EPTWhat do you think of the Starleague's best of one Ro32 for…
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
jinsanity
United States137 Posts
| ||
|
Angelavenger
United States59 Posts
| ||
|
PVJ
Hungary5214 Posts
It's an unbelievably tense and great format. | ||
|
zelderan
United States163 Posts
On June 21 2013 17:37 Angelavenger wrote: I really dislike this format. Players often staying in games they would normally leave in a bo3 or just cheesing all the time. Really prefer the gsl format. Exactly. People like Stardust who go for the baserace end up wining, which might be exciting at the time, but cheesers end up winning in the long run, wich is boring :\ | ||
|
Hall0wed
United States8486 Posts
On June 18 2013 11:19 Verator wrote: It is neither the GSL or OSL. Its WCS. And WCS, kind of sucks. Not only this but also this is Starcraft 2, not Broodwar. People seem to forget this important fact when talking about how "OSL has always been this way". I don't care too much about the format though. BO3 is better, but BO1 is not the worst thing ever. | ||
|
Savko
Canada45 Posts
| ||
|
BrainPaste
United States18 Posts
| ||
|
BrainPaste
United States18 Posts
On June 21 2013 19:02 PVJ wrote: Disappointing results to be honest. It's an unbelievably tense and great format. I agree. Even in the Finals, a Bo7 I think is too much. Best of 5 would be just fine. Makes the games more important, more intense, makes every encounter and mistake that much more magnified. | ||
digmouse
China6329 Posts
| ||
|
iyasq8
113 Posts
| ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
On June 18 2013 10:16 BisuDagger wrote: Love it. Love the drama. Deal with it. I know. BO1 bring about great moments in SC History. ^_^ | ||
|
Tx3Jorge
United States32 Posts
Bo1 matches in a group in ro32 is fine. Players have to win twice and are are allowed to lose once if they want to advance to ro16. Sound familar? Winning twice and losing once is the same as a bo3. If Bo3 in ro32 in a 32-player bracket format tournament is fine, then why would bo3 ro32 group-format tournament be any different? They're both the same. People who are disgusted that its "bo1" format don't know how to put things in perspective. | ||
|
Deadlyeye
Germany14 Posts
wcs should have bo3 because its blizzards intention to provide a tournament in every region so viewers can tune in for the evening. in a bo1 theres 5 matches... include some all ins and its over in an hour (aditional 2 hrs for advertising, ok). anyway, ONE format for wcs (at least in one region). esl and mlg (probably nasl too) stick to the gsl bo3 system, so we have wcs eu/na bo3, wcs kr bo3 when goms in charge and one stray dog. | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
I hate the way in a Bo3 you can go for a quick all in or go super eco if you're a game ahead. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
I think for the purpose of qualifying (especially with sc2 being reasonably volatile, and the fact there are only 4 seasons per year) they should have a more dense qualifying process with more games played. However, if the Ro32 is going to be part of the main tournament I actually prefer the best of 1, simply because it allows us to have two groups per day and drastically shorten this part of the tournament. | ||
|
tns
1054 Posts
On June 18 2013 10:16 BisuDagger wrote: Love it. Love the drama. Deal with it. drama makes people sad T^T fortunately it can makes few laugh... but still... thought WCS was a whole blizzard tournament? why wcs.eu premier bo3 and wcs.kr bo1 allowing koreans to compete other region to equalize foreigners skills... oh it makes sense... more games for foreigners to improve and catch up with koreans... but still... it's such a chaotic format bracket... | ||
|
karlkarlson
26 Posts
| ||
| ||
