• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:50
CEST 15:50
KST 22:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN2The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL19Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)13Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN Karma, Domino Effect, and how it relates to SC2. Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group B EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
Practice Partners (Official) GG Lan Party Bulgaria (Live in about 3 hours) BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Battle.net is not working Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Monster Hunter Wilds Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18679 users

PvT way to deal with EMP - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 23 24 25 Next All
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 22:18:21
June 11 2010 22:17 GMT
#81
You could remove a whole buttload of GSs from play without having to target-fire the Sentries, and can still double-tap a spot with EMP to remove shield/energy from it if you have to. Its not like the Protoss is going to be able to bring up a second wave of GS between the time it takes you to launch two consecutive shots.

Isn't GS the reason you guys don't like building Marines, and then complain about how Void Rays are too hard to counter?
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 22:18 GMT
#82
On June 12 2010 07:08 CruelZeratul wrote:
What about cutting the energydrain to a maximum of 100 instead of all and remove the ability to reveal cloaked units (with turrets, OC's and even Ravens i wonder why they do this in the first place)?

EMP only removes 100 energy as it is right now.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
trucejl
Profile Joined May 2010
120 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 22:21:47
June 11 2010 22:20 GMT
#83
emp will eventually be changed in the future bc its just too strong right now. just look at the void ray nerf, it was basically scout ppl n ull be fine but they choose to nerf instead. with ghost even if u scout, its still hard to play around. i bet some of those same ppl that cried void ray left n right when told to scout n micro r saying micro against ghost which is 100x harder.

maybe something like have it come with remove shield but require research to have remove energy too
cive
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada370 Posts
June 11 2010 22:21 GMT
#84
Whats the point in discussing how the game change for us to deal EMP? Especially when toss r winning a lot at higher levels? we have such an advantage with extremely simple macro. Really well placed pylons or a warp prism and chrono boost is an extreme edge we have over T. sure they take out half our health and we cant do anything about it but we have more than enough tools to indirectly counter that. Hallucination is an awesome idea as well.
Play Terran
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 22:22:58
June 11 2010 22:21 GMT
#85
On June 12 2010 07:18 GodIsNotHere wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2010 07:08 CruelZeratul wrote:
What about cutting the energydrain to a maximum of 100 instead of all and remove the ability to reveal cloaked units (with turrets, OC's and even Ravens i wonder why they do this in the first place)?

EMP only removes 100 energy as it is right now.


No it doesn't. It removes all energy and 100 shields, which is like all of the shields of everything but Carriers, Collossi, buildings and Motherships.


"Creates an electromagnetic pulse that does 100 damage to shields and drains all energy from units in a targeted area. Cloaked units hit by EMP are revealed for a short time."
trucejl
Profile Joined May 2010
120 Posts
June 11 2010 22:25 GMT
#86
On June 12 2010 07:21 cive wrote:
Whats the point in discussing how the game change for us to deal EMP? Especially when toss r winning a lot at higher levels? we have such an advantage with extremely simple macro. Really well placed pylons or a warp prism and chrono boost is an extreme edge we have over T. sure they take out half our health and we cant do anything about it but we have more than enough tools to indirectly counter that. Hallucination is an awesome idea as well.


chrono boost should not be part of any balance discussion since terran has mule, supply drop n scan.

toss has warp in, terran has reactors for double production.

n a well executed drop ship is same as warp prism

hallucination is a decent idea but when u have both that n warp gate finished, they should have mult emp rdy
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 22:26 GMT
#87
The big problem with this GS idea is that people seem to think the entire Protoss army will only have 1 sentry which I'm pretty sure is not the case. Pretty sure this change would do one thing an that is if the Terran wanted to go Bio/Ghost he'd have to invest twice as much Gas/Minerals which would take a huge chunk out of the Marine/Marauder count even more so if he invested in Cloak to try an sneak in a clean EMP. I just wouldn't see a reason to get Ghost, it would be a lot more effective just to go Mech an from the 3-4 post this week crying over how overpowered that is I image thats not what people want to see happen.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
yarkO
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Canada810 Posts
June 11 2010 22:26 GMT
#88
My problem with EMP is that even if it doesn't hit my Templars, and just smashes my Chargelots + Stalker support, I still lose the battle, even with Storm going off (and being micro'd out of).

