• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:32
CEST 10:32
KST 17:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)10Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rogue EWC 2025 Hype Video! Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025) Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 SOOP Starcraft Global #22 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 30969 users

Too many SCVs..... When do I stop making them?

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4198 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 05:20:36
December 07 2010 05:20 GMT
#1
I generally have this problem, believe it or not. When it comes to late-game, I still end up spamming SCV production, and will often get more than 100 by the end of the game. This hurts, because when I am maxed, half of it is from workers alone.....

2 very recent examples - this was for the most recent Day[9] Funday Monday, against a 1800 pt diamond and this was against a friend of mine. I generally have this problem in late-game situations..... I'd give you more replays, but I often delete them.....

I know that I want to stop somewhere between 60 and 80. I generally try to go by the "3 well saturated bases or 4 low saturated and stop" type approach, but I end up spamming scv production anyways.....

How do you (preferably higher level players) remember key points to stop production of workers? And actually act on it?

EDIT - thought I should add in - I also have this problem as Zerg. It sucks when I max out, and have a shitty army cause 120 food is stuck in workers.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
lyAsakura
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1414 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 05:25:06
December 07 2010 05:22 GMT
#2
I make SCVs when it looks like I don't have enough, and stop making SCVs when it looks like I have enough. Just drag a box over your entire mineral line and if theres more then one page then you have enough.

You don't actually need more then 60 workers, imo. You're never really going to have to have more then two fully mining bases in most games.
WeMade FOX would be a deadly SC2 team.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
December 07 2010 05:25 GMT
#3
When you realize you have too many workers, or its super-late game and income is no longer important and you want more supply room, you can always suicide workers into your opponent. They make great scouts too!
Who called in the fleet?
Azn_Christian
Profile Joined September 2010
United States153 Posts
December 07 2010 05:26 GMT
#4
use your scvs to repair your mech /medivacs. =D who knew medivacs could tank so well <3
drones. i stop after saturation like 24 /base. When i expo like the larva popl before hatch finishs, then i start drone production for that expo.
Life appears to me too short to be spent in nursing animosity or registering wrongs." - Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre
Parra
Profile Joined September 2010
United States152 Posts
December 07 2010 05:28 GMT
#5
60-65 is usually more than enough where you can even add several into your army comp to handle the repairs on any mechanical or soak a little damage.

I notice I usually slow on worker creation when i finally saturate my third (obviously if you didn't lose any Scv's on the way)
madcow305
Profile Joined January 2010
United States152 Posts
December 07 2010 05:31 GMT
#6
On December 07 2010 14:22 whitelynx wrote:
I make SCVs when it looks like I don't have enough, and stop making SCVs when it looks like I have enough. Just drag a box over your entire mineral line and if theres more then one page then you have enough.


False. Please don't spread misinformation. You have enough SCVs way before you go over one page.

To OP:

2 SCVs per mineral node/chunk is almost full saturation, something like 80 or 90%. 3 SCVs is full saturation for all normal bases. Generally, most pros go for 2 SCV's per node.

If your Command Center is not centered on the mineral line, then obviously you'll need more SCVs to reach full saturation on nodes that are farther away.

Generally, each base on Blizzard maps have 8 mineral nodes, meaning 16 SCV's per mineral line is the number to go for.

The exception to this rule is when you're planning on Manyarding, which is transferring workers from your first base to an expansion. In this case, you can go further than the 16 SCVs, because you're planning on moving a bunch to a new base later.

Another exception is when you're going for your 4th base. Usually, you won't get your 4th up to full saturation when your main starts being mined out. Sometimes, if you've been stuck on 2 bases for a while, even your third won't be fully saturated. What you do then is build some new workers at your 3rd/4th, and transfer SCVs from your main as mineral nodes start disappearing.

Additional information, as well as where I got my 2 SCV/mineral node information, can be found on Liquipedia.
pat965
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada274 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 05:39:26
December 07 2010 05:33 GMT
#7
To clarify, the OP knows roughly how many workers he should have, but is asking for cues he can look for in order to know when he should stop making SCV's.

(Cues besides manually looking at each mineral line)

I personally have no good answer to the question, except that the "cue" is likely to change depending on the flow of the game, which indeed brings us back to the "looking at your mineral line" suggestions, which are obvious. So, you're boned, I think.

