• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:48
CEST 15:48
KST 22:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202532Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder8EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced38BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Serral wins EWC 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 604 users

OUTLAW MINI MAFIA

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 25 2015 03:20 GMT
#104
Whatevs.
/in

Probably will be inactive on new years eve.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:17 GMT
#420
On December 27 2015 09:18 Damdred wrote:
Your right guys I'm 100% wrong. I'm sorry I'll be back later

No youre not wrong.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:19 GMT
#424
On December 27 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote:
Because rit is obvious town if you pay attention even if he a wrong. Mixture of tone posts and a couple of things

Otherwise it would be yes but the read on Trfel is just quite...unbelieveable.
Trfel is easily town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:29 GMT
#435
On December 27 2015 10:31 rsoultin wrote:
anyway gb you're right that i've been wrong on your alignment before. i don't think that i am now, but i'm willing to admit to the possibility. do your thing

Except you called gb scum on d1 in drams....
This was also an answer to your post bewfore the quoted one.
You literally wanted to lynch gb the most on d1 there when he actually looked really town.

Idk... I dont think there is anything that indicates that he is scum here. He looks actually more town than he does AS TOWN here... Usually. So its not actually a reason to call him scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:31 GMT
#438
On December 27 2015 10:40 Vivax wrote:
I just disagree with your reads and Damdred's too when I think they aren't warranted, there is no intent to discredit anyone, but I'll let you know that ritoky town and GB mafia is not what I'm seeing in their posts so far.

Why do you disagree with damdred's reads? Or which ones?
I think damdred has the prolly the best reads atm up to your post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:36 GMT
#441
On December 27 2015 11:07 nooniansoong wrote:
@exo don't get mad. Just try to find scum and answer any questions people ask you.
If we lynch you and you're town, that's our problem not yours.

No. Its actually his problem.
Abd by blowing your smurf you earned my vote.
Shit. Cheap. Crap. Die.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:41 GMT
#451
On December 27 2015 11:16 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:11 N e s s wrote:
And i'm not going to write Exo off as scum myself. Sure, people are throwing scum! at him, but to me he reminds me alot of how i played in mafia. Getting accused then getting mad.

He could be mafia,
[image loading]


Yeah go for it. If you want to hurt town just lynch me b/c I'm tired of being accused of scum on nothing during day 1. I'm going to try my best to help town win but I'm not even going to be given the time of day.

Youre most likely town but please stop complaining and play okay?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:44 GMT
#453
On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote:
Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around.

Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open.

No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi

I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything.

This looks a bit scummy.
I cant understand anything in this post. Except for the exo read.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 02:46 GMT
#457
On December 27 2015 11:39 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:07 nooniansoong wrote:
@exo don't get mad. Just try to find scum and answer any questions people ask you.
If we lynch you and you're town, that's our problem not yours.

No. Its actually his problem.
Abd by blowing your smurf you earned my vote.
Shit. Cheap. Crap. Die.


Kush hasn't revealed anything, he has already said his smurf name pre-game in the Newbie game:

Show nested quote +
On December 22 2015 10:11 nooniansoong wrote:
/in this is kush


Oh.. It makes sense then why i missed the post.
Maybe i should get my laptop..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:01 GMT
#461
On December 27 2015 11:44 rsoultin wrote:
Hf and slam to town pile

I hate you for being more articulate than me hf :/

Rayn, bad. bad. bad rayn. drams was a clusterfuck d1 cause i was having difficulty finding scum which led to the whole marv fiasco. this is not comparable at all. this is clarity.

You think gb looking more town (please define what you mean here) than he normally does as town is a good thing?

I obviously understand what youy mean here. The point was you have been wrong on his alignment before, which you basically claimed you havent. Yes, the situation was "different", but that doesnt change the fact you can be wrong on him.

GB is actually not makig shit out of shit that doesn't mean shit and most likely trying to genuiinely figure out shit.

You know hat; If you want to lynch him, go ahead. If it's you and HF, especially if someone like Artanis / Damdred joins there you are gonna get you lynch, most likely. But you are most likely wrong. I am not going to use my limited time here woth nonsense like arguing about reads like this -- especailly since whenever i listen to other people i am gonna go super wrong adn then people come tell me it was somehow my responsibility to do the right thing when 100% of the other people couldn't do it.

I am just gonna have a nice game with glasses of red wine i got for Xmas and tell who i think is scum and who isn't.
<3

##unvote
##vote TicTock
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:04 GMT
#463
To further my case;

TicTock was more interested in talking about his townreads (which he claimed are not really town reads) instead of his scumreads. As scumreads he just pointed out (easy) names.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:06 GMT
#465
And don't get me wrong,kush can still easily be scum.
Just not that sure about it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:06 GMT
#466
On December 27 2015 12:05 Koshi wrote:
Why would anybody use a smurf instead of his main account? Sense it makes none.

Because people are stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:09 GMT
#471
Let me read Vivax.
First impression is that i don't remember anything he has posted so he could be scum very well.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:11 GMT
#473
On December 27 2015 10:40 Vivax wrote:
I just disagree with your reads and Damdred's too when I think they aren't warranted, there is no intent to discredit anyone, but I'll let you know that ritoky town and GB mafia is not what I'm seeing in their posts so far.

Oh yeah there was this which was basically disagreeing with just for the sake of disagreeing ("no reasoning"), instead of legitmately poiniting out his own read even don't align with them.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:15 GMT
#474
It's like.... It looks like the post i just quoted is like an infinite pointless bunch of nothing.
Like it doesn't really try to achieve anything, it doesn't question anything, hell it doesn't even accuse anyone of anything -- it's just " there is no intent to discredit anyone".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:19 GMT
#476
On December 27 2015 12:16 rsoultin wrote:
@rayn

im not here to argue. i was just trying to understand your perspective and get a read on you. i get what youre saying about gb but im not sure that it makes him town? Is this a firm read of yours, cause you were pretty sure in drams.

It's quite firm. I don't know what you are referring with the bolded part?
IS it on D1 (when i considered him town), if so, yes i was -- until D3 (or N2 idk) when he said something super unbelieveable that had no thought behind it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:21 GMT
#478
Do you think Artanis is scum or town or anything?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:26 GMT
#481
On December 27 2015 12:23 rsoultin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 12:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:16 rsoultin wrote:
@rayn

im not here to argue. i was just trying to understand your perspective and get a read on you. i get what youre saying about gb but im not sure that it makes him town? Is this a firm read of yours, cause you were pretty sure in drams.

It's quite firm. I don't know what you are referring with the bolded part?
IS it on D1 (when i considered him town), if so, yes i was -- until D3 (or N2 idk) when he said something super unbelieveable that had no thought behind it.


D1 you were quite adamant when i couldnt see it. The problem is gb is posting but not being ADD at all...which is how i read him. like he seems pretty focused on a limited number of things rather than being volatile bear. if youre sure i can drop him for a day cause i like a viva lynch too

Yes.. He also does that as mafia. The thing is it is not townie. This, here, is townie, at least for now -- given the state of the game. It is true it doesn't exactly look like his town play but imo it doesn't look like his mafia play either, and when something is MORE townie than what someone usually does as TOWN, i can't possibly consider them scum for it.

Did you look at TT's reasoning for his scumreads?
Any comment?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:29 GMT
#486
On December 27 2015 12:25 rsoultin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 12:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Do you think Artanis is scum or town or anything?


Nh, i kinda think town or pocketing me hard tbh. its not a well-developed read

Okay we are in the same boat with where his alignment falls atm.
Like some things look very town but there are a few really weird things in his filter. Like the Trfel townread (well not that in itself) but the followup... Is like... meh. I also didn't like the GB question from him because considering N e s s as mafia at that point was imo perfectly reasonable.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:32 GMT
#487
On December 27 2015 12:27 Damdred wrote:
Man tt post was bad.

Rayn totes town so now I can sound board off him without butting heads.

I think koshi and exo are town also.

So town: exo, ness, truffle, art, koshi, RS, rayn, ritoky,

still town lean: tt

what do you think of that list besides tt for you rayn?

I disagree with the Artanis read.
I somewhat disagree with ritoky. He looks town but in the last game he was fucking supertown so he should play up to that if he is town.
Idk why you think Koshi is town? I really don't have a read on him.

I'd add Slam and maybe rsoultin and HF.
was there someone else? prolly not since i don't remember.
i kinda speedread the thread... I thought this would start tomorrow.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:35 GMT
#491
On December 27 2015 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:
Rayn what do you think of Ritoky and Ness?

I think i just answered that.
If you want something more specific go ahead and lay it out.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:40 GMT
#493
On December 27 2015 12:35 rsoultin wrote:
As for tt, idk. The scumreads seem rather lazy. smurf thing is an ick reason but his ness scumread is focusing on scummy things i guess even if i disagree that scum posts so blatantly scummy. he could believe it maybe?

The kush thing is basically at best him not reading the thread properly -- it was pointed out by HF already that kush outed his smurf in another thread, there is absolutely nothing scummy in it.

Ness' play looks more like he (she?) just doesn't know who is scum and isn't overplaying anything. I don't know where the "he doesn't follow up on his questions" comes from because basically noone ever answered him in the first place....... It just doesn't make any sense to scumread Ness here, it would make sense to not townread him -- but scumread is definitely not a legit read, at least for those reasons imo.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:42 GMT
#496
On December 27 2015 12:39 GlowingBear wrote:
@Rayn

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote:
town: artanis, ness
pocketing me: slam, rsoul
mafia lean: gb, trfel


This post of him felt really scummy to me. I kinda liked his answer but I asked more questions and I don't remember him answering it yet. What do you think of it?

I don't think the "pocketing me" category can be considered non-joke, at least i consider it as a semi-joke at least.
I can see why he thinks you are / were mafia when he made the post. I can also understand the town reads.
The only thing i don't really get is the Trfel read, which gives me a pause on ritoky. I heavily disagree with that read.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:43 GMT
#498
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 03:59 GMT
#509
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:03 GMT
#512
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:09 GMT
#518
On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.

Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town.

Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point?

TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething).
Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:12 GMT
#523
On December 27 2015 13:11 ritoky wrote:
rayn agrees with all but 1 of my reads and then calls me scum anyway, probably town rayn.

Yeah i don't think there is anything "contradicting" in that if that's what you want to say?
And i am not calling you scum am i?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:24 GMT
#532
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.

Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town.

Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point?

TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething).
Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.


Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it

Seems legit

Except that i don't, which is just explained.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:28 GMT
#536
On December 27 2015 13:25 ritoky wrote:
hey rayn, you should click on boxerfred's filter. it'll amuse you i am sure.

I actually did already. He can get lynched if that's the way he is gonna continue playing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:38 GMT
#542
On December 27 2015 13:19 ritoky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:11 ritoky wrote:
rayn agrees with all but 1 of my reads and then calls me scum anyway, probably town rayn.

Yeah i don't think there is anything "contradicting" in that if that's what you want to say?
And i am not calling you scum am i?


oh you're not? i thought the whole "you should have opposite read" and "one game he was super town, but..." indicated scum lean. guess was assuming wrong.

To be honest i would prolly consider you scum if it wasn't for the read on BH in that one game....
I actually do think Trfel jumping to conclusions without proofreading what he says beforehand is is quite big of a towntell for him. It's like... he thinks something is true (which can be clearly seen from his posts), then figures out he is wrong (or something happens) and he backs off. I think it shows he is thinking about the game, and i have no idea why you think that is scummy. Also his posts were not bad at all on any level, as as i said it shows he is actually re-evaluating his reads.

Him having much/few reads at the point of the game is not alignment indicative i think.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:39 GMT
#544
On December 27 2015 13:34 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:23 ritoky wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.

Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town.

Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point?

TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething).
Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.


Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it

Seems legit


and your read on kush is: he's a smurf

which he literally explained pre-game when he said "this is a smurf, cuz i can't view kush account at work"

...like wat?


Ah, I didn't see that

So you just selectively decided to read some of my posts and not all of them?
Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 04:44 GMT
#550
Okay frands i am gonna go to bed.
cya tomorrow.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:15 GMT
#685
On December 27 2015 21:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Have a random read list cause they're fun.
100% Town forever
Artanis[Xp]
N e s s

Town
Damdred
Trfel
Rsoultin
Alakaslam

Town by association of people I think are town reading them as town and me being a lazy shit
Raynpelikoneet
Onegu

Weak Town
HF
Ritoky
ExO_
Koshi
TickTock

Null
Anyone not in other categories

Weak Mafia
Boxerfred - Made one post and it was bad.
GB - Development on Rso was meh. Seems to be thread cop more than all over the place. Way he engages N e s s doesn't really make much sense to me.

Leaning Mafia
Vivax - doing fuck all, not being remotely tinfoil. Very much out of the ordinary for Vivax.

So you're scum?
This post doesn't make much sense....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:17 GMT
#687
Because it looks like you are both reading the thread and not.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:26 GMT
#691
On December 27 2015 22:18 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 22:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because it looks like you are both reading the thread and not.

That's probably kinda true in the sense that there were like 17 pages to read when I woke up and I kinda read them but did it pretty fast so it's likely not everything actually registered.

So like... the first thing you usually do in any game is to form a read on me. Here you "form" a read on me due to... association?!?!? You completely ignore my scumread however...

Then you have this weird read progression on Exo, where you first call him scum but then, idk why, you suddenly don't call him scum anymore but null and in the next post he is even a town lean.

Then i have absolutely no idea why you (or anyone -- but anyone is not as good as you are) would ever think Koshi is town because he hasn't actually done jack shit in this game. There is no Koshi-passion to solve the game, which is actually really characteristic to his townplay regardless of how much he yells he won't play before the game...

And to the first part, you claim TT's posting is bad but hey let's ignore the case on him completely and just call him town instead... And HF is town but GB is scum... Did you forget HF did the exact same thing GB did regarding Ness?? Just because HF posts more words about it and is generally capable of producing better looking posts does not mean the motivation is/was the same.. But GB is scum for what he did? And HF is town, for calling Vivax scum? Or what, because that would be everything else HF basically did. Do you realize even if Vivax is mafia here it's not out of question at all HF is also mafia? I think you at least should, and if you srsly consider GB as scum for why you do, your townread on HF makes absolutely zero sense at all.

I really really do not understand any of that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:36 GMT
#694
On December 27 2015 18:47 sicklucker wrote:
also I theres no way you can town read coag he has no posts. im going to assume this is a masson claim because thats the only thing that makes any sense.

Rstoulin and coags are masons apparently take notes mafia

Yeah this is pretty fucking weird tbh.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:42 GMT
#696
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two:


Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything.


