|
On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me.
Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy
|
On June 27 2016 20:48 Superbia wrote:
I need to reread EoD because I was sure Jean wanted to lynch me lol.
Fairly certain that this was misdirection, I have a feeling Jean-esque people will lynch the objectively scummiest people.
Pretty sure he's not a smurf, like QT is Arnold Schwarzenegger T1 and Jean is the steel goo guy from T2. However both have the humor pack from Grey Worm installed, like they both have heard jokes and objectively understand them, but fuck please don't make me think of that scene again
|
I may have made a huge mistake
|
Damdy, why did you decide to vote Jean as mayor when you decided to vote me?
QT, why did you prefer to vote Jean instead of me?
|
On June 27 2016 23:40 GlowingBear wrote:
I may have made a huge mistake
Yeah, you should've pardoned MD!
|
On June 27 2016 23:13 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me. Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy
I'm glad someone reads my posts!
We can be friends for so long! And if your scum you pocketed me so hard right now
|
Chez, my friend, I would like to know where your head's at after the night ends. Is there anyone setting off your colour blind alarm?
|
On June 27 2016 23:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Yeah, you should've pardoned MD!
He is probably talking about the bodyguard.
This is the one thing that's going to be extremely helpful in deducing GlowingBear's alignment. His choice of bodyguard is very, very important. Do not let him get away with anything less than a full explanation for his choice and make sure it fits his thinking and approach.
In addition, this is just speculation, but at some point in the game it may be a good idea to claim the bodyguard role. The reason is quite simple. We probably have some blues the mafia is going to be looking into shooting. A claimed bodyguard is a massive annoyance to mafia because if they want to eliminate me they have to first kill the bodyguard (if I understand the rules correctly).
That means two extra nights for our blue roles to do their job.
Also, this is more long term, but there is no world where we have named townie + 3 blue roles. That would be excessive, so if a situation comes up where the claims look like that, be very vary of the claims and start making hard decisions on blue roles.
|
On June 28 2016 00:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Chez, my friend, I would like to know where your head's at after the night ends. Is there anyone setting off your colour blind alarm?
Chez has been unimpressive so far. There's always a certain leeway with him, because you can usually count on him showing up to actually do stuff later in the game, but this is getting both annoying and suspicious. I don't trust quiet revolutionaries.
|
These MTG spoilers are kind of depressing z_z
|
On June 27 2016 23:13 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me. Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy
It sounds like you disagree with my read then and presumably you think Damdred is town.
So what am I not seeing? Why is Damdred town?
While we are at it, who are you scumreading Emp?
|
On June 28 2016 00:25 Jean Valjean wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 23:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On June 27 2016 23:40 GlowingBear wrote:
I may have made a huge mistake Yeah, you should've pardoned MD! He is probably talking about the bodyguard. This is the one thing that's going to be extremely helpful in deducing GlowingBear's alignment. His choice of bodyguard is very, very important. Do not let him get away with anything less than a full explanation for his choice and make sure it fits his thinking and approach. In addition, this is just speculation, but at some point in the game it may be a good idea to claim the bodyguard role. The reason is quite simple. We probably have some blues the mafia is going to be looking into shooting. A claimed bodyguard is a massive annoyance to mafia because if they want to eliminate me they have to first kill the bodyguard (if I understand the rules correctly). That means two extra nights for our blue roles to do their job. Also, this is more long term, but there is no world where we have named townie + 3 blue roles. That would be excessive, so if a situation comes up where the claims look like that, be very vary of the claims and start making hard decisions on blue roles.
I think it's a little early to be discussing this.
|
On June 28 2016 00:49 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 00:25 Jean Valjean wrote:On June 27 2016 23:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On June 27 2016 23:40 GlowingBear wrote:
I may have made a huge mistake Yeah, you should've pardoned MD! He is probably talking about the bodyguard. This is the one thing that's going to be extremely helpful in deducing GlowingBear's alignment. His choice of bodyguard is very, very important. Do not let him get away with anything less than a full explanation for his choice and make sure it fits his thinking and approach. In addition, this is just speculation, but at some point in the game it may be a good idea to claim the bodyguard role. The reason is quite simple. We probably have some blues the mafia is going to be looking into shooting. A claimed bodyguard is a massive annoyance to mafia because if they want to eliminate me they have to first kill the bodyguard (if I understand the rules correctly). That means two extra nights for our blue roles to do their job. Also, this is more long term, but there is no world where we have named townie + 3 blue roles. That would be excessive, so if a situation comes up where the claims look like that, be very vary of the claims and start making hard decisions on blue roles. I think it's a little early to be discussing this.
How about you deliver me some mafia instead of telling people what they should or should not discuss. Go forth my minion and find mafia, then deliver me their heads. I shall make quick judgement of your successes or failures.
|
On June 28 2016 00:48 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2016 23:13 emperorchampion wrote:On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me. Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy It sounds like you disagree with my read then and presumably you think Damdred is town. So what am I not seeing? Why is Damdred town? While we are at it, who are you scumreading Emp?
