• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:16
CEST 01:16
KST 08:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)0Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer8Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Echoes of Revolution and Separation UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32844 users

[H][D] Terran and long distance maps - Page 6

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Lurk
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany359 Posts
March 25 2011 13:09 GMT
#101
On March 25 2011 21:53 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 21:39 infinity21 wrote:
I think you need to get combat shield first vs 4 gate instead of stim if you are FEing now. Stim kills the durability of your army anyways so it's not as effective until medivacs come in play. I suppose the biggest downside of that is dealing with VR which is a lot easier with stim.


If you have 3-4 bunkers (which are absolutely needed to hold off 4 gate) don't you think stim is by far the better choice?


If it's a stalker heavy 4gate, mass bunkering is not gonna help you much. Stalkers have the same range as marines in bunkers so he can focus fire your bunkers one by one while avoiding the rest.
Silent331
Profile Joined June 2010
United States356 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 13:19:44
March 25 2011 13:18 GMT
#102
On March 24 2011 03:18 iloveroo wrote:
Q: You won the GSL January 2011. But you were eliminated from Code S by losing two fast games to Julyzerg. What do you think about the current state of Code S? Are you confident you will be able to do well in future GSLs?

With longer starting distances on the new GSL maps, it has become very bad for Terran, I think it’s pretty obvious when all the Terrans were eliminated from GSL. If Terran gets nerfed again, I think it will be hard to produce good results. I’ve even considered changing races for the next tournament, but I’m not sure about what I’ll do yet


replace the terrans in bold with zerg and its all been hear'd before

On March 24 2011 03:24 NATO wrote:
the less opportunity they have to be aggressive, so they have to expand. However, the other races can do either


How do are the zerg shoes treatin ya?
A zerg won GSL 1 when this exact thing was said about zerg. Terrans will have to adapt
They cant beat you, They only hope you beat yourself.
goiflin
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1218 Posts
March 25 2011 13:28 GMT
#103
Veto the long maps, then. They only added one (two if you include SP, which terrans did perfectly fine on).

Or figure out a new way to play, terran is very robust and alot of units/abilities haven't seen much use as of yet. You guys have only used half of your tools, start experimenting with the other half!
Albrithe
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada187 Posts
March 25 2011 13:30 GMT
#104
I think that hellions need to be used more extensively by every Terran player to keep constantly aggression and scouting versus all races. They might not always be facing light units, but that splash damage can be pretty potent regardless of the units it's being used on (with, I'd say, the exception of immortals and roaches). So long as you are careful with your positioning, don't get into sticky situations or over-commit, then I think people will find it to be a strong way to get tech/expand advantages.
"You don't need a condom... to get up on 'dem..." -Zach Weiner
AcrossFiveJulys
Profile Blog Joined September 2005
United States3612 Posts
March 25 2011 13:39 GMT
#105
On March 25 2011 22:09 Lurk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 21:53 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
On March 25 2011 21:39 infinity21 wrote:
I think you need to get combat shield first vs 4 gate instead of stim if you are FEing now. Stim kills the durability of your army anyways so it's not as effective until medivacs come in play. I suppose the biggest downside of that is dealing with VR which is a lot easier with stim.


If you have 3-4 bunkers (which are absolutely needed to hold off 4 gate) don't you think stim is by far the better choice?


If it's a stalker heavy 4gate, mass bunkering is not gonna help you much. Stalkers have the same range as marines in bunkers so he can focus fire your bunkers one by one while avoiding the rest.


Well if you don't make bunkers you have no chance of surviving off 1 rax FE, so I don't get your point.
xZiGGY
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom801 Posts
March 25 2011 13:44 GMT
#106
people have only been playing on long maps for a relatively short period of time, heres hoping some more drastic or awesome strategies come from it ;p
Meh.
Lurk
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany359 Posts
March 25 2011 13:48 GMT
#107
On March 25 2011 22:39 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 22:09 Lurk wrote:
On March 25 2011 21:53 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
On March 25 2011 21:39 infinity21 wrote:
I think you need to get combat shield first vs 4 gate instead of stim if you are FEing now. Stim kills the durability of your army anyways so it's not as effective until medivacs come in play. I suppose the biggest downside of that is dealing with VR which is a lot easier with stim.