You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all.


...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?



Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret.

On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious.


If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for.


this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions?

2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal?

3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square?


Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

So Artanis what exactly is different in HF's/GB's questioning on Ness?

This is the only thing GB has "pushed" Ness for after the initial questions. I am like 90% sure if i go to Ness' home forum and pick any mafia game there the game starts with RVS -- which makes this perfectly valid (and unanswered) question.

So, what other difference there is? Is GB pushing Ness as scum rn?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:44 GMT
#697
On December 27 2015 22:40 Vivax wrote:
I don't believe the kush smurf is actually kush, i would never expect kush to enter the game "hey folks im gonna work on my read accuracy", as if kush ever cared about such a thing. Kush is like the joker he just does stuff

It's definitely kush because he in obviously inactive as fuck and lectures people about "how to play" and whose fault it is when someone gets lynched in a really annoying way -- which usually makes him also mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:49 GMT
#699
On December 27 2015 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
This is the only thing GB has "pushed" Ness for after the initial questions. I am like 90% sure if i go to Ness' home forum and pick any mafia game there the game starts with RVS -- which makes this perfectly valid (and unanswered) question.

and i was right...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 13:53 GMT
#701
On December 27 2015 22:50 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

[quote]

Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

[quote]

You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

[quote]

...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

[quote]


Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

[quote]

[quote]

this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

[quote]

Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

So Artanis what exactly is different in HF's/GB's questioning on Ness?

This is the only thing GB has "pushed" Ness for after the initial questions. I am like 90% sure if i go to Ness' home forum and pick any mafia game there the game starts with RVS -- which makes this perfectly valid (and unanswered) question.

So, what other difference there is? Is GB pushing Ness as scum rn?

HF made a case on Ness, waited for him to respond to it whilst doing other shit and didn't attempt to bury him. I saw direction which I didn't really see with GB whom had to be reminded to look at him. Whereas HF decided he's probably town, GB's still on the fence but it doesn't feel like he's trying to actually find out N e s s's alignment, more just continuously explaining why he has this minor scumread.

That doesn't answer the question.
What has GB pushed him for after the initial questioning?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:00 GMT
#706
On December 27 2015 22:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 22:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 22:50 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

So Artanis what exactly is different in HF's/GB's questioning on Ness?

This is the only thing GB has "pushed" Ness for after the initial questions. I am like 90% sure if i go to Ness' home forum and pick any mafia game there the game starts with RVS -- which makes this perfectly valid (and unanswered) question.

So, what other difference there is? Is GB pushing Ness as scum rn?

HF made a case on Ness, waited for him to respond to it whilst doing other shit and didn't attempt to bury him. I saw direction which I didn't really see with GB whom had to be reminded to look at him. Whereas HF decided he's probably town, GB's still on the fence but it doesn't feel like he's trying to actually find out N e s s's alignment, more just continuously explaining why he has this minor scumread.

That doesn't answer the question.
What has GB pushed him for after the initial questioning?

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two:


Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything.


You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all.


...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?



Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret.

On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious.


If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for.


this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions?

2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal?

3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square?


Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 14:10 GlowingBear wrote:
I have slight SCUMREADS on you, Tictock (his jokes on hammerig me and stuff seems off, he doesn't seem invested in the game) and ritoky (which I'm not sure anymore)

He keeps pushing him on the same thing without getting anything new, basically. Asking questions that lead nowhere which is basically what he's accusing N e s s of.

Except that GB made a read out of Ness' answers.
Ness didn't make anything out of anything.
Can you tell me what Ness' reads are?

Let's be honest. The reason for Ness to be town (if he is), is his response to the pressure -- same as why Exo is town (or was -- before he posted reads) if he is. There is absolutely no other reason to townread him, and anyone who claims otherwise is either bad or mafia. Ness has literally given zero reads on basically anything. He has just posted... a bunch of nothing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:01 GMT
#707
Okay so like... You think GB is scum because of his lack of direction in his questioning on Ness.
What do you make out of rsoultin basically saying the opposite -- and also scumreading GB for it?!?!?!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:03 GMT
#709
On December 27 2015 10:20 rsoultin wrote:
gb is far too directed and monotone to be the town gb i know and love this game

Is GB scum for not being directed and being too directed -- both??
Or what? Why don't you have a problem with this then if you think you are right Artanis?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:11 GMT
#713
On December 27 2015 11:19 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:14 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:11 Holyflare wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:00 Koshi wrote:
On December 27 2015 10:25 Holyflare wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote:
To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed.


Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day.

1) First riddle
setup:
- People can only look forward.
- People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed)
- People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat.

goal:
- A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say)
[image loading]

question:
- How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously)


2) second riddle
setup:
- People can only look forward.
- People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed)
- People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head.

goal:
- Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9.

[image loading]
question:
- How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously)



+ Show Spoiler +
1) If the back person sees two of the same colour hat then the puzzle is easy and he can say the opposite. If he sees two different colours such as the picture then he should stay silent which indicates to the second person that there are two different colours. The person in front will be able to see the colour and so can yell out the colour on the top of his head easily.

In your picture it would be:

Back person: *Silence*
Middle person: "Hmm the person in front of me is a white hat which must mean my hat is black!"


2) Are they allowed to formulate a plan beforehand?


Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day.


first one is correct


Since they can come up with a plan beforehand and I presume that they can hear every other person's response then they should formulate the plan that the person with the perfect information (Number 1 in the picture) should sacrifice himself to relay that information to everyone else.

The strategy should be that player 1 says "Black" if he can see an even amount of black hats or "White" if he can see an odd amount of black hats. This way if person 1 is wrong then everyone else can determine the colour of their hat based on how many of each colour they can see and the person 1's fate.

The situation would go as follows:

As person 1 can only see 5 black hats then he should exclaim the aforementioned planned phrase of, "White".

Person 1 does not explode as he has a white hat.

Person 2 now knows there are an odd amount of black hats as Person 1 did not die but can only see 4 black hats, he therefore knows that he has a black hat and shouts, "Black".

^^your long posts remind me a bit of someone i play with

Town reads-HolyFlare, Aramis or whoever you say his username.

But Ness! Shouldn't there be more town reads?

To be blunt, i'm lazy. I'm diabetic and i'm at 340 (which is bad.)
I'll go back and do more later, thats just the majority of whom i think is town atm.


Much more important than who is town

Who is Mafia?

perfectly valid question given Ness' posts at the point.
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two:


Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything.


You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all.


...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?



Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret.

On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious.


If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for.


this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions?

2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal?

3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square?


Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Extremely valid question.
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two:


Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything.


You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all.


...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?



Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret.

On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious.


If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for.


this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions?

2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal?

3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square?


Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

Follow up on both of the questions regarding Ness' answers.

There is just... Fucking nothing wrong with what GB says.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:12 GMT
#714
On December 27 2015 23:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
This is basically my issue.
[image loading]

If we are completely honest and ignore the "getting frustrated over being scumread" part you should probably change the color in HF <-> GB.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:15 GMT
#716
WHY DOES ONE'S READ HAVE TO CHANGE IF THE OTHER PERSON JUST POSTS SHIT??!?!?
Like do you have to FORCE out a townread just because someone says something? Even if it's not townie. You are not even going to WHAT GB and Ness ACTUALLY say, you just say "well Ness answered and GB still thinks he is scum -- so GB is scum".

It's really fucking bad way to look at people. You really are not bad enough to see beyond the surface level?

Are you scum because your read on Vivax is static?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:25 GMT
#723
Here is what GlowingBear did:

Scumreads Ness for asking useless questions.
HF agrees with GB (but somehow still scumreads him?!?!?).
Makes a "better" post on Ness.
GB waits for Ness to answer HF's post (gets scumread for it too obvs...)
Focuses on other things (gets scumread for it....).
Ness answers.
Ness' answer doesn't please GB (gets scumread for it too..)
GB asks a follow up question -- reads.
Ness gives basically nothing...
GB asks another legit question.
Ness answers basically nothing.
GB still scumreads him (gets scumread for that one too.-...)

Something is really fucking wrong here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:26 GMT
#724
On December 27 2015 23:24 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

The way he so clearly doesn't give a shit about how the thread perceives him gives me town vibes though.


Does it? I don't seem to get a "I don't care what you think about me" vibe from him. I seem to get a wishywashy vibe that hasn't called anybody scum, has said a lot of "maybe" without explaining anything, and then disappeared. Looks scummy. I don't get an "I don't care" vibe at all here.

What TT doesn't clearly care about it actually reading the thread.
Otherwise i totally agree with this post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:27 GMT
#725
sicklucker what is your read on Ness & GB?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:35 GMT
#735
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

[quote]

Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

[quote]

You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

[quote]

...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

[quote]


Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

[quote]

[quote]

this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

[quote]

Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:36 GMT
#738
On December 27 2015 23:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Focussing on the what instead of the how again. Already said I could very well be wrong. Gonna need more to decide to lynch him anyway.

Okay so it's a tone read then.
I 100% disagree. There is nothing to discuss on this matter then.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:38 GMT
#742
On December 27 2015 23:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?

Nononono. Bad Rayn. Stop using logic and think about what a newbie mafia would actually do on this site.

He is not newbie though.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:40 GMT
#745
On December 27 2015 23:39 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?

Nononono. Bad Rayn. Stop using logic and think about what a newbie mafia would actually do on this site.

He is not newbie though.

He is to this site, and from how he opened I really don't think he'd have what it takes to play mafia the way he's posted so far. Faaaar too sincere and fearless.

So your interpretation is that somneone who has played 10+ mafia games and is actually capable of at least looking like they are playing mafia properly doesn't have to do anything that makes any sense because "new forum"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:43 GMT
#748
On December 27 2015 23:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:39 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]

It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?

Nononono. Bad Rayn. Stop using logic and think about what a newbie mafia would actually do on this site.

He is not newbie though.

He is to this site, and from how he opened I really don't think he'd have what it takes to play mafia the way he's posted so far. Faaaar too sincere and fearless.

So your interpretation is that somneone who has played 10+ mafia games and is actually capable of at least looking like they are playing mafia properly doesn't have to do anything that makes any sense because "new forum"?

And you think this... especially, after the dude starts arguing about meta and to use it / not to use it in mafia games? Like, he clearly has an idea on how he percieves mafia should be played -- regardless of his affiliation -- which already means he is NOT afraid to say stuff, if he is mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:44 GMT
#752
On December 27 2015 23:42 sicklucker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?


he scumread me because I made some troll post. Im ok with this I usual try to and secede to get people mad at me. If I have a problem with it, it would be because people forced him to make one. I can see a town and mafia getting pressed into going for lil old me here

The problem is he refuses to vote for GB (who he had actual reasons of being scum -- at least according to him) because of "bigger fish to fry", but his "bigger fish" are because "annoying" and "the dude who didn't post -- so i vote him for pressure".

Makes sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:49 GMT
#757
On December 27 2015 23:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:39 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]

You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?

Nononono. Bad Rayn. Stop using logic and think about what a newbie mafia would actually do on this site.

He is not newbie though.

He is to this site, and from how he opened I really don't think he'd have what it takes to play mafia the way he's posted so far. Faaaar too sincere and fearless.

So your interpretation is that somneone who has played 10+ mafia games and is actually capable of at least looking like they are playing mafia properly doesn't have to do anything that makes any sense because "new forum"?

And you think this... especially, after the dude starts arguing about meta and to use it / not to use it in mafia games? Like, he clearly has an idea on how he percieves mafia should be played -- regardless of his affiliation -- which already means he is NOT afraid to say stuff, if he is mafia.

What I'm saying is I A)
Think he'd be more cautious as mafia and find out how other people play on this site and try to play into that.
And B)
Get discouraged from how much shit he gets for what he was posting and either go full martyr, stop posting altogether or just post more asinine stuff.

Instead, he tried to talk to people and work with people. Also the question about if you can see people reading the thread as I think SL pointed out cements the read even more. Probably something he'd ask in a scumQT

Actually, he did exactly (A) at the start of the game. Then he did (B) just before he left.
Can you show me where he is actually trying to work with people? Defending yourself doesn't count, because regardless of affiliation everyone defends themselves.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:51 GMT
#758
And let's not go into what people would or would not ask in scum QT.
It works 0% of the time 100% of the time...
Or if you wanna base reads on that i can just stop posting and only post votes from now on.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 14:56 GMT
#767
Well i have nothing to discuss here until someone says something that actually has to do with something someone else posted... You can play "random lynch people" or "i think this guy wouldn't say this because scum QT" games but i am not participating.

later.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:02 GMT
#775
On December 27 2015 23:43 Damdred wrote:
When I first came to this forum I played at least 20 games and I was lynch bait for a long time.

I don't think it's unthinkable that if he rolled scum first game here he would be a bit more fearful and watch what he posts more.

Atm he's bringing a lot of heat on himself and it's reminiscent of when people,come from other places and not used to how we play.

He clearly comes off as a person who is / thinks he is good at mafia since he had to point out he has won both of his games where he was mafia in. I don't agree with this argument.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:06 GMT
#779
sicklucker do you have any real reason to not lynch Vivax?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:07 GMT
#781
On December 28 2015 00:05 sicklucker wrote:
im saying its day 1 we should prioritize lynching people with historys of not giving a shit and being unreadble. obviously lynching mafia is nice but lets be real base on one day of play the day one lynch is going to flip mafia like less then 40% of the time. I want the 60%+ of the time we miss to take out the trash. I think you misunderstood me exo. Like we can still get a >rand lynch and be garbage men at the same time

I agree with this but so far your play makes it 100% impossible to lynch mafia because you don't even seem to be caring about figuring out people's alignments.

The lynch is ~30 hours away and you already refuse to vote for certain people for really dumb reasons that aren't really even reasons.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:09 GMT
#785
On December 27 2015 23:30 Damdred wrote:
Ok so I thought of a decent reason gb could 've scum.

I've played with it before now but gb is generally super uneasy about hf. And likes to think,he can read hf well.

Instead of being suspicious of,him or trying to,figure out his alignment he just ignores him and follows him a bit. At another point he starts showing he's suspicious of hf but then,no follow up or anything about it.

That's why I'm torn on gb besides some things said. I think he's the lean I'd most likely drop down to,scum.

Idk Damdred... I don't know why GB should scumread HF (if he is town) here??
After all HF basically agreed with his read, so it makes sense for him to townread him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:10 GMT
#787
On December 28 2015 00:08 sicklucker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
sicklucker do you have any real reason to not lynch Vivax?


