• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:33
CEST 00:33
KST 07:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 695 users

MULE - Hunting the Wumpus - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
cartoon]x
Profile Joined March 2010
United States606 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-12 00:56:37
March 12 2010 00:43 GMT
#61
Actually, it is important for us to consider whether the MULE, while it is mining from a mineral patch, prevents an SCV from mining from the same patch. If this is the case, a fully saturated base with a MULE added to it will only boost your economy by ~180 minerals (270 - 90 for the SCVs no longer using the patch). Since this principle only applies to a fully saturated base, I don't think it will heavily impact the opening analysis you've made (the SCVs will just switch to a nearby patch). But once you reach the middle game, and your mineral patches are fully saturated, a scan will only really cost you ~180 minerals. (Good news for people who like to scan)

To the poster above: It would only be necessary to make those calculations up until the point where the base reached full saturation. As far as I'm aware that's around 18 SCVs on minerals. The time period from beginning to build the new comsat station to reaching full saturation shouldn't be too long, but its length will also vary depending on whether you're taking 1 or 2 gas.
It is not enough to conquer; one must learn to seduce.
crate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2474 Posts
March 12 2010 01:50 GMT
#62
Update on the cost of the OC: the OC costs 150, minus 100 (2 SCVs you'd build during its construction) minus 25 (SCV supply) plus SCV mining ... plus 2 minerals per second once the OC finishes since you don't have those 2 SCVs (until saturation, when this 2 mineral per second cost decreases).

MULEs effectively mine 3 minerals per second (270 over 90 seconds), so you do clearly come out ahead once you start using MULEs; this is (maybe) where the 30 seconds--the correct amount of time--comes from.
We did. You did. Yes we can. No. || http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/players/crate.html || twitch.tv/crate3333
Fulgrim
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States560 Posts
March 12 2010 02:05 GMT
#63
Great experimenting, sounds like terran should be getting these pretty early on to get an economic lead. Having played a few games with terran on my friends beta account, I haven't gotten a good feel on when to get it, but I tended to get it somewhere between 10-20 supply.
One does not simply walk into mordor
Nivra
Profile Joined March 2010
37 Posts
March 12 2010 12:56 GMT
#64
Alright, so let's talk about supply. The minimum cost of a supply is 150 mins. 100 min for the supply, 50 min for the mining time. Counting additional travel cost, it could be 155-160 min. Calling down supplies gives you the equivalent of 100 min immediately, 55-60 mins over the next 55-60 seconds. A mule gives you 270 mins over 90 seconds, or 180 mins over 60 seconds and 90 mins over the next 30 seconds.

Thus, a mule gives the following over the supply: 120 mins over 60 seconds and 90 mins over the next 30 seconds. In essence, it's a very back-loaded 210 mins over 90 seconds.

The supply gives 100 mins NOW. So the question is: What is the time cost of minerals?
Would you prefer 100 mins instantly vs. 210 mins backloaded over 90 seconds? For an early bio push within the next 60 seconds, I could easily see how you would want the 100 mins immediately (assuming you're production line isn't saturated).

Especially in the early game, I can see the argument as to how 100 minerals now >> 210 mins over 90 seconds. That 100 mins? You can start your expo CC 60 seconds sooner. You could open gas heavy, but still have enough mins for an early fact w/o sacrificing rines and D.

jabberwokie
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada142 Posts
March 12 2010 13:06 GMT
#65
Calling down supply is actualy creating something that would cost minerals and making it free as well as fortifying a structure. When you use the mule (at main) you just mine faster from minerals you already control. Which means you have to go find new minerals faster. The supply drop is the effective oposite. I feel there is place for all of them in terran play.
Mikilatov
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States3897 Posts
March 13 2010 03:14 GMT
#66
On March 12 2010 21:56 Nivra wrote:
Alright, so let's talk about supply. The minimum cost of a supply is 150 mins. 100 min for the supply, 50 min for the mining time. Counting additional travel cost, it could be 155-160 min. Calling down supplies gives you the equivalent of 100 min immediately, 55-60 mins over the next 55-60 seconds. A mule gives you 270 mins over 90 seconds, or 180 mins over 60 seconds and 90 mins over the next 30 seconds.