Hopefully, a better player has an answer.
hi
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4198 Posts
December 07 2010 05:43 GMT
#8
Trust me, if I'm playing seriously, I'll even make sure that the closest mineral patches get doubled up first during my opening to give me those extra minerals..... I'm not a terrible player..... I'm not good, but I'm not terrible.....

Hell, my very first post on this site was pretty much the exact opposite - I had the impression that 1 scv per patch was ideal (in BW), but then again, back then I never expanded until I ran out of minerals anyways.....

I just keep fucking up something that I know I should be doing, and I'm asking what others do, in case there are some tricks I'm missing.
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
lyAsakura
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1414 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 05:48:45
December 07 2010 05:46 GMT
#9
On December 07 2010 14:31 madcow305 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 14:22 whitelynx wrote:
I make SCVs when it looks like I don't have enough, and stop making SCVs when it looks like I have enough. Just drag a box over your entire mineral line and if theres more then one page then you have enough.


False. Please don't spread misinformation. You have enough SCVs way before you go over one page.

To OP:

2 SCVs per mineral node/chunk is almost full saturation, something like 80 or 90%. 3 SCVs is full saturation for all normal bases. Generally, most pros go for 2 SCV's per node.

If your Command Center is not centered on the mineral line, then obviously you'll need more SCVs to reach full saturation on nodes that are farther away.

Generally, each base on Blizzard maps have 8 mineral nodes, meaning 16 SCV's per mineral line is the number to go for.

The exception to this rule is when you're planning on Manyarding, which is transferring workers from your first base to an expansion. In this case, you can go further than the 16 SCVs, because you're planning on moving a bunch to a new base later.

Another exception is when you're going for your 4th base. Usually, you won't get your 4th up to full saturation when your main starts being mined out. Sometimes, if you've been stuck on 2 bases for a while, even your third won't be fully saturated. What you do then is build some new workers at your 3rd/4th, and transfer SCVs from your main as mineral nodes start disappearing.

Additional information, as well as where I got my 2 SCV/mineral node information, can be found on Liquipedia.


16 SCV is 75% saturation, not enough to make you stop making SCVs, and no pro ever goes for 2 workers per node, because it is stupid and you will never know when you are going to lose some and when you will need to maynard to a new base. Why would a command center ever not be centered? You are not zerg or protoss, you can lift.

If you simply make the bare minimum amount of SCVs, then trust me, you will not do good in a game.
WeMade FOX would be a deadly SC2 team.
Welmu
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Finland3295 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 05:50:10
December 07 2010 05:49 GMT
#10
When you have ~80SCVs I would stop production. Dunno though, if Terran needs even that much, because of mules =/
Progamertwitter.com/welmu1 | twitch.com/Welmu1
zak
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)1009 Posts
December 07 2010 05:52 GMT
#11
bro 30 workers per base. no more.if you keep spamming scvs you can get caught with your pants down just like a zerg who is spamming drones. Not as bad but you could be diverting those minerals into marines in a critical battle.
You know how to gain a victory, but not use it - maharbal
kevmo
Profile Joined September 2010
United States38 Posts
December 07 2010 06:02 GMT
#12
I find cues in my build through replays. I'll look at my worker count and say to myself "I should have stopped here" and note the situation. For me, it's shortly after I take my third, right around when my main gets mined out. At that point I'll have enough to mine 3 bases, and I take a fourth as my main fully mines out.
xJaCEx
Profile Joined August 2010
155 Posts
December 07 2010 06:05 GMT
#13
I have to say as a terran player I have never had the problem of too many scv/bases in a game but if I did I would just sac some when I was getting close to max food. Depending on how much minerals you have saved up you might not even need any for the rest of the game. Imo best way to sac them would be to raid an opponents expo with them cause they will have to pull forces just to stop your scvs lol...
First blood is as good as anything.
Arckan
Profile Joined September 2010
243 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 06:14:56
December 07 2010 06:14 GMT
#14
On December 07 2010 14:46 whitelynx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 14:31 madcow305 wrote:
On December 07 2010 14:22 whitelynx wrote:
I make SCVs when it looks like I don't have enough, and stop making SCVs when it looks like I have enough. Just drag a box over your entire mineral line and if theres more then one page then you have enough.


