|
On June 28 2016 03:19 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 06:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Just looked at TT's filter for interactions regarding MD. On June 25 2016 22:36 Tictock wrote:On June 25 2016 22:27 Superbia wrote:On June 25 2016 22:21 Tictock wrote:On June 25 2016 21:28 Superbia wrote:
TT lend me your thoughts Almost caughtup. I'd like to know where you are going with Moosy and Jealous. Moosy's entrance feels too much like "hey guys, I'm claiming MAFIA, like I did last game I was TOWN". Feels too fake. I would expect town moosy to actually switch it up instead of doing nearly the same thing as last game. You know I kinda felt the same... It was overblown especially with his interaction with Damdred. I didn't get the same happy go lucky trolling feeling from him either, more like ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/T1ZPun4.jpg) I'm surprised you want to read Jealous based off an "I'm AFK" post. On June 26 2016 00:40 Tictock wrote:On June 26 2016 00:33 Damdred wrote:
And who exactly is scum TT? Even outside me? I could go with a yolo team of Art/Damdred/Moosy Though my gut feeling isn't so strong on Moosy atm ... (wasn't digging his opening though). Looks pretty bad to me. Soft scumming a scum whilst pushing others. The first post is one of the only ones actually addressing MD.That said, there wasn't much to go off on anyway so there is that. Scumreads TT for him being soft gut reading Moosy. Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 05:57 Damdred wrote:
I also think moosey flips town though meh. Just a gut feel nothing to base it on There is no way in world I'm gona believe you missed this post which is basically identical. Also you talk about tunnelling after this is so ironic...
I didn't scumread him for a soft gut read. I said that I scumread him for soft scumreading flipped scum whilst hardpushing others. It's a standard mafia strategy to soft scumread your scummates whilst pushing other players, and that's what TT had been doing. Damdred did nothing of the like, indicating he didn't really have a strong read or even had a townread on MD.
I also have plenty of other reasoning to townread Damdred which I didn't have for TT, so that adds to it.
|
On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask.
Why are you hard townreading GB?
Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town?
Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null?
|
Pls no killerino me mafia I want to to compleat my night action ty4listening.
|
Also, go Iceland!
![[image loading]](http://icelandflag.facts.co/icelandflagpicture2.png)
|
On June 28 2016 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask. Why are you hard townreading GB? Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town? Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null?
I am also interested in Skynx' answer to the first question. GB does not seem town to me right now.
|
On June 28 2016 04:15 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask. Why are you hard townreading GB? Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town? Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null? I am also interested in Skynx' answer to the first question. GB does not seem town to me right now.
[1]GB
This post 1st opened my eyes:
On June 25 2016 09:25 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2016 09:22 Damdred wrote:
I think art v qt is t v t.
Its good though keep it up. Actually, doesn't it look like they are trying to distance from each other?
No one commented on this save Tumblewood. (also to an extent Art but he was more like ridiculing the idea rather than criticising) I thought it was a good hint at Damdred's 1st signs of being scummy.