Ill know his alignment 99% of the time by day 3. Here if we lynch him its a stupid gamble. Like hes just such a godamn easy read and people keep lynching him and its pissing me off.

Literraly my last game I said lets not lynch fucking vivax day one and then town went and did it.

DONT FUCKING DO IT AGAIN ITS VERY BAD


SOOOO BAD

I think i can read Vivax aswell.
Why is he town then?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:12 GMT
#792
On December 28 2015 00:11 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:08 sicklucker wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
sicklucker do you have any real reason to not lynch Vivax?


Ill know his alignment 99% of the time by day 3. Here if we lynch him its a stupid gamble. Like hes just such a godamn easy read and people keep lynching him and its pissing me off.

Literraly my last game I said lets not lynch fucking vivax day one and then town went and did it.

DONT FUCKING DO IT AGAIN ITS VERY BAD


SOOOO BAD

I think i can read Vivax aswell.
Why is he town then?


you really think Vivax is a better lynch candidate than somebody like BF at this point?

From the people who have posted, yes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:13 GMT
#793
On December 28 2015 00:11 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:08 sicklucker wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
sicklucker do you have any real reason to not lynch Vivax?


Ill know his alignment 99% of the time by day 3. Here if we lynch him its a stupid gamble. Like hes just such a godamn easy read and people keep lynching him and its pissing me off.

Literraly my last game I said lets not lynch fucking vivax day one and then town went and did it.

DONT FUCKING DO IT AGAIN ITS VERY BAD


SOOOO BAD

I think i can read Vivax aswell.
Why is he town then?


The point he is trying to make is that figuring that out is a bad idea this early.
So if you ask him why I'm town it kinda misses it.

Well if you think what sicklucker says about lynching / not lynching you means anything into if we actually lynch you or not you're wrong...

Can you just play?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:19 GMT
#799
On December 28 2015 00:17 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:11 ExO_ wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:08 sicklucker wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
sicklucker do you have any real reason to not lynch Vivax?


Ill know his alignment 99% of the time by day 3. Here if we lynch him its a stupid gamble. Like hes just such a godamn easy read and people keep lynching him and its pissing me off.

Literraly my last game I said lets not lynch fucking vivax day one and then town went and did it.

DONT FUCKING DO IT AGAIN ITS VERY BAD


SOOOO BAD

I think i can read Vivax aswell.
Why is he town then?


you really think Vivax is a better lynch candidate than somebody like BF at this point?

From the people who have posted, yes.


I have to disagree. I get that I might not be able to make the same metareads as others here, but is Vivax really THAT scummy to this point? Everything that makes Vivax scummy (low post count, not contributing a lot) BF is worse at.

At least Vivax is somewhat active in the thread. People posting = more information. People like BF not posting do not add any information at all.

I don't think this is a good comparison like you are doing it.
BF has just.. not posted after his initial post.
Vivax has posted but doesn't really say anything of value.
Those two things are different.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:21 GMT
#802
On December 28 2015 00:20 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Fwiw BF posting nothing is reminiscent of some game where he was town and people lynched him for doing it.
They were quite upset after he flipped so I'm not sure we can really read into him being bad all that much.

yes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:21 GMT
#803
actually about every game to be exact...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:27 GMT
#814
On December 28 2015 00:22 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Rayn, how do you feel about HF? I got the impression you thought he's slightly scummy but got anything more than that?

I actually thought he could be town because he isn't trying to aggressively control the thread (no, i don't think him asking/telling people to lynch Vivax is that). But idk... He is lacking something and i don't know if it's because he hasn't played in a while or if he is scum. Can't tell yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:29 GMT
#815
If HF is scum we should probably lynch Ness though---...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:32 GMT
#819
Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:32 GMT
#820
On December 28 2015 00:31 Holyflare wrote:
Holy fuck you people are awful.

Only 99 more "i am town" posts and you are confirmed town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:35 GMT
#824
I mean like.... It's not really that people even scumread Vivax / TT, but the fact that everyone has no problem discussing Vivax and giving an opinion while not touching TT with a long stick is really.... weird.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:39 GMT
#830
On December 28 2015 00:36 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 22:40 Vivax wrote:
I don't believe the kush smurf is actually kush, i would never expect kush to enter the game "hey folks im gonna work on my read accuracy", as if kush ever cared about such a thing. Kush is like the joker he just does stuff


This is a blatant post that much like TickTock proves that Vivax wasn't reading the thread AT ALL and just jumped on something that his defender (SL) was posting because SL wasn't also reading the thread. Nobody even jumped on this.


People not reading the thread: TickTock, SL, Vivax

The thing is the master conspiracy theorist Vivax could easily make this post as town even if he read the post where kush says he is kush (well he actually read the post, otherwise he couldn't make the post he did in the first place). I don't know where you are coming from with this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:41 GMT
#832
Like HF, are you suggesting Vivax isn't reading the thread because he didn't see that kush claimed kush, while still knowing kush claimed kush?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:44 GMT
#837
What the hell are you talking about if he was reading the thread he'd see me linking both the newbie game where Kush says he is Noonian in pre-game twice and also the post where I tell you that it's not a big surprise he's Kush because of the last two posts.

I am saying he has obviously seen this because he KNOWS kush has claimed kush, otherwise he couldn't have known, right? So your argument that he isn't reading the thread is incorrect by default.

If he believes it is actually kush or not is another thing, but it doesn't mean he is not reading the thread --- in fact it points to the opposite.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:48 GMT
#843
Yes HF, i think Vivax is mafia too.
I just think his argument of him reading the thread is incorrect.
And no, it's not the same thing TT did. Because Vivax actually gave away he in fact WAS reading the thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:49 GMT
#845
EBWOP: your argument....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:49 GMT
#846
On December 28 2015 00:48 Holyflare wrote:
I really give absolutely 0 shits what you think SL. You're just defending random people but then wanting to lynch BF and other people for being equally useless. Your points are irrelevant.

Yes i agree with this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:50 GMT
#849
On December 28 2015 00:47 Holyflare wrote:
It's quite clearly a skim the thread into post whatever looks good to appease people or bolster people town reading him aka what TickTock was doing to you "Oh you have the same read as me why are you scum reading me!" and what Vivax is doing to SL.

okay this makes sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 15:51 GMT
#850
idk why are we arging over people we both think both of them are scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 16:57 GMT
#947
On December 28 2015 01:41 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is what GlowingBear did:

Scumreads Ness for asking useless questions.
HF agrees with GB (but somehow still scumreads him?!?!?).
Makes a "better" post on Ness.
GB waits for Ness to answer HF's post (gets scumread for it too obvs...)
Focuses on other things (gets scumread for it....).
Ness answers.
Ness' answer doesn't please GB (gets scumread for it too..)
GB asks a follow up question -- reads.
Ness gives basically nothing...
GB asks another legit question.
Ness answers basically nothing.
GB still scumreads him (gets scumread for that one too.-...)

Something is really fucking wrong here.

Not really no rayn.

Please explain what happened then.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:09 GMT
#955
So let me get this straight:

HF and Ness both think my interpretation of GB's posts is not correct.
Regardless of why i think what i do (either i am mafia or missing something) GB does not correct me. In the case on HF and Ness being right, GB not correcting me should mean GB HAS TO BE MAFIA for them, there is literally no other explanation since there should be zero reason for GB to let me say stuff that is just --- incorrect and he 100% knows it.

Neither of them is voting for GB....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:12 GMT
#957
On December 28 2015 02:01 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 01:41 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is what GlowingBear did:

Scumreads Ness for asking useless questions.
HF agrees with GB (but somehow still scumreads him?!?!?).
Makes a "better" post on Ness.
GB waits for Ness to answer HF's post (gets scumread for it too obvs...)
Focuses on other things (gets scumread for it....).
Ness answers.
Ness' answer doesn't please GB (gets scumread for it too..)
GB asks a follow up question -- reads.
Ness gives basically nothing...
GB asks another legit question.
Ness answers basically nothing.
GB still scumreads him (gets scumread for that one too.-...)

Something is really fucking wrong here.

Not really no rayn.

Please explain what happened then.

He didn't ask me a legit question if i can remember correctly, it wasn't even a question at all.

He said "i find it amusing you don't know the reason we were voting moose".

something along those lines. I don't even see how you think thats wrong at all....

Dude you sound like saying "i don't think you are town" somehow means a different thing that "i think you are mafia"... What a way to argue about semantics.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:14 GMT
#962
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Definitely not a question at all?
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote:
Alrighty! So, heres my defense.

First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum.

Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two:


Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on.

http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7

At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything.


You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time.

but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all.


...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this-

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?



Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose.

Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret.

On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious.


If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for.


this. this rubs me the wrong way.

1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it?
2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me?
3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical.

1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions?

2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal?

3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square?


Smh answered those first 2 already.

but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest.

But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all.


Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Also an explanation to WHY he asks the question.

It's amusing... Like.. Magic! How things become something that they are not.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:16 GMT
#963
"Let's just read the explanation and ignore the original question which i answered unstatisfyably and call it fishy"

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:17 GMT
#968
So Holyflare what's your explanation to this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:34 GMT
#990
On December 28 2015 02:23 Holyflare wrote:
your chain of events is wrong and isn't what happened, simple as that but I think you are towny and so it wasn't worth mentioning because I didn't care:

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is what GlowingBear did:

Scumreads Ness for asking useless questions.
HF agrees with GB (but somehow still scumreads him?!?!?).
Makes a "better" post on Ness.
GB waits for Ness to answer HF's post (gets scumread for it too obvs...)
Focuses on other things (gets scumread for it....).
Ness answers.
Ness' answer doesn't please GB (gets scumread for it too..)
GB asks a follow up question -- reads.
Ness gives basically nothing...
GB asks another legit question.
Ness answers basically nothing.
GB still scumreads him (gets scumread for that one too.-...)

Something is really fucking wrong here.


I scum read N E S S initially and didn't scum read GB but then the more ness posted the more he looked town and then GB's questions which you quote above looked worse and worse because asking about the moosy wagon was a question I asked already in my long post, GB was not going anywhere with his questioning and rehashing what I had already stated, Ness answered and GB did not bother to follow up or mention it while I was still questioning ness about stuff and I thought that was suspicious and I even highlighted that in my post on GB which multiple people stated similar reasoning for agreeing with (rsoul et al).

I said I was placated with GB when he highlighted other stuff meaning he was no longer a real scum read. So to say GB was scum read throughout by me wasn't really what was happening and if you say you meant other people then that was a legitimate scum read because I shared similar sentiment at the time.

Did Ness answer you before GB re-asked the question? People tend to ask same questions again when the counter-part for any reason refuses to answer them. I am pretty sure that's what happened.

Idk... Like... Did you find Ness' reads (which was the other thing GB asked about) good enough.. or even legit? Is it out of question GB thinks he is scum for writing stuff but not really doing anything at all (which is basically what he is doing)?

And how does this contradict what i said? I am not talking about if GB is reharsing your questions or not, because i don't think -- if he is doing so -- that it makes him mafia. Is there something wrong with the chain of events i pointed out? The point is not if he gets scumread for it or not, the point is did he ACTUALLY do that or not?

Maybe we are arguing about different things.. I am not blaming anyone for scumreading GB, otherwise my vote would be on someone who scumreads him. I am trying to understand why people can't uderstand his logic from town perspective. I understand your logic now, other people's logic i do not understand. I just think you are wrong and i think he is not mafia.

But for example Ness' answer here -- again, was really fucking bad. Do you wanna argue about that? He literally said GB didn't actually ask anything -- which i proved to be wrong. Then he just brushed it off like "you're bad", which is just... stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:35 GMT
#994
On December 28 2015 02:31 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 02:26 Holyflare wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:12 ExO_ wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:06 Holyflare wrote:
On December 28 2015 01:58 ExO_ wrote:
I don't think rsoultin breadcrumbed coag. No mention of anything remotely related to him until after somebody else mentions it in the thread. then she hops right onto the idea that she breadcrumbed him.

I don't believe rsoultin/coag are masons. I don't necessarily think they are scum buddies either. I think a huge variety of things could be happening here. but when rsoultin has been accused of being scum so far she kinda just goes "shrug nothing I can do to convince you guys". So I think rsoultin is scum, and coag is some non-scum role kinda just piggy bagging off rsoultin's "bread crumbing" to make up for his lack of posting.


so then the real 2 masons just out and we have 2 mafia.... don't think that's a good plan exo


Why should the mason's speak up? On this forum, I think it'd be more likely that 2 people who are VT fake claim mason rather than actual masons claim on day 1. I don't think that's the case here, but it's not impossible.

What I don't think happened is rsoultin as a mason bread crumbed her mason buddy in this manner.


I think you're entirely on the wrong train of thought, rsoultin would absolutely breadcrumb like this because she's done the same thing before, it is also incredibly out of the blue for rsoultin to just randomly pick coagulation as a mason buddy to randomly put in a town list too, too many things don't add up. I don't think they are VT and I think you are following an end that has no real goal here. I think you should focus on other things and question people you scum read that aren't coag/based on something silly.

You seem to have a problem with my posts and questions that seemingly lead nowhere (I'm pretty sure I've made cases on both vivax and GB early game) and I'd like you to point out some things that you had problem with in my posts and I can show you where they lead me. Or because I'm town and that would ultimately be a fruitless endeavor for you and me you could talk about some other intuitive tidbit you've seen.


Give me an example of rsoultin breadcrumbing, particularly if its a player who hasn't posted, and when it turned out to be true. I think you're awfully quick to believe that rsoultin "bread crumbed here" and that she isn't scum. How can you be so sure that rsoultin is a mason? You really believe that she can't be scum, or fake claiming VT. It's not worth pursuing that line of thought at all?

yeah Exo, you should let that go. They are masons.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:38 GMT
#1000
On December 28 2015 02:36 Holyflare wrote:
tbh I've ignored NESS since his defence, and the GB thing was just rehashing and asking questions that I already asked but he's not a real scum read either.