If you have 3-4 bunkers (which are absolutely needed to hold off 4 gate) don't you think stim is by far the better choice?


If it's a stalker heavy 4gate, mass bunkering is not gonna help you much. Stalkers have the same range as marines in bunkers so he can focus fire your bunkers one by one while avoiding the rest.


Well if you don't make bunkers you have no chance of surviving off 1 rax FE, so I don't get your point.


My point was the while you need 1-2 bunkers, you can't rely entirely on them - you'll need "free" marines too - which benefit greatly from combat shields.
turdburgler
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
England6749 Posts
March 25 2011 13:50 GMT
#108
On March 25 2011 06:43 infinity21 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 06:40 Xirroh wrote:
Toss defiantly seem very strong right now on all maps. However I do think Terran has the ability to adapt. They have so many units / abilities --> options that are underused right now.

Muta Harass is tough, but what about a Raven and PDD over the turrets? With the time upgrade a PDD lasts equal to the time it takes for a raven to gather 100 energy so it can be maintained indefinitely. At only 2 supply even one raven per base would only be a 6-8 supply cost and would shut down muta harass pretty hard.

Big maps extend the game. Terran has so many upgrades, they need to start exploiting this in the longer games.

PDD only stops 20 muta shots or something. It really doesn't make a difference vs 15-30 mutas since they can ignore turrets after a certain point. If anything, seeker missile is scarier for zerg.



imagine it the other way around 20 mutas vs 18 mutes and a raven with a pdd

who wins

just because ravens arent free wins doesnt mean pdd isnt absurdly strong.

i think the adjust to bigger distances to push for terran will just have to leave a few thors at home, and either wait for the zerg to fuck up, or take scvs on the push and build turrets as you siege crawl. either that or agressively expand forwards in the early game after taking map control with helions, and build your production half way up the map
goiflin
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1218 Posts
March 25 2011 13:53 GMT
#109
On March 25 2011 22:50 turdburgler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 06:43 infinity21 wrote:
On March 25 2011 06:40 Xirroh wrote:
Toss defiantly seem very strong right now on all maps. However I do think Terran has the ability to adapt. They have so many units / abilities --> options that are underused right now.

Muta Harass is tough, but what about a Raven and PDD over the turrets? With the time upgrade a PDD lasts equal to the time it takes for a raven to gather 100 energy so it can be maintained indefinitely. At only 2 supply even one raven per base would only be a 6-8 supply cost and would shut down muta harass pretty hard.

Big maps extend the game. Terran has so many upgrades, they need to start exploiting this in the longer games.

PDD only stops 20 muta shots or something. It really doesn't make a difference vs 15-30 mutas since they can ignore turrets after a certain point. If anything, seeker missile is scarier for zerg.



imagine it the other way around 20 mutas vs 18 mutes and a raven with a pdd

who wins

just because ravens arent free wins doesnt mean pdd isnt absurdly strong.

i think the adjust to bigger distances to push for terran will just have to leave a few thors at home, and either wait for the zerg to fuck up, or take scvs on the push and build turrets as you siege crawl. either that or agressively expand forwards in the early game after taking map control with helions, and build your production half way up the map


Open with ebay into planetary in your opponents natural!

Now that's agressively expanding.

But yeah, forcing the zerg to expand away from you while you seige/turret push towards him, taking expansions along the way, has alot of potential, I think, especially given the strength of the PF.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 13:55:17
March 25 2011 13:53 GMT
#110
Terran has slow units but the speed the other races have is not a given fact and maybe terran can combat it to make it even on long maps
Zerg units are not incredibly fast by themselves, they need creep wich is alot of work to spread and wich can be killed by the terran player
Toss units depend on pylons for their mobility and pylons can be scouted and killed, taking away alot of the mobility toss has
Another thing terran units have to make up for their slower speed is their bigger range
this mostly goes for anti air like viking and thor, maybe tanks
So uh ya, larger maps are not in terrans favour it seems though i dont think its that bad

Stimming your way across the map as someone said jokingly in a post earlier is not such a terrible bad idea btw lol
stimming while out of combat just to get to the action faster (or get away from it) is actually viable i think though its annoying that the medics fall behind
rmAmnesiac
Profile Joined January 2011
United Kingdom185 Posts
March 25 2011 13:57 GMT
#111
On March 25 2011 22:50 turdburgler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 06:43 infinity21 wrote:
On March 25 2011 06:40 Xirroh wrote:
Toss defiantly seem very strong right now on all maps. However I do think Terran has the ability to adapt. They have so many units / abilities --> options that are underused right now.

