What are your thoughts on the balance test map? - Page 2
Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
| ||
NOOBALOPSE
Canada802 Posts
On November 23 2012 09:21 Survivor61316 wrote: Yeah, sorry man, Ive never heard a caster or anyone else use those terms until right now.. Lol, he's trying to say that really you can complain about anything in this game if you really wanted. Imbalings imbastim, you name it, but in reality you're just QQIng and not getting anything done. That's why i find it completely useless to debate balance. | ||
DMZ
Canada51 Posts
On November 23 2012 09:16 Verator wrote: Just like Freewin colossus and unbeatable forcefields and imbastim. ^^ | ||
NMxSardines
77 Posts
| ||
LowEloPlayer
United States205 Posts
On November 23 2012 11:13 merinerkongprine wrote: Ive also never heard casters use gglords or winfestors either I've heard tons of casters and people use the term. Also, even Artosis and Tasteless (the former of which has become a figure that never complains about balance ever) laughed in agreement when somebody told him the collective noun for a group of brood lords is a "GG" of brood lords | ||
LowEloPlayer
United States205 Posts
On November 24 2012 09:47 NOOBALOPSE wrote: Lol, he's trying to say that really you can complain about anything in this game if you really wanted. Imbalings imbastim, you name it, but in reality you're just QQIng and not getting anything done. That's why i find it completely useless to debate balance. Yea, QQing doesn't get anything done, why bother complain about balance? Why bother complain about anything? Wouldn't humans just be better off if they couldn't voice their opinion on anything? | ||
mahO
France274 Posts
On November 24 2012 12:38 LowEloPlayer wrote: I've heard tons of casters and people use the term. Also, even Artosis and Tasteless (the former of which has become a figure that never complains about balance ever) laughed in agreement when somebody told him the collective noun for a group of brood lords is a "GG" of brood lords And please remind me, what race do they play? Like 80% of casters? Ooh... | ||
Atlan___
Germany38 Posts
| ||
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On November 23 2012 12:39 Survivor61316 wrote: Listen to husky, day9, or hd sometime then bro lol. Personally I like the change to fungal becoming a projectile but feel the psionic thing isn't that great, ghosts are out of the way and emp range isn't even that big, one emp = 2-4 infestors? How do ghosts get close enough to the infestors to cast emp btw? | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
Jakkerr
Netherlands2549 Posts
On November 23 2012 09:16 Verator wrote: Just like Freewin colossus and unbeatable forcefields and imbastim. what? xD you must have made those up yourself. | ||
StarscreamG1
Portugal1652 Posts
On November 24 2012 22:00 darkness wrote: Is 1-1-1 raven seeker missile OP vs P? I haven't tried it that much, but it looks very powerful to me. The PDD to defend stalkers fire will always be more important than HSM. | ||
Lukeeze[zR]
Switzerland6838 Posts
| ||
Novalisk
Israel1818 Posts
| ||
Skoop
United States214 Posts
On November 25 2012 01:14 Lukeeze[zR] wrote: It's hard to believe but somehow blizzard managed to nerf fungal for ZvP and not for ZvT, unbelievable. DKim hates us :[ Well ghosts can't be fungal'd anymore, that's at least a minor change. It's the patch effect. People will think this makes the ghost better and start playing with it more in TvZ and realize how good it was to begin with. However, I can't see them keeping the changes that prevent fungals on warp prisms and dark templar. | ||
breadfanSC2
7 Posts
I really like the raven change, and I think the same treatment should be tried with battlecruiser/yamato cannon (which might promote some lategame bc use) I think the PvZ end-game problem might be helped some in HotS, and I don't think that's something that can be fixed with balance tweaks. | ||
fireforce7
United States334 Posts
| ||
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
Grapefruit
Germany439 Posts
| ||
mhael
United States102 Posts
| ||
| ||