Which race do you think is currently the strongest?
Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
oGsChess
23 Posts
| ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
Just because they are the least played doesn't mean they aren't the strongest, meta game shifts either chases people away or brings them back, if protoss remain this strong I guarantee we will see more protons on ladder. Being the least played race means that ladder protons players get plenty of practice vs Terran and zerg, while Terran and zerg players get comparatively much less practice against protons opponents. | ||
A_Scarecrow
Australia721 Posts
On May 06 2016 09:06 Shield wrote: Some people vote for a race just because last GSL Code S was won by protoss. I think you should vote in general. The truth is protoss is the least played race. It doesn't make sense if the strongest race is the least played race. Some could say fun is more important but there are a lot of people in sc2 who are happy to play whatever is the strongest not the most fun. during hots zerg was the most played race in several regions yet did not have the results. just because a race is not popular does not mean its not the strongest. | ||
SpunXtain20
Australia554 Posts
On May 06 2016 09:06 Shield wrote: Some people vote for a race just because last GSL Code S was won by protoss. I think you should vote in general. The truth is protoss is the least played race. It doesn't make sense if the strongest race is the least played race. Some could say fun is more important but there are a lot of people in sc2 who are happy to play whatever is the strongest not the most fun. U serious bro? People almost always pick one race and stick to it - for years. Much longer than the time between balance patches. Your logic is so flawed. Moron. User was warned for this post | ||
VanSCPurge
United States169 Posts
On May 06 2016 11:49 Beelzebub1 wrote: Protoss seems very powerful both on ladder and at the highest level of play, having a plethora of powerful macro and aggression builds along with the easiest to control end game gives them the edge in the meta. Ok, not to be "that guy", but this is pretty blatantly not true. A "plethora" would imply that protoss isn't forced into pheonix play in every single PvZ. From what I've seen PvT is pretty balanced actually. "Easiest to control end game" also makes it sound like you've never actually had to control an end-game protoss army. | ||
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
On May 06 2016 23:18 VanSCPurge wrote: Ok, not to be "that guy", but this is pretty blatantly not true. A "plethora" would imply that protoss isn't forced into pheonix play in every single PvZ. From what I've seen PvT is pretty balanced actually. "Easiest to control end game" also makes it sound like you've never actually had to control an end-game protoss army. Yeah anyone who thinks Protoss armies in LotV are easy to control probably hasn't played since HotS. | ||
Sharkken
Jordan141 Posts
| ||
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On May 06 2016 10:40 oGsChess wrote: Winrates overall in KR leagues suggest Protoss (both PvT and PvZ favor Toss on highest level), EU tends more to Zerg, but there's considerably more Zergs in EU aswell. Terran does fine overall imo, although not overperforming like always. korean zergs seem to lack in the strategic departement, idk, i feel like a random EU zerg strat played by a top korean zerg would demolish everyone. Also, If LIFE was playing and he tried, i can guarantee you that zest wouldn't be champion right now... i might be wrong though, and zerg is just quite easy to execute well enough to be good, but you cannot beat the best with it right now (too little things that divide skill). Hence, Guru can beat ppl Snute has trouble with, while snute can beat zest which no Zerg in korea can. i feel like zerg skill is really fucking random right now. Terran is still struggling with tech transitions and rebuilding army. If they could remax / reinforce as fast as Z and P and techswitch as fast as espeically Z, T would probably be the best race. Terrans don't even get to try to build their dream army cuz they struggle to rebuild T1 units to be able to remax fast enough. I still don't see any P/Z army beating ~25 ravens, 10 vikings, some ranged liberators, 5 BCs, + a tiny bit of medivac/bio/ghost with mass scans. But: a) T won't ever be able to afford that without dying or playing 3 T base vs 5/6 P or Z bases b) The army is highly immobile and hard to rebuild, even when always trading efficiently c) it's pretty much impossible to control TL:DR After all, P is the best race right now results wise, at least in Korea. The reason is that Korean Z doesnt seem to be on top of their game [esp. strategy-wise] and is missing their all time star players, while the terran race as a whole is still a bit weird as it doesnt have good enough remax and transition / techswitch possibilities. | ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
