copy-cats who go FFE --> stargate, harass with voidray/phoenix, realize that you can't do any damage after killing 2 overlords, try to macro a stalker/colossus-ball and get roflstomped later.

I've seen both HuK and Mana do this gateway-attack-follow-up, I also mentioned it in one post. The problem is, I have neither experience, nor do I recognize any "pattern" when watching streams/VODs. Meaning, they attack at a timing that is completely random to me and that I can't grasp. I like the underlying idea of getting the zerg into the thinking-pattern "cool, stargate, lets make some queens and mass-drones" and then killing him with a 6 gate attack or at least getting him to invest into units while taking the third behind all that. But I have no idea how such a build could/should/would look like.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Geiko
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
France1939 Posts
August 10 2011 18:24 GMT
#49
On August 11 2011 02:50 See.Blue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
First of all, while I like the idea of this discussion, it seems like your struggles are with PvZ in general and not so much these 2 opening builds. Both these openings have their advantages and disadvantages, and both can work (pretty much PvZ's 2 best openers right now).

Also let me preface this by saying that I don't have too much experience with 1 gate FE. My initial experience with 1 gate FE is that while sometimes it can force the zerg to be more cautious with your earlier aggressive potential, many zergs still treat it as any other fast expansion and just drone up like they do against FFE, and then you're just economically behind with no gain. But I could just be playing it wrong so I won't comment too much on 1 gate FE vs FFE.

Instead let share my thoughts on misconceptions with FFE and how to FFE more effectively.

1. The most optimal followup/transition is stargate play. This is false. Many other builds can pressure, provide safety, and provide scouting just as well as stargate play. For example, remember half a year ago when you can play super standard and follow up a 3 gate expand with robo play? You can still do this with a FFE. There's no need for "gimmicky" tech builds like stargate or DTs or blink. Get a robo instead of stargate, and get gateways relatively faster and start making sentries. Then you'll have a fast obs for scouting, and lots of sentries for defense, then you can move into the map with your gateway/robo army and put pressure on the zerg with a regular ground army. If the zerg mass drones on 3 bases and techs slow and only has ling/roach, that has a really difficult time dealing with a 10+ sentry army.

2. The best transition after FFE > stargate is colossus. Yea, that makes sense. Force hydras blah blah and kill with colossus. But this is way too predictable and counterable. Try following up a stargate opener with a 6 gate attack. This comes earlier than colossus, will absolutely destroy anyone who tries to spire in response or continues to drone/tech after fending off your void/phoenix harass thinking they're safe. And if the zerg masses too much hydra/roach instead, you can get your own 3rd much earlier and safer than going the colossus route.

3. 6 gate attacks come too late to be effective, are easy to scout/counter, and are gimmicky/all-in. Yes, I agree that a standard 6 gate with some sentry/stalker/zealot is not that great. But I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.

So to sum up, I'm in favor of bigger gateway armies in the beginning, and slower teching. Whether this is a 1 robo 5 gate army, a fast 6 gate army, a fast blink army, or a stargate > 6 gate army, this allows you to punish the zerg if he drones too hard, or back off and establish your own 3rd safely if you choose.

EDIT: A note about taking 3rds as Protoss: don't expect to take your 3rd as fast as the zerg can and be able to safely defend it. This isn't possible. The zerg WILL have an eco advantage in the mid game when his 3rd is set up and safe and you realize you can't kill it with your gateway army. It's ok. You're not behind - as long as you play smart and don't suicide your army, the zerg will have a difficult time in stopping you from getting your own 3rd, and then a 3 base protoss can be pretty scary.


Could you sometime write a guide outlining how to FFE? There's lots of scattered posts all around, none of which seem to agree on build order or how to react to scouting or what maps are better to nexus first or forge at whatever on. I can usually scrape by with a "forge fast expand", my problem is i feel SO clunky transitioning into whatever out of it. You'd be my favorite if you could throw some light on the topic :D


I wrote this a while back. Some parts are a bit outdated but the general idea behind an FFE into stargate are here :
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=230939

I agree that someone should write a full guide about FFE on all maps and different transitions.
geiko.813 (EU)
Mastermind
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Canada7096 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 18:33:59
August 10 2011 18:26 GMT
#50
I find this discussion interesting because I feel the opposite. I feel like if I cant FFE on a map then I am at a huge disadvantage vs zerg. 3gate expand has been completely figured out by zergs. 1gate expand is very tricky to pull off and in my experience only possible when zerg has a late gas, otherwise zerg shows up with 12 lings and 4 roaches and all I have is 3 sentries and zealot. The winner of that battle is obvious.

