• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:23
CEST 22:23
KST 05:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double1Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2313Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon105
StarCraft 2
General
Recent patches and the Future StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026?
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Grand Finals ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Bot on ladder [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8513 users

[D/H] The end of Supply Depots? - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 24 Next All
TheRunawayFound
Profile Joined March 2009
64 Posts
December 02 2010 20:11 GMT
#141
You need scvs to build barracks, factorys, etc etc.
goiflin
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1218 Posts
December 02 2010 20:20 GMT
#142
On December 03 2010 05:11 TheRunawayFound wrote:
You need scvs to build barracks, factorys, etc etc.


Don't take it at face value, the build is about balancing your scv/depot count out with more orbitals. It doesn't get rid of supply depots, nor does it get rid of SCV's. The concept here is raising a 200/200 army that will be worth more than another player's 200/200 army.

I don't think it'll work too well, for reasons I've already stated (lack of room on the map, serious mineral consumption that will put a dent in the rate of growth for your army, etc.), but you never know.

If this DOES work, however, I'm not sure how blizzard will deal with this, since they can't really make the mule take supply, and putting a cooldown on the sucker wouldn't really alleviate this (Unless it was such a long CD that you end up generating more energy than you use putting down the mules whenever the CD ends).
XXXSmOke
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
United States1333 Posts
December 02 2010 20:29 GMT
#143
base space will severly hurt this style. How are you going to stop muta harass when you have 5 OC's that you have to walk around. Not to mention this would tkae forever to really get setup with a ton of OC's.

Now through this I have generated the happy medium.

Could a 2 base with 3 OC be beneficial to a T??

Or what about a 15 CC that stays in your base instead of expanding and then you have two OC's early to spring out a 1 base timing attack?

interesting.
Emperor? Boxer disapproves. He's building bunkers at your mom's house even as you're reading this.
30to1
Profile Joined November 2010
105 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 21:08:02
December 02 2010 20:57 GMT
#144
I'm working right now - so I can't put together a big post.

I just wanted to point out a couple minor points - yes - I am a plat toss player. That's why I posted this here first - because I don't play terran and I'm not a top tier player - so I need your help to figure out how to maximally abuse this.

The key here is to understand that the OC is fundamentally different from any other structure in SC. Because of oversaturation the OC ITSELF as a building essentially produces 180m/minute as well as supply. Every other race relies on workers to generate income, OC/MULE because of OVERSATURATION is really exceptional - in that really the OC itself provides GUARANTEED income regardless of saturation - and without investment in workers.

I also wholeheartedly agree with the people saying that this can be used mostly as a general improvement to standard play going into mid game. At the very least.

I also think this can be viable when abused more extremely. But I need to figure out builds and test them in games.

META NOTE: To this point, terran is the most aggressive race. It's funny because their defensive capabilities are unmatched and with mules they should be theoretically able surpass zerg macro. Really abusing this stuff would require a very different playstyle for terran, but I think it can produce a very abusive terran game. Anyway, I'm really glad this has generated 8 pages of responses in 12 hours. If nobody else can put together some build options / replays I will do so tonight or tomorrow when I have time.

EDIT: I'm absolutely sure that blizzard will nerf mules (maybe because of this thread). In the mean time, the goal here is to figure out how to abuse the shit out of them before that happens.

EDIT 2: bottom line - a two basing terran who is farming OCs can do something that no other race can do - and that this fact hasn't been properly abused yet is sort of shocking.

GreEny K
Profile Joined February 2008
Germany7312 Posts
December 02 2010 21:03 GMT
#145
Don't really know what to say... but I think this is a really bad idea. I don't really know how you came up with it or if you tested it, but I don't see any way of making this work. Just seems too wastefull, all of those cc's would probably make you really weak against ANY early pressure situation.
Why would you ever choose failure, when success is an option.
freetgy
Profile Joined November 2010
1720 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 21:08:29
December 02 2010 21:07 GMT
#146
i don't know if this has any relevance on the calculation, but only 1 Mule can mine on each mineral patch (same like Workes block other workers)

idk. how this limits the mining rate overall on 1 or 2 bases.
30to1
Profile Joined November 2010
105 Posts
December 02 2010 21:14 GMT
#147
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=173703

So this is a sort of cross thread - but there are two REPLAYS at high level diamond based off of 4 cc.

So its viable :D

dtz
Profile Joined September 2010
5834 Posts
December 02 2010 21:24 GMT
#148
this has amazing potential imo. at least the concept of it is very sound.

Sure it needs tweaking but sooner or later someone will figure out a good timing to start massing cc to be able to get rid of scv and having pure 200/200 army as well as having multiple mules and scans and supply drops.

yellowmoe
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada59 Posts
December 02 2010 21:31 GMT
#149
I am a zerg user, and yet I am so happy about this revelation. I wonder why. :D:D
Zaixer
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden82 Posts
December 02 2010 21:39 GMT
#150
Where would you find space for the extra CCs? From what I can remember lifted of OCs cannot drop mules.
tetramaster
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada253 Posts
December 02 2010 21:42 GMT
#151
Extra CCs would definitely be map dependent.