On May 06 2016 23:18 VanSCPurge wrote: Ok, not to be "that guy", but this is pretty blatantly not true. A "plethora" would imply that protoss isn't forced into pheonix play in every single PvZ. From what I've seen PvT is pretty balanced actually. "Easiest to control end game" also makes it sound like you've never actually had to control an end-game protoss army. I guess by plethora I meant viable macro and viable aggression builds in all of their match ups I have zero clue about pvp. Any no further comments about protoss end game from me, that's merely my opinion, not trying to start a flame war. | ||
Tosster
Poland299 Posts
On May 06 2016 11:49 Beelzebub1 wrote: Protoss seems very powerful both on ladder and at the highest level of play, having a plethora of powerful macro and aggression builds along with the easiest to control end game gives them the edge in the meta. Just because they are the least played doesn't mean they aren't the strongest, meta game shifts either chases people away or brings them back, if protoss remain this strong I guarantee we will see more protons on ladder. What a complete nonsense. User was warned for this post | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On May 06 2016 17:39 A_Scarecrow wrote: during hots zerg was the most played race in several regions yet did not have the results. just because a race is not popular does not mean its not the strongest. Sure, but if you have an OP race, there are people who will to switch to it. Why else do people like IdrA, Morrow, Artosis, TLO and so on change their races? Hint: it's not just because of fun. | ||
![]()
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
On May 07 2016 07:26 Shield wrote: Sure, but if you have an OP race, people are likely to switch to it. Why else do people like IdrA, Morrow, Artosis, TLO and so on change their races? Hint: it's not just because of fun. Still doesn't mean most played race = strongest. It's definitely possible that the strongest race could also be the least played race. | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On May 07 2016 07:30 Jer99 wrote: Still doesn't mean most played race = strongest. It's definitely possible that the strongest race could also be the least played race. Possibly, if you have a few Korean players who dominate but the same might not be true for race in general for non-pro players. That's why we need ladder stats but Blizzard stopped providing it at some point? After all, the poll isn't clear whether it asks in general or the strongest race in pro games. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
![]()
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
On May 07 2016 07:32 Shield wrote: Possibly, if you have a few Korean players who dominate but the same might not be true for race in general for non-pro players. That's why we need ladder stats but Blizzard stopped providing it at some point? After all, the poll isn't clear whether it asks in general or the strongest race in pro games. All it's asking is what do you think is the strongest race, preferably with arguments to support your claim. | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20278 Posts
Winrates overall in KR leagues suggest Protoss (both PvT and PvZ favor Toss on highest level) Maps are different for those KR leagues vs ladder | ||
bestviva
148 Posts
On May 07 2016 04:20 KalWarkov wrote: korean zergs seem to lack in the strategic departement, idk, i feel like a random EU zerg strat played by a top korean zerg would demolish everyone. Also, If LIFE was playing and he tried, i can guarantee you that zest wouldn't be champion right now... i might be wrong though, and zerg is just quite easy to execute well enough to be good, but you cannot beat the best with it right now (too little things that divide skill). Hence, Guru can beat ppl Snute has trouble with, while snute can beat zest which no Zerg in korea can. i feel like zerg skill is really fucking random right now. Terran is still struggling with tech transitions and rebuilding army. If they could remax / reinforce as fast as Z and P and techswitch as fast as espeically Z, T would probably be the best race. Terrans don't even get to try to build their dream army cuz they struggle to rebuild T1 units to be able to remax fast enough. I still don't see any P/Z army beating ~25 ravens, 10 vikings, some ranged liberators, 5 BCs, + a tiny bit of medivac/bio/ghost with mass scans. But: a) T won't ever be able to afford that without dying or playing 3 T base vs 5/6 P or Z bases b) The army is highly immobile and hard to rebuild, even when always trading efficiently c) it's pretty much impossible to control TL:DR After all, P is the best race right now results wise, at least in Korea. The reason is that Korean Z doesnt seem to be on top of their game [esp. strategy-wise] and is missing their all time star players, while the terran race as a whole is still a bit weird as it doesnt have good enough remax and transition / techswitch possibilities. well…If BByong was playing and he tried, i can guarantee you that LIFE wouldn't be champion either… the "if"situation is useless thing in this game, champion is champion. Zest was preparing GSL when he lost to snute . and also I doubt if the top class korean players give a shit about online matches. I think it's player op rather than race op, strong players make their race look op. like Maru with Terran, Zest with Protoss, Dark with Zerg. | ||
SNSeigifried
United States1640 Posts
http://aligulac.com/players/1658/results/?after=&before=&event=&race=z&country=all&bestof=all&offline=both&game=LotV&wcs_season=&wcs_tier=&op= | ||