Ness could be mafia but there's too many inactives for me to really give a shit, I just wanna play hots ^^

Never let me play Zeratul... At least when i am semi-drunk.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:47 GMT
#1012
On December 28 2015 02:46 ExO_ wrote:
I'm going to repeat myself

I want Coag to get rsoultin to tell him what forum I met rsoultin on, and the name I went by over there. It'll settle my doubts, and get me off this case. It's a win win for town. It wouldn't take much effort either. If Coag/rsoultin can't be arsed to do that much then I'm going to continue thinking that rsoultin is scum and coag is either being played, or is scum too

Okay good.
Now you can talk about something else.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:49 GMT
#1016
Vivax could you tell me who are your scumreads with actual reasoning?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:50 GMT
#1017
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:
eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything

well said. about a guy who shares at least 2 of your scumreads.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:52 GMT
#1019
On December 28 2015 02:49 Koshi wrote:
rayn is Artanis scum?

idk tbh.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:55 GMT
#1022
On December 28 2015 02:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:
eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything

well said. about a guy who shares at least 2 of your scumreads.

to be more exact shares 2/3 of your scumreads, and the third one you have (exo) is never ever going to be mafia in this game. Keep digging a hole.

I would want to remind you this is not a forum where people are dumb enough to try lynch me for questioning illogical stuff in comparison to trash forums.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 17:59 GMT
#1028
On December 28 2015 02:57 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 02:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:
eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything

well said. about a guy who shares at least 2 of your scumreads.

to be more exact shares 2/3 of your scumreads, and the third one you have (exo) is never ever going to be mafia in this game. Keep digging a hole.

I would want to remind you this is not a forum where people are dumb enough to try lynch me for questioning illogical stuff in comparison to trash forums.

Yeah, with that you're on me for the most BSist reasons.

How am i sharing scum reads with anyone exactly?

I am on you because you say shit that doesn't make any sense and you are not even trying to explain why you do so.

You think Vivas is mafia. I do that too.
You think TT is mafia. I do too.
How the FUCK is that NOT sharing a scumread? It's literally what it is.
So, i share 2/3 of your scumreads -- yet you somehow claim you KNOW "i am wrong about everything in this game".
That, again -- is literally fucking bullshit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:00 GMT
#1030
You can't possibly think that. You jsut can't.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:00 GMT
#1032
Okay let's put it this way:
If i say i am "sharing a scumread" what does that in your opinion mean Ness?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:09 GMT
#1049
On December 28 2015 02:58 N e s s wrote:
"trash forums"

wat

Yeah like this:

33% of the people post like "hi!" and don't really do anything else.
33% of the people make awesome cases like "you must be mafia because mafia vigilante shot you on D1, and the only possible explanation is that you shot yourself", and then a town vigilante shoots you.... or like, "this guy who said "Hi!" instead of "Hi." is scum because of the exclamation mark..." (yes, that's really how it goes..)
33% of the people -- the people who actually can play mafia, don't care to play because rofl..

Happens almost everywhere except for here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:11 GMT
#1053
On December 28 2015 03:01 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 02:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:57 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:
eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything

well said. about a guy who shares at least 2 of your scumreads.

to be more exact shares 2/3 of your scumreads, and the third one you have (exo) is never ever going to be mafia in this game. Keep digging a hole.

I would want to remind you this is not a forum where people are dumb enough to try lynch me for questioning illogical stuff in comparison to trash forums.

Yeah, with that you're on me for the most BSist reasons.

How am i sharing scum reads with anyone exactly?

I am on you because you say shit that doesn't make any sense and you are not even trying to explain why you do so.

You think Vivas is mafia. I do that too.
You think TT is mafia. I do too.
How the FUCK is that NOT sharing a scumread? It's literally what it is.
So, i share 2/3 of your scumreads -- yet you somehow claim you KNOW "i am wrong about everything in this game".
That, again -- is literally fucking bullshit.

I didn't even realize i was sharing reads with you.

and how the fuck am i saying "you're wrong about everything rayn"

then start realizing it. read the thread?

you literally said so.... here:
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:
eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:14 GMT
#1061
nobody seems to know how to behave in a civilised manner

In fact people are acting in a really civilized manner here.
If someone gets mad because they get questioned for their inconsistancies they should probably try to explain it instead of just throwing their shit on the floor and quit.

At least i am trying to act nice, but if people just straight out refuse to even TRY to explain what they mean.... Then it's their probelm.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:15 GMT
#1063
And i am not calling him a moron. Fuck you Holyflare...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:20 GMT
#1067
On December 28 2015 03:18 Holyflare wrote:
This thread doesn't understand the word civilised.

Fuck is not a normal word people used in civilised conversation.
Calling someone stupid is not something people do in civilised conversation.

Your way of questioning him was blatantly antagonistic and not getting the desired results and I'm pretty sure he misunderstood the phrasing of the whole thing and was confused so it did nothing to alleviate the situation.




Ness when someone says "Sharing reads," they simply mean that you have some scum reads and they also have the same scum reads as you. You haven't shared anything per se but you both have the same some scum reads.

And i asked him to explain what does he mean with "sharing reads".
I am also expecting an answer instead of quiting. If he has one.
Because he had an opinion, he should have an opinion what "sharing reads" in his opinion means no?

I am aggressive, i know, but i am no fucking way in hell being a dick here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:21 GMT
#1069
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.

so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:25 GMT
#1072
On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.

so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?

Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means.

I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you.

So, again...
Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything.
In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no?
But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed).

How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:26 GMT
#1074
Don't worry. Tkae your time and if you are town try just explain yourself. There is a reasonable explanation if that's the case.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:30 GMT
#1077
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.

so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?

Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means.

I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you.

So, again...
Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything.
In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no?
But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed).

How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it?

What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes.

Okay.

I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right?

Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me.
So could you explain these things:
1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia?
2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:33 GMT
#1078
On December 27 2015 08:15 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 08:03 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Alright guys, I've devised a strategy that is fullproof. Since everyone wanted to lynch moosy before the game began and since not lynching me has a significantly higher percent chance of lynching scum than lynching me, I suggest we lynch moosy until further notice.
##Vote Moosydoosy

Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious.

Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?

Like.. this is a weird post.
And what i was talking about.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:36 GMT
#1082
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
i never said you were wrong about your reads on other people.

I understand this can be the case. If you are telling the truth here you should maybe choose your words more carefully in the future. Because i am not even the only person who read your post literally... People here tend to actually read post literally because we expect people to mean what they say and not something else.

If everything can be brushed off with "oh i didn't actually mean this" there is always an out for mafia on anything they ever say. So please. If you say something, be precise.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:38 GMT
#1084
On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.

so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?

Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means.

I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you.

So, again...
Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything.
In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no?
But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed).

How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it?

What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes.

Okay.

I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right?

Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me.
So could you explain these things:
1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia?
2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)?

1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start?
2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to.

Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked.....

And i don't know if it is my fault or not...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:40 GMT
#1087
On December 28 2015 03:39 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 03:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.

so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?

Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means.

I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you.

So, again...
Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything.
In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no?
But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed).

How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it?

What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes.

Okay.

I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right?

Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me.
So could you explain these things:
1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia?
2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)?

1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start?
2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to.

Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked.....

And i don't know if it is my fault or not...


You're using acronyms he doesn't understand I think, just explain what RVS means?


The thing is i went to his forum and looked at games and they random vote there -- or pressure, just like everywhere else. They even call it RVS..... Which is the problem i can't understand why he doesn't understand what RVS stands for...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:55 GMT
#1099
On December 28 2015 03:47 N e s s wrote:
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.

Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.

THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.

That's not the point. The point is you at least implied Artanis is suspicious of it when you should know it's not actually suspicious at all (considering you know what RVS is and why people do that).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 18:57 GMT
#1100
Like i could totally understand it if you said:
"In the same way Artanis voted for Moosy i wanted to pressure him to get the game started and i understand that's what he was trying to do -- regardless of his affiliation".

But you didn't...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:06 GMT
#1123
On December 28 2015 04:47 rsoultin wrote:
rayn do you really think ness is scum here? cause if you don't it would probably be better to drop it i think

I would like him to answer something... like anything that is asked from him... in a manner that is suitable for a mafia game.

On a sidenote.. I could lynch every single person that conmplains about the amount of posts in this game without even trying to do a single thing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:06 GMT
#1124
Because like "lol you're so bad" is not really an answer i am going to accept. Nor is "i don't wanna talk about this"...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:08 GMT
#1125
So hey Ness, are you "frying these bigger fish" you were talking about? If so, where? If not, were those "bigger fish" sicklucker and Vivax?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:25 GMT
#1128
On December 28 2015 04:47 rsoultin wrote:
lol exo you're one person in a 26-player game going against un-cc'd masons in a known setup

Can i also say that if you think Exo is town you should probably obey his wish so we can be 100% sure you are either mason or mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:31 GMT
#1132
I know but again, if you think Exo is town why would you not do that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:32 GMT
#1133
Like rsoultin.. Do you understand that guy is gonna call you scum until Coag does what he asked and there is nothing you or anyone can do about it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:33 GMT
#1134
Is that productive when you can stop it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:38 GMT
#1136
I believe Coag doesn't even know the other site.... So who cares.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:38 GMT
#1137
Well if anyone else wants to claim mason then please go a head in your next post.
It's the correct play.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:41 GMT
#1140
Anyways... let's murder TT or Vivax.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 20:44 GMT
#1141
1. Holyflare - prolly town
2. Rels - ???
3. Onegu - meh... town?
4. nooniansoong - scum
5. sicklucker - town
6. raynpelikoneet - town
7. damdred - town
8. Waylanner - ????
9. Exo_ - town
10. Koshi - ????
11. Ritoky - town
12. rsoultin - town
13. Mooseeeeeeeeydooseeeeeey - ???
14. Boxerfred - idk... scum?
15. Glowingbear - town
16. Coagulation - town
17. Trfel - town
18. ObiWanShinobi - town... maybe
19. The Shining - ????
20. Palmar - ????
21. Tictock - scum
22. n e s s - i have honestly no idea
23. Vivax - scum
24. Alakaslam - town
25. Artanis[Xp] - on the edge...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 21:39 GMT
#1159
On December 28 2015 06:04 nooniansoong wrote:
TT was very try hard as mafia last game. I suppose his play could be scum feeling mafia fatigue. I think he is more likely low effort town.

Which is that game?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 22:19 GMT
#1165
Well ig that's what you guys call tryhard then it has nothing to do with my read.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 22:21 GMT
#1166
Kuah who are your scumreada?
Do you think its perfectly fine to discredit people's scumreads without actually never touching the reasoning and then just wanting to lynch some policy people?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 22:21 GMT
#1168
Kush..*

Fycking phoneposting.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 22:23 GMT
#1169
On December 28 2015 07:21 Damdred wrote:
I don't remember how many games have you played with tt?

If you wanna go by meta i read 2 pages of excuses and no real reada on the nutcracker game and same here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 22:30 GMT
#1171
Maybe ritoky coyld share some light on this.
After all he correctly called him scum last game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:04 GMT
#1182
On December 28 2015 07:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Basically being a complete non-factor, stating his opinions multiple times without attempting to engage or push anyone. When engaging people he's engaging them on things he doesn't actually care about rather than his scumread and makes no attempt to engage his scumread either.

Well he engaged the two most imporatnt things in the game which is more than 60% of the players have done...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:08 GMT
#1187
On December 28 2015 08:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 07:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Basically being a complete non-factor, stating his opinions multiple times without attempting to engage or push anyone. When engaging people he's engaging them on things he doesn't actually care about rather than his scumread and makes no attempt to engage his scumread either.

Well he engaged the two most imporatnt things in the game which is more than 60% of the players have done...

I expect scum to be much more concerned with addressing the "most important things in the game", whereas town is more likely to engage the things they care about the most.

Okay. And given the effort cava has put into the game what shoyld he do?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:09 GMT
#1192
On December 28 2015 08:08 Alakaslam wrote:
WTF I don't even see this Vivax
When EXO has said this huge scummy thing I can't remember

And rayn while you are here how do you see EXP as town because I dont

I am not going to answer you to questions you can find answers to in thread.
If are capable of making a page of posts yourself which all start with "fuck rayn" then you sure can read my filter.
So chopchop...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:10 GMT
#1193
On December 28 2015 08:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 08:07 Holyflare wrote:
What if they just care about the most important things...?

I'm arguing he doesn't actually care about anything. He just addressed everything going on without showing any real care.
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 08:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 07:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Basically being a complete non-factor, stating his opinions multiple times without attempting to engage or push anyone. When engaging people he's engaging them on things he doesn't actually care about rather than his scumread and makes no attempt to engage his scumread either.

Well he engaged the two most imporatnt things in the game which is more than 60% of the players have done...

I expect scum to be much more concerned with addressing the "most important things in the game", whereas town is more likely to engage the things they care about the most.

Okay. And given the effort cava has put into the game what shoyld he do?

Spend the little time he has actually telling the thread why he prefers TT over Vivax so we have something to read him on.

But he did just that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:12 GMT
#1197
On December 28 2015 08:11 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:16 ExO_ wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:11 N e s s wrote:
And i'm not going to write Exo off as scum myself. Sure, people are throwing scum! at him, but to me he reminds me alot of how i played in mafia. Getting accused then getting mad.

He could be mafia,
[image loading]


Yeah go for it. If you want to hurt town just lynch me b/c I'm tired of being accused of scum on nothing during day 1. I'm going to try my best to help town win but I'm not even going to be given the time of day.

Youre most likely town but please stop complaining and play okay?

This is all I saw, I don't remember you fleshing it out at all

I did. Later.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:14 GMT
#1201
On December 28 2015 08:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 08:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:07 Holyflare wrote:
What if they just care about the most important things...?

I'm arguing he doesn't actually care about anything. He just addressed everything going on without showing any real care.
On December 28 2015 08:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 07:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Basically being a complete non-factor, stating his opinions multiple times without attempting to engage or push anyone. When engaging people he's engaging them on things he doesn't actually care about rather than his scumread and makes no attempt to engage his scumread either.

Well he engaged the two most imporatnt things in the game which is more than 60% of the players have done...

I expect scum to be much more concerned with addressing the "most important things in the game", whereas town is more likely to engage the things they care about the most.

Okay. And given the effort cava has put into the game what shoyld he do?

Spend the little time he has actually telling the thread why he prefers TT over Vivax so we have something to read him on.

But he did just that?

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:05 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Alright, I'm caught up.
I'm going to vote tictock because his filter is basically a bunch of empty nothingness. Rayn's points on his readslist were solid and I'm going to roll with that.

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 00:16 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I read it and I don't think his filter is as bad as tictock's.
I like my vote where it is atm.

"I think TT is scummier because his filter is worse."
That's as much reasoning as "I like the sky better without clouds because it's sunnier."

Or like... He agrees with my case. Which is btw why you voted for TT..... No?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:22 GMT
#1210
On December 28 2015 08:15 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 08:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:09 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:07 Holyflare wrote:
What if they just care about the most important things...?