I think Damdred stated fairly clearly why he switched his vote. I will discuss reads more during the day phase, but my post does not make any assumptions of damdred's alignment.
I am uneasy with how you are coming to your own conclusion in your post about damdred's actions, rather than evaluating what he has already posted. It makes more sense to me to maybe say, "oh I don't believe that you switched your votes for this reason, here is why I think you actually switched votes..." then continue on to your post or something. But I don't see any of that.
|
On June 28 2016 00:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Chez, my friend, I would like to know where your head's at after the night ends. Is there anyone setting off your colour blind alarm?
I've been busy. just got back from a weddding yesterday, about to submit a revision for a journal article, and then will be moving.
So, I have been skimming thread lately. Pretty much since I talked to QT.
|
On June 28 2016 00:39 Superbia wrote:
These MTG spoilers are kind of depressing z_z
Magic has spoilers?? :o
|
On June 28 2016 01:09 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 00:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Chez, my friend, I would like to know where your head's at after the night ends. Is there anyone setting off your colour blind alarm? I've been busy. just got back from a weddding yesterday, about to submit a revision for a journal article, and then will be moving. So, I have been skimming thread lately. Pretty much since I talked to QT.
Props on the article! What about?
|
Poor chez doesn't want to help his friends.
Anyway got a few things to do today and then back to finding the mafia.
|
On June 28 2016 01:08 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 00:48 Tictock wrote:On June 27 2016 23:13 emperorchampion wrote:On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me. Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy It sounds like you disagree with my read then and presumably you think Damdred is town. So what am I not seeing? Why is Damdred town? While we are at it, who are you scumreading Emp? I think Damdred stated fairly clearly why he switched his vote. I will discuss reads more during the day phase, but my post does not make any assumptions of damdred's alignment. I am uneasy with how you are coming to your own conclusion in your post about damdred's actions, rather than evaluating what he has already posted. It makes more sense to me to maybe say, "oh I don't believe that you switched your votes for this reason, here is why I think you actually switched votes..." then continue on to your post or something. But I don't see any of that.
Ok I'm just going to assume you are mafia with Damdred then.
I've looked through Damdred's filter multiple times now (just did it again) and I see no explanation for why Damdred went from this
On June 27 2016 00:57 Damdred wrote:
I won't vote gb or super and neither should have the pardoned position.
And gb it's because you don't do well with these sorts of decisions tbh.
While I tr both all a sudden the last few pages have made me kind of suspicious on super just seems off now.
I would like to be pardoner or mayor. There will always be debate but I am one of the best players in this game. And idk why art isn't voting for me rip.
To this
On June 27 2016 04:31 Damdred wrote:
Why am I not even being considered for pardoner when I an the best person ons ite finding town and actually being right?
Literally I am the most level headed and incapable of omgus for a long time. Get me pardoner and gb mayor.
+ voting GB
+ Show Spoiler +and then to this... On June 27 2016 06:25 Damdred wrote:
You know a gb+tt+moosey isn't the most out there team
And I literally see no mention of Jean in his filter till this
On June 27 2016 05:54 Damdred wrote:
Lynch Tt Jean blah
So stop Fucking telling me he's explained all this shit when I can't find anything that does.
|
On June 28 2016 01:27 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2016 01:08 emperorchampion wrote:On June 28 2016 00:48 Tictock wrote:On June 27 2016 23:13 emperorchampion wrote:On June 27 2016 21:12 Tictock wrote:
Yea thats the one.
The whole switch of choice over who to lynch is what makes this an imposing EoD to reread. Not only do I need to look at why people voted who they did for mayor, but when that happened in correlation with who the mayor claimed would be the lynch.
That's why I've had issues with Damdred's filter kus his vote and reads were all over the place EoD. Said he didn't trust GB to be mayor kus he's "wishy-washy" or something, voted GB. Pressed Jean to Lynch me and semi-defended Moosy, voted Jean right before EoD who claimed he was going to lynch Moosy.
Like the switch at the end seems towny because Moosy was scum, but nothing about how he got there makes any sense to me. Damdred has stated at least once his reasons for switching, this post feels very fluffy It sounds like you disagree with my read then and presumably you think Damdred is town. So what am I not seeing? Why is Damdred town? While we are at it, who are you scumreading Emp? I think Damdred stated fairly clearly why he switched his vote. I will discuss reads more during the day phase, but my post does not make any assumptions of damdred's alignment. I am uneasy with how you are coming to your own conclusion in your post about damdred's actions, rather than evaluating what he has already posted. It makes more sense to me to maybe say, "oh I don't believe that you switched your votes for this reason, here is why I think you actually switched votes..." then continue on to your post or something. But I don't see any of that. Ok I'm just going to assume you are mafia with Damdred then.
Is this something you genuinely believe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
