|
On November 16 2011 00:31 bbm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 00:04 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 22:23 Velr wrote:On November 15 2011 22:11 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 21:59 FoxSpirit wrote:On November 15 2011 21:32 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 21:24 monkh wrote: I'm right in thinking none of the SC2 talk shows talked about Stephano's practice schedule? What is there to talk about? Either he's lying and he really practices more than 3 hours a day, or he's telling the truth and the game is a joke. The article said 4 hours. And a sports where you can excel if you train 4 hours a day and are prodigious is a joke? Michael Phelps trains nearly 5 hours, 7 days a week. And we know what he achieved. Or maybe it's just that swimming is a joke? Or maybe chess is a joke? Because many top players also put up around 4 hours each and every day. Every day. Do yourself a favour and don't stick to that train of thought. It's pretty disadvantageous in life, ya know. Best regards, Fox So then are you going to argue that Stephano is just so good that he gets twice as much out of practice as other players? Or that the Korean teams are wrong and have been wasting their time all these years? If that's the case I hope someone shows them the light soon so they can stop wasting their youth pointlessly trying to get good. You bound the legitimacy of a sport/sc2 to the amount of training/day required to excel. Thats retarded logic. Thats all. It's perfectly reasonable logic to call a game a fraud when one player can beat someone who trains twice as much just by having good "mentality." What if they're just better? My flatmate is just flat out better at games than me. We get a brand new game, and he'll just be better. Whether it's call of duty, chess, gears of war, starcraft, trackmania or forza, he's just better than me. Infuriating. Doesn't matter how much I practice, he's just better. His mind is more attuned to gaming, his reactions better, his multitasking more functinoal, whatever I don't know. But without practicing more he's better than me. Similarly I remember a guy in my class at school, who, having never played golf before, after 45 minutes was hitting every shot 200 yards at the driving range. I can't do that shit and I've played for hours (not _masses_ of hours, but more than he had).
So then Stephano is some kind of savant who learns twice as much from every game compared to other pros? Or does Huk have a learning disability that makes it so that he has to work twice as hard to improve to the same degree? There's no such thing as "natural ability" when it comes to learned skills. It all comes down to how dedicated you are to improving.
|
United Arab Emirates874 Posts
Oh my god. That poster is so amazing!!! Hope they do well in MLG!!
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Wasn't Day9's post something to do with Fantasy's Mech play vs Zerg?
Anyway, great article. I disagree with a few points (I think going to the EG house certainly improved Idra's play, and not just his mental strength) but overall, a very cool analysis. I'd love to see interviews with other foriegn high level players, such as Thorzain, or even better, Mana. He's still in school, but is capable of getting to the finals of almost any tournament he enters (but incapable of winning ). How he does it with his schedule I have no idea.
|
So then Stephano is some kind of savant who learns twice as much from every game compared to other pros? Or does Huk have a learning disability that makes it so that he has to work twice as hard to improve to the same degree? There's no such thing as "natural ability" when it comes to learned skills.
Natural ability certainly exists. You should read up on it, for example twins given the same training, they don´t get to the same skill level. Some people are just born for sports, they have the body, the mindset and everything to become good, becoming as good and/or even better then some other people who do nothing but practice. But eventually, if one practices 10 hours and the other 2 hours, the one who practices 10 hours will catch up and surpass the naturally talented one.
Your "competitive spirit", your mentality, your age, your gender even how you were raised up - these are all things that greatly affect your rate of improvement in competitive sports. These things don´t affect your play in your sport, but yet attribute to your "natural skill" in that sport. HuK doesn´t have any sort of learning disability, nor is Stephano any kind of savant, both are very naturally skilled players, but my guess is out of the two, Stephano scores higher in the "natural abilities" section then HuK, just a guess, cause his resaults recently seem to indicate he´s very talented and has the mentality of a champion.
|
On November 16 2011 01:11 n0btozz wrote: Great article, you and WaxAngel are both phenomenal writers, really enjoy it.
However, I want to be "critical" of this article. From a coach´s standpoint, the Korean model is simply better then any other we currently see in the starcraft scene. That is not a myth like you claim in this article. Many scientific articles have been written on training and how to maximize the amount of top pro´s in any sport.
