EPT[SC2B] Benchmarks, 2v2, and the Patch! - Page 3
| Forum Index > News |
|
seRapH
United States9706 Posts
| ||
|
LuDwig-
Italy1143 Posts
 | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
 | ||
|
hyst.eric.al
United States2332 Posts
| ||
|
Sok4R
Germany124 Posts
Even at the highest resolution numbering almost double the amount of pixels it does not reflect back on the frame rate of Starcraft 2. I have yet to explain this behavior, but obviously this is interesting to say the least. There is a slight drop, but that could also be explained by the nature of the tests. I have an idea for this: A higher resolution puts more load only onto the GPU, not the CPU (or say something like 99,9%, your CPU isn't affected much by the output resolution) . Looks like SC2 is heavily limited by the CPU, as most RTS games (or games with a top-down-view) are. Also, in your "older" PC is a quite new and good graphics card. To prove that, you should make benchmarks with different CPUs, but the same GPU and vice versa. Right now, you got completly different systems, which make a good indication on how the game runs on them. But it's not a good setup for benchmarking and see which component of the system limits performance. | ||
|
crate
United States2474 Posts
From what I've seen, mass recall works exactly like SC1 recall. You target an area, all your units in the targeted area are warped to the mothership. I think you're misunderstanding it. Nice article, too bad I can't play SC2  | ||
|
Titusmaster6
United States5936 Posts
| ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
I am also glad they didn't nerf zerg. I have watched a number of platinum level plays where it wasn't imba and the terran or toss scouted, prepared for it, and countered it with relative ease. | ||
|
0mgVitaminE
United States1278 Posts
| ||
|
tedster
984 Posts
| ||
|
Polygamy
Austria1114 Posts
| ||
|
WheelOfTime
Canada331 Posts
I like. | ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
|
danl9rm
United States3111 Posts
| ||
520
United States2822 Posts
| ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
loved the 2v2 strategies HB! | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
You say the mutalisks are actually OVERpowered? To me they seemed quite useless, i never seen them being effetive, only if they cought the opponent absolutely off-guard | ||
Insane
United States4991 Posts
On February 27 2010 07:06 Geo.Rion wrote: wait! You say the mutalisks are actually OVERpowered? To me they seemed quite useless, i never seen them being effetive, only if they cought the opponent absolutely off-guard I don't think Mutalisks are overpowered. On February 27 2010 06:38 danl9rm wrote: actually, Insane, if you hold your cursor over the arrows on the ladder it says it's from the previous week. so, the up and down arrows correspond to whether you moved up or down over the past week. Really? I swear I tried that | ||
|
Floydian
United Kingdom374 Posts
| ||
|
Exteray
United States1094 Posts
| ||
| ||