Muta Harass is tough, but what about a Raven and PDD over the turrets? With the time upgrade a PDD lasts equal to the time it takes for a raven to gather 100 energy so it can be maintained indefinitely. At only 2 supply even one raven per base would only be a 6-8 supply cost and would shut down muta harass pretty hard.

Big maps extend the game. Terran has so many upgrades, they need to start exploiting this in the longer games.

PDD only stops 20 muta shots or something. It really doesn't make a difference vs 15-30 mutas since they can ignore turrets after a certain point. If anything, seeker missile is scarier for zerg.



imagine it the other way around 20 mutas vs 18 mutes and a raven with a pdd

who wins

just because ravens arent free wins doesnt mean pdd isnt absurdly strong.

i think the adjust to bigger distances to push for terran will just have to leave a few thors at home, and either wait for the zerg to fuck up, or take scvs on the push and build turrets as you siege crawl. either that or agressively expand forwards in the early game after taking map control with helions, and build your production half way up the map


so the mutas fly away and harrass somewhere without a pdd. i don't really get the point.
infinity21 *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada6683 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 14:05:22
March 25 2011 13:57 GMT
#112
On March 25 2011 22:39 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 22:09 Lurk wrote:
On March 25 2011 21:53 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
On March 25 2011 21:39 infinity21 wrote:
I think you need to get combat shield first vs 4 gate instead of stim if you are FEing now. Stim kills the durability of your army anyways so it's not as effective until medivacs come in play. I suppose the biggest downside of that is dealing with VR which is a lot easier with stim.


If you have 3-4 bunkers (which are absolutely needed to hold off 4 gate) don't you think stim is by far the better choice?


If it's a stalker heavy 4gate, mass bunkering is not gonna help you much. Stalkers have the same range as marines in bunkers so he can focus fire your bunkers one by one while avoiding the rest.


Well if you don't make bunkers you have no chance of surviving off 1 rax FE, so I don't get your point.

I prefer stim too but combat shield comes 30 seconds faster so...
I think it depends on P's unit composition too. If it's a 1 gas 4 gate (zeal/stalker) then I think stim is def. better but if it's 2 gas 4 gate (more sentries) then P will be picking off a few bunkers so I think combat shield is a little more useful (relatively speaking compared to 1 gas; idk if it's better than stim but at least i'll have shield when they attack for sure lol)
Official Entusman #21
Lurk
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany359 Posts
March 25 2011 14:00 GMT
#113
On March 25 2011 22:50 turdburgler wrote:imagine it the other way around 20 mutas vs 18 mutes and a raven with a pdd

who wins

just because ravens arent free wins doesnt mean pdd isnt absurdly strong.

i think the adjust to bigger distances to push for terran will just have to leave a few thors at home, and either wait for the zerg to fuck up, or take scvs on the push and build turrets as you siege crawl. either that or agressively expand forwards in the early game after taking map control with helions, and build your production half way up the map


Even if a terran could build mutas, i'd bet my money on the 20 mutas winning vs a pdd and 18 mutas. The pdd absorbs less damage than the 2 additional mutas have hitpoints.

And to the second part: You can't just leave 2-3 thors at every expansion and still expect to have any army left to push the zerg.
branflakes14
Profile Joined July 2010
2082 Posts
March 25 2011 14:03 GMT
#114
Maybe he just needs to... oh, I don't know, maybe figure out how to play Terran on larger maps? Just a thought.
infinity21 *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada6683 Posts
March 25 2011 14:04 GMT
#115
On March 25 2011 22:50 turdburgler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2011 06:43 infinity21 wrote:
On March 25 2011 06:40 Xirroh wrote:
Toss defiantly seem very strong right now on all maps. However I do think Terran has the ability to adapt. They have so many units / abilities --> options that are underused right now.

