|
On June 17 2015 08:25 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:21 Damdred wrote:On June 17 2015 08:15 KelsierSC wrote:On June 17 2015 08:09 LightningStrike wrote:On June 17 2015 08:08 NydusHerMain wrote:
I don't think LS is being that towny o.O. Am I crazy? I'm not saying he's not town but how do people have a "probs town" or "hard town" read on him already. Because they know my meta? Check the database lpus Witchcraft III for my meta if you want any  seriously can you shut the fuck up already with this shit you have just taken a shit in your hand and thrown whatever came out into the thread. I don't think your town and bringing up all this meta crap so early on is fucking irritating Even if I'm right and your town keep the bm out of thread. Its not needed even if you are annoyed at this point. I'll substantiate later, but I don't believe nhm or ls are capable of posting such as these as scum. Both are somewhat meta based reads. Kel is just a maybe town. I know I'm town obviously I also think gb is a decent shot as town but don't tell him I said that you can explain ls right now actually...what has he posted that makes him town? There's a lot of shit but nothing of real value.
pot calling the kettle black right here
|
On June 17 2015 08:26 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:22 ritoky wrote:On June 17 2015 08:21 GlowingBear wrote:On June 17 2015 08:15 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 08:07 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:03 Breshke wrote:
WBG is trying to hunt for who the good players are again and it doesn't necessarily make him mafia it just makes him big headed have you played with any of these players much? what do you think of LS's posts this game so far? Some but I wouldn't say I can judge who is good and who is bad nor would I really want to. I assume thats why you are asking me this question. I really liked his opening. I find it hard thinking that LS could make that first post as scum idk it just feels really genuine. Also the rest of his posts don't really seem forced which I think is one of the biggest giveaways for scum LS and is something that would be hard to change. On June 17 2015 08:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:06 GlowingBear wrote:On June 17 2015 08:03 Breshke wrote:
WBG is trying to hunt for who the good players are again and it doesn't necessarily make him mafia it just makes him big headed How did you reach this conclusion? I'm not going to speak for him, but given that he played with me in the previous game while you were busy being scum, and he actually uses his head (unlike you) you should consider thinking a bit more like him and a little less like you Also relax with this. GB coached me a bunch when I first started, I honestly don't understand why you are acting like him since he was scum last game so any reasoning you thought was bad from him doesn't mean shit because he was scum. ![[image loading]](http://media.tumblr.com/5d5f1c8da282ba8ed038a97c4fccf4a6/tumblr_inline_mkvnoovRz61qz4rgp.gif) OI I ALREADY USED THIS GIF IN A PREVIOUS GAME! THIEFFFFF Blame GIFinder. Download it here: virus
wtf
I hope no one clicks that. Even if it's not a virus the url is shady
|
On June 17 2015 08:27 rsoultin wrote:-rolls around the thread- hihihihi ls town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town  yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ lol so angry rit wbg eh...bresh may be right on the ego thing gettin' that too big for the thread feel from your posts, dude... badumdum what else caught my eye in a scan worth commenting on? oh i like damdy tone, yay! \o/ oneg...can wait. not sure why he was the focus for so long lol >< i've got a semi-decent metaread i may break out later on him but it requires some actual posting xP
what does that even mean
|
On June 17 2015 08:30 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:28 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:27 rsoultin wrote:-rolls around the thread- hihihihi ls town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ lol so angry rit wbg eh...bresh may be right on the ego thing gettin' that too big for the thread feel from your posts, dude... badumdum what else caught my eye in a scan worth commenting on? oh i like damdy tone, yay! \o/ oneg...can wait. not sure why he was the focus for so long lol >< i've got a semi-decent metaread i may break out later on him but it requires some actual posting xP what does that even mean you know the part that came after the part you bolded? it explains it ^^ cool, yeah?
so do you actually think he is town or not?
|
On June 17 2015 08:30 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:26 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:15 Breshke wrote:
Also relax with this. GB coached me a bunch when I first started, I honestly don't understand why you are acting like him since he was scum last game so any reasoning you thought was bad from him doesn't mean shit because he was scum.
nah I'm not sure GB gleaned anything useful about anyone's play from the last game given that he was scum if he is town this game he should probably consider that at the very least, given that it is his only exposure to my play SO you think GB should try meta read you off of one game?