addn1s
Japan39 Posts
On May 08 2016 00:56 SNSeigifried wrote: You guys do realize that zest is only a god vs terran/protoss right :D http://aligulac.com/players/1658/results/?after=&before=&event=&race=z&country=all&bestof=all&offline=both&game=LotV&wcs_season=&wcs_tier=&op= :D:D:D:D:D zest is god terran protoss indeed | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20278 Posts
| ||
TronJovolta
United States323 Posts
| ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On May 09 2016 02:34 TronJovolta wrote: WTF is wrong with this community? It's so very obviously Zerg. Zerg is the most played race, hence they can't admit their race is the strongest or most flexible one. At least versus protoss. How do you explain some random zerg (departure) winning against Zest (GSL Code S champion)? Well, I can't. On May 08 2016 16:42 Cyro wrote: P>T>Z>P? I guess it's more or less this at the moment. | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
ZertoN
Germany214 Posts
| ||
AvonMexicola
Netherlands36 Posts
With this map pool zerg is strongest easy, because Prion and Korhal should be unwinnable for an equally skilled protoss and terran. With a kEspa map pool, I think protoss could get more scary. | ||
SmileZerg
United States543 Posts
Maybe after the Liberator nerf there will be cause to say Zerg is second strongest. | ||
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
On May 06 2016 09:06 Shield wrote: Some people vote for a race just because last GSL Code S was won by protoss. I think you should vote in general. The truth is protoss is the least played race. It doesn't make sense if the strongest race is the least played race. Some could say fun is more important but there are a lot of people in sc2 who are happy to play whatever is the strongest not the most fun. people dont raceswap to FOTM during an expansion, thats ridicilous. I think all races are pretty balanced now but protoss seem to have a slight edge in PvT | ||
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
On May 09 2016 04:05 Shield wrote: Zerg is the most played race, hence they can't admit their race is the strongest or most flexible one. At least versus protoss. How do you explain some random zerg (departure) winning against Zest (GSL Code S champion)? Well, I can't. I guess it's more or less this at the moment. How about the fact that zest played like dogshit? | ||
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
I really think balance is decided by the meta and mappool right now. Of course there are phases in the game where one race is stronger than the others and some units are too strong compared to others, but that's how sc2 is designed and overall it seems very balanced to me right now. Just because Protoss in theory has an almost unbeatable late game composition it does not make them imbalanced, since they are weaker in other aspects. Well that's my opionion. | ||
Topher_Doll
United States76 Posts
Ah the internet, we love you. | ||
ThaReckoning
United States197 Posts
| ||
My_Fake_Plastic_Luv
United States257 Posts
| ||
RedAlice
51 Posts
On May 06 2016 11:49 Beelzebub1 wrote: Protoss seems very powerful both on ladder and at the highest level of play, having a plethora of powerful macro and aggression builds along with the easiest to control end game gives them the edge in the meta. Just because they are the least played doesn't mean they aren't the strongest, meta game shifts either chases people away or brings them back, if protoss remain this strong I guarantee we will see more protons on ladder. Being the least played race means that ladder protons players get plenty of practice vs Terran and zerg, while Terran and zerg players get comparatively much less practice against protons opponents. It is nonsense yelling protoss being easy to play if you did actually try it. Z is easiest in micro by far and Protoss has the least tolerence of any mistake | ||
Hurricaned
France126 Posts
Zerg has a very strong late game and in fact I don't know how to deal with a maxed hive army but Terran finally got a unit that could deal with mass mutas and terran can still do mid game timing so the matchup isn't as bad as PvT. I have no clue about PvZ though. | ||
Lightrush
Bulgaria164 Posts
| ||
Play3rFTW
United States3 Posts
On May 06 2016 09:06 Shield wrote: Some people vote for a race just because last GSL Code S was won by protoss. I think you should vote in general. The truth is protoss is the least played race. It doesn't make sense if the strongest race is the least played race. Some could say fun is more important but there are a lot of people in sc2 who are happy to play whatever is the strongest not the most fun. I completely agree with you everyone believes that just because a world championship tier player won with that specific race/faction the believe that one is currently the strongest. It's not so much the race/faction you play it's the way you play and know what to play when to play it. | ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