He is actively trying to progress the game
+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2016 00:29 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 00:26 Superbia wrote:On June 27 2016 00:24 GlowingBear wrote:
Superbia, what are your reads? Unsure on Damdred. Very unsure on Art given his last few posts, though I'm prone to stick with my earlier read on him (which is town). By proxy I'm also iffy on TT. He has been more aggro this game than I expect from him d1. Outside of those interesting players I would say: Moosy should die. EC should die. Ok but I need townreads We have to decide the mayor and the pardonner
+ Show Spoiler +On June 26 2016 12:07 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:03 Tumblewood wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. why though like, people call koshi bad all the time and it's the same exact thing Because silently wanting to be elected as mayor is something I would expect from mafia. If I am mafia and I'm seeing town organising themselves - specially when a town player is being elected as president -, I would start to discredit people in order to push my agenda. It's not like calling Koshi bad. I can call Koshi bad and not vote with him, but if Koshi was the towniest person in the game I would vote him 100% of the times simply because having a bad town mayor is better than risking having a good mayor that could be mafia
+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2016 00:42 GlowingBear wrote:I had QT as top town for the way he was engaging the thread. But he isn't here anymore. Kinda dropped a little but still my top town. I have Tumble as probably town for his interest in the game and the way he was putting thoughts on what I've wrote. Downside is that I don't remember him giving any reads. I had you as null to scummy but I like the way you came back to the thread. You're leaning town. Damdred is leaning scum. I think most of his posts are disinterested, and that makes me suspicious of him. He is not naturally reacting to what has been posted but he is here. He just, from times to times, post reads and chill. The problem is that his town passes looks like the town passes he would give as town. Moosy I have a gut feeling he is town. Mostly because he was naturally reacting to what I have been posting in here. I don't know about jealous I don't know about TT (I have a gut feeling he might be town) Jean Valjean has very good posts and the only thing that gives me pause is his stiffness. Other than that, a townread. Artanis usually follows the thread and inquire people more as town than when he is Mafia. I've seen him too defensive in this game. Actually, his approach to the thread seems quite similar to the last game where we played together where he was Mafia. EC is my lynch of choice today. He needlessly discredited QT for mayor while still townreading him. Had very faint reads on his three townreads (the one on you was the worst). When I inquired him to explain he basically dodged, and when I asked a quotation on where you have being on point, he quoted your list post where you actually were very obscure on why Jean Valjean, with one post at the moment, was almost top town. It felt like he was simply making that up, not really believing in what he said.
Objective gaming. I think all these are some good posts that are constructive and add to the general scheme of town action. Finally this;
On June 26 2016 12:55 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:50 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]
Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point. Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta. Btw can you quote a post where you think he was "on point"? So I'll pussy(cat) out on the question answering stand-off since I'm heading to bed meow. On June 25 2016 21:22 Superbia wrote:
I'm going to go with mainly gut again bc that actually worked out pretty well last d1.
Town:
- Art
- TW
- QT
Almost there:
- Chez
- TT
- Jin Valjean
- Damdred
- GB (least sure)
Somewhere:
- EC
- Skynx
On their way out of here:
- Moosy
- Jealous This is Superbia being on point? The post where he puts a guy as probably town for his opening only? Yeah, I can't trust you. You might be mafia.
This conversation with emp is really good. Forces a lot of content out of him when he was all one liner posts. It is after this I went back to re-read emp and got my scumread.
|
On June 28 2016 04:39 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 04:15 Jealous wrote:On June 28 2016 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask. Why are you hard townreading GB? Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town? Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null? I am also interested in Skynx' answer to the first question. GB does not seem town to me right now. [1]GBThis post 1st opened my eyes: Show nested quote +On June 25 2016 09:25 GlowingBear wrote:On June 25 2016 09:22 Damdred wrote:
I think art v qt is t v t.