When you are prepared, there's no such thing as pressure.
trucejl
Profile Joined May 2010
120 Posts
June 11 2010 22:30 GMT
#89
for gs idea to work, it should be like remove gs n reduce energy dmg n shield dmg somewhat. it shouldnt outright block emp. maybe like 50 energy n 50 shield
whoopadeedoo
Profile Joined June 2010
United States427 Posts
June 11 2010 22:46 GMT
#90
This isn't a balance/OP issue (at least not for me). It's simply about giving Toss a workable solution to prevent/mitigate EMP. But I think I've said this already
whoopadeedoo
Profile Joined June 2010
United States427 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 22:58:27
June 11 2010 22:54 GMT
#91
On June 12 2010 07:26 GodIsNotHere wrote:
The big problem with this GS idea is that people seem to think the entire Protoss army will only have 1 sentry which I'm pretty sure is not the case. Pretty sure this change would do one thing an that is if the Terran wanted to go Bio/Ghost he'd have to invest twice as much Gas/Minerals which would take a huge chunk out of the Marine/Marauder count even more so if he invested in Cloak to try an sneak in a clean EMP. I just wouldn't see a reason to get Ghost, it would be a lot more effective just to go Mech an from the 3-4 post this week crying over how overpowered that is I image thats not what people want to see happen.


What this change will do is delay EMP's early advantage (before Toss has a chance to exploit macro advantage) and give Toss an option to deal with EMP instead of just having to take it without being able to do anything to stop it. The ability to shut down GS in an AoE radius is pretty f'ing powerful for MMG Terrans; -2 range damage adds up very fast for MM balls. I have no desire to unilaterally buff Toss (even if you do not believe me, I'm a Terran player too). FYI: Ghosts don't need cloak to fire off a clean EMP. The thing has a f'ing range of 10 (+2 radius).


On June 12 2010 07:30 trucejl wrote:
for gs idea to work, it should be like remove gs n reduce energy dmg n shield dmg somewhat. it shouldnt outright block emp. maybe like 50 energy n 50 shield


Removing GS and taking out half energy and shield is in OP territory. MM armies would absolutely steamroll toss if this change occurred.
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 23:05 GMT
#92
I'm pretty sure if you ask any Terran I don't think any of them would pick the GS change over how it is now and this is not saying how it is now isn't a bit over the top. Also with the GS protection HT would just have free reign an the Terran would spend 90% of this time dodging storms since he wouldn't be able to stop them.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 23:13:42
June 11 2010 23:09 GMT
#93
You'd just need to invest the energy in double-tapping the same spot. First one removes the GS, second one drains the shield and energy. The odds of bringing up a second shield before the second EMP hits is incredibly unlikely.

You still have the range and 'hiding inside the M&M blob' advantage over Feedback, so a Protoss can't stop every single one getting off, just like you won't be able to stop every Psi Storm, but you can stop some of it and so can we.

That's much more balanced than "Find Ghosts in clusterfuck, cast Feedback on them and pray he doesn't cast EMP before your slow-ass HT closes the range gap or gets mauled by a Siege Tank".
whoopadeedoo
Profile Joined June 2010
United States427 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 23:22:45
June 11 2010 23:13 GMT
#94
On June 12 2010 08:05 GodIsNotHere wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you ask any Terran I don't think any of them would pick the GS change over how it is now and this is not saying how it is now isn't a bit over the top. Also with the GS protection HT would just have free reign an the Terran would spend 90% of this time dodging storms since he wouldn't be able to stop them.


Kinda like Ghosts have free reign now? LOL. Now you're getting it In case you didn't know: Psi Storms range is 6 (+1.5 radius). EMP range is 10 (+2 radius).

At least you can dodge Psi Storms.

Seriously, play some toss. I think you'll understand where I'm coming from. I switched from Toss to Terran because I wanted to see how the other side played. As Toss, the most frustrating battles are against Terran, and I know this is often said by Zerg players too. What I found is not that Terran is OP, but Terran is easier and more forgiving to play effectively then P or Z.
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 23:19 GMT
#95
A lot people seem to think storms are pretty weak from how everyone seems to be talking about them, Sure you might not get the full damage out of them but the results of it causing the enemy to move can't be overlooked. It gives you plenty of free shots, and breaks any form of concave which in most cases will be devastating. Also, so now theres Siege tanks in this scenario? because if wanna do this "What if" game things can be spun in many different directions but right now most people are talking about that early to mid game Ghost/Bio push vs Gateway/Templar.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 23:23 GMT
#96
On June 12 2010 08:13 whoopadeedoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2010 08:05 GodIsNotHere wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you ask any Terran I don't think any of them would pick the GS change over how it is now and this is not saying how it is now isn't a bit over the top. Also with the GS protection HT would just have free reign an the Terran would spend 90% of this time dodging storms since he wouldn't be able to stop them.


