[N]Emergency Quarantine Mafia - Page 23
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Let's make that really simple: If I am mafia, it's my job to simply lynch TOWN Kelsier, it's part and parcel that I would create a narrative to lynch him or drown him out with a wall of text. Why would it be a game breaking problem that I created a case on him? If I am town and Kelsier is town, he has never expressed any hesitance about my playstyle ever before, I could be wrong and he could just ignore it and hunt for mafia. I didn't push that case against him just in case he was feeling bad and Palmar etc gave him many outs to come back repeatedly for a good 12+ hours and he did nothing with it. If I am town and Kelsier is mafia, he has to create a narrative and excuses to not play, deflect from the case and react to the pressure. He KNOWS that a town Holyflare is a bully (has any of my behaviour this game been bullyish? - look at my filter to find evidence that he knows I make cases as town) and he reacts badly. The only thing that makes sense is the bolded since, like my case said, he has the perfect narrative and his mafia style is to "deconstruct" with the perfect information rather than construct cases and direction to the thread flow. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 27 2020 13:01 Rels wrote: HF do you have a read on Chez? Not a clue. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On March 27 2020 13:08 Holyflare wrote: I went back and read Trfel's last game and it feels a lot more free flowing and conversationally asking questions in paragraphs than I'm seeing here. Don't know if it means anything but it's definitely a different playstyle at least. This seems more like state facts, no intrigue? In my mind Trfel was more of a case maker than a freeflowing talker, but I probably didn't play with him in a long time | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 27 2020 13:27 Rels wrote: on this part TBH I don't understand you or GB. I don't see how him not voting early makes him scummy. I didn't say it did necessarily but why even have hesitance? It's not like your vote can't move once you have placed it and an added vote count creates pressure to the intended person you are voting, otherwise what's the pressure at all? If he agrees with my case, had further points to add to it about Kelsier's stance on LS then it's kind of strange suddenly to NOT be certain about where to place your vote and to be suddenly "conflicted" that Palmar, his other new scum read, is also voting Kelsier? It's just a line of text in a vote thread, what's the big deal about not being sure? It creates pressure and shows your INTENTION throughout the game to give players more information about where your head was at at any given time. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
On March 27 2020 13:40 Holyflare wrote: I didn't say it did necessarily but why even have hesitance? It's not like your vote can't move once you have placed it and an added vote count creates pressure to the intended person you are voting, otherwise what's the pressure at all? If he agrees with my case, had further points to add to it about Kelsier's stance on LS then it's kind of strange suddenly to NOT be certain about where to place your vote and to be suddenly "conflicted" that Palmar, his other new scum read, is also voting Kelsier? It's just a line of text in a vote thread, what's the big deal about not being sure? It creates pressure and shows your INTENTION throughout the game to give players more information about where your head was at at any given time. I mean, yes to everything, in a perfect world that's right ... but in my experience it's common for certain townies to hold their vote when they're not sure, so that's kind of a moot point in my opinion | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
##Vote KelsierSC | ||
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On March 27 2020 14:03 Holyflare wrote: You can't possibly see any situation where Kelsier is mafia??? What are his strong points in his filter? Hmm instantly twisted my words but ok. | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On March 27 2020 12:53 Holyflare wrote: I don't know what point you're trying to raise to be honest. Do you think that when I created the case on Kelsier those points magically jumped out to me while I was making it or do you think I already had a pre-determined set of points that I wanted to raise in the thread? Trfel asked me about that first quote here: I had already determined that Kelsier was mafia and wanted to test the waters with Sentinel some more to see if they were either mafia together or if there was a chance Sentinel could be town. It was entirely inconclusive but that's neither here nor there. I also didn't "jump back to Sentinel", I was questioning (and answering at some point) Rels' questions. You can see how I'm trying to reach a conclusion on RELS (not Sentinel) because I am asking Rels questions in relation to the events. So, no, I didn't become undecided between the two, since none of these questions relate to MY read on Sentinel in the slightest, rather Rels' read progression on me and Sentinel. The point I was trying to make is that you instantly came with a list of his posts, gave your opinion why you think he’s mafia only after being pressured to give reasons, but it’s literally KC first few posts. Essentially what you’re criticizing him for is what you’re doing to him. Giving opinions. But hey you determined he was mafia at some point with only about 10 posts. | ||
| ||