EPT
To put it on the table![G] (T) 3 racks : Cheesing your way to GM league - Page 49
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
Ivanero
Spain140 Posts
To put it on the table! | ||
|
kevmo
United States38 Posts
On June 27 2011 08:37 grimAuxiliatrix wrote: If you think you would win for certain you don't actually need the money. Except either way Blizzard would probably try to ban you for account sharing + Show Spoiler + http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=236979 | ||
|
Geiko
France1943 Posts
On June 27 2011 08:25 Ivanero wrote: If I had the money... 100 free euro :D I can reduce the amount a little if you want, and in some way you can pay. For example, if you win I give you 60€ but if I win I get to keep your SC2 account. You're not taking that much a risk since you are sure I wont succeed right ? Of course we'd have to clear up the rules of the bet etc... BTW anyone who wants to take me on on my offer is welcome. I most probably wont be doing gold and under accounts though, as that would take forever (or then we should up the stakes). On June 27 2011 09:10 kevmo wrote: Except either way Blizzard would probably try to ban you for account sharing + Show Spoiler + http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=236979 I think blizzard doesn't actually mind account sharing when both players have their own accounts. Besides at the end of the bet it won't be account sharing, it will be just me using my second freshly won account. | ||
|
Teliko
Ireland1044 Posts
On June 27 2011 07:30 Ivanero wrote: Bump, for those retarded cheesers. Youmad because you still haven't worked out how to do it? On June 27 2011 09:10 kevmo wrote: Except either way Blizzard would probably try to ban you for account sharing + Show Spoiler + http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=236979 There are hundreds of SC2 players account sharing. The reason they got threatened from blizz is because they made it blatantly publicly obvious and it was being made a huge deal of, so of course blizz had to take action. They're not going to care about some minor random thread. | ||
|
closey
Hong Kong272 Posts
On June 27 2011 07:45 Geiko wrote: Fine, how about another 100€ bet. I bet I can take ANY account to masters using ONLY this. Who's up for the bet ? Allow me to change my account user name to "3 rax cheeser" to alert everyone first  | ||
|
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
i agree it's really hard for protoss but not impossible | ||
|
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
|
onmach
United States1241 Posts
I'm going to search around this thread for the "proper" defense against this as zerg, but I'm going to be honest, I don't think there is a proper defense. If the defense is get a super early gas, sac half my economy for a baneling nest and enough gas to morph banelings every time I see someone wall at the bottom of his ramp, that's not good enough. I'm angry that blizzard put in both mules and supply drop so that this build can exist. It is no wonder korean maps all have supply depots underneath ramps. | ||
|
rmAmnesiac
United Kingdom185 Posts
On June 27 2011 18:24 Sated wrote: I know that it isn't impossible, but it's one of those strategies where you feel kinda helpless afterwards. There's nothing to learn, just a crushing defeat. It takes 100x more effort to defend this than to execute it. It's like the raven/banshee/marine all-in... except worse Sometimes I wish protoss and zerg had such awesome all-ins... but then the game would be worse  they do and they too are a hundred times harder to defend than they are to execute, like with most cheese. so seriously stop trying to boost your own ego. it's kind of pathetic. | ||
|
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
|
rmAmnesiac
United Kingdom185 Posts
On June 27 2011 19:32 Sated wrote: Why would I need an ego boost? I'm in gold league, I am well aware that I suck at this game and that losing to this build is my own fault. Didn't you see what I wrote? Don't take an off-hand comment so seriously, it's kinda pathetic oh wow, you're telling me to read? ok. here you go then, this is what i read: "There's nothing to learn, just a crushing defeat. It takes 100x more effort to defend this than to execute it. It's like the raven/banshee/marine all-in... except worse Sometimes I wish protoss and zerg had such awesome all-ins... but then the game would be worse" and that is what i was responding to. | ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On June 27 2011 18:45 rmAmnesiac wrote: they do and they too are a hundred times harder to defend than they are to execute, like with most cheese. so seriously stop trying to boost your own ego. it's kind of pathetic. Not really. A 6 pool might be 100 times harder to defend than to pull off, but a 6pool is ridiculously easy to defend while a rax push like the one in this thread is almost impossible to hold unless you scout it really early and go all-in defence. Zerg has no other all-in which is comparable. | ||
|
rmAmnesiac
United Kingdom185 Posts
| ||
|
Pulimuli
Sweden2766 Posts
Ive tried it myself a couple of times and i think ive won about 50% of the games as well so not that big of a success for me (zerg seems to have the easiest time to hold this off) | ||
|
Nyast
Belgium554 Posts
| ||
|
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
|
tuestresfat
2555 Posts
| ||
|
koveras
163 Posts
| ||
|
Strykerz
United States85 Posts
Terran > Bunker Zerg > spines/ling concave Protoss > Who has better micro Seems like a viable strat to try to up your ladder positioning, but who cares what your rank is if you don't understand the game outside of your one all-in. Still worth using if you're frusterated at losing a bunch of 40 min macro games. | ||
| ||