Muta Harass is tough, but what about a Raven and PDD over the turrets? With the time upgrade a PDD lasts equal to the time it takes for a raven to gather 100 energy so it can be maintained indefinitely. At only 2 supply even one raven per base would only be a 6-8 supply cost and would shut down muta harass pretty hard.

Big maps extend the game. Terran has so many upgrades, they need to start exploiting this in the longer games.

PDD only stops 20 muta shots or something. It really doesn't make a difference vs 15-30 mutas since they can ignore turrets after a certain point. If anything, seeker missile is scarier for zerg.



imagine it the other way around 20 mutas vs 18 mutes and a raven with a pdd

who wins

just because ravens arent free wins doesnt mean pdd isnt absurdly strong.

i think the adjust to bigger distances to push for terran will just have to leave a few thors at home, and either wait for the zerg to fuck up, or take scvs on the push and build turrets as you siege crawl. either that or agressively expand forwards in the early game after taking map control with helions, and build your production half way up the map

Except Terran won't have 18 mutas ready to fight back. The whole point of PDD is to turn the tide of a close battle into your favour. If there's 20 mutas somewhere in my base and my turrets are spread out, then having to spread out hundreds of gas to stop 1 volley from the mutas isn't going to make that big of a difference.

Your suggestions are also absurd. Leaving a "few" thors at home means leaving behind 18-24 supply worth of units at your expansions which is ridiculous. I'd rather build mass turrets and if you want to be super safe then have 1 raven with seeker missile patrolling your bases. Building your production in the middle of the map means you auto-lose once you lose a single battle. I'd rather not put myself in a situation where 1 small mistake can lose me the game instantly. Expanding aggressively is extremely risky because of mutas and you're leaving yourself to chance.
Official Entusman #21
Axeinst
Profile Joined March 2011
Belize281 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 14:11:38
March 25 2011 14:10 GMT
#116
On March 25 2011 18:25 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Terran wants to do a 1 rax expand, which imo is really the only viable non-cheese build againt'

Any proof?

There is no reason to believe that 2rax expand isnt as viable, i would say 1rax expand is more dangerous actually.

In this game fast expanding is not really useful anyway, like it was in Brood war.
Albrithe
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada187 Posts
March 25 2011 14:42 GMT
#117
On March 25 2011 23:10 Axeinst wrote:
In this game fast expanding is not really useful anyway, like it was in Brood war.

I don't even know what to say to this... ._.
I vehemently disagree with this opinion. In my experience, if I do early aggression and the fast expanding player defends my push, I will lose within the next 10 minutes.
"You don't need a condom... to get up on 'dem..." -Zach Weiner
Ballpit
Profile Joined March 2011
3 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 15:23:16
March 25 2011 15:21 GMT
#118
I think it would be real exciting if Blizz made an upgrade for the medivac/to the starport/or just anyway to get this bad boy into the lategame:

[image loading]

I Don't know if it would really directly solve Terran immobility issues, but more robust dropships might keep Z and P from freely leaving their base to counterattack. The constant threat of hard to stop drops might help T with some map control or map presence. Also, and this is my brightest idea for the day: safely transporting units to the frontlines in influencial numbers a bit faster and a bit safer.

I am allowed to dream am I not?
Deltablazy
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada580 Posts
March 25 2011 15:30 GMT
#119
Yes you are.

Sadly, that thing will never appear in multiplayer. Which is too, too bad.
lvl1ninja
Profile Joined October 2010
11 Posts
March 25 2011 15:34 GMT
#120
I wish they had those dropships! Lol everytime I play Risk
"IF you can wake up, you should, because someday you won't be able to"
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 44m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft385
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 439
Aegong 82
yabsab 20
HiyA 10
League of Legends
Trikslyr44
Counter-Strike
Fnx 951
Stewie2K829
Super Smash Bros
PPMD97
Other Games
shahzam893
C9.Mang0731
summit1g185
Maynarde125
Sick79
Mew2King75
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick663
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH163
• davetesta61
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21633
Other Games
• imaqtpie1277
• Scarra901
• Shiphtur346
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
44m
RSL Revival
10h 44m
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
WardiTV Qualifier
16h 44m
PiGosaur Monday
1d
RSL Revival
1d 10h
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
SC Evo League
4 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.