And on top of that bo3/5/7 is way more fun to watch than bo1.
What do you think of the Starleague's best of one Ro32 for…
Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
Tuczniak
1561 Posts
And on top of that bo3/5/7 is way more fun to watch than bo1. | ||
nimdil
Poland3743 Posts
On June 18 2013 10:16 BisuDagger wrote: Love it. Love the drama. Deal with it. ^this. Also so far there are no surprises. I think in Bo1 format players are less willing to gamble. | ||
Salivanth
Australia1071 Posts
Since the maps are randomised, maps don't make much of a difference in this calculation. The more lopsided the maps, even lopsided equally (Such as a map pool comprised of two maps in a TvZ, one with a 90% win-rate for Terran, one with a 90% win-rate for Zerg) the better this is for the less skilled player, but the maps aren't THAT lopsided. The main reason I dislike the change is simple: Less games to watch. + Show Spoiler + Maths shown in spoiler. The possible outcomes are: Red 2-0 Blue: 36% chance. 60% * 60% = 36%. Blue 2-0 Red: 16% chance. 40% * 40% = 16%. Red 2-1 Blue: 28.8% chance. Blue wins g1, Red wins the next two: 40% * 60% * 60% = 14.4% Red wins g1, Blue wins g2, Red wins g3: 60% * 40% * 60% = 14.4% Blue 2-1 Red: 19.2% chance. Red wins g1. Blue wins the next two: 60% * 40% * 40% = 9.6% Blue wins g1, Red wins g2, Blue wings g3: 40% * 60% * 40% = 9.6% Total chance of Red winning the Bo3: 64.8%. Green 2-0 Yellow: 64%. 80% * 80% = 64%. Yellow 2-0 Green: 4%. 20% * 20% = 4%. Green 2-1 Yellow: 80% * 80% * 20% = 12.8%. Total of 25.6%. Yellow 2-1 Green: 20% * 20% * 80% = 3.2%. Total of 6.4%. Green's chances: 89.6%. | ||
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
EDIT: This has nothing to do with the Higher BO rewarding the player with the better chance to win (mathematically). But, I like how a series plays out between two players. The possibility of long term head games. The comeback after being down 0-2. ETC. | ||
Sjokola
Netherlands800 Posts
But I don't like the inconsistency between the wcs regions. I think it's best to let OSL be seperate from wcs. I like their format but not for wcs | ||
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
| ||
Thor.Rush
Sweden702 Posts
The thrill of new strategies and fast paced games. sure fair point. | ||
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
I think this is also good for the metagame because players will have to spend more effort into practicing to defend the "standard" cheeses, but at the same time it will encourage well-prepared snipe builds. | ||
oneill12
Romania1221 Posts
| ||
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
| ||
midnight999
United States257 Posts
On June 18 2013 14:09 Vault Boy wrote: Its this "GomTV does BO3 so we do something different" again... Proly not. OSL used this format for years. | ||
nimdil
Poland3743 Posts
| ||
Kabras
Romania3508 Posts
| ||
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19032 Posts
On June 20 2013 23:46 Sated wrote: This can happen in a Bo3, especially when the loser picks the next map. Someone can easily prepare a strategy for a specific map and then pick that map if they lose a game. Seeing how someone deals with losing to a prepared strategy, timing or all-in is interesting, which is why I like BoX better when X > 1. It's all about reactions and longevity for me, not single map strategies. EDIT: BisuDagger said they "love the drama". I would argue that a Bo3 has more drama than a Bo1, as you have the possibility of seeing someone go full-tilt after losing to a prepared strategy or all-in in the first game etc. which you will rarely get to see in a Bo1 format. I actually am saying I love the drama. Not sure who this "they" is. And the drama I'm referring to is all you people out there freaking out about bo1's. It amuses me to hell. So thank you all for picking up some pitch forks and getting angry cause the more drama the better. | ||
EonShiKeno
United States122 Posts
| ||
KivTM
Australia90 Posts
(I can only imagine how many OSL's Bisu might have had if GSL format was used.) | ||
Vasoline73
United States7674 Posts
| ||
KivTM
Australia90 Posts
| ||
jeffvip
211 Posts
| ||
| ||