edit: What I like to do after a FFE is build a stargate, and make just a single void. This will force defense from the zerg, because he must prepare for the void/phoenix harass that is never coming. Use the void to kill overlords, scouting lings, and to scout your opponents buildings. Follow this up with mass gateway units. Depending on the situation you can either attack or take a third and tech to colossus. If you take the third you should at least do some pressuring with your army so zerg cant macro up 80+ drones. I usually like to start making voids again at some point because your opponent wont make hydras when he realises you arent getting mass air.

CecilSunkure
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2829 Posts
August 10 2011 18:29 GMT
#51
I've never really liked FFE to be honest. The way I get by with FFE is by keeping the Zerg in the dark by using early Zealots to clear Xel'Nagas, and poke around looking for a Third, sometimes just attacking at odd times with 2 Zealots after clearing Towers. Basically I exploit weak players, though if I were to face a really good Zerg.. They wouldn't fall for it and simply build just enough to kill whatever I'm doing early game.

I've seen MC and some other Protoss do really well with 1 Gate FE into a fast third. Basically if you're good with your third timing, and cut an appropriate amount of gateway units I'm confident you can play without falling behind. See MC vs I think it was Sheth on Metal recently. MC cut a lot of Gateway units a lot of the time in reaction to Sheth's passivity.

I feel a FFE has to be a reactive opening. You can lay a blind forge down, but I think it's important to either cancel it, or not make any cannons the moment you know an early pool isn't being throw at you. I feel 1 Gate FE and 3 Gate FE both are fine openings, and I feel 3 Gate Expand is the opening zergs are currently most comfortable playing against. I don't think any of those openings is "out-dated" or just plain weak anymore. I do feel that certain ones are better on certain maps and in certain situations compared to the others.
TibblesEvilCat
Profile Joined March 2010
United Kingdom766 Posts
August 10 2011 18:50 GMT
#52
not from low player.

With my freind i get him to 3gate pressure into expo into 6gate for a 3rd, 9gate to take a 4th. He upgrades of 1. And gets blink, charge and hallusinations. Basically. He plays reactiveley with the warpgates, but quite heave on static defences to deter herass/run buys. 1 cannön per mineraline then adding 2nd after taking nat at both bases, 3rd with 3rd base, 4 with 4 etc...

He builds alot i mean alot of sentries, and faints units, generally zeals an stalker. This simple combination, has had me waste larva and fungles. Ff are pureley defensive to prevent any busts.

Basically 3 gate sentry expand with cannons over units.

We are silver level player though, maybe a pro can tell me how to beat that.
Live Fast Die Young :D
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
August 10 2011 18:58 GMT
#53
On August 11 2011 03:50 TibblesEvilCat wrote:
not from low player.

With my freind i get him to 3gate pressure into expo into 6gate for a 3rd, 9gate to take a 4th. He upgrades of 1. And gets blink, charge and hallusinations. Basically. He plays reactiveley with the warpgates, but quite heave on static defences to deter herass/run buys. 1 cannön per mineraline then adding 2nd after taking nat at both bases, 3rd with 3rd base, 4 with 4 etc...

He builds alot i mean alot of sentries, and faints units, generally zeals an stalker. This simple combination, has had me waste larva and fungles. Ff are pureley defensive to prevent any busts.

Basically 3 gate sentry expand with cannons over units.

We are silver level player though, maybe a pro can tell me how to beat that.


That'll unfortunately start losing around gold league because he'll simply fall behind in economy. He's taking a late 2nd base AND he's not using his most powerful units (sentries) to make an offense. If he's hitting with zealot stalker pokes late enough you can have fungals, just macroing a little better will crush it.
galivet
Profile Joined February 2011
288 Posts
August 10 2011 19:04 GMT
#54
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.


What if you do this, and zerg opens a nydus near your third (but in your fog of war) and pumps some composition that includes a good number of hydras at your third? Is it possible for the zerg to do that? Can he have enough hydras to overcome your gateway-heavy army supported by cannons? If you scout the den and the nydus bulding in the zerg's base, how would you respond?