A couple of factors weigh in, for how long you train, how often, with whom, where and under what kind of an instructor. Those are just a few examples. Of course, adding to that is the individual himself. I can have twins, training the exact same way, yet one will get better then the other, you can call it the natural factor. Within that, you have the players "need" for winning, you have his natural talent, you have his passion, and then you have his (some say) gender. And gender matters a lot, because in a competitive environment, men have an advantage, but that´s irrelevant for this article.
Back to training - In the short term of a year or two, the Korean model has already established it´s dominance. No foreigner can claim the success comparable to that of the top Koreans. The Korean training model gives us so many top top top players, compared to any other model. The Korean model, which is a copy of good sport related coaching models, get´s us top level players, the other coaching models, "bashing the NA server" and "not training so much but still a bit" have not shown us resaults even close to those given to us by the Korean model.
To name 2 players outside of the Korean model, that have in 1 month out of the last 12, bashed a couple of Koreans in a tournament and all of a sudden the Korean model isn´t superior to the other models, this is very faulty reasoning. Also, only 1-2 of those tourneys had the top tier Koreans in them, and when there were top tier Koreans, none of them were either NesTea or MVP, which reminds me of their trip to Blizzcon, in this revolutionary month, where MVP and NesTea absolutely roflstomped the top qualified players from the rest of the world, i´m not sure they even broke a sweat.
This article obviously was supposed to breath life into the hope of foreigners being able to dominate in the SC2 scene equally to Koreans, but that is a distant dream simply because the Korean model dominates that of any foreigner model currently employed. The Korean model is mirrored in any top sport training model, the guys playing football with their friends every day, don´t get as good as the guys who play football and/or do football related practice regimes all day with their professional club. However, 1-2 guys might have a real talent in the former group, and being able to play on par with the guys in the latter model, however, they will not reach the same hight as equally talented players who train all day, simply because their training methods are better.
When SC2 has been out for such a short while, we will have some foreigners who are able to come close to the Koreans, the Korean model hasn´t paid off fully, not even close. Right now, with much fewer players playing then play in the rest of the world, we can say out of the top 100 players, probably 60-70% or more of them are Koreans. The model doesn´t make up for individual skill/talent, but that get´s less and less relevant over time as the Korean model produces more good players. What i´m trying to say is, the Korean model produces a lot of really really good players, some of whom become elite simply because of natural talent, not everyone can become elite. We in the foreigner scene have just as many players with the talent to become elite, but our training models don´t get them there, they can like Stephano, become really good even though they don´t practice that much, but Stephano isn´t one to take down the GSL any time soon (sorry Stephano fans). However, had Stephano spent the last year in the Korean model, I am pretty sure NesTea wouldn´t have 90%< win ratio.
This is mirrored in the start of starcraft BW, where Koreans hadn´t gotten as untouchable. We have every reason to learn from that, over time the Korean model not only shapes the top 2-5 players. It will always start to add on one and one who get to that "elite tier" which isn´t reachable just by playing 3 hours a day, or bashing inferior players all day long. In 5 years time, if foreigners don´t start to do what EG did and start pro houses (rather in Europe since the overall quality of top EU players seems to outshine the NA ones pretty hard), the foreigner scene will fall behind rather quickly, and we´ll end up with the same situation as in BW, not a single foreigner who can claim he´s a top 30 player in the world. Let´s not let this October month or this article fool us, in the field of "quality practicing" the Korean model is much closer to how it´s supposed to be then the current foreigner training.
However, just to not only be critical, the part about mentality was great. It most often falls under the persons talents, and can contrary to popular belief be "coached" or taught to players. Hence the players with the mentality of them being champions, usually end up as champions. Good mentality is really important as we all know.. Good players with poor mentality don´t get far in any sport.