Thus, a mule gives the following over the supply: 120 mins over 60 seconds and 90 mins over the next 30 seconds. In essence, it's a very back-loaded 210 mins over 90 seconds.

The supply gives 100 mins NOW. So the question is: What is the time cost of minerals?
Would you prefer 100 mins instantly vs. 210 mins backloaded over 90 seconds? For an early bio push within the next 60 seconds, I could easily see how you would want the 100 mins immediately (assuming you're production line isn't saturated).

Especially in the early game, I can see the argument as to how 100 minerals now >> 210 mins over 90 seconds. That 100 mins? You can start your expo CC 60 seconds sooner. You could open gas heavy, but still have enough mins for an early fact w/o sacrificing rines and D.




Not to mention the fact that you can make up for a missed depot, and also you're not taking away from the minerals which do still exist on your patches and can eventually be mined.

I suppose supply drop isn't so bad after all.
♥ I used to lasso the shit out of your tournaments =( ♥ | Much is my hero. | zizi yO~ | Be Nice, TL.
glassmazarin
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Sweden158 Posts
March 13 2010 03:47 GMT
#67
On March 12 2010 21:56 Nivra wrote:
Especially in the early game, I can see the argument as to how 100 minerals now >> 210 mins over 90 seconds. That 100 mins? You can start your expo CC 60 seconds sooner. You could open gas heavy, but still have enough mins for an early fact w/o sacrificing rines and D.


How did you get to the conclusion that you can start a CC 60 sec sooner? If a SCV mines ~1 min/sec, it will take ~15 SCVs (probably realistic amount for fast expo) ~7-8 sec to get 100 mins, which means that the CC can be started maby max ~10 sec earlier if you use the supply skill.. Which I would argue is not worth it.
Jonoman92
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
United States9103 Posts
March 13 2010 04:02 GMT
#68
On March 12 2010 07:25 Tartantyco wrote:
I get my Orbital Command just after I finish my first rax, which is about 16 I think. Goes something like this:

Supply on 9
Barracks on 11/12
Gas on 14-ish
(It should be timed so that you finish an SCV 3-4 secs before rax finishes, you should get 150-160 minerals exactly when rax finishes.)
Orbital on 16
Supply and Marine on 17


I do:

supply 10
rax 12
gas 13/14
OC 15 (rax finishes right as the scv is done and I start OC immediately)

TvR isn't a big deal in sc2. I use the same build for every MU! Although I have been changing it a bit after what I have above for TvP. I've realized trying to rush at all vs P isn't that great since sentries just own it.
Jonoman92
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
United States9103 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-13 04:05:45
March 13 2010 04:04 GMT
#69
And I completely agree with Fakesteve. Even though I'm using terran in sc2 it annoys me when people complain about using a scan "costing" 270 minerals. The intel you can gain is well worth it, and it doesn't matter how many minerals you have if dts are killin your dudes and you don't even have an ebay started.

I've only been dt rushed once though, and dts seem weaker in sc2.

edit:
On March 12 2010 22:06 jabberwokie wrote:
Calling down supply is actualy creating something that would cost minerals and making it free as well as fortifying a structure. When you use the mule (at main) you just mine faster from minerals you already control. Which means you have to go find new minerals faster. The supply drop is the effective oposite. I feel there is place for all of them in terran play.


That's a really good point actually. I'm not sure if I'm going to start using calldown supply instead of the MULE but on maps where securing a 3rd can be hard it's something to think about I suppose.
glassmazarin
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Sweden158 Posts
March 13 2010 06:03 GMT
#70
On March 13 2010 13:04 Jonoman92 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 12 2010 22:06 jabberwokie wrote:
Calling down supply is actualy creating something that would cost minerals and making it free as well as fortifying a structure. When you use the mule (at main) you just mine faster from minerals you already control. Which means you have to go find new minerals faster. The supply drop is the effective oposite. I feel there is place for all of them in terran play.


That's a really good point actually. I'm not sure if I'm going to start using calldown supply instead of the MULE but on maps where securing a 3rd can be hard it's something to think about I suppose.


Am I correct in assuming that you can only use the supply depot skill once on a given depot? If so, the maximum amount of "free" cash (i.e. the cash that won't dissapear from your mineral line) you could get from using that skill is ~1000 (skill used 10 times for 200/200 supply limit). Considering that each mineral stone has 2500 minerals, and that there are ~8 stones in a base, you have 2500*8*2 = 40000 minerals at your desposal before you secure your third.