My fear is that by using the mobility of nydus to overcome defender's advantage and slow off-creep hydra speed, there is just no way to defend without colossus or templar...but if you wait until you have enough of those units to take a third, then you've delayed your economy so much that the zerg's economy is overwhelming (since he can choose whether or not to build the hydras based on whether or not he scouts the RF). Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
CecilSunkure
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2829 Posts
August 10 2011 19:37 GMT
#55
On August 11 2011 04:04 galivet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.


What if you do this, and zerg opens a nydus near your third (but in your fog of war) and pumps some composition that includes a good number of hydras at your third? Is it possible for the zerg to do that? Can he have enough hydras to overcome your gateway-heavy army supported by cannons? If you scout the den and the nydus bulding in the zerg's base, how would you respond?

My fear is that by using the mobility of nydus to overcome defender's advantage and slow off-creep hydra speed, there is just no way to defend without colossus or templar...but if you wait until you have enough of those units to take a third, then you've delayed your economy so much that the zerg's economy is overwhelming (since he can choose whether or not to build the hydras based on whether or not he scouts the RF). Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

I don't see why a Nydus attack on your third is relevant to what anihc is talking about. That's not even a tactic commonly used. You should as a Protoss realize what they are doing and match their army value in order to take your third when you feel it's needed.
Skyro
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1823 Posts
August 10 2011 19:44 GMT
#56
From what I've experienced/seen from pros is that to achieve this massive eco advantage the 3rd is laid down so early it can (and should) be scouted by your initial probe scout. If you open FFE I think cannon rushing can be effective here. At the very least it forces units and disrupts the zerg player.

Personally I've never been a fan of FFE even though I do use it on some maps. To me the strength of the FFE or 15 Nexus is not the strict eco advantage (which is debatable since if you don't FFE zerg won't take that super early 3rd), but the fact that you can make certain unit compositions on 2-bases (void ray/colossi) that is not possible with a normal 1 or 3-gate sentry expand since you can skimp on sentries.

Right now the mentality of protoss players is mostly geared around 2-base timing attacks, yet I remember in season 1 when FFE/15 Nex was able to keep up with the zerg worker count with chrono boosted probes. I don't believe it is a given that protoss cannot keep up economically with proper expo timings and pressuring to force units. For example would you really be behind if you 1-gate FE (so zerg doesn't take that super early 3rd), then take your 3rd immediately after warp-gate tech is done? You would take your 3rd behind a gateway army and feint some pressure to force units.

I also think it's a problem to automatically assume a zerg plays flawlessly and that certain strategies are outdated or completely figured out. Stargate openers out of FE is still viable and there are many variations as you can go 1 or 2 stargate, more void ray or phoenix heavy, fake a stargate and just 1 void ray, etc. 6-gates are still incredibly effective vs fast 3rds especially if you get a proxy pylon up.
Snaphoo
Profile Joined July 2010
United States614 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 19:44:59
August 10 2011 19:44 GMT
#57
On August 10 2011 18:22 Tryxtira wrote:
From my experience of watching this FFE-strat develop during the last months, I do firmly believe that if you're going FFE, the correct response from the Zerg is to get a quick third, I believe that a Protoss should then respond in the exact same fashion. Getting a quick third. I believe that this is the only way to do it without getting as you say in a very disadvantageous position.

My own favorite way to do this is to go for Stargate play, force sporecrawlers and extra queens, possibly Hydras, and then simply 4-6 pheonixes to get map control and from here expand while the Zerg is defending up his 3 bases, I'm sure I've seen a few proreplays where this style is being used, I just can't find them at the moment.


If P goes for an ultra fast 3rd to counter Zerg's fast 3rd, Zerg responds with Muta, and neither Blink/Storm nor a sufficient number of Stalkers to cover 3 mineral lines are done in time to prevent massive damage. Does anyone disagree with this statement?
BlueyD
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada437 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 19:54:55
August 10 2011 19:54 GMT
#58
I think the biggest problem with PvZ at this moment is a timing window in the early game where protoss absolutely can't scout. Once speedlings pop, zerg has full map control and any zerg player who plays properly should spot a probe on the map and kill it pretty fast. This is true whether we're playing a gate expand strategy or a FFE.