I'm arguing he doesn't actually care about anything. He just addressed everything going on without showing any real care.
On December 28 2015 08:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 28 2015 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 07:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Basically being a complete non-factor, stating his opinions multiple times without attempting to engage or push anyone. When engaging people he's engaging them on things he doesn't actually care about rather than his scumread and makes no attempt to engage his scumread either.

Well he engaged the two most imporatnt things in the game which is more than 60% of the players have done...

I expect scum to be much more concerned with addressing the "most important things in the game", whereas town is more likely to engage the things they care about the most.

Okay. And given the effort cava has put into the game what shoyld he do?

Spend the little time he has actually telling the thread why he prefers TT over Vivax so we have something to read him on.

But he did just that?

On December 28 2015 00:05 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Alright, I'm caught up.
I'm going to vote tictock because his filter is basically a bunch of empty nothingness. Rayn's points on his readslist were solid and I'm going to roll with that.

On December 28 2015 00:16 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I read it and I don't think his filter is as bad as tictock's.
I like my vote where it is atm.

"I think TT is scummier because his filter is worse."
That's as much reasoning as "I like the sky better without clouds because it's sunnier."

Or like... He agrees with my case. Which is btw why you voted for TT..... No?

I didn't agree with your TT read at first because I had my own recollection on him which was inaccurate. I re-evaled him after going through him again which was prompted by someone else.. Was it GB? Think it might be.

Honestly don't even remember your case.

Sooo... You dont remember my case but cava is scum because he agrees with the case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:26 GMT
#1212
Well is he still your top scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2015 23:30 GMT
#1216
On December 28 2015 08:28 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 02:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:31 ExO_ wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:26 Holyflare wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:12 ExO_ wrote:
On December 28 2015 02:06 Holyflare wrote:
On December 28 2015 01:58 ExO_ wrote:
I don't think rsoultin breadcrumbed coag. No mention of anything remotely related to him until after somebody else mentions it in the thread. then she hops right onto the idea that she breadcrumbed him.

I don't believe rsoultin/coag are masons. I don't necessarily think they are scum buddies either. I think a huge variety of things could be happening here. but when rsoultin has been accused of being scum so far she kinda just goes "shrug nothing I can do to convince you guys". So I think rsoultin is scum, and coag is some non-scum role kinda just piggy bagging off rsoultin's "bread crumbing" to make up for his lack of posting.


so then the real 2 masons just out and we have 2 mafia.... don't think that's a good plan exo


Why should the mason's speak up? On this forum, I think it'd be more likely that 2 people who are VT fake claim mason rather than actual masons claim on day 1. I don't think that's the case here, but it's not impossible.

What I don't think happened is rsoultin as a mason bread crumbed her mason buddy in this manner.


I think you're entirely on the wrong train of thought, rsoultin would absolutely breadcrumb like this because she's done the same thing before, it is also incredibly out of the blue for rsoultin to just randomly pick coagulation as a mason buddy to randomly put in a town list too, too many things don't add up. I don't think they are VT and I think you are following an end that has no real goal here. I think you should focus on other things and question people you scum read that aren't coag/based on something silly.

You seem to have a problem with my posts and questions that seemingly lead nowhere (I'm pretty sure I've made cases on both vivax and GB early game) and I'd like you to point out some things that you had problem with in my posts and I can show you where they lead me. Or because I'm town and that would ultimately be a fruitless endeavor for you and me you could talk about some other intuitive tidbit you've seen.


Give me an example of rsoultin breadcrumbing, particularly if its a player who hasn't posted, and when it turned out to be true. I think you're awfully quick to believe that rsoultin "bread crumbed here" and that she isn't scum. How can you be so sure that rsoultin is a mason? You really believe that she can't be scum, or fake claiming VT. It's not worth pursuing that line of thought at all?

yeah Exo, you should let that go. They are masons.

Wth who claims Mason's day 1? Was one of them up for lunch or something ? -_-

Yeah they must be scum now lynch them...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 01:08 GMT
#1245
On December 28 2015 10:04 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?


Pfft rayn I pointed that out forever ago,

and btw yes I still do think Ness is scum

No you actually just quoted posts..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:04 GMT
#1481
On December 28 2015 17:49 Tictock wrote:
Ok I'm caught up.

I was serious about this:
Show nested quote +
On December 24 2015 22:46 Tictock wrote:
Wow this game has grown to epic proportions.

/in

My only condition: I refuse to tryhard this game.


So I'm still ok with lynching Ness but I don't think Vivax is a good lynch anymore.

Art's case on Obi is pretty good I think, I also know I don't know how to read Obi and he swore to never play with me after mislynching me in New Personalities.

I'm not at all sure about HF kus I've never played with the guy but I wouldn't trust him right now.

Oh the Kush stuff, yea don't lynch Kush either. Don't know why everyone assumes I should know he outed his smurf in the other game before it got pointed out by HF.

On December 28 2015 17:49 Tictock wrote:
Oh the Kush stuff, yea don't lynch Kush either. Don't know why everyone assumes I should know he outed his smurf in the other game before it got pointed out by HF.

Your problem here is you DIDNT REALIZE IT EVEN AFTER HF POINTED IT OUT...
We had a fucking 5 post discussion about it with him..

And that only means you are not reading the thread at all.

Also the shit you said about Ness is NOT EVEN CLOSE to what i said, it ABSOLUTELY cannot be, you never even cared to explain WHAT you actually meant in your post. You just quoted some posts and said "well this guy is scum". That is NOT what i did. Then you tried to brush off suspicion off you by saying "look you are saying same things", which -- again -- was NOT what i said.

Same thing with both of the cases. You try to defend yourself with some lazy shit that isn't even true, which you would know if you cared to think about the game and what people post for a second.

My vote is not going to move.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:16 GMT
#1484
On December 29 2015 00:41 Palmar wrote:
So I'm too lazy to read the backstory to artanis' case Obi, can you tell me why he thinks you're mafia?

Artanis thinks OWS is scum because he is voting for mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:19 GMT
#1485
On December 29 2015 00:55 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 00:53 Palmar wrote:
On December 29 2015 00:48 Vivax wrote:
On December 29 2015 00:45 Palmar wrote:
On December 29 2015 00:44 Vivax wrote:
Kush is town and you should know it Plammar

Can you explain why?


He doesnt try to be a factor in the game as mafia, as mafia he has the mafia version of Alzheimers and just talks about odd stuff.

In this game he even says good stuff!

as a counterpoint, he repeatedly fucks up as mafia by being less wrong than he is as town. In general one of kush's biggest scumtells is that he's right about things.


Which I'm sure you can tell on D1 without flips. Oh you so smart Plmarr

Mafia is HF, ritoky, The Shining, Moosey and 1-2 other guys I didnt look at yet

ritoky and Moosy are most likely not scum.
Especially ritoky is not scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:23 GMT
#1487
On December 29 2015 01:07 Palmar wrote:
Hi rayn

are you sheepable this game?

yes.

TT/kush/boxerfred is where i think most likely scum are at this point.
I can be wrong on boxerfred but... i don't think i am. His dumbass question about my list post should almost definitely make him scum.
idk.. maybe shining is town? i didn't pay attention to his posts yet.

then maybe Rels is scum, but i don't wanna go there yet. Artanis could actually be scum, especially now that Vivax is town.
OWS is definitely not mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:25 GMT
#1489
This post should be rememberd after D1.
On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:28 GMT
#1491
And TT is still not saying anything at all.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:41 GMT
#1501
Shut up about Vivax already Koshi. It's not productive.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:42 GMT
#1502
Vivax why do you believe ritoky is mafia?
And why is TT not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:43 GMT
#1507
On December 29 2015 01:00 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 00:56 Damdred wrote:
Shining is def town
ritoky is most likely town

anyway rels and the other guy who hasn't posted are decent lynches.


There really is no point for ritoky being town, he has just been background noise and all the gifs reminded me of Guardians I think

Because this is certainly not true if you are actually reading this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 16:48 GMT
#1511
Maybe i should actually write a case then about what i mean...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:06 GMT
#1517
First of all there is this:
On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote:
Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around.

Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open.

No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi

I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything.

This post is non-commital as hell. There is the read on Koshi that is never going to be warranted at this point of the game. There is just no way TT thinks Koshi is town here. No. Then the GB read. If TT thinks GB is town for his posting why does he feel the need to tell he doesn't necessarily actually think GB is town? It's like... he is in the both sides of his own argument... Let's see what he says about Ness and noonian then:
On December 27 2015 12:10 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:37 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote:
Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around.

Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open.

No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi

I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything.

this.

why lynch me or noonian?


You kus you posted a bunch of questions to everyone but haven't really used peoples responses to further reads. Also these:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:11 N e s s wrote:
And i'm not going to write Exo off as scum myself. Sure, people are throwing scum! at him, but to me he reminds me alot of how i played in mafia. Getting accused then getting mad.

He could be mafia,
[image loading]


Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:22 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:19 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:14 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:11 Holyflare wrote:
On December 27 2015 11:00 Koshi wrote:
On December 27 2015 10:25 Holyflare wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote:
To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed.


Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day.

1) First riddle
setup:
- People can only look forward.
- People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed)
- People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat.

goal:
- A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say)
[image loading]

question:
- How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously)


2) second riddle
setup:
- People can only look forward.
- People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed)
- People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head.

goal:
- Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9.

[image loading]
question:
- How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously)



+ Show Spoiler +
1) If the back person sees two of the same colour hat then the puzzle is easy and he can say the opposite. If he sees two different colours such as the picture then he should stay silent which indicates to the second person that there are two different colours. The person in front will be able to see the colour and so can yell out the colour on the top of his head easily.

In your picture it would be:

Back person: *Silence*
Middle person: "Hmm the person in front of me is a white hat which must mean my hat is black!"


2) Are they allowed to formulate a plan beforehand?


Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day.


first one is correct


Since they can come up with a plan beforehand and I presume that they can hear every other person's response then they should formulate the plan that the person with the perfect information (Number 1 in the picture) should sacrifice himself to relay that information to everyone else.

The strategy should be that player 1 says "Black" if he can see an even amount of black hats or "White" if he can see an odd amount of black hats. This way if person 1 is wrong then everyone else can determine the colour of their hat based on how many of each colour they can see and the person 1's fate.

The situation would go as follows:

As person 1 can only see 5 black hats then he should exclaim the aforementioned planned phrase of, "White".

Person 1 does not explode as he has a white hat.

Person 2 now knows there are an odd amount of black hats as Person 1 did not die but can only see 4 black hats, he therefore knows that he has a black hat and shouts, "Black".

^^your long posts remind me a bit of someone i play with

Town reads-HolyFlare, Aramis or whoever you say his username.

But Ness! Shouldn't there be more town reads?

To be blunt, i'm lazy. I'm diabetic and i'm at 340 (which is bad.)
I'll go back and do more later, thats just the majority of whom i think is town atm.


Much more important than who is town

Who is Mafia?

Choose one person with not much to go off of?

Sicklucker, just because.
That or whoever seems scummiest rn i don't care enough to do anything


Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:24 N e s s wrote:
*as to why sicklucker

his posts are annoying me. he's giving me a gut feeling of him being scum.

Butttt Ness! Isn't Glowbunny scummier?

Gb seems good. He was going after me, which seems alright. While others did too i don't think he's mafia atm.


Noonian mostly kus of the smurf thing.

Now the first thing TT says makes sense. But the quotes he bring up don't make any sense at all because he doesn't even explain what is scummy in them. I personally don't find anything scummy in them. TT townreads Exo himself, why does he bring up a quote where Ness calls Exo town? Why is it scummy Ness finds sicklucker most likely mafia? Why is it scummy that he townreads GB now? This chain of quotes --> Ness is mafia doesn't make any sense because the quotes are logical and there is no contradiction in them.

Then he calls kush scum for the smurf thing when it has already been explained when and how kush blew his smurf, which makes this post..
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.

Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town.

Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point?

TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething).
Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.


Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it

Seems legit

... a very bad defense. Not only was he not reading the thread when he made the kush read, he is also not even trying to understand what happens in the thread at any point. Look at the defense, seriously, it is so stupid i can't even.....

Another instance of this is this one:
On December 28 2015 10:04 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
[quote]
Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?


Pfft rayn I pointed that out forever ago,

and btw yes I still do think Ness is scum

Look at this post and what i say there in comparison to why TT called Ness mafia.
Does it look like he "pointed out what i did before"????? Fucking no!
First of all we are talking about completely different things (well i don't even know what TT is talking about because he is just quoting some posts and not explaining what there is there). He possibly cannot talk about same thing i do because what i am talking about happened mostly after TT had made his post about Ness!!!! Therefore it's literally impossible he is talking about the same thing i am (or that he thinks so) -- it's just fucking impossible he thinks so.

So, again, this is just a half-assed try to defend himself based NOT on why he did what he did but instead due to some association to his posting that could possibly look similar (when it even doesn't -- and he fucking should know that).

So yeah, there it is. Also go read ritoky's case. Here:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 28 2015 15:41 ritoky wrote:
So basically TT made some bullshit read progression last game on a new player that he totally never makes as town. basically he made an awakward joke then randomly backed out of a town read over literal nothing and over-explained why he did so. He hasn't quite done that this game, but he has some elements going on.

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 08:51 Tictock wrote:
On December 27 2015 08:11 GlowingBear wrote:
OHAI
I'm mafia!

Lynch me

##Vote: GlowingBear


Is nobody gunna discuss this obvious legit very real claim and self vote?

Personally, I could try and get GB killed for 3 games in a row.


Like is this a joke or is it serious? Normally I just assume this is 100% a joke, but GB is one of those assholes who would claim scum as scum or claim cop as cop just to dick around. He would also do both as VT for the same reason. So it very well could be him using some meta and taking it actually serious. And if it is not serious then it isn't really funny and it is a shitty joke...shitty jokes actually tend more toward scum.

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote:
Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around.

Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open.

No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi

I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything.


Bold #1: Firstly I just disagree with this pretty strongly. Secondly, his eventual reason for this read is "you ask questions and then don't conclude things" (which btw after this post you don't really do either of those things) which is the most vague and gray goo accusation of a new player ever. It feels like you pulled it out of a box.