To get 1000 extra minerals is not very much compared to the ones you have (2.5%), so I would say that mining these 40000 minerals faster (using MULE) is always better, i.e. the supply skill needs a buff in some way.
crate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2474 Posts
March 13 2010 06:25 GMT
#71
Mineral patches usually have 1500 minerals each, not 2500, but 1000 minerals is still paltry compared to 30k.
We did. You did. Yes we can. No. || http://crawl.akrasiac.org/scoring/players/crate.html || twitch.tv/crate3333
Gretorp
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States586 Posts
March 13 2010 07:29 GMT
#72
they're all investments. Look at it this way.


Call down supply is an instantaneous investment. You get the 100 minerals => supply depot instantly, allowing you to not get supply capped in the event you're macroing and can't keep up or just slip once. It will keep you steady.

The Mule is a mid investment, as it needs 90 seconds to reach its full potential. During those 90 seconds, it is vulnerable, and can die. Also, the money is gathered over at a rate of 3 minerals per second, hence telling you that you are investing in slow +3 minerals per second for 90 seconds.

The scan can be both for short term and long term uses. Getting the right unit composition is rather strong. Intelligence is a very useful thing.

They all serve a purpose and i think it's a very important idea that people shouldn't start prioritizing which is better. I've used all three in my games, and i will tell you that it's all of them are important and detrimental to the new terran.
I am Unheard Change
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
March 13 2010 10:16 GMT
#73
On March 12 2010 07:07 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
I don't like this assertation that using a scan "costs you 270 minerals". It seems to be the prevalant thought process.

Those minerals still exist, and with a fully saturated line, the MULE consists of a smaller percentage of your current income. Advocating blowing all your OC's energy as soon as it hits 50 without fail might seem like the best way to go about things mathematically, but with the increased importance and difficulty of scouting in SC2, it's definitely not the most clever thing one can do.

Basically I just want to squash this notion that scan = 270 minerals omg unfair omg i used mule now i cant see dt i cant see attack omg they killed a depot and i need a tank right now but i used used mule, and so on. Yes, the MULE is great, but scan doesn't "cost 270 minerals"

Food for thought: If my opponent uses MULE exclusively, intent on an early-game attack, and I block it with superior information combined with additional resources spent on units rather than depots, is he really making the best decision? Purely hypothetical situation, but it illustrates my point. Further to that, the supply boost is the only mechanic present in the game that fundamentally creates extra resources. It brings the cost of +8 supply from 100 minerals to 0 minerals, increasing the longevity of your mining base and freeing up additional resources for whatever your plans happen to be.

i agree that going mule isn't always the best choice but the notion that it costs 270 to scan is not flawed at all. yes, i understand that the minerals are still there waiting to be mined some other time but the fact is it's 270 by the end of 30 seconds or so that you don't have in your bank and 270 that you don't have in your bank is 270 you can't spend.

this creates somewhat of an imbalance (as in unequal not "OMG IMBA") early game when you're forced to use it on scan if you can't get an scv in. i think it was a good point brought up in another thread that was closed: the terran macro mechanic is the only one where you are forced between a positive and a negative.

before everyone gets all rowdy about how zerg have to choose what to build and protoss have to choose what to boost let's focus on what was said. positive and negative. aside from the initial cost there's no negative side of injecting larva, you inject a hatchery you get larva. there's no negative side of chronoboosting , you boost something you get it faster. the terran mechanic is the only one where choosing between one or the other you are actually losing out on something else.

in the early game mule is needed to keep up with the other races' macro mechanics. zerg can inject larva and build multiple workers at once, protoss can boost workers faster than normal. terran is the only one who is left building workers 'normally'. the mule helps balance this out but if a terran is forced to scan they lose out. in the mid-late game when mineral lines become saturated the mule becomes optional because now you should be on even ground in terms of economy with the other races. they cant add extra minerals per trip like the mule can and scan becomes more important.