We have to get hallucination/air/observer to know what's going on... And by that time, it's often too late: There's been enough time for the zerg to get a significant macro lead on the protoss, or an attack comes right as the scout pops out. The time to make a decision as to how we follow through after getting the natural happens before we can see anything the zerg does, so it's essentially a coin flip.

Is the 1 gate expand better than the FFE? Both have their advantages and disadvantages. I would say the 1 gate expand makes you able to pressure faster, but it also is more risky: You're defending with 3 units and relying on the zerg not to force a cancel on your nexus. If we start seeing more 1 gate expands, we're just going to see more early ling pokes.
Zealot Chaaaaarge!
BlindSC2
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom435 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 20:04:34
August 10 2011 20:02 GMT
#59
No where near fully tested idea -

+ Show Spoiler +
I've been working on a zealot/cannon early game push to deny the natural, or at the very least a fast third, getting the nexus at a similar timing as if you went a ~30 food 1 gate FE.

Essentially, 14 gate/~16 forge, or similar depending on map (earlier gate for further spawn positions/scouting info), starting a wall at the natural. 1-2 partially walled cannons and a zealot does wonders against a hatch/pool, is hit or miss vs pool/hatch, terrible vs gas/pool or pool/gas. VS early pools, I don't know, theorycrafting tells me either easy win or crushing defeat

Very limited testing on ladder, just throwing it out there if someone else wants to test it further
Wise men speak because they have something to say, fools; because they have to say something - Plato
galivet
Profile Joined February 2011
288 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-10 20:08:44
August 10 2011 20:02 GMT
#60
On August 11 2011 04:37 CecilSunkure wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 04:04 galivet wrote:
On August 11 2011 00:35 Anihc wrote:
I'm a big fan of the zealot-only 6 gate +1, which can happen as early as 8:00 (depending on how proxy of a pylon you can set up). The trick to this build is to not make it all-in. How? Don't stop making probes. Know when your attack will not work or be ineffective. For example, you warp in your first 6 zealots and head over to the zerg's 3rd, and you see roaches popping out. Or your 6 gate gets scouted by an overlord. You don't have to attack! You've already forced a response out of the zerg by making him get defense earlier than usual. Now warp in a round of sentries, and get your 3rd faster. Your big gateway army helps you defend your 3rd much better than a fast colossus or 1 void ray would.


What if you do this, and zerg opens a nydus near your third (but in your fog of war) and pumps some composition that includes a good number of hydras at your third? Is it possible for the zerg to do that? Can he have enough hydras to overcome your gateway-heavy army supported by cannons? If you scout the den and the nydus bulding in the zerg's base, how would you respond?

My fear is that by using the mobility of nydus to overcome defender's advantage and slow off-creep hydra speed, there is just no way to defend without colossus or templar...but if you wait until you have enough of those units to take a third, then you've delayed your economy so much that the zerg's economy is overwhelming (since he can choose whether or not to build the hydras based on whether or not he scouts the RF). Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

I don't see why a Nydus attack on your third is relevant to what anihc is talking about. That's not even a tactic commonly used. You should as a Protoss realize what they are doing and match their army value in order to take your third when you feel it's needed.


I'm trying to discuss the idea of building a big +1 zealot-heavy gateway army to psychologically pressure the zerg but actually employing it to secure a third base rather than using it press an attack.

So what if you do that and then the zerg responds by using nydus to put a bunch of hydras + meatshields in striking distance of your third? Hydras are the counter to lots of gateway units and the conventional wisdom is that you need colossus or templar to defend against them, which you won't have if you decided to go mass gateway and take a third. So how now brown cow? I'm hoping that since Anihc is "a big fan" of this strategy he's used it enough to know what the outcome of this situation is.

I mean maybe I'm missing some implicit assumption in what Anihc's talking about -- for example, "There's no way that the zerg will have a lair in the situation I'm describing, so you're talking nonsense."
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
LiuLi Cup #46 - Day 2
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft639
Nathanias 144
StarCraft: Brood War
Soulkey 231
Noble 22
Icarus 8
sorry 0
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K462
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox464
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor107
Other Games
summit1g9113
C9.Mang0327
Skadoodle167
Trikslyr61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1134
Counter-Strike
PGL374
Other Games
BasetradeTV243
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4349
• Scarra1402
• Rush669
• Lourlo317
Other Games
• WagamamaTV200
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
7h 37m
Wardi Open
11h 7m
PiGosaur Monday
20h 37m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 19h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Online Event
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.