----
To add a little to the article, inspire the same sort of hope, I know for a fact that there is still time to make foreigners the top players in Starcraft. If the foreigner teams would get team houses in say, Europe, put up the same model as the Koreans have, the time it would take to surpass them would not be long. Why? Because the player pool in Europe, and therefor the naturally talented players pool of the foreigner servers is so much much much bigger then what Koreans have to play with. The quality of practice on the EU server would get much higher, giving the lower level players (mid/high masters now) a chance to play the worlds best on a regular basis, upping their own skill. This is why so many Koreans are so good, they are always playing the best players and therefor improving faster (playing against better players is a proven training method and considered to be one of the fastest training methods in sports ranging from football to chess). But we can´t do that in 5 years time, then we are too far behind. So I really hope the foreigner teams start to realize there is a lot of money in starcraft, and throwing up team houses and getting the best players in the world together, living and breathing starcraft, is actually going to pay off for them and the foreigner scene very fast.
Foreigners fighting!
/no flame please.
While i just skimmed parts of your post (sorry), I feel that you said more or less what I was about to write. Let me sum up my thoughts.
1) You don't have anywhere near statistical significance to say that foreigners are doing ok from these 3 tournaments. Out of the 12 months of sc2, with the foreign scene drawing talent from 7 billion people, korea from 50 millions, you find only one months where foreigners do well. That is a pretty clear indication about who has understood best how to train. It is a sign that foreigners CAN win, its not 0% probability, but not a sign that they win anywhere near as much as they should do if they'd train as efficiently as Koreans. Also you say that we shouldn't use foreigners bad results in code A since its harder for them compete just after traveling, yet you are fine with referring to tournaments where the Koreans have to travel? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
2) You make a very good point about mentality, and specially at high level with all its meta game and (mis)information and scouting in every game, the psychological part is really important. Maybe getting a dedicated psychologist on each team is the way to go? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
So please, in the future, present these articles as what they are: great motivational speeches for fans to cheer for our players. Not analysis of facts with indisputable conclusions. You don't have more facts behind your statements than any of the raging "KOREA >> ALL!!" or "FOREIGN POWAH!!" fanatics in the sc2 forum, you just formulate your statements infinitely better. In the end you are just fueling all the baseless claims in the sc2 forum rather than showing how you can be passionate about your player without trying to bend the truth.
Sorry for the criticism. :o) You asked for feedback, and here you got it. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" I should mention again that the article really woke up the foreigner-fan in me, and reminded me about my deep zerg feelings for Stephano. (no homo)
|
While an interesting article it doesn't change that I don't think Stephano alone disproves anything. Idra has a long history of hardcore playing, spent a lot of time in Korean and was BW pro. It is often joked (and for good reason) that maybe Huk should be considered a Korean and then there is Stephano.
Meko wrote: "It was clear after IPL3, and his subsequent ESWC triumph that either we'd been looking at the foreigner-Korean relationship wrong, or Stephano was one hell of a fluke. "
Personally I think Meko is missing the third (and imo the correct conclusion) that Stephano is just THAT much more talented then either Idra or Huk. Huk is a product of hard work, Idra of talent and experience while Stephano is wonder boy. And there we have what seems to be the biggest taboo in esports, talking about talent. So my conclusion is that Stephano is as good as he is despite how little he plays, despite that he is not on a serious team, despite that he has never been to korea and from where I am sitting I see the greatest sc 1/2 talent we have had outside of korea.
|
On November 16 2011 01:46 Krogan wrote: While an interesting article it doesn't change that I don't think Stephano alone disproves anything. Idra has a long history of hardcore playing, spent a lot of time in Korean and was BW pro. It is often joked (and for good reason) that maybe Huk should be considered a Korean and then there is Stephano.
Meko wrote: "It was clear after IPL3, and his subsequent ESWC triumph that either we'd been looking at the foreigner-Korean relationship wrong, or Stephano was one hell of a fluke. "
Personally I think Meko is missing the third (and imo the correct conclusion) that Stephano is just THAT much more talented then either Idra or Huk. Huk is a product of hard work, Idra of talent and experience while Stephano is wonder boy. And there we have what seems to be the biggest taboo in esports, talking about talent. So my conclusion is that Stephano is as good as he is despite how little he plays, despite that he is not on a serious team, despite that he has never been to korea and from where I am sitting I see the greatest sc 1/2 talent we have had outside of korea.