Its good though keep it up. Actually, doesn't it look like they are trying to distance from each other? No one commented on this save Tumblewood. (also to an extent Art but he was more like ridiculing the idea rather than criticising) I thought it was a good hint at Damdred's 1st signs of being scummy. He is actively trying to progress the game + Show Spoiler +On June 27 2016 00:29 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 00:26 Superbia wrote:On June 27 2016 00:24 GlowingBear wrote:
Superbia, what are your reads? Unsure on Damdred. Very unsure on Art given his last few posts, though I'm prone to stick with my earlier read on him (which is town). By proxy I'm also iffy on TT. He has been more aggro this game than I expect from him d1. Outside of those interesting players I would say: Moosy should die. EC should die. Ok but I need townreads We have to decide the mayor and the pardonner On June 26 2016 12:07 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:03 Tumblewood wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. why though like, people call koshi bad all the time and it's the same exact thing Because silently wanting to be elected as mayor is something I would expect from mafia. If I am mafia and I'm seeing town organising themselves - specially when a town player is being elected as president -, I would start to discredit people in order to push my agenda. It's not like calling Koshi bad. I can call Koshi bad and not vote with him, but if Koshi was the towniest person in the game I would vote him 100% of the times simply because having a bad town mayor is better than risking having a good mayor that could be mafia On June 27 2016 00:42 GlowingBear wrote:I had QT as top town for the way he was engaging the thread. But he isn't here anymore. Kinda dropped a little but still my top town. I have Tumble as probably town for his interest in the game and the way he was putting thoughts on what I've wrote. Downside is that I don't remember him giving any reads. I had you as null to scummy but I like the way you came back to the thread. You're leaning town. Damdred is leaning scum. I think most of his posts are disinterested, and that makes me suspicious of him. He is not naturally reacting to what has been posted but he is here. He just, from times to times, post reads and chill. The problem is that his town passes looks like the town passes he would give as town. Moosy I have a gut feeling he is town. Mostly because he was naturally reacting to what I have been posting in here. I don't know about jealous I don't know about TT (I have a gut feeling he might be town) Jean Valjean has very good posts and the only thing that gives me pause is his stiffness. Other than that, a townread. Artanis usually follows the thread and inquire people more as town than when he is Mafia. I've seen him too defensive in this game. Actually, his approach to the thread seems quite similar to the last game where we played together where he was Mafia. EC is my lynch of choice today. He needlessly discredited QT for mayor while still townreading him. Had very faint reads on his three townreads (the one on you was the worst). When I inquired him to explain he basically dodged, and when I asked a quotation on where you have being on point, he quoted your list post where you actually were very obscure on why Jean Valjean, with one post at the moment, was almost top town. It felt like he was simply making that up, not really believing in what he said. Objective gaming. I think all these are some good posts that are constructive and add to the general scheme of town action. Finally this; Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:55 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:50 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:
[quote]
At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point. Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta. Btw can you quote a post where you think he was "on point"? So I'll pussy(cat) out on the question answering stand-off since I'm heading to bed meow. On June 25 2016 21:22 Superbia wrote:
I'm going to go with mainly gut again bc that actually worked out pretty well last d1.
Town:
- Art
- TW
- QT
Almost there:
- Chez
- TT
- Jin Valjean
- Damdred
- GB (least sure)
Somewhere:
- EC
- Skynx
On their way out of here:
- Moosy
- Jealous This is Superbia being on point? The post where he puts a guy as probably town for his opening only? Yeah, I can't trust you. You might be mafia. This conversation with emp is really good. Forces a lot of content out of him when he was all one liner posts. It is after this I went back to re-read emp and got my scumread.
Good points. What do you think of his rise to power/push for mayor? His reaction about not becoming mayor?
|
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day
|
|
|
On June 28 2016 04:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
LOL England 1-2 Iceland.
Fuck yes.
|
On June 28 2016 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask. Why are you hard townreading GB? Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town? Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null?
[2]
I believe you referring to TT read. Well, I have my reasoning behind my scumreads that I'm confident in and 100% believe in them. If someone is thinking similar to you (mind you TT is very very similar) then there is no way they are mafia cuz I know I'm town myself.
[3]
emperor's filter fits perfectly to his newbie game where he was my scum teammate. I can see myself that my posting changed a lot after rolling town in 1day and if he was town I'd expect him to change as well.
So far I see no changes: constant 1 liners and joky posts which he likes a lot, followed by a 1 big read on JVJ which is totally wrong imo, then some forced reads and general posts fitting the category of "activity for sake of activity".
Chez is unreadable as I said before. I wouldn't feel comfortable voting for him when I'm confident on my other scumreads. He is totally afk and I think has some beef with me for no other reason than me not sucking his dick for presidency. Also if mafia has 2 super trolly/afk players after Moosy flip I think its ballsy beyond recognition.
|
On June 28 2016 04:48 Jealous wrote:Fuck yes.