Bold #2: This is the part that really blows my mind. Why the fuck koshi? Of all people, why koshi? I say this ENTIRELY because of the last game. To give you context: in nutcracker koshi opened the game with the literal exact same post basically and attempted to hold to it; after approximately 12 hours he crumbled and started spamming the thread (or the equiv of spamming in a post limit game). #1) If you're going to base your read off of koshi making the same play shouldn't you actually wait until a proper amount of time has passed for koshi to explode and fail at being quiet or succeed and then make your judgment from then on? #2) koshi had been fairly calm (for his standards) up until kinda recently where he posted some more which is the OPPOSITE of what happened in the last game. So I have a very hard time grasping this read, because I can only assume there is some meta behind it since koshi was nowhere near the most town in the thread from a play perspective. Like either you think koshi got better at being quiet and is town (in which case how the fuck did you make this read so fast?) or this read is manufactured.

Bold #3: If the above was serious and based on meta (which to me this post kinda indicates it slightly was) then you backed out of a meta read about GB claiming scum super easy and at a time when I don't really think he deserved it in the slightest. In fact GB was pretty fucking scummy early and I think he still has a solid chance of flipping scum.

Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta.

its bad to go off of meta.

It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion.

Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart.

What if he's changed his play style?

But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on.

Well here is where we disagree..
And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means.

But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do.

Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town.

Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point?

TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething).
Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.


Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it

Seems legit


To me this part is weaker than the koshi part, but still scum indicative. Basically it is simple: he is not reading and doesn't care. Multiple points in the thread and the pages surrounding this, kush, rayn, and hf had all mentioned that kush was a smurf who admitted he was a smurf because he couldn't log on his original name from work. It is mentioned quite a few times, but TT agrees with the read made initially that kush = scum cuz admitting smurfing = nonsense. But he keeps standing by it in the face of facts. Facts that he hadn't read because he didn't care about making an informed read. It is only when I quote it for him a bit later that he says "oh". Also when your read goes from he admitted he was a smurf -> oh, nothing after 1 correction of facts....and it is your most prominent read; clearly he isn't interested in finding scum.

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 12:11 Tictock wrote:
On December 27 2015 23:46 sicklucker wrote:
Ness is town because he asked this "can you see whos viewing thread" basicly hes asking if people can see if hes lurking or if he can see lurkers.

If hes mafia and he is worried about people seeing him lurk he would ask his mafia qt so this is not possible.

This only leaves the other option that he legitly wants to see if people are lurking.

I think this statement alone makes him town and alot of other people have reasons to think hes town so im sure he is.

The only other option is an intentional dumbtell which is very rare. I dont think a mafia would ask this ever due to being afraid of suspicion


My only issue with this thinking is that it could just be a very legit, NAI, question he asked there and you are way overthinking it.

I will admit that the nature of the question is more town indicative, but this wont really change my opinion by itself.


Like this, he is just shitting on someone's town read, but even in shitting on it he is being wishy-washy about shitting on it. However after dumping on it he provides nothing of his own. No indication of direction or wanting people to get on board with him lynching Ness. He simply shits to shit.

I don't see how posts like this push town in any positive direction. Like where are you trying to find scum? Where are you gathering information? Where are you showing you're reading the thread? Where are you trying to get people to understand your point of view? You're doing none of that, so you're probably just mafia.

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 12:19 Tictock wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:16 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I read it and I don't think his filter is as bad as tictock's.
I like my vote where it is atm.


Ouch.


Ouch is right.

Currently I think TT is a better lynch than Vivax. Vivax is nibbling at the edges while actively reading which annoys me greatly and also engaging in riddles before gameplay which also frustrates me, but he has some LS in him....and that kinda makes me a pussy about it.

##unvote:
##vote: TickTock



After, and aside those things that have been pointed out in his play, he hasn't done jack shit. There is not a single analysis on anything, people are just town for no reason, he doesn't care about what some people say, or he wants to lynch lurkers (and obviously the dude who is voting for him and has been cased with a bad case).

There, now you can place your votes accordingly.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:11 GMT
#1519
On December 29 2015 01:49 rsoultin wrote:
raaaayn i think art is most likely town and ows is most likely scum where's our disconnect?

if you said it before, i'm sorry, it's just a big thread and my memory's not the best

But OWS is not scum because TT is.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:20 GMT
#1524
On December 29 2015 02:17 nooniansoong wrote:
Rayn a lot of those points against him you make are due to his laziness and you and him misundertanding each other,

Maybe he misunderstood your case against Ness and thought he had already made it by posting those quotes.

It's impossible because i talk about his vote on Vivax and his SCUMREAD on GB which never existed at the point he made his post.

Maybe you should for once try to read what people post if you are town, which i also find hard to believe.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:21 GMT
#1526
HOW THE FUCK IS THERE A SINGLE THING I MISUNDERSTAND IN TT'S POSTING`?!?!?!
What the fuck are you talking about.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:26 GMT
#1534
On December 29 2015 02:25 nooniansoong wrote:
Rayn he did point out the sl thing.

Yes and in it's own it doesn't mean shit.
Now go away if this is the level of your arguments.
I am done arguing with you about this. Maybe some more intelligent people see what i am trying to say, discussing anything with you is pointless because you are not even trying to understand what people write.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:40 GMT
#1550
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons?


This guy probably mafia too tbh.

I had the same feeling but then i read the name above the post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:49 GMT
#1559
On December 29 2015 02:42 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 02:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons?


This guy probably mafia too tbh.

I had the same feeling but then i read the name above the post.


wanna play some hots?

I can't, i only have a tablet and a shitty laptop i can basically use occasionally and it won't even run hots...
Have to wait until next week.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:50 GMT
#1561
On December 29 2015 02:48 GlowingBear wrote:
Fucking lots of people not playing and you tunnel Vivax and just say "oh lol this guy can be Mafia" "oh kush can be Mafia because his read took a big leap" "but I just want to lynch Vivax anyway ROFL"

You're mafia

It's actually more characteristic to town Holyflare than mafia...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:53 GMT
#1565
On December 29 2015 02:50 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 02:48 Holyflare wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons?


This guy probably mafia too tbh.


Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed?


So you're accusing me of making Vivax claim when Vivax has been calling me mafia all game? Are you okay in the head?

On December 29 2015 02:34 Holyflare wrote:
but well actually maybe not


regarding N E S S ^


I'm accusing you of pushing a guy solely on inactivity to the point he had to claim without caring for other inactives that are as bad as him.

Look Glowingbear.

Vivax was not inactive. He had over 2 page filter basically full of nothing. There is no way to compare him into any inactive, like Rels or Palmar or the one dude who hasnt posted at all, who were ACTUALLY inactive... Hell even boxerfred goes to this category, or at least went. Vivax was NOT inactive. He looked "inactive" while having posted because his posting was just some random things that didn't seem to be leading anywhere.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 17:57 GMT
#1569
Hmm... i am actually interested in seeing GB's answer to this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:07 GMT
#1585
On December 29 2015 03:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 02:54 Holyflare wrote:
Yup classic GB fake mafia anger. Not only are your points illogical (I couldn't have made Vivax claim, I said I don't really want to lynch Ness straight away after etc etc) but they are ones that you yourself FOLLOW IN SENTIMENT.

On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons?


This guy probably mafia too tbh.


Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed?


Let's look at this post as a classic example of a wtf he's mafia moment. GB is calling me out for:

A) Being suspicious of Vivax which is weird as fuck because:

On December 28 2015 04:18 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote:
If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo.

If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too


And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today



B) Being suspicious of TickTock:

On December 28 2015 00:35 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT.


Let's do it

##Vote: Tictock



C) Being suspicious of N E S S:

On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote:
can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture


Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum.


D) Being suspicious of Kush:

-absent because GB has been afk for ages-


So, what do we see here ladies and gentleman? Glowingbear is accusing me of calling all his mafia reads mafia and then using it to call me mafia.

/case

get rekt GB


Yeah, you're mafia.

You're completely twisting my argument here. You can call all my scum reads scum and do nothing about it. Yes, I've said after a long time that Vivax might be the best lynch because there was enough time for him to react and he didn't. But you have been pushing him since the beginning of the game while calling everyone else suspicious but doing nothing about it.

And about "D", I think kush is more likely to be town than mafia here, out of tone basically. I remember very well his mafia play in avogadro's mini mafia and it's nothing like this. Plus I think him going against Palmar was an okay play. Also, why would he come back to the thread like that, drawing all attention he can? Pretty much suicidal.

I'm voting you

So you think HF is scum because he pushed his main scumread (who was also your main scumread unless i am mistaken??) and tried also find other scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:08 GMT
#1587
rofl.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:09 GMT
#1589
On December 29 2015 03:08 Koshi wrote:
No he didnt. That case is bullshit and I am surprised rayn agrees.

Then what is he saying? Explain it to all of us dumb people please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:11 GMT
#1592
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:12 GMT
#1597
On December 29 2015 03:10 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote:
On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote:
Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons?


This guy probably mafia too tbh.


Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed?

Nothing in this post even suggest that GB is pushing HF for having the same scumreads. GB says HF wants to lynch townreads.

The part GB says about Vivax is trash though.

yes which is factually incorrect.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:14 GMT
#1602
On December 29 2015 03:12 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:08 Koshi wrote:
No he didnt. That case is bullshit and I am surprised rayn agrees.

Then what is he saying? Explain it to all of us dumb people please.

Read the post... nothing GB said was about having the same scumreads. HF his case is bullshit because he starts with an hypothesis that is a lie and then proves the lie...

What is the hypothesis that is a lie?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:15 GMT
#1604
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:20 GMT
#1620
On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....


Tell me what's wrong with it

Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid).
If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead.
Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:23 GMT
#1628
I'll be back in 20, gotta go buy some drinks.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:54 GMT
#1687
On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....


Tell me what's wrong with it

Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid).
If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead.
Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does....


Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it.

He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me.

My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments.

So that would only make HF mafia if TicTock is scum right?
Because otherwise he is refusing to vote for a townie -- which is not scummy.
I am not going to check rn if your story stands up or not, because i don't think that makes HF mafia even if it does. I think you are exaggerrating the "reluctant to lynch" thing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:56 GMT
#1691
On December 29 2015 03:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....


Tell me what's wrong with it

Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid).
If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead.
Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does....


Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it.

He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me.

My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments.

So your main case on him is association based on TT being mafia.
TT has a lot of votes. HF had none. Why did you vote HF instead of TT?

Maybe you are town after all.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 18:57 GMT
#1699
On December 29 2015 03:32 MoosyDoosy wrote:
When is deadline? Who do I vote for?

On December 29 2015 03:32 MoosyDoosy wrote:
When is deadline? Who do I vote for?

You vote for TicTock.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:07 GMT
#1710
On December 29 2015 03:58 ExO_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 03:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...]

GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....


Tell me what's wrong with it

Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid).
If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead.
Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does....


Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it.

He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me.

My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments.

So that would only make HF mafia if TicTock is scum right?
Because otherwise he is refusing to vote for a townie -- which is not scummy.
I am not going to check rn if your story stands up or not, because i don't think that makes HF mafia even if it does. I think you are exaggerrating the "reluctant to lynch" thing.


isn't a matter or refusing to vote for what he thinks isn't a townie? If HF thinks TT is scum then why would he be hesitant to vote him?

The only reason to be hesitant about lynching a townie here (who HF suspect is mafia) is that he knows that TT is town and the only way he'd know that is if he was scum

The thing is we are talking about Holyflare here. He has already set up a venue on voting for TicTock (if not Vivax), so when Vivax claims -- if HF is scum and TT town here -- he will definitely vote for TT. That is where GB's argument falls apart (even if we believe his side of things here). There is not a world where scum!HF does not insta-vote town!TT when Vivax claims.

I can guarantee you in this game it is impossible that both HF is scum and TT is town are true.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:09 GMT
#1713
On December 29 2015 04:08 Damdred wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 04:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:58 ExO_ wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
[quote]
GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible.
If you don't understand why, then i can't help you.


"WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out.

Pushing a townie is okay.

Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not.

This is a really shitty case GlowingBear.....


Tell me what's wrong with it

Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid).
If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead.
Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does....


Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it.

He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me.

My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments.

So that would only make HF mafia if TicTock is scum right?
Because otherwise he is refusing to vote for a townie -- which is not scummy.
I am not going to check rn if your story stands up or not, because i don't think that makes HF mafia even if it does. I think you are exaggerrating the "reluctant to lynch" thing.


isn't a matter or refusing to vote for what he thinks isn't a townie? If HF thinks TT is scum then why would he be hesitant to vote him?

The only reason to be hesitant about lynching a townie here (who HF suspect is mafia) is that he knows that TT is town and the only way he'd know that is if he was scum

The thing is we are talking about Holyflare here. He has already set up a venue on voting for TicTock (if not Vivax), so when Vivax claims -- if HF is scum and TT town here -- he will definitely vote for TT. That is where GB's argument falls apart (even if we believe his side of things here). There is not a world where scum!HF does not insta-vote town!TT when Vivax claims.

I can guarantee you in this game it is impossible that both HF is scum and TT is town are true.


I do like this point and I hate that Rayn stole it from me. :'(

write faster biash
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:10 GMT
#1716
And that is why GB seems a bit fishy here. Othe stuff and his case i can understand coming from town.
I can't understand why is he not pushing TT instead of HF -- because he should.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:12 GMT
#1719
On December 29 2015 04:09 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 04:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There is not a world where scum!HF does not insta-vote town!TT when Vivax claims.


Why not? Do you think hes that easily predictable?

Until i see a game that proves me wrong yes.
This is like one of the easiest things to figure out.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:13 GMT
#1721
On December 29 2015 04:10 Vivax wrote:
Meanwhile completely ignoring that HF probably only pushed town with his usual outflux of fact twisting

But that is not what he did, and even if he did.. Do you think also me and Artanis and Damdred are mafia because we saw the same thing HF did. Geez... You got almost the full fucking scumteam here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:15 GMT
#1723
On December 29 2015 04:13 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 04:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 04:09 Vivax wrote:
On December 29 2015 04:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There is not a world where scum!HF does not insta-vote town!TT when Vivax claims.


Why not? Do you think hes that easily predictable?

Until i see a game that proves me wrong yes.
This is like one of the easiest things to figure out.


He made it clear he was just spite voting me (idk why) after my claim so you cant bring that argument.

When I made 2 posts he was already convinced I was mafia.

I was also pretty cunvinced you are mafia from the beginning of the game until you claimed.
Just because i didn't put my same basket as HF doesn't make him any more scum than anyone who thought you were mafia -- because it was actually fucking reasonable to assume you were mafia, tbh....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:17 GMT
#1726
On December 29 2015 04:15 Vivax wrote:
No its not cause I never have this degree of thread interaction, how bad it might be, as mafia.