False. Please don't spread misinformation. You have enough SCVs way before you go over one page.

To OP:

2 SCVs per mineral node/chunk is almost full saturation, something like 80 or 90%. 3 SCVs is full saturation for all normal bases. Generally, most pros go for 2 SCV's per node.

If your Command Center is not centered on the mineral line, then obviously you'll need more SCVs to reach full saturation on nodes that are farther away.

Generally, each base on Blizzard maps have 8 mineral nodes, meaning 16 SCV's per mineral line is the number to go for.

The exception to this rule is when you're planning on Manyarding, which is transferring workers from your first base to an expansion. In this case, you can go further than the 16 SCVs, because you're planning on moving a bunch to a new base later.

Another exception is when you're going for your 4th base. Usually, you won't get your 4th up to full saturation when your main starts being mined out. Sometimes, if you've been stuck on 2 bases for a while, even your third won't be fully saturated. What you do then is build some new workers at your 3rd/4th, and transfer SCVs from your main as mineral nodes start disappearing.

Additional information, as well as where I got my 2 SCV/mineral node information, can be found on Liquipedia.


16 SCV is 75% saturation, not enough to make you stop making SCVs, and no pro ever goes for 2 workers per node, because it is stupid and you will never know when you are going to lose some and when you will need to maynard to a new base. Why would a command center ever not be centered? You are not zerg or protoss, you can lift.

If you simply make the bare minimum amount of SCVs, then trust me, you will not do good in a game.
I think you got carried away in trying to dismantle his post, he's referring to instances where there is not an equal distance to each mineral patch from the Command Center.
Tossup
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States208 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 08:58:35
December 07 2010 08:55 GMT
#15
You should look at the option of saccing the majority of your scv's later game because minerals that you do get can be transformed into an orbital command which gives you mules...which are each worth about 5-6 scv's. That's like another 3 core units for the price of 400 minerals that pay back with free energy regen.

That point however, varies between game to game. I would suggest maybe about 4 CC's would be the best time to completely stop scv production and use mules as the main source of income. If you think about it, by the time you get to about 3 bases, your main would be about mined out. Therefore, you don't need more than roughly 60 scv's for for mining. Also, given that your mules provide additional income, you even out at about 4 CC's if you start saccing your scv's and making more CC's.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4198 Posts
December 07 2010 08:57 GMT
#16
I've never actually experimented with the mass OC late-game strat that seems to be becoming more popular..... I might have to do that, but I don't think that'll stop my problem of building way too many workers before then..... Which is essentially a waste of resources.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
positron.
Profile Joined May 2010
634 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 09:05:07
December 07 2010 09:03 GMT
#17
70 workers max for any game. You make any more then you are hurting your army. If you have too much minerals then start spamming OC. You just have to learn this by feeling. I don't think there is a fast way to count all your workers during game.
Holgerius
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sweden16951 Posts
December 07 2010 09:03 GMT
#18
I also have this problem sometimes. It's so deeply programmed into my brain to spam SCVs all the time that I just can't stop. It's even worse when I try to play Zerg, last game I played I ended up with 118 drones and actually lost to the computer. XD
I believe in the almighty Grötslev! -- I am never serious and you should never believe a thing I say. Including the previous sentence.
Grack
Profile Joined October 2010
51 Posts
December 07 2010 09:17 GMT
#19
NTT: Never
Talack
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada2742 Posts
December 07 2010 09:19 GMT
#20
2 Workers per node is generally enough to have good production of units/tech options. Free minerals should be spent on extra SCVs. if you are planning to be moving out and expanding then start production of scvs when you have all your unit-producing buildings at work. Excess minerals beyond that should be applied to tech or upgrades.

To many scvs (even if you're working towards full saturation) can hurt your army alot more than you think. Having a strong economy isn't going to do anything if you're behind in supply when your opponent comes knocking on your door. Remember that those SCVS take up supply as well which in turn forces you to make more supply depots which is even less money spent on army.