maybe that was what meko meant with a fluke? That normally the foreign training model does not produce very good players, but Stephano came out as a fluke. I dont know, I have no clue about the context, so sorry if I don't make any sense.
|
We better savor it while it lasts this Era of Foreigner Victories may not last.
|
stephano is a babe just saying
and this was a really great article
|
Just to chip in, tree.hugger wrote the text, meko 'only' did the photoshop.
|
for me it has never been about "foreigner" of "Korean" gamers, it has been about the peak of possible play. if a foreigner can be the best player in the world ill root for him, until then ill be cheering for people who are.
gl.
|
I hate to disagree with one small part of such a nicely written article, but when I look at his mechanics I come to the conclusion they're rather poor.
His hotkey scheme is simple but doesn't allow for perfect play, and his multitasking is unimpressive. Ultimately, being able to build a tremendous amount of units as a Zerg depend primarily on drone, unit, and expansion timings, and it is in this area where Stephano excels. In particular, he seems to understand how to dominate a game a with low tier units without getting checkmated against a max army of higher tech units.
|
our boys still got crushed on their turf...
|
I will wait with overreacting on this until there will be some consistency in foreign wins against koreans. What we have here is just not enough to think that we can evenly compete. Mentioned players give some hope though.
|
On November 16 2011 00:31 bbm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 00:04 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 22:23 Velr wrote:On November 15 2011 22:11 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 21:59 FoxSpirit wrote:On November 15 2011 21:32 BrosephBrostar wrote:On November 15 2011 21:24 monkh wrote: I'm right in thinking none of the SC2 talk shows talked about Stephano's practice schedule? What is there to talk about? Either he's lying and he really practices more than 3 hours a day, or he's telling the truth and the game is a joke. The article said 4 hours. And a sports where you can excel if you train 4 hours a day and are prodigious is a joke? Michael Phelps trains nearly 5 hours, 7 days a week. And we know what he achieved. Or maybe it's just that swimming is a joke? Or maybe chess is a joke? Because many top players also put up around 4 hours each and every day. Every day. Do yourself a favour and don't stick to that train of thought. It's pretty disadvantageous in life, ya know. Best regards, Fox So then are you going to argue that Stephano is just so good that he gets twice as much out of practice as other players? Or that the Korean teams are wrong and have been wasting their time all these years? If that's the case I hope someone shows them the light soon so they can stop wasting their youth pointlessly trying to get good. You bound the legitimacy of a sport/sc2 to the amount of training/day required to excel. Thats retarded logic. Thats all. It's perfectly reasonable logic to call a game a fraud when one player can beat someone who trains twice as much just by having good "mentality." What if they're just better? My flatmate is just flat out better at games than me. We get a brand new game, and he'll just be better. Whether it's call of duty, chess, gears of war, starcraft, trackmania or forza, he's just better than me. Infuriating. Doesn't matter how much I practice, he's just better. His mind is more attuned to gaming, his reactions better, his multitasking more functinoal, whatever I don't know. But without practicing more he's better than me. Similarly I remember a guy in my class at school, who, having never played golf before, after 45 minutes was hitting every shot 200 yards at the driving range. I can't do that shit and I've played for hours (not _masses_ of hours, but more than he had).
The point isn't arguing about Stephano specifically. I don't think anyone doubts that Stephano is one of the most "talented" SC2 players in the world, including the current Korean SC2 scene. Note, I put talented in quotations because I think it's a nebulous and poorly defined word, but I'll just define it in this case as someone who can grasp the intricacies of real time strategy games faster than the average human being. Everyone is fine with Stephano being an outlier - an aberration in the mass myriad of progamers who just aren't as talented.
However, since the point this article tries to make is that because practicing less but having a "right mentality" seems to be working for a select couple of players (Idra and Stephano, specifically), some are making the inference that the entire whole of the foreigner scene is catching up as well because of this. If that's the case, then it sure seems like a mighty huge coincidence that all of a sudden, in late September, foreigners are just "getting it." There is no collective hive mind in the foreigner scene, which makes this all the more strange of a point to make.