On May 10 2016 04:45 NEEDZMOAR wrote: How about the fact that zest played like dogshit? Uh I second this? Just because he is a top Protoss player doesn't mean he is incapable of playing badly or unbeatable. I just saw a Proleague game where he made an obvious bad but small mistake, paused, tried to blame it on the hot keys, delayed the game about 20+ minutes, came back obviously tilted and got massacred by Solar ( a player he should rightfully kick the shit out of imo). Give Departure some respect as well, he's still a Kespa player. | ||
RaiZ
2813 Posts
![]() | ||
MadaoDotaSc2
Greece35 Posts
| ||
toriak
Slovakia477 Posts
isnt it the same for like 15 years or so ? | ||
FoxDog
170 Posts
On May 09 2016 02:34 TronJovolta wrote: WTF is wrong with this community? It's so very obviously Zerg. I think articulating it as "which race gives you the most trouble" would get more people to admit zvz is harder then zvp, when asking someone which race is the best they go bias mode and read the question as "which race of the other races is the most op" and this doesnt include your own because thats not "another" race, think about it. | ||
breaker1328
Canada295 Posts
On May 16 2016 06:11 FoxDog wrote: I think articulating it as "which race gives you the most trouble" would get more people to admit zvz is harder then zvp, when asking someone which race is the best they go bias mode and read the question as "which race of the other races is the most op" and this doesnt include your own because thats not "another" race, think about it. "Whichever race I am currently playing against is the strongest race, yes, even in mirror match ups." It's difficult for a lot of players to take a step back and look at the game balance as a whole when it comes to which race is the best. Protoss are stuck playing stargate openers all the time, zerg has a million mid game options but aren't that great late game without ultras, terrans are seemingly not allowed to play mech at all anymore, there's a lot of things to dislike about the balance but when you look at it objectively there's also counter balances where immortals and archons nullify an entire race in zerg, where terrans can win high level games with marines and medivacs, where zerg can mass muta/ling/bane and annoy their opponents into submission. I think game balance is in a pretty good place overall right now, even if some of the minutiae is frustrating. As a protoss and sometimes random player, I personally voted that zerg is the strongest race, even though my personal win rate is highest against zerg and lowest against toss. The immense amount of options that zerg has going into the midgame is something that, to me, is lacking in the other races. | ||
OkStyX
Canada1199 Posts
On May 16 2016 09:09 breaker1328 wrote: "Whichever race I am currently playing against is the strongest race, yes, even in mirror match ups." It's difficult for a lot of players to take a step back and look at the game balance as a whole when it comes to which race is the best. Protoss are stuck playing stargate openers all the time, zerg has a million mid game options but aren't that great late game without ultras, terrans are seemingly not allowed to play mech at all anymore, there's a lot of things to dislike about the balance but when you look at it objectively there's also counter balances where immortals and archons nullify an entire race in zerg, where terrans can win high level games with marines and medivacs, where zerg can mass muta/ling/bane and annoy their opponents into submission. I think game balance is in a pretty good place overall right now, even if some of the minutiae is frustrating. As a protoss and sometimes random player, I personally voted that zerg is the strongest race, even though my personal win rate is highest against zerg and lowest against toss. The immense amount of options that zerg has going into the midgame is something that, to me, is lacking in the other races. So the most reactive race (supposedly), Zerg has the most options in the most hectic point of the game to survive it? I mean late game by its nature is more static in terms of army comp, and every race had their own strengths and weaknesses in different points of the game. I wouldn't say that it's bad per se, it's what makes it fun. The defensive tools of protoss and terran make it hard to straight up kill them and player skill coupled with easy scouting and predictable cheese from zerg limits their early game killing threat in the early game. The varies midgame options let's you take that threat away and you gain some control of the tempo away from your Protoss or Terran players. I think it's a fine paradigm. The abilities of protoss or Terran players to have threat over their zerg opponents is pretty fierce. I think the game is pretty good where it is at as well, maybe the immortal shield decrease would be pretty cool for everyone. Terran seems the best designed right now and has some pretty cool tools at their disposal and very mobile powerful armies with crazy defensive capabilities. Able to switch from defensive turtle to snappING turtle real quick. Toss late game armies feel massively powerful but I don't think thats so bad as they are really vulnerable to tech switches in their static mid game. | ||
JWD[9]
364 Posts
Zerg (1134) 37% Terran (639) 21% Poll standings as off this post. 101% balanced ![]() | ||
Murlox
France1699 Posts
On May 15 2016 19:06 toriak wrote: what do u mean curently strongest ? isnt it the same for like 15 years or so ? You made me laugh. I voted protoss, as usual. | ||