Practice lots and try different combinations of worker/army ratios. And remember to make scvs "before" your expansion finishes so you can start work on getting those minerals back asap.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4198 Posts
December 07 2010 16:10 GMT
#21
Wow. Strategy forum strikes again.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
ZasZ.
Profile Joined May 2010
United States2911 Posts
December 07 2010 16:27 GMT
#22
It depends on a lot of factors, like people above have mentioned. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is that it depends on how many OC's you have. Some maps will allow you to take a third with an Orbital while some maps you'll need a PF there. You obviously need less SCV's if you have more Orbital Commands, and it frees up food/minerals for combat units.

Also in my experience as a Random player, Terran in general needs less workers than Protoss or Zerg because of Mules, which is fine because Terran has the slowest worker production of the three races (assuming a portion of Chrono Boosts go to Probes). IMO, it's not necessary to fully saturate (3 per patch) as Terran due to Mules, and the freed minerals/supply really helps Terran be the aggressive race I think its meant to be.
bobucles
Profile Joined November 2010
410 Posts
December 07 2010 16:55 GMT
#23
SCVs are actually fairly effective on the front lines. With repair they can hold off Zealots and Zerglings in the early early stages of the game, when your marine count may be dangerously low. In the mid game they can build forward Missile turrets, bunkers, sensor towers, and barrack walls, providing map dominance especially against muta/phoenix harass. In the mid to late game they provide critical repair services for Terran mech. This can be very important to keep a banshee harrass strong or to keep your attrition rates down.

With mules at home, losing minerals isn't a problem. It's hard to think you could have too many SCVs.
Sub4
Profile Joined November 2010
Brazil3 Posts
December 07 2010 17:35 GMT
#24
It seems your problem with too many SCVs is supply and not minerals.

So make them part of your army composition, not only it will free your supply but it will waste enemy volleys.

Even if its not against siege tanks or collossus, your oponent will hardly be able to 'perfect micro' (not waste any volleys) if you have a good position on those SCVs.

Also, and most importantly, it takes a 'place' (in terms of engage positioning) in your army that doesnt conflit with other units - since even the beefy terran units, like marauders, kite with considerable range (as opposed to zerg or protoss that would have their workers conflicting with other melee units during the engage)

Thats why I believe army-composition-wise the SCV fits perfectly as a military unit, to soak up damage, repair and help with the kiting, preventing other melee to engage your kiting units. Also, if any of them lives, you can always make a random bunker in the middle of the push, if you are about to be forced to a bad position.
Does it make sense?
captainwaffles
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States1050 Posts
December 07 2010 17:39 GMT
#25
After your Third CC has been up for a little bit, unless you've been losing them for whatever reason.
https://x.com/CaptainWaffless
Dusken
Profile Joined April 2010
United States12 Posts
December 07 2010 17:58 GMT
#26
Hi
If you find yourself hitting 200/200 food consistently with 100-120 scv's, congratulations you are an excellent player. Stopping worker production is really quite unusual if you are both harassing mineral lines. However you may still have games where you have this problem so:
As far as what I look for when trying to transition out of worker production there are a couple major things.
Firstly, if I ever hit 200 food I stop making workers. (already maxed no point)
Secondly, when I transition onto a fourth base if i haven't taken many scv casualties. (assuming roughly 28-30 workers per base allows me to comfortably pull a majority from the main and some from each expansion. (~85-90 workers total)
Finally, if I don't feel comfortable taking another base and feel confident in my current production to end the game quickly. (ie. losing really hard, or destroying) (if losing I usually just try and macro like a fiend using the cut scv money and try to make something happen [slow loss is worse than fast loss imo])

Outside of physically boxing and counting your scvs, there really is no way to accurately gauge unless you expand at consistent markers.

Ignore the 16 workers advice as they clearly misunderstand the reason for over-saturation. Its not to squeeze out more minerals but to minimize the effects of worker harass and also to speed getting other bases up. Going from 24 workers on minerals to 16 is a minor income loss but 16 to 8 is a full half.

If you still find yourself having issues with too many scvs you could always take some riskier bases. Nothing helps cut down your scv count than losing a base .



That wasnt... zergling tight.
Panoptic
Profile Joined September 2009
United Kingdom515 Posts
December 07 2010 18:00 GMT
#27
On December 08 2010 02:39 captainwaffles wrote:
After your Third CC has been up for a little bit, unless you've been losing them for whatever reason.


