• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:50
CET 19:50
KST 03:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
Foreign Brood War Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion MBCGame Torrents [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1675 users

[M] (2) ESV Bloody Ridge AE

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
July 30 2012 00:14 GMT
#1
[image loading]
[image loading]

ESV Bloody Ridge AE


Bloody Ridge, a remake of the brood war map, is a SC2 map featured in the ESV Anniversary Edition map pack. The map design uses many new elements in map design, such as a flat main choke. Other examples are the island expansions located in the center, the inbase natural, and the lowground main.

ESV AE2 Mappack

[image loading]
Playable Bounds: 144x120
Textures: Belshir, Aiur

The map can be found on NA, EU, KOR, and SEA under "ESV Bloody Ridge AE".

[image loading]
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
essencesc2
Profile Joined May 2012
United States18 Posts
July 30 2012 00:20 GMT
#2
the zerg can take that creep base without destroying the tumor o_O
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
July 30 2012 00:23 GMT
#3
On July 30 2012 09:20 essencesc2 wrote:
the zerg can take that creep base without destroying the tumor o_O


Imagine what would happen if they couldn't ^^
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
July 30 2012 00:50 GMT
#4
On July 30 2012 09:23 monitor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2012 09:20 essencesc2 wrote:
the zerg can take that creep base without destroying the tumor o_O


Imagine what would happen if they couldn't ^^

Out of curiosity, what caused the tumour to be deemed necessary?
Twitter: @iamcaustic
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
July 30 2012 00:57 GMT
#5
On July 30 2012 09:50 stormfoxSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2012 09:23 monitor wrote:
On July 30 2012 09:20 essencesc2 wrote:
the zerg can take that creep base without destroying the tumor o_O


Imagine what would happen if they couldn't ^^

Out of curiosity, what caused the tumour to be deemed necessary?


4-Gates in PvP. And just in general, proxy pylons warping into the main would be very annoying and potentially imbalanced.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
NapkinBox
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States314 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-30 01:01:03
July 30 2012 00:59 GMT
#6
I can't tell from the picture. Is the main ramp blocked by rocks?

EDIT: Oh nvm. That's not a ramp.
"Who has the best durability feat in all of comic book superheroes?" "Aquaman surviving pop culture."
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
July 30 2012 01:00 GMT
#7
On July 30 2012 09:59 NAPoleonSC wrote:
I can't tell from the picture. Is the main ramp blocked by rocks?


I think you might be confused, but no there aren't any rocks. The main choke is flat with LoS blockers. The inbase natural has a 1x ramp leading up to it (unblocked).
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
July 30 2012 01:14 GMT
#8
On July 30 2012 09:57 monitor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2012 09:50 stormfoxSC wrote:
On July 30 2012 09:23 monitor wrote:
On July 30 2012 09:20 essencesc2 wrote:
the zerg can take that creep base without destroying the tumor o_O


Imagine what would happen if they couldn't ^^

Out of curiosity, what caused the tumour to be deemed necessary?


4-Gates in PvP. And just in general, proxy pylons warping into the main would be very annoying and potentially imbalanced.

Oh yeah, I guess that would make sense, with the main being on lower ground and all.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
lost_artz
Profile Joined January 2012
United States366 Posts
July 30 2012 02:11 GMT
#9
Are those island bases with XNT? If so we like :D
Ingebrigtsen
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Norway343 Posts
July 30 2012 02:18 GMT
#10
I wanna play this map O-O ladder plzzzzzzzzzzzz
"These animals should be rewarded for not being people... I hate people"
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
July 30 2012 02:28 GMT
#11
I really like to see people experimenting with map features, but can we have some pics? it is a bit hard to judge the map without knowing exactly how big the nat is for example.

The map does seem really unique and cool, but a few I noticed that makes me wonder is why does the watch tower on the island? wouldn't it be better suited for it to be on the low ground? that why it would be easier to raid the island, which I think is important since unless that Terran can take it as a free base early on.

About the amount of bases, 4+ island is not a bit low? I think a forward half base for each player instead of (or with) the current middle expo would help make this map not run out of minerals too early.

About the creep tumor, how about making it a bit more to the edge? to allow Protoss and Terran players to not have to wait a long time until they can take their fast 3rd. about the matter of the low ground 3rd, while I like it that you made it so you can't warp in to the low ground you forgot about blink stalkers which would still be a pain to deal with and would actually kill phoenix play in PvP on this map imo, but we shall see of course.