Kinda like Ghosts have free reign? LOL. In case you didn't know: Psi Storms range is 6. EMP range is 10.

At least you can dodge Psi Storms.

Seriously, play some toss. I think you'll understand where I'm coming from. I switched from Toss to Terran because I wanted to see how the other side played. As Toss, the most frustrating battles are against Terran, and I know this is often said by Zerg players too. What I found is not that Terran is OP, but Terran is easier and more forgiving to play effectively then P or Z.

I do play Protoss but I do play Terran more.(Can't stand Zerg at all) Protoss just feels boring if you ask me.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
whoopadeedoo
Profile Joined June 2010
United States427 Posts
June 11 2010 23:24 GMT
#97
I'm not arguing Storms are weak or EMP is more powerful than Storm (though I could make a good argument for this). I'm just arguing you can't do anything about EMPs as Toss. This is not true of HTs or any other unit/spells. I'm not sure how many different ways I need to say this to get through
whoopadeedoo
Profile Joined June 2010
United States427 Posts
June 11 2010 23:25 GMT
#98
BTW, thank you for giving me something to do on this slow Friday at work :D Worldcup means no one else is working and I'm bored out of my mind today.
GodIsNotHere
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada395 Posts
June 11 2010 23:26 GMT
#99
On June 12 2010 08:13 whoopadeedoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2010 08:05 GodIsNotHere wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you ask any Terran I don't think any of them would pick the GS change over how it is now and this is not saying how it is now isn't a bit over the top. Also with the GS protection HT would just have free reign an the Terran would spend 90% of this time dodging storms since he wouldn't be able to stop them.


Kinda like Ghosts have free reign now? LOL. Now you're getting it In case you didn't know: Psi Storms range is 6 (+1.5 radius). EMP range is 10 (+2 radius).

True the range & area of affect should be made equal, I doubt anyone would argue other wise.
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-11 23:31:20
June 11 2010 23:28 GMT
#100
On June 12 2010 08:19 GodIsNotHere wrote:
A lot people seem to think storms are pretty weak from how everyone seems to be talking about them, Sure you might not get the full damage out of them but the results of it causing the enemy to move can't be overlooked. It gives you plenty of free shots, and breaks any form of concave which in most cases will be devastating. Also, so now theres Siege tanks in this scenario? because if wanna do this "What if" game things can be spun in many different directions but right now most people are talking about that early to mid game Ghost/Bio push vs Gateway/Templar.


So I because I put "or mauled by a Siege Tank" the argument goes out of the window?

Its more like two possible situations:

Bio Ball + Ghosts vs Gateway units and maybe an Immortal or Void Ray (you NEVER have an HT here...ever)

or

Gigantic army made of everything, Ghosts included vs Gigantic army made of everything, HTs included

My point there was, they're not ONLY useful in an early push. In a late-game battle with two massive armies colliding, when we DO have HTs there to 'counter' the Ghosts, its still a massive coin-toss to use Feedback because you have the range advantage with both the spell itself, and the rest of your army.

We just get range 9 Collossi that kill Ghosts in what, 4 (8) shots? You get range 13 tanks that squish our HTs in two.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 23 24 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
12:30
K-cup France
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Vindicta 68
EnDerr 64
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29031
Calm 5341
Bisu 3271
Sea 3069
Rain 2566
Shuttle 2430
Horang2 1203
Hyuk 996
actioN 462
Zeus 455
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 315
Stork 311
Mini 217
Mind 78
Rush 77
firebathero 76
TY 48
ToSsGirL 36
JulyZerg 31
Killer 22
Sacsri 18
GoRush 17
SilentControl 16
Mong 15
Free 14
soO 11
Yoon 9
Icarus 9
IntoTheRainbow 9
Bale 6
Dota 2
Gorgc4716
qojqva2344
Dendi2177
Fuzer 284
XcaliburYe255
PGG 81
BabyKnight66
League of Legends
rGuardiaN73
Counter-Strike
markeloff702
edward125
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King108
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 69
Other Games
singsing2172
B2W.Neo1411
XBOCT444
DeMusliM427
Happy400
crisheroes388
hiko377
ArmadaUGS87
ToD82
QueenE75
KnowMe73
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 46
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Dystopia_ 5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 5359
• WagamamaTV605
League of Legends
• Jankos2157
Upcoming Events
Road to EWC
2h 11m
Road to EWC
8h 11m
Road to EWC
19h 11m
Road to EWC
20h 11m
Road to EWC
1d 8h
Road to EWC
1d 19h
Road to EWC
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Road to EWC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.