Okay, then about 15 players in this game were just bad.
But still, it doesn't make HF scum. Unless you think there is about 15 scum in this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:17 GMT
#1727
On December 29 2015 04:16 Vivax wrote:
i would have fucked off for several hours after the claim, for example. Mission accomplished then I go do something that isnt lying about a game I dont have to solve

I have no idea what are you talking about here?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:21 GMT
#1732
wait wait wait...
Vivax are you actually unclaiming here?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:21 GMT
#1733
On December 29 2015 04:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Oh I forgot OWS and TT on there. Coloured in red so I skipped over them

post your chart real quick
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:22 GMT
#1738
On December 29 2015 04:22 ExO_ wrote:
Does the gunsmith's given gun get to shoot the night he gives it, or does it have to wait until the following night? I asked earlier but if anybody answered me I didn't see it

If you can't find it in the OP PM the hosts.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:25 GMT
#1742
On December 29 2015 04:24 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
If this is the reason people actually TR me I swear I'm going to shoot someone

You mean the chart?
No, if you didn't have one you would be scum.

If Vivax actually unclaimed we lynch him 100%. I don't fucking care if he is town or not but we lynch him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:27 GMT
#1747
On December 29 2015 04:26 ritoky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 04:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 04:24 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
If this is the reason people actually TR me I swear I'm going to shoot someone

You mean the chart?
No, if you didn't have one you would be scum.

If Vivax actually unclaimed we lynch him 100%. I don't fucking care if he is town or not but we lynch him.


what do you think of hf being so heated @ gb that he didn't even give vivax unclaiming the time of day?

I don't care. If Vivax actually unclaimed he should be lynched.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:28 GMT
#1750
Vivax are you unclaiming jailkeepr or not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:30 GMT
#1754
mhm...
##unvote
##vote Vivax
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 19:36 GMT
#1771
I am officially retracting from playing until i am dead or Vivax is dead.
When smart people become dumb as fuck all hope is lost.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2015 23:21 GMT
#2058


Hey tictock. D2 just claim jailkeeper and then unclaim. Noone will ever remember they thought you were scum and you can continue sayong whatever you want.

Good lynch boyz! Keep it up!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 06:03 GMT
#2112
I should probably try to play for a bit when i get up properly.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:01 GMT
#2122
See TicTock, here is my problem.

I agree that it is possible your reads post at the start of the game comes from town. So let's say you did that as town, fine.
But then again we come to this:

I am quoting this on parts, so it is easier to read and respond to:

Rayn said he couldn't understand my reads post he quoted first here, (1)yet he had the exact same reaction to Kush revieling his smurf that I did, and (2)later questioned Ness for very similar things that I was seeing.



ONE:
The shit about me not reading kus of Kush's smurf I already responded to and is just not true. I wouldn't sign up for a game I didn't intend to make some effort to read, and I would read things twice as carefully if I were scum. Just kus I don't see things or react to things the same as you do doesn't mean I'm not reading.

That is just not right. The difference is the following;
I made that read. After i had made the read Holyflare (and someone else, maybe ritoky?) pointed out why my read is based on incorrect basis. After that, you come in and make the same read -- which you should already know is based on incorrect basis.

TWO:
I posted 3 posts of Ness. One he flippantly writes off trying to read Exo with a gif trying to act like it's non of his buisness, saying he might be town or mafia.
He also gives a "just cause" read on Sl, then immediately backs it up with "reasons"

Those posts furthered the idea that he wasn't really trying to make reads on people or think about the game, and the post regarding Exo was just one example of him going "well maybe they are town or mafia, not my problem"

Okay now look at this. This is what you say about your scumread on Ness and where it was (is?) based on. Here is what i wrote about Ness:
On December 27 2015 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2015 23:31 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote:
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]

Let me ask you something

What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy?

Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to?


It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from

Food for thought~

Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is?

I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum.

Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum?


It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment.

mmmm on the contrary

that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you.
Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game.

please answer my question now.


You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe

I find you being town hard to believe.

Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ.

*sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c:


You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed?

I am actually retracting from my townread on Ness.
This is one thing.
The other thing is he calls sicklucker mafia for "just because".
Then he votes for Vivax?!?!?!?
Than he says this... Bigger fish to fry? Like.... sicklucker who he has basically no read on and just calls scum? Or Vivax, who is basically a non-poster at that point?

What i am saying here is that Ness had a scumread on Glowingbear. But still he didn't want to vote for Glowingbear because of "i have bigger fish to fry". Not only does he not try to actually "fry these bigger fish", he votes for Vivax -- who is a complete non-entity contentwise at this point -- instead. His only other scumreads are Vivax (for who knows why) and sicklucker (for gut reasons), so i found it very hard to understand what this "i have bigger fish to fry" means , since it doesn't fucking mean anything (as based on his reasoning, Vivax and sicklucker cannot possibly be "bigger fish" than GB), nor does he even follow up on it on ANY way.

So yes, this could be really easily seen from my post - -and from my questioning from Ness after. Now go look at the posts, yours -- and mine, again:
questioned Ness for very similar things that I was seeing

... does this look like a fair comparison of what i did and what you did? Not only you are completely incorrect here, the reasoning for MY SCUMREAD ON NESS i pointed out HADNT EVEN HAPPENED WHEN YOU MADE YOUR POST!!




So, we come to this:
In both of those cases, you are completely misrepresenting either the chain of events timelinewise or what actually happened. In both of those cases you are using my read on same person you scumread as a defense on why i should not be thinking you are mafia, and say we "said the same thing" when it is actually completely different things we are saying.... Here is a simple question to you:

I can find two reasons for this. You are either...
(1) ...just straight out lying, which makes you mafia, or
(2) ...you haven't read the thread properly and/or are not thinking about what you read properly. With this the problem is you claim you are not, you STILL claim you are not, when i can easily prove i am right and you are 100% wrong here. This also makes you mafia, because it makes you not reading the thread, and you claim it is not true, which brings us back to you lying...

(3) If you are not doing either of this, then please, tell me, and everyone else WHAT are you doing then? What is this option three i am missing because i can't fucking see it. AtE will not help you, calling people dumb will not help you. Explaining will, if you are town. If you are not you can do what the fuck you want.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:05 GMT
#2124
And we should fucking murder Vivax straight up. Just fucking lynch him. He is either jailkeeper or he is mafia, there is no other option. If he does not die during the night we lynch him, period.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:07 GMT
#2127
Retracting from the JK claim is the fucking stupidest thing you can ever do if you are the real jailkeeper. Mafia would know already you are town so you are very very likely the jailkeeper.

Mafia please, if Vivax is not in your team, shoot him, you get a 100% jailkeeper.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:10 GMT
#2128
Holyflare i don't think Glowingbear is mafia and i think you should let go of that read.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:18 GMT
#2129
Scumlist:

TicTock / Ness (one of them is definitely mafia, i am heavily leaning on TT especially after his respone i just commented on)
Vivax
boxerfred
noonian (especially if TT is somehow town -- kush is fucking 100% mafia there, otherwise only 90%)

Koshi is probably scum too, just because i have zero reasons to townread him. I tend to not care about reading him on D1, it's basically the same thing than with geript -- i just don't have any fucking reason to townread Koshi because he isn't doing anything at all.

Slam could be easily mafia. idk, just shoot him in the face.

Shining said some very very weird things.

I don't remember anything sicklucker has said.
Onegu can die in fire.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 07:41 GMT
#2132
On December 29 2015 16:21 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 16:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Retracting from the JK claim is the fucking stupidest thing you can ever do if you are the real jailkeeper. Mafia would know already you are town so you are very very likely the jailkeeper.

Mafia please, if Vivax is not in your team, shoot him, you get a 100% jailkeeper.


the way HF reacted to the claim right afterwards sothere might be some interesting stuff to be found. Ill check it out after a match of doto

Or you are scum and just claimed JK for shits and giggles when it was quite likely HF will yell the town to lynch you over TT and when ~15 players posted and votes came off you you decided you have an out by unclaiming (since let's be honest -- if almost anyone else in the game CC'd you you are dead). That's how i see it.

And now you have developed a bullshit reason for suspecting HF for it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:06 GMT
#2138
Ahh okay i understand the kush thing now. You should have said that earlier, i didn't think you were explaining your earlier reasoning and not saying like "i still think kush is mafia"... Let me look for something real quick...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:09 GMT
#2140
meh.. maybe you are just telling the truth about the Ness thing aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:10 GMT
#2142
On December 29 2015 17:04 Tictock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 16:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And we should fucking murder Vivax straight up. Just fucking lynch him. He is either jailkeeper or he is mafia, there is no other option. If he does not die during the night we lynch him, period.


There is more than black and white rayn.

If there wasn't these games would be boring as fuck.

I never understand why you have to think in absolutes.

Because people who do stupid things are like +1 mafia even when they are town.
They distract the town from actually scumhunting and finding mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:11 GMT
#2143
On December 29 2015 17:04 ritoky wrote:
so that list is: ritoky, koshi, palmar, SL, trfel, rsoul, shining, damdred

wait wait wait.
did Palmar switch to Rels?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:14 GMT
#2145
Okay guys Palmar is mafia.
Palmar is so fucking mafia it hurts.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:15 GMT
#2146
There is no way Palmar does neither of:
(1) stay on TicTock when having claimed to sheep me
(2) vote Vivax after unclaim
..as town.

There is just no way and it makes Palmar 100% mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:16 GMT
#2148
On December 29 2015 17:15 ritoky wrote:
CAN YOU STOP STEALING MY THUNDER! I make a case on TT and everyone praises rayn's case; I am about to call palmar mafia and rayn calls him mafia! FUCK OFFFFFF

Don't worry, we were probably both wrong on TT.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:17 GMT
#2150
The mafia should be:

Palmar
kush
Vivax
BF
Ness
maybe Onegu. Or Koshi. Or Slam.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:18 GMT
#2151
TicTock what is your read on Coagulation?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:18 GMT
#2152
His filter is really short it should be easy to give a quick response if you haven't read it yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:21 GMT
#2157
On December 29 2015 17:19 ritoky wrote:
coag is mason with rsoul rayn that's why you didn't read anything he typed.

meh you blew it.....
did you see tictock saying "i have no idea what rsoultin's alignment is".

ugh this is so fucking annoying... i like want to believe TT is town because it makes the shit a lot easier but i fucking can't when he again proves he is not reading the thread....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:29 GMT
#2169
On December 29 2015 17:26 Tictock wrote:
Idk the arguing over that shit was hard to read.

I took it all with a grain of salt and never saw them really come out and say they were maybe I missed it.

Yeah.. Was that because Exo yelled for pages that rsoultin needs to confirm she is mason with Coag by telling in the mason QT his username and the other forum they have played and Coag did confirm that.

Or did you forget about this all too?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:31 GMT
#2171
There is literally no way Palmar is town with his actions. No way.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:40 GMT
#2175
On December 29 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The mafia should be:

Palmar
kush
Vivax
BF
Ness
maybe Onegu. Or Koshi. Or Slam.

ritoky what do you think of this?
Ignore Vivax if you want to, i am not going to argue about that one because he should be lynched on D2 in case he is not dead. Let's also ignore TT because i have no fucking idea what to make out of him and i honestly don't care anymore, i hope he just gets copped and the problem is solved.

Anything to add, subtract?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:42 GMT
#2177
On December 29 2015 17:41 ritoky wrote:
has anyone played with moosy more than once? and can they confirm the whole gives a shit = mafia; fucks off/does dumb shit = town read that he self-proclaims?

can confirm. he can get vigged too.
he is basically mislynch number one if he is town and therefore +1 scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:57 GMT
#2182
On December 29 2015 17:45 Trfel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 17:41 ritoky wrote:
has anyone played with moosy more than once? and can they confirm the whole gives a shit = mafia; fucks off/does dumb shit = town read that he self-proclaims?
It's true, but MoosyDoosy is probably capable of replicating it as mafia, since not caring really isn't hard to fake.

I'd actually still go with it, I imagine that MoosyDoosy would have a fun time doing random stuff as mafia in a game like this, but I do note that MoosyDoosy didn't complain about rolling town at all, which I've come to expect from him.

I'm still embarrassed about my errant read on MoosyDoosy last game, especially since I figured out the problem with the read and then forgot what it was. So I'm kind of ignoring him this game

I'm tired and babbling, but to this point MoosyDoosy's self-meta is true.

yeah , the bolded is completely true, but the fact is he is not caring if he is town either, so he is just a fucking coinflip and the best vigi shot. 100%.

On December 29 2015 17:45 ritoky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 17:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The mafia should be:

Palmar
kush
Vivax
BF
Ness
maybe Onegu. Or Koshi. Or Slam.

ritoky what do you think of this?
Ignore Vivax if you want to, i am not going to argue about that one because he should be lynched on D2 in case he is not dead. Let's also ignore TT because i have no fucking idea what to make out of him and i honestly don't care anymore, i hope he just gets copped and the problem is solved.

Anything to add, subtract?


the subbed player is a coinflip...probably just ignore until posts shit worth reading.
i have no read on moosy so add him to the bottom tier.
i also am not sold GB is town, so i would add him below ness.
i remember kush kinda telling me to fuck off and i liked that, so i would move him into onegu/koshi/slam/moosy range

I agree on OO.
I think the way and the confidence he went on with HF makes more sense from town perspective than it makes from mafia.
The thing with kush is -- he isn't really trying to find scum. It's like... ugh.. a meta thing where he just fucking disagrees with me for the sake of disagreeing based NOT on the argument, he isn't even trying to understand the argument.... It becomes even more likely he is scum if TT is town, as i said. Basically the only smart thing kush has said in this game is actually the shit he brought on Shining, which would (unfortunately for Shining) indicate that Shining is also mafia. kush has a tendency to ONLY make really good points on his scumbuddies when he is scum because he can't fabricate good looking reads on townies. When kush is town he sometimes actually plays really well, but here, when he ONLY calls one player mafia for REASONS -- after ~90 pages, it strongly indicates he is scum, and also that the player (Shining) is scum too.

So yeah, i'd add Shining to the scumlist, especially when kush flips mafia. We should probably lynch him after Palmar and Vivax or only after Palmar if the Vivax issue is solved during the night.

So like lynch:
(Vivax) --> Palmar --> kush.
Then look very very closely into shining and lynch shining/boxerfred (or both)
Then lynch Ness if he continues doing what he has (or like... hasn't)
Then look at Onegu/Koshi/Slam further....

Check TT to confirm his affiliation.