let's delve into this a little deeper. you might be thinking choosing between drones or probes with a macro mechanic is equivalent to choosing between mule and scan but early game it simply is not. the mule can only return a finite amount of minerals within a certain time span, when that time span is over you no longer get more return because the mule disappears. the same cannot be said for zerg or protoss. when you boost a probe or make multiple drones you are increasing mining input by X amount for the remainder of the game and you are getting linear returns on your macro mechanic. it is a lasting factor until you fully saturate your mineral line.

for example: for every 1 scv i build you are boosting and building 2 drones or 2 probes, by the time i build 2 you will have 4, i build 3 you have 6, etc. to balance this out early game blizzard implements the mule which returns a FLAT mineral amount which only introduces a momentary spike in mineral intake equivalent to 3 scvs. if you stop boosting when i stop mule'ing i cannot keep up with your economy. even if you stop boosting but maintain regular probe production and i am still mule'ing i cannot catch up until i am 3 scvs from fully saturating.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
Koffiegast
Profile Joined February 2010
Netherlands346 Posts
March 13 2010 23:09 GMT
#74
Tbh, if anyone thinks scan isnt worth the so-called 270 minerals, then obviously you should change your priorities. A good scan can net you over 1000s of minerals (lots of banelings burrowed and your army happens to run into it, or you see what your opponent is making so you can counter) or even, basically, win you the game. 270 minerals is just 270 minerals, scan gives something more precious than that: information.
Wut
Yasser
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany27 Posts
March 14 2010 02:05 GMT
#75
thanks for the work! i actually often didn't build OC at my expansions this will change now.
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3361 Posts
April 11 2010 15:51 GMT
#76
Excellent read and great analysis. thank you!
Horang2 fan
JamesLame
Profile Joined February 2010
Sweden25 Posts
April 11 2010 16:18 GMT
#77
Thanks a lot!
The info about the expo was very useful, I've always thought it to be good to get OC as soon as you have maybe 5-6 scvs created, seems i was wrong.
ScoSteSal
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States54 Posts
May 22 2012 15:28 GMT
#78
um, sry guys, but every1 in this entire thread has been operating on significantly warped data: each scv mines 2/3 to 3/4 of a mineral per second, not 1 per second (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Resources#Minerals). This means that the mule is potentially a good bit better than scvs than you have been estimating, considering this is a 25-33% reduction in the SCV mining rates for your calculations...

User was warned for this post
Iustum Agere Arduum Est...Sed Modo Sine Day9o
sexyandiknowit
Profile Joined February 2012
United States18 Posts
May 22 2012 15:42 GMT
#79
On March 07 2010 10:11 ghrur wrote:
Cost of depot/8 makes a good assumption of cost per supply, but a depot does not cost 100 minerals.
Rather, it costs 100minerals+(build time)minerals because if SCVs mine 1 mineral/sec, and a depot costs 50 seconds to build, the SCV could have mined 50 minerals in that time, but didn't, thus the whole cost is 150 minerals.


By this logic, every zerg building is worth thousands of minerals, as a drone loses mining time for the entire duration of the game when it becomes a building.
High Master Protoss
ZeromuS
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada13389 Posts
May 22 2012 15:50 GMT
#80
On May 23 2012 00:28 ScoSteSal wrote:
um, sry guys, but every1 in this entire thread has been operating on significantly warped data: each scv mines 2/3 to 3/4 of a mineral per second, not 1 per second (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Resources#Minerals). This means that the mule is potentially a good bit better than scvs than you have been estimating, considering this is a 25-33% reduction in the SCV mining rates for your calculations...


You do realise this was posted almost 2 years ago, while the game was in beta right? Why would you Necro this thread?
StrategyRTS forever | @ZeromuS_plays | www.twitch.tv/Zeromus_
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 27m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 200
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 416
Dota 2
monkeys_forever371
capcasts170
League of Legends
Grubby4663
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2299
Stewie2K687
taco 365
flusha346
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King109
AZ_Axe85
Liquid`Ken29
Other Games
tarik_tv18149
summit1g10224
gofns8282
FrodaN1833
C9.Mang0173
ViBE64
Sick42
PPMD26
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 58
• poizon28 46
• musti20045 41
• RyuSc2 20
• davetesta17
• Adnapsc2 8
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 36
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22460
League of Legends
• Doublelift3914
Other Games
• imaqtpie1114
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 27m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
15h 27m
CSO Cup
17h 27m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 27m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.