SwiftCrane
26 Posts
I still don't see any P/Z army beating ~25 ravens, 10 vikings, some ranged liberators, 5 BCs, + a tiny bit of medivac/bio/ghost with mass scans. actually mass tempest ht with a few random ground units, maybe like blink stalker, im actually pretty sure terran has no counter to this Zerg can just get parasitic bomb vs so much air and a few corruptors along with any other unit like hydra ultra ling or whatever that "little bio medivac ghost amound won't be able to deal with even the smallest amount of ling bane ultra and the liberators that are supposed to protect them will just die to parasitic bomb | ||
DanceSC
United States751 Posts
| ||
odem
143 Posts
On May 17 2016 21:04 DanceSC wrote: Votes make sense, protoss is the least played and terrans are not going to whine about zerg players :/ people are more likely to vote for a race that they get annoyed versing rather than what is actually broken sherlock holmes at his peak. i'm glad u revealed the major and ongoing conspiracy against protoss which clearly can be deducted by the outcome of this poll. | ||
![]()
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19202 Posts
| ||
BronzeKnee
United States5214 Posts
http://aligulac.com/misc/balance/ | ||
Pugfarmer
70 Posts
| ||
Hularuns
United Kingdom37 Posts
Also protoss in PvT, ![]() But, it's all fairly even, Terran is the only race where the late game is a bit weaker than the rest, but I feel as if that's to do with Terrans yet adapting, but they don't seem to be underperforming. | ||
Boneyard0216
Canada32 Posts
Now - fear me and my shields. -.- | ||
Topdoller
United Kingdom3860 Posts
![]() | ||
FoxDog
170 Posts
On May 16 2016 09:09 breaker1328 wrote: "Whichever race I am currently playing against is the strongest race, yes, even in mirror match ups." It's difficult for a lot of players to take a step back and look at the game balance as a whole when it comes to which race is the best. Protoss are stuck playing stargate openers all the time, zerg has a million mid game options but aren't that great late game without ultras, terrans are seemingly not allowed to play mech at all anymore, there's a lot of things to dislike about the balance but when you look at it objectively there's also counter balances where immortals and archons nullify an entire race in zerg, where terrans can win high level games with marines and medivacs, where zerg can mass muta/ling/bane and annoy their opponents into submission. I think game balance is in a pretty good place overall right now, even if some of the minutiae is frustrating. As a protoss and sometimes random player, I personally voted that zerg is the strongest race, even though my personal win rate is highest against zerg and lowest against toss. The immense amount of options that zerg has going into the midgame is something that, to me, is lacking in the other races. finally someone who gets it, that was exactly what i was thinking too | ||
_Animus_
Bulgaria1064 Posts
| ||
looken
727 Posts
On May 29 2016 19:17 Topdoller wrote: Protoss , This pretty much sums it up. I am not doubting they are good players, but the fact they seem to roll over the other races with alarming regularity with no dip in form, basically means they race has no fundamental weakness to exploit. ![]() This made me vote Protoss as well. I dont know if it was just a lot of luck on the Tosses side of things, but their dominance in the Proleague playoffs was really sick. Especially in this format where players cant prepare for ONE player specifically but simply have to play their best against whoever gets send out next. If you also consider GSL zerg got extinct in the RO16 (yeah Losira made it through but there were 3 zerg in that group...) I cant understand how you can vote for zerg in this poll. I dont really care about the potential strength of a race. You can theorycraft all you want, but at the end of the day results tell a different story. Also i dont understand how we still have arguments like "overall protoss has only 40% win rate". In lower leagues (where these general results get generated since most players are in lower leagues) balance doesnt mean shit. i mean come on, winter made it to diamond with drone rushes... you wanna tell me drones are OP? If you look at balance it is my firm believe that you should only consider high lvl play. so i guess most of your personal experience simply shouldnt weigh in on these questions. | ||
ZertoN
Germany214 Posts
On May 11 2016 23:57 Hurricaned wrote: As a terran I feel like protoss is just too strong right now. It's always ahead economically. It has a lot of cheeses that are very powerful where theres little to no cheese that works as terran. Protoss late game army (air + storms) is simply unmatched by any terran composition and terran can not be aggressive until a long time because MSC defends so well. It's basically WoL PvT but instead of terran being strong in mid game it is now weak all game. Zerg has a very strong late game and in fact I don't know how to deal with a maxed hive army but Terran finally got a unit that could deal with mass mutas and terran can still do mid game timing so the matchup isn't as bad as PvT. I have no clue about PvZ though. amen | ||
zealotstim
United States455 Posts
| ||
bloodshy
10 Posts
| ||
| ||