That's what i suggest at the moment.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 08:58 GMT
#2183
EBWOP:
I think the way and the confidence he went on with HF makes more sense from town perspective than it makes from mafia.

this was about GB if it wasn't clear.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:01 GMT
#2186
There is no way Palmar is going to squirm out of this one.
Everyone who knows Palmar and reads the EOD / my posts about Palmar here, know he is mafia and will push him regardless of if i am alive on D2 or not.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:08 GMT
#2190
On December 29 2015 18:06 ritoky wrote:
we don't get vig shots until n2 tho right? cuz GS distributes n1?

yeah but i am suggesting to not waste a check on Moosy, worst thing is he comes up as mafia and is miller (or town as GF) and town wastes a lynch on him AFTER a copclaim....

Just shoot him whenever you have a chance if this is how he is going to play.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:15 GMT
#2196
On December 29 2015 18:10 ritoky wrote:
btw rayn do you have an OWS read?

I think he is town. But weakest of my townreads. There are already alot people who don't give any fucks about the game (or don't manage to produce proper posts) and they can't all be mafia. At least he is trying to put his vote on where he thinks it's best and explain it, while not with many words, with something that makes sense.. That's my interpretation. The thing that now makes me wonder about his towniness is if TT is in fact town. Then it's true that he looks worse. But still, he doesn't look as bad as the scumreads or people i am waffling on more.

I believe i have seen him be "lazy" like this before, maybe even gotten lynched for it. I will check that out later today.
On December 29 2015 18:10 Trfel wrote:
Kushm4sta is still my strongest scumread. I'm pretty confident in it.

But anyway, good night. And I'm not so sure that Vivax is mafia, I was kind of thinking he was town, but I didn't check what he did at End of Day.

Vivax didn't do anything worth anything...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:39 GMT
#2211
I don't believe you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:40 GMT
#2212
Especially if you know i moved off from TT you also know that i moved to EXACTLY Vivax and the onöy reason i would ever do that is that Vivax unclaimed which makes everything you said in your post a lie since "you just now found out Vivax unclaimed".

Your story does not add up.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:44 GMT
#2215
I still don't believe you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 09:45 GMT
#2217
I assume rayn moved from ticktock for a good reason

You moved to Vivax for what I kinda assumed were spite reasons

....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 10:01 GMT
#2233
On December 29 2015 19:00 Vivax wrote:
You and rayn are pretty bad and should just listen to Artanis who managed to reach the next level in the evolution of TL mafia, but if you must keep posting your second class opinions

No Vivax, you are bad if you are town in this game.
So gtfo.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 10:08 GMT
#2240
You can keep bashing on me and everyone as much as you want but anyone who is intelligent knows it's ridiculous because the only reason you are most likely not lynched at this point is because you claimed a role which is -- given the way you are going about this -- hilarious in the first place, as you LITERALLY played SO FUCKING BAD you almost got yourself lynched on D1 in a 25 player game.

So yeah, you should probably just stfu regardless of your affiliation because your play was bad, not anyone's who suspected / suspects you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:30 GMT
#2259
On December 28 2015 01:46 Onegu wrote:
Also I thought this was supposed to be a mini...

I hate large games.

Onegu is probably scum based on this post alone, considering:
On December 24 2015 21:06 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 24 2015 20:10 GlowingBear wrote:
On December 24 2015 17:29 Rels wrote:
Epic! How large can we make this grow ?
##pardon moosy


That's what she said



Only when talking about me though.

.... he made this post before the game start.

Sooooo... Before game he knows the game is already growing to be > mini game and then in game he complains about shit because "he thought this was a mini".

So yeah, the list of very very scummerosios grow:
Vivax
Plammer
kush
boxerfred
Ness
(or TicTock)
Lynch those guys and i promise you'll hit at least 3 scum, easily, probably more.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:37 GMT
#2262
On December 29 2015 20:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Rayn if I die and you don't and you get town vivax lynched D2 I will be very mad at you.

If you get him lynched and he's somehow actually scum I will profusely apologize. I doubt it though. Not only due to the claim and unclaim timing but also his extreme cockiness. If he's scum he wouldn't keep antagonizing you, no point.

He is not town if he doesn't die this night so i don't really care to discuss this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:39 GMT
#2263
Anyways, I believe the mafia is:
Palmar
kush --> (shining)
Onegu
Boxerfred
Ness/(tictock)
(Vivax)

I on't think i am going to do anything during this night phase unless something extreme happens.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:44 GMT
#2265
Artanis do you mean cocky Vivax like this:
On March 21 2014 04:49 Vivax wrote:
I'm still not caught up with the thread, I'm also tired today, and I don't see how I can save myself from this lynch.

I give up and I don't want to play this game anymore, I'm tired of getting called scum whenever I have a life outside of this fucking game compared to people like rayn. Get this over with and I hope it's going to make you feel extremely satisfacted to see me flipping green you bad bastards.

Hope scum wins this game, this town doesn't deserve to win. I gave you scum on a silver plate and you rejected it for some shitty reasoning.

.....?
Do you want to guess what alignment he was?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:45 GMT
#2266
On December 29 2015 20:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 20:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 20:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Rayn if I die and you don't and you get town vivax lynched D2 I will be very mad at you.

If you get him lynched and he's somehow actually scum I will profusely apologize. I doubt it though. Not only due to the claim and unclaim timing but also his extreme cockiness. If he's scum he wouldn't keep antagonizing you, no point.

He is not town if he doesn't die this night so i don't really care to discuss this.

Mafia sees you basically 100% wanting to lynch vivax. I don't see why they'd shoot him at all. Even the shitstorm tomorrow alone is worth keeping him around, especially since they can just RB if he is.

No that's not how it works and if you really can't see why then i dnu what to tell you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:48 GMT
#2267
I'll give you a hint
+ Show Spoiler +
this is an open setup and Vivax is never gonna be green in this game
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:52 GMT
#2269
I don't care. If he lives he is scum. If he lives and is not scum then the scumteam is retarded.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:53 GMT
#2271
Artanis are you mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:55 GMT
#2274
On December 29 2015 20:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 20:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't care. If he lives he is scum. If he lives and is not scum then the scumteam is retarded.

If I was scum here I rb him shoot me/rso/damdred and let you tunnel him alll day.

Okay work now.

Yeah you know like....
When D2 starts people will vote for Vivax.
Then he claims jailkeeper again.
Then when noone counter-claims him he becomes confirmed town.
Or mafia can counter-claim him and trade 1-1 which is in your opinion better than just get rid of the fucking blue town role who is going to be confirmed town on D2?!?!?

Right Artanis? srsly?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:56 GMT
#2275
And i also believe Vivax is just shitting the thread because now he actually has no outs anymore.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 11:59 GMT
#2276
And i would never ever shoot rsoultin in this game on N1 because her play tbh here has been quite abysmal... I'd personally shoot the gunsmith. I guess i can say this because VayneAuthority is not in the game and scum seem to not be reading the thread anyways.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 12:05 GMT
#2280
On December 29 2015 21:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 20:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2015 20:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 29 2015 20:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't care. If he lives he is scum. If he lives and is not scum then the scumteam is retarded.

If I was scum here I rb him shoot me/rso/damdred and let you tunnel him alll day.

Okay work now.

Yeah you know like....
When D2 starts people will vote for Vivax.
Then he claims jailkeeper again.
Then when noone counter-claims him he becomes confirmed town.
Or mafia can counter-claim him and trade 1-1 which is in your opinion better than just get rid of the fucking blue town role who is going to be confirmed town on D2?!?!?

Right Artanis? srsly?

I presumed that the very fact of him still being alive would be enough for you to push him even without a CC. Thought we were dealing with the true tunnelrayn.

Very well, carry on. Still think he can be green though.

I might wanna lynch stupid even when it's not sure it hits scum, but i am not completely retarded....
Vivax is not green, never. Never ever.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 18:50 GMT
#2461
On December 29 2015 20:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways, I believe the mafia is:
Palmar
kush --> (shining)
Onegu
Boxerfred
Ness/(tictock)
(Vivax)

I on't think i am going to do anything during this night phase unless something extreme happens.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 18:53 GMT
#2466
On December 30 2015 03:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2015 20:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways, I believe the mafia is:
Palmar
kush --> (shining)
Onegu
Boxerfred
Ness/(tictock)
(Vivax)

I on't think i am going to do anything during this night phase unless something extreme happens.


The only other person who looks terrible in any way is sicklucker for two reasons:
1) His D1 consists of "don't lynch Vivax because i can read him better when the game goes on" into "don't be pussies and lynch Holyflare, he is scum" at the EOD....
2) He also says something like "i could shennie into Palmar", which is the only time he ever mentions Palmar in his filter, and when me and ritoky call Palmar out in his actions at D1 end, sicklucker comes in with him "btw i called Palmar scum ages ago"...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 19:27 GMT
#2493
On December 30 2015 04:22 nooniansoong wrote:
artanis. your case boils down to him having no original thoughts. I disagree. He has no original opinions maybe but i do see him making original observations.
i can empathize with palmar because ive been in his situation many times. it can be hard to be a factor in a game when everyone has already put in so much more work than you.

So then you claim you will sheep person X (but really don't after all) and the reason for that is that you didn't read his posts (when earlier you claimed you would -- as you would sheep them)?
And then you claim you have orignial thoughts (when you actually don't)?
What Artanis -- or anyone -- says has nothing to do with if Palmar is a factor in the game or not. The fact is he isn't, and he claims he will / has done something he actually doesn't follow up the way he should based on his own words, or he actually hasn't done the things he claims at all.

You are so fucking annoying when you twist every single thing anyone ever writes into something completely different. Like are you high 24/7 or what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 19:29 GMT
#2496
Slam is almosty definitely town because he's on drugs.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 19:32 GMT
#2499
On December 30 2015 04:30 Alakaslam wrote:
I didn't see any real actual defense of EXO from you

Again, read my filter. If you can't comprehend what you read or are incapable of reading then it's your problem.
I won't discuss anything with you because it's beyond useless because of the above.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 19:34 GMT
#2501
On December 28 2015 06:03 boxerfred wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2015 05:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1. Holyflare - prolly town
2. Rels - ???
3. Onegu - meh... town?
4. nooniansoong - scum
5. sicklucker - town
6. raynpelikoneet - town
7. damdred - town
8. Waylanner - ????
9. Exo_ - town
10. Koshi - ????
11. Ritoky - town
12. rsoultin - town
13. Mooseeeeeeeeydooseeeeeey - ???
14. Boxerfred - idk... scum?
15. Glowingbear - town
16. Coagulation - town
17. Trfel - town
18. ObiWanShinobi - town... maybe
19. The Shining - ????
20. Palmar - ????
21. Tictock - scum
22. n e s s - i have honestly no idea
23. Vivax - scum
24. Alakaslam - town
25. Artanis[Xp] - on the edge...


"have a random opinion on everyone"?

For the record this is why boxerfred is mafia.
There is absolutely no way he believes in what he is suggesting here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2015 19:40 GMT
#2507
On December 27 2015 23:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Let's be honest. The reason for Ness to be town (if he is), is his response to the pressure -- same as why Exo is town (or was -- before he posted reads) if he is. There is absolutely no other reason to townread him, and anyone who claims otherwise is either bad or mafia. Ness has literally given zero reads on basically anything. He has just posted... a bunch of nothing.

Fair enough Slam. This is my reasoning, which can clearly be interepreted from my posts before i even said this.
+ the actions around the claims.
+ his actions later on, he is clearly interested in solving the game.

But that was the original reasoning, and it is in my filter for anyone to read -- it's amazing everyone else could gather this from reading my posts but somehow you cannot. Good job, may i say...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2015 05:50 GMT
#2755
gg
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:06 GMT
#5227
I retract my comment.
This game was far worse than Noir.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:07 GMT
#5234
Well played guys, you decided to not lynch the dude who every single townie who died called mafia and another dude who SCUMSLIPPED IN HIS VIDEO!!!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:13 GMT
#5249
On January 17 2016 08:11 ExO_ wrote:
My bad though. I didn't hear the scum slip in the video. The way everyone was voting Onegu and no one was here at the end, combined with how much onegu was freaking out made me think he was town.


maybe you should have listened to his scumbuddy who pointed that out and was kind enough to re-post the video starting from where the scumslip happens........................................
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:16 GMT
#5256
I am totally gonna nominate this game for the best mafia performance by the town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:18 GMT
#5259
On January 17 2016 08:17 Onegu wrote:
[image loading]

I had this ready

I don't think you could have lost even if you used that as a mask on your video.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:19 GMT
#5262
On January 17 2016 08:18 Onegu wrote:
None of our claims were worth it...

Yours was because Tictock killed like three townies with it...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:23 GMT
#5266
On January 17 2016 08:22 Damdred wrote:
I can't be here 24/7 when I'm stuck at work and someone claims scum.

Then the person who says he did leads you onto the other person who actually did work this cycle with the top scum read of the day.

Maybe you could have at some point try to think why two people who yell "lynch Palmar" die on N1....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 16 2016 23:25 GMT
#5270
On January 17 2016 08:25 ExO_ wrote:
You know what I'm salty about is fucking coag :/

At least he yelled "lynch Palmar" too....
table for two on a tv tray
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 531
LamboSC2 67
Rex 66
ProTech58
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 45437
Sea 5202
Bisu 3113
EffOrt 1270
Jaedong 1257
ggaemo 1056
Larva 621
Mini 611
firebathero 573
Soulkey 288
[ Show more ]
Soma 205
Snow 201
Nal_rA 142
hero 129
PianO 104
Mong 101
ToSsGirL 99
Zeus 97
TY 96
Rush 86
Hyun 68
Movie 62
Sharp 45
[sc1f]eonzerg 43
zelot 20
Free 20
Shine 12
sas.Sziky 12
yabsab 12
Terrorterran 4
Stormgate
RushiSC13
Dota 2
qojqva3180
Gorgc1894
XcaliburYe337
Counter-Strike
oskar200
byalli151
sgares64
edward36
kRYSTAL_16
Other Games
singsing2210
B2W.Neo1001
DeMusliM496
crisheroes390
Lowko307
djWHEAT76
QueenE30
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta19
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2448
• WagamamaTV751
League of Legends
• Nemesis3429
• Jankos925
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
2h 12m
MaNa vs NightPhoenix
ByuN vs YoungYakov
ShoWTimE vs Nicoract
Harstem vs ArT
Korean StarCraft League
13h 12m
CranKy Ducklings
20h 12m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
22h 12m
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
Shameless vs MaxPax
HeRoMaRinE vs SKillous
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 20h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.