Lastly, about the ridge at the ends of the map. is it pathable? if so how about to make a ramp to it? I think it would make defending it more possible since you would be able to reach the opponent with a ground army.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
July 30 2012 02:39 GMT
#12
On July 30 2012 11:28 moskonia wrote:
I really like to see people experimenting with map features, but can we have some pics? it is a bit hard to judge the map without knowing exactly how big the nat is for example.


I'll try to get some close up shots soon. I will also add some more detailed information. Sorry, I got kind of impatient making the thread.

On July 30 2012 11:28 moskonia wrote:
The map does seem really unique and cool, but a few I noticed that makes me wonder is why does the watch tower on the island? wouldn't it be better suited for it to be on the low ground? that why it would be easier to raid the island, which I think is important since unless that Terran can take it as a free base early on.


The watchtower is on the island for two reasons. One (in no particular order) is to add a new dynamic with watchtowers so players have to fight over them on the islands. Second is to make the island easier to defend by scouting drops and other forms of harassment, to have extra time to prepare defenses.

On July 30 2012 11:28 moskonia wrote:
About the amount of bases, 4+ island is not a bit low? I think a forward half base for each player instead of (or with) the current middle expo would help make this map not run out of minerals too early.


I too have been concerned the 5 bases might be too few considering two are islands. However I don't like the idea of adding forward expansions because they tend to favor Terran. When I see some test games I can determine if its necessary to add in an extra expansion per player.

On July 30 2012 11:28 moskonia wrote:
About the creep tumor, how about making it a bit more to the edge? to allow Protoss and Terran players to not have to wait a long time until they can take their fast 3rd. about the matter of the low ground 3rd, while I like it that you made it so you can't warp in to the low ground you forgot about blink stalkers which would still be a pain to deal with and would actually kill phoenix play in PvP on this map imo, but we shall see of course.


The tumor has to go where it is to prevent pylons from warping in, including over the LoS blockers, so no I can't move it. Protoss almost always has a robo when taking an early third, even when its before 7 minutes, because immortals are crucial. An observer isn't too much to ask I believe. Terran is a little more problematic, but getting a turret or spending a scan isn't going to break anything. Also I didn't forget about blink stalkers, there is just nothing that I can do about it. Yes, its going to be easier than most maps, but I don't predict its going to be map breaking.

On July 30 2012 11:28 moskonia wrote:
Lastly, about the ridge at the ends of the map. is it pathable? if so how about to make a ramp to it? I think it would make defending it more possible since you would be able to reach the opponent with a ground army.


Yes those cliffs can be dropped on. My idea was that the expansions themselves are so difficult to attack into due to the long ground distance and tight choke that a cliff would encourage aggression/harassment. A ramp isn't out of the question, but I'd just like to see if this works since it shouldn't be too difficult to defend drops at the fourth base. If it does prove to be bad for gameplay then yes I'll consider a change like adding a ramp with or without rocks.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20322 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-30 03:17:42
July 30 2012 03:14 GMT
#13
Protoss almost always has a robo when taking an early third, even when its before 7 minutes, because immortals are crucial. An observer isn't too much to ask I believe


It would prevent This which is amazingly strong on certain 2 player maps PvZ, which is a shame. I like the variety with the main choke and stuff, but is a LOS blocker really enough?
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Syphon8
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada298 Posts
July 30 2012 04:12 GMT
#14
If you keep the in-base expo ramps 1x wide, you should put a neutral depot at the top.
',:/
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-30 04:46:10
July 30 2012 04:45 GMT
#15
On July 30 2012 12:14 Cyro wrote:
Show nested quote +
Protoss almost always has a robo when taking an early third, even when its before 7 minutes, because immortals are crucial. An observer isn't too much to ask I believe


It would prevent This which is amazingly strong on certain 2 player maps PvZ, which is a shame. I like the variety with the main choke and stuff, but is a LOS blocker really enough?


Yeah it does prevent the 1gate expands, but that build only started getting "popular" a few weeks ago... I started this a few months ago. I am a bit sad that it doesn't work but you forget that there is an inbase natural expansion so it changes a lot of the need for an early gate/forge/cyber like there is on a map like Daybreak if you want to FE.