This comes back to the original argument: if just "getting it" with a right mentality is enough, then what's so impressive about these feats? Idra is a good example: his mechanics, relative to almost all foreigners and even some Koreans, are excellent. But compared to the S-class BW players or even some BW A-teamers? They're a joke. His tactical awareness and sense of strategy? Even compared to some foreigners, he's not top notch in those areas. Yet, if just having a confident mental attitude can push him over the top in this game, while it couldn't in BW, then I have no qualms about saying that the competition is farcical due to the shallowness of the game.
Some people seem to have a short memory, but let's look at WCGs in the past for BW. I mean, everyone acknowledges the fact that in BW, Koreans were invincible, right? Ok, let's see:
2001: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/WCG_2001
Doggi and Gundam both lost twice to guys like Nazgul and Elky. But oh, you say, they weren't that good, and BW wasn't very established in 2001. Ok, fine.
Let's jump ahead to 2003, about 3 years after the establishment of Korean progaming: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/WCG_2003
Control lost to Fisheye in the groups. HOT lost to PJ. then in the brackets, gets 2-0'd by some Brazilian I don't even remember. Fisheye manages to take a game off Ogogo in the Finals, and Grrr... manages to beat Control for 3rd place. Okay, Grrr, although falling off by then, was still pretty damn good.
But aha, you say. Most of these guys still aren't that good, and many lucked out because the Korean WCG qualifiers was where the real competition happened, and just by the luck of the draw, we got some mediocre Koreans in the world finals - only Boxer, Yellow, Reach, Nal_ra, and a young Nada at the time were noteworthy. However...doesn't this strangely sound familiar to SC2, where only the top few Koreans are actually any good in the grand scheme of things? Let's keep going.
2005: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/WCG_2005
Androide beats Silent Control 2-0, and takes second after Foru. Sure, it was a big upset, but hey...this is BW in 2005, remember - where the Koreans are supposedly already invincible? So why the hell are foreigners still winning BoX's? Btw, Foru and Silent Control both dropped games to foreigners during the group stages as well.
This goes on and on throughout the years, up until around 2008'ish, when the current crop of Koreans, with their inhuman mechanics, finally became impossible to beat for even the best foreigners.
Sure, none of the foreigners ever won a gold in BW at WCG, but they took quite a few seconds, and beat quite a few Koreans throughout the years. The point here is that, even in BW, with its much higher mechanical demands, it was possible for foreigners to win YEARS after foreigner interest dropped and BW became a national sport in Korea. How? PURE VARIANCE. By nature, an RTS game with limited information introduces elements that aren't human-controlled. No human being is prescient - so why aren't we just seeing variance here? Why do we have to conjure up some convoluted reasoning to explain one month of "foreigner success"? (I wouldn't even call it success...more one like month of Idra and Stephano doing well).
|
@fishuu interesting but i disagree well written. with all due respect, be more efficient with your language. You could have cut 1/4 of the words without losing any meaning.
|
On November 15 2011 15:49 NoctisAnima wrote: i wonder what Stephano thinks of that picture o.o
'They got my boobs just right.'
Awesome pictures. Great article. 10/10.
|
|
Great article. I expect a korean win at Providence, but we still know the foreigners can win.
|
On November 15 2011 16:09 Qaatar wrote:Show nested quote +Might the future look different? We might have good reason to desperately wish it will. At the heart of 'balance' in starcraft is a belief that the better, harder working, smarter player will always win. In challenging the idea that practice is what matters most of all in Starcraft 2, we open up the argument that Starcraft 2 is simply not as balanced a game as we wish to believe. That players who have put in less time, in less rigorous conditions can win is a threat to the basic premise of Starcraft 2 competition. This argument seems like too dramatic an overall conclusion after just a month of foreigner success. But it might be that we all have a stake in rooting for Koreans in the future, if only because it'll mean that practice is slowly starting to make perfect. This is the only part of the article that I agree with. If practice doesn't make perfect in this game as it does in BW, then I might as well as stop watching. I can only hope that HoTS and LoTV bring more depth, both physical and mental, to this game.
Practice NEVER makes perfect and never has. Practice makes permanent. How well you spend your time practicing will matter for how well you do, not just how long you practice.
|
|
|
|