2 Brexits in 1 week inc.
|
On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day
I ho early don't know why nobody said this rip
|
On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day
"Hmm I suggest t v t, he suggests s v s... whats wrong about that, I'll give him credit. Why should I question a read that is polar opposite of mine anyway?"
Get real bro
|
Will bother with your GB read if not NKed after night. Requires a bit more indepth reading and watching England getting rekt is more important.
On June 28 2016 04:49 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On June 28 2016 03:55 Skynx wrote:
I can expand on reads if required, don't be hesitant to ask. Why are you hard townreading GB? Why do you believe that having similar reads means someone's very likely to be town? Why is emperor in the 'super scum' category, yet Chez is in null? [2]I believe you referring to TT read. Well, I have my reasoning behind my scumreads that I'm confident in and 100% believe in them. If someone is thinking similar to you (mind you TT is very very similar) then there is no way they are mafia cuz I know I'm town myself.[3]emperor's filter fits perfectly to his newbie game where he was my scum teammate. I can see myself that my posting changed a lot after rolling town in 1day and if he was town I'd expect him to change as well. So far I see no changes: constant 1 liners and joky posts which he likes a lot, followed by a 1 big read on JVJ which is totally wrong imo, then some forced reads and general posts fitting the category of "activity for sake of activity". Chez is unreadable as I said before. I wouldn't feel comfortable voting for him when I'm confident on my other scumreads. He is totally afk and I think has some beef with me for no other reason than me not sucking his dick for presidency. Also if mafia has 2 super trolly/afk players after Moosy flip I think its ballsy beyond recognition.
Yeah, I used to think like that too. It happened to me with Toad in Outlaw. We just thought the same on everything, had mindmelds like 3 times where we posted the same ideas at the same time.
I was town. he was mafia. It's not a valid way to evaluate someone. Needs more.
Also need to take more time to evaluate the 3rd thingy.
|
On June 28 2016 04:51 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day I ho early don't know why nobody said this rip
Please man, try to type more legibly ):
|
On June 28 2016 04:51 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day "Hmm I suggest t v t, he suggests s v s... whats wrong about that, I'll give him credit. Why should I question a read that is polar opposite of mine anyway?" Get real bro
You said no one commented on it, but Damdred really did. He was actually the first to ping it out. You might not like the content but he noticed it and read into it.
The reason Damdred townread it as he also said is because it showed a paranoid mindset from GB. Having the same opinion has nothing to do with alignments.
|
On June 28 2016 04:51 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day I ho early don't know why nobody said this rip
On top of being a bad scum, your ego is unbearable. I'm not gona bother replying if you don't remember how to make sense.
|
On June 28 2016 04:55 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 04:51 Skynx wrote:On June 28 2016 04:45 Damdred wrote:
SK how did I not comment on it when I see ifically said I disagreed but it was a good thought by GB?
Fibbing doesn't get you points.
Back to date day "Hmm I suggest t v t, he suggests s v s... whats wrong about that, I'll give him credit. Why should I question a read that is polar opposite of mine anyway?" Get real bro You said no one commented on it, but Damdred really did. He was actually the first to ping it out. You might not like the content but he noticed it and read into it. The reason Damdred townread it as he also said is because it showed a paranoid mindset from GB. Having the same opinion has nothing to do with alignments.
I don't know what you're trying to say here, it's not english. Anyway, go back to early D1, when i raised this question I was never bothered at him reading tvt or GB reading svs, but him no reacting to it and just playing along with it is not a town play. On top of that there is like 5 posts him claiming like best town/pres candidate whatever...
|
What ego exactly? I've been pretty pleasant the entirety of the game and even when insulting GB well GB understood what I was getting at and the game in question.
As for bad scum I'm actually one of the best scum on site so meh at that.
As for you being insulting for no reason, its apparent autocorrect got me
So no reason to get nasty for being called out on something factual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