On July 30 2012 13:12 Syphon8 wrote:
If you keep the in-base expo ramps 1x wide, you should put a neutral depot at the top.


Good point, I totally agree. I will try to add that in.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
July 30 2012 07:42 GMT
#16
On July 30 2012 13:45 monitor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2012 12:14 Cyro wrote:
Protoss almost always has a robo when taking an early third, even when its before 7 minutes, because immortals are crucial. An observer isn't too much to ask I believe


It would prevent This which is amazingly strong on certain 2 player maps PvZ, which is a shame. I like the variety with the main choke and stuff, but is a LOS blocker really enough?


Yeah it does prevent the 1gate expands, but that build only started getting "popular" a few weeks ago... I started this a few months ago. I am a bit sad that it doesn't work but you forget that there is an inbase natural expansion so it changes a lot of the need for an early gate/forge/cyber like there is on a map like Daybreak if you want to FE.

Also to note, I don't feel that every build has to be possible on every map. Builds should be catered to the map you're playing on, not the other way around. So long as a map allows for certain conventional standards (e.g. able to safely obtain a natural), IMO there isn't really a problem.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
July 30 2012 10:16 GMT
#17
Very neat little rush type map with a lot of interesting stuff going on Would love to see this in a map pool as the odd small map!
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
Monochromatic
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States998 Posts
July 30 2012 15:36 GMT
#18
With the tumor where it is this map would be horribly imba for zerg. Creep takes too long to recede and it forces a scan, or much worse, a robo bay, to take your third. Maps shouldn't force you to get a certain tech to expand.

Also, can you get some analyzer pics up? I really can't make out the layout in the center. And if those are XNW on the center islands, I'd suggest removing them.
MC: "Guys I need your support! iam poor make me nerd baller" __________________________________________RIP Violet
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
July 30 2012 15:46 GMT
#19
On July 31 2012 00:36 Monochromatic wrote:
With the tumor where it is this map would be horribly imba for zerg. Creep takes too long to recede and it forces a scan, or much worse, a robo bay, to take your third. Maps shouldn't force you to get a certain tech to expand.

I thought the common complaint about Protoss is that they have to get Robo first every game, as opposed to a quick Twilight or Stargate. I see no major deviation there. What you're suggesting is to remove most of what makes this map so different to other maps, and considering this map was designed specifically to change how the game is played, I don't see that happening.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
July 30 2012 16:06 GMT
#20
On July 31 2012 00:36 Monochromatic wrote:
With the tumor where it is this map would be horribly imba for zerg. Creep takes too long to recede and it forces a scan, or much worse, a robo bay, to take your third. Maps shouldn't force you to get a certain tech to expand.

Also, can you get some analyzer pics up? I really can't make out the layout in the center. And if those are XNW on the center islands, I'd suggest removing them.


Really, a scan or a robo/canon is too much to handle to take a third now?
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IPSL
17:00
Ro8 Set 1
Dewalt vs ZZZero
Liquipedia
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
16:55
FSL TeamLeague: ASH vs IC
Freeedom39
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Livibee 94
trigger 92
BRAT_OK 69
MindelVK 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3670
EffOrt 683
firebathero 271
Bonyth 171
Rush 133
Larva 100
Rock 30
Dota 2
Gorgc5805
qojqva4742
Fuzer 413
420jenkins362
Counter-Strike
fl0m5656
zeus1257
chrisJcsgo50
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King108
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor466
Liquid`Hasu382
Other Games
Grubby4304
Mlord824
DeMusliM224
RotterdaM212
Hui .142
KnowMe96
Sick77
Trikslyr65
Beastyqt11
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1578
gamesdonequick442
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 34
• LUISG 22
• Dystopia_ 1
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 6
• Pr0nogo 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3258
Other Games
• imaqtpie1015
• Shiphtur165
• tFFMrPink 16
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
1h 10m
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
OSC
3h 10m
Solar vs Creator
ByuN vs Gerald
Percival vs Babymarine
Moja vs Krystianer
EnDerr vs ForJumy
sebesdes vs Nicoract
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 10m
WardiTV 2025
17h 10m
OSC
20h 10m
IPSL
22h 10m
Bonyth vs KameZerg
BSL 21
1d 1h
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Wardi Open
1d 17h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 21h
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV 2025
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
WardiTV 2025
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Sziky vs JDConan
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-04
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
Light HT
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.