Even though timings for 3rds differ depending on the game, I use this as a queue also. Once my third has been up for a short while, I'll give it some passing assessment and then stop if I deem necessary.
"Crom laughs at your four winds!"
nalgene
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada2153 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 18:06:00
December 07 2010 18:05 GMT
#28
3x8 on blue minerals and 3x2 on gas = 30 in total
3x6 on gold minerals and 3x2 on gas = 24 in total

losing 10 to banshees while you had 10 extra won't hurt as much as having only just enough while you go from 20 to 10
extra to expansions when you get them
extras could be later used in an attack with auto repair on
Year 2500 Greater Israel ( Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen )
squintz
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada217 Posts
December 07 2010 18:11 GMT
#29
Never, just send the extra ones you have to attack with your main army. That's what the coolkids are doing in GSL.
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
December 07 2010 18:32 GMT
#30
On December 07 2010 14:31 madcow305 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 14:22 whitelynx wrote:
I make SCVs when it looks like I don't have enough, and stop making SCVs when it looks like I have enough. Just drag a box over your entire mineral line and if theres more then one page then you have enough.


False. Please don't spread misinformation. You have enough SCVs way before you go over one page.

To OP:

2 SCVs per mineral node/chunk is almost full saturation, something like 80 or 90%. 3 SCVs is full saturation for all normal bases. Generally, most pros go for 2 SCV's per node.

If your Command Center is not centered on the mineral line, then obviously you'll need more SCVs to reach full saturation on nodes that are farther away.

Generally, each base on Blizzard maps have 8 mineral nodes, meaning 16 SCV's per mineral line is the number to go for.

The exception to this rule is when you're planning on Manyarding, which is transferring workers from your first base to an expansion. In this case, you can go further than the 16 SCVs, because you're planning on moving a bunch to a new base later.

Another exception is when you're going for your 4th base. Usually, you won't get your 4th up to full saturation when your main starts being mined out. Sometimes, if you've been stuck on 2 bases for a while, even your third won't be fully saturated. What you do then is build some new workers at your 3rd/4th, and transfer SCVs from your main as mineral nodes start disappearing.

Additional information, as well as where I got my 2 SCV/mineral node information, can be found on Liquipedia.


Don't listen to this. 2 workers per node is no where near saturation and your income will fall behind fast. 2 workers per node is OPTIMAL mining efficiency as the rate of increase after 2workers/node decreases, but you really want 3 workers per node. After that, extra workers aren't mining minerals faster.

60 workers is probably pretty optimal, 48 on minerals, 12 on gas, two mining bases. If you have 3 mining bases, you can stretch those 60 workers across all three (20 per) and gain a pretty big increase in economy without making more workers (except to fill gas for your 3rd). It's very rare that you have three expansions in one game without one being depleted.
the UMP says YER OUT
ppshchik
Profile Joined September 2010
United States862 Posts
December 07 2010 18:54 GMT
#31
I have problem with this as well when i play terran or protoss in Starcraft 1...

I mean 2 pernode rule is efficient, but sometimes you just want to produce more than that to transfer to your third base.

I always wonder should i keep pumping excessive workers to transfer to my 4th? Or my main will be mined out by the time I secure my 4th?
Legends never die... they end up working in McDonalds.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 28m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
TY 368
Zeus 156
JulyZerg 115
Killer 90
Yoon 89
Leta 81
NaDa 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
sSak 9
Movie 9
[ Show more ]
Sharp 8
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Fuzer 256
XcaliburYe237
League of Legends
JimRising 504
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K955
shoxiejesuss519
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor159
Trikslyr43
Other Games
C9.Mang0969
ceh9473
Hui .115
SortOf60
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick781
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH341
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV305
League of Legends
• Stunt757
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 28m
RSL Revival
1h 28m
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
WardiTV Invitational
3h 28m
ByuN vs Reynor
Clem vs MaxPax
OSC
3h 58m
Replay Cast
15h 28m
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 6h
SOOP
2 days
Cure vs Zoun
SC Evo League
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
[ Show More ]
SOOP Global
2 days
Future vs MaNa
Harstem vs Cham
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Sziky vs JDConan
Cross vs MadiNho
Hawk vs Bonyth
Circuito Brasileiro de…
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
UltrA vs TBD
Dewalt vs TBD
Replay Cast
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.