Lifted OCs DO gain energy though, so just make the CCs into OCs, drop the mules and then lift them, then land them when you have enough energy for mules (assuming you have the APM to do so, but it would free up base space)
iEchoic
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1776 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 21:43:49
December 02 2010 21:42 GMT
#152
This theorycraft ignores the fact that RTSes have inflation. Spending 550 on an OC early in the game only to have it eventually pay off due to MULE spam is not efficient. If it costs you 550 and you make back 550 in 3 minutes, you haven't made it back. 550 is more valuable at 7:00 than at 10:00. You're also sacrificing map control by doing this (as someone who did not do this would have a bigger army). There's a whole host of reasons in RTS games that you do not want to invest large amounts of money into things upfront if it is not necessary.

Don't forget the increased building time for a CC as opposed to 1-2 supply depots. Now with worker mining time loss you're looking at ~600 resources per OC. That's going to take a long time to play off when you include the natural devaluation of resources as time goes on.
vileEchoic -- clanvile.com
fishinguy
Profile Joined November 2010
Russian Federation798 Posts
December 02 2010 21:52 GMT
#153
Some nice maps to use this idea would be Temple, Station (islands) and Sharkuras (blocked expo)
So you can get more patches to mule on. Ok this idea is extreme but maybe something similar to macro hatches could be discovered - like macro orbitals.
30to1
Profile Joined November 2010
105 Posts
December 02 2010 21:54 GMT
#154

Think of it as Farming OCs.

I'm going to put that in the first page. I want to coin the phrase :D
Chicane
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7875 Posts
December 02 2010 22:09 GMT
#155
I just can't picture this working early on due to powerful timing pushes completely destroying someone who is sitting in their base waiting for their 550 mineral (9 marine (subtracted 2 for the supply depot alternative)) orbital command to finish.

There might be a potential for command centers to be put up in the mid or late game which I have thought about before simply because being maxed would mean a lot more, but early game seems WAY too risky.
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
December 02 2010 22:11 GMT
#156
I didn´t read past page 5 or so, but I don´t think it was pointed out yet:

What kind of army can you raise with mass minerals/4 gas? I mean, it sure is great having oodles of money, but when you do have the oodles, you should build mass depots anyway(you cant physically build 18 CCs for 200 supply).
After that what will you build as army? Marines and Hellions are obvious, Marauders of course too, but what else?

At some point your gas will drop to zero while you still have oodles of minerals. Tanks, Banshees, Medivacs and especially Thor and BC are limited strongly by gas.
That kinda leaves Viking as far as you have gas with Marines/Hellions and maybe Marauders.

Marines are easily counterable by Bling/FG or Storm/Colossi(vikings sure help, but still) or Tanks and Hellions.
You can´t build a strat on "I have lots of money so I win" since Marines can be killed very costeffective. This is too vague of a concept to be realistically useful.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
eeniebear
Profile Joined February 2010
United States197 Posts
December 02 2010 22:16 GMT
#157
On December 02 2010 19:37 Nycaloth wrote:
Day[9] should make a funday monday about this...


this
illfate
Profile Joined February 2010
United States6 Posts
December 02 2010 22:38 GMT
#158
I think its funny how many people didn't even watch the replays to even really see anything about the build and how many units he had and that his base isnt unprotected. It starts out with the same build as every Terran is doing and the CC's are built during harassment, and Marines are being produced out of multiple rax's.
burninglegionx
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada22 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 22:42:41
December 02 2010 22:39 GMT
#159
with mass OCs how about this:

New Terran late game strategy:

scan on enemy base, and drop f***ton of mules on their mineral line and waste their minerals.
On your PC, the units seem to perform quite poorly. I think there might be something nearby the PC that is causing this problem for you. You may need a mirror to find out what it is. :D
Aui_2000
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada435 Posts
December 02 2010 22:48 GMT
#160
On December 03 2010 06:07 freetgy wrote:
i don't know if this has any relevance on the calculation, but only 1 Mule can mine on each mineral patch (same like Workes block other workers)

idk. how this limits the mining rate overall on 1 or 2 bases.


wrong. mules have worker ai meaning that they will go to unused mineral patches but more than 1 mule can mine from the same patch.
follow @aui_2000 // www.twitch.tv/aui_2000
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 24 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 351
JuggernautJason92
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 576
White-Ra 182
firebathero 75
910 45
Trap 23
NaDa 10
Counter-Strike
Fnx 760
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0164
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby9712
crisheroes1796
Liquid`Hasu1688
Trikslyr83
Other Games
summit1g5638
Liquid`RaSZi5420
Beastyqt827
shahzam520
B2W.Neo292
Pyrionflax139
KnowMe139
ArmadaUGS116
ZombieGrub100
IndyStarCraft 88
UpATreeSC60
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream403
Other Games
BasetradeTV191
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 32
• FirePhoenix13
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV378
League of Legends
• TFBlade1146
Other Games
• imaqtpie792
• Shiphtur297
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 37m
Afreeca Starleague
13h 37m
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
1d 3h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 14h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-27
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.