I would expect him to at least consider my last game, yes. Your question comes off as really leading though, there's not some sort of binary extreme between being incapable of reading someone and having to autoread them after one game. Not all players fall into that, although some tend to be very easily distinguishable. But I'm probably biased given that I think I am pretty easy to read as town.
|
On June 17 2015 08:34 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:31 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:30 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:28 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:27 rsoultin wrote:-rolls around the thread- hihihihi ls town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ lol so angry rit wbg eh...bresh may be right on the ego thing gettin' that too big for the thread feel from your posts, dude... badumdum what else caught my eye in a scan worth commenting on? oh i like damdy tone, yay! \o/ oneg...can wait. not sure why he was the focus for so long lol >< i've got a semi-decent metaread i may break out later on him but it requires some actual posting xP what does that even mean you know the part that came after the part you bolded? it explains it ^^ cool, yeah? so do you actually think he is town or not? oh this is gonna be fun ^^ let me break it down i think ls is town the "not town" part is my way of saying take it with a grain of salt BECAUSE (and this is the best part cause i love explaining myself five times) i have a tendency to townread him even when he's scum HOWEVER others who are better at reading him (i.e. damdy) also say town so i'm more comfortable with the read than i otherwise would be ^ the best part is all of that was in a much more concise package originally ^^
okay.
can you tell me what you like about Dam?
|
On June 17 2015 08:36 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:33 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:30 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 08:26 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:15 Breshke wrote:
Also relax with this. GB coached me a bunch when I first started, I honestly don't understand why you are acting like him since he was scum last game so any reasoning you thought was bad from him doesn't mean shit because he was scum.
nah I'm not sure GB gleaned anything useful about anyone's play from the last game given that he was scum if he is town this game he should probably consider that at the very least, given that it is his only exposure to my play SO you think GB should try meta read you off of one game? I would expect him to at least consider my last game, yes. Your question comes off as really leading though, there's not some sort of binary extreme between being incapable of reading someone and having to autoread them after one game. Not all players fall into that, although some tend to be very easily distinguishable. But I'm probably biased given that I think I am pretty easy to read as town. Yeah it was leading because I have a problem with how you consider yourself. I know you say you are a much better scum player than town player right? Yet you also think you are an easy townread which doesn't make sense if your scum play is better than your town play. Does it not mean people should be wary of you even if they are reading you town.
I think I'm a better scum player than town but I would rate my town play like 2 on a scale of 1 to 10 and my scum play as a 5
I think it's fairly obvious when I am town because I personally put in far more effort when I am town. For example in the last game I must've read at least half a dozen of LS's games over the space of day 1 just to make sense of his posts. It's actually a point of frustration for me when the only serious lynches I've had to deal with were all as town because normally I take almost no suspicion at all when I am scum. I think I've been lynched twice as scum and both times I felt it was not really my fault and more a fault of my lazy teammates.
Also people have said what you have said before and I welcome people to scrutinize my reads and my play. It'll help me get better at least, but I find it odd that most people call me town when I am scum and scum when I am town.
|
On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:34 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:31 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:30 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:28 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:27 rsoultin wrote:-rolls around the thread- hihihihi ls town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ lol so angry rit wbg eh...bresh may be right on the ego thing gettin' that too big for the thread feel from your posts, dude... badumdum what else caught my eye in a scan worth commenting on? oh i like damdy tone, yay! \o/ oneg...can wait. not sure why he was the focus for so long lol >< i've got a semi-decent metaread i may break out later on him but it requires some actual posting xP what does that even mean you know the part that came after the part you bolded? it explains it ^^ cool, yeah? so do you actually think he is town or not? oh this is gonna be fun ^^ let me break it down i think ls is town the "not town" part is my way of saying take it with a grain of salt BECAUSE (and this is the best part cause i love explaining myself five times) i have a tendency to townread him even when he's scum HOWEVER others who are better at reading him (i.e. damdy) also say town so i'm more comfortable with the read than i otherwise would be ^ the best part is all of that was in a much more concise package originally ^^ okay. can you tell me what you like about Dam? he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^
umm what
why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment
|
On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:34 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:31 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:30 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:28 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:27 rsoultin wrote:-rolls around the thread- hihihihi ls town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ lol so angry rit wbg eh...bresh may be right on the ego thing gettin' that too big for the thread feel from your posts, dude... badumdum what else caught my eye in a scan worth commenting on? oh i like damdy tone, yay! \o/ oneg...can wait. not sure why he was the focus for so long lol >< i've got a semi-decent metaread i may break out later on him but it requires some actual posting xP what does that even mean you know the part that came after the part you bolded? it explains it ^^ cool, yeah? so do you actually think he is town or not? oh this is gonna be fun ^^ let me break it down i think ls is town the "not town" part is my way of saying take it with a grain of salt BECAUSE (and this is the best part cause i love explaining myself five times) i have a tendency to townread him even when he's scum HOWEVER others who are better at reading him (i.e. damdy) also say town so i'm more comfortable with the read than i otherwise would be ^ the best part is all of that was in a much more concise package originally ^^ okay. can you tell me what you like about Dam? he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty
no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them.
|
anyway gonna play dota, I'll be back later.
|
On June 17 2015 09:07 KelsierSC wrote:
i bet when WBG loses in Dota it's always his teams fault for being lazy.
I don't lose in dota!
|
On June 17 2015 09:55 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 09:54 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:07 KelsierSC wrote:
i bet when WBG loses in Dota it's always his teams fault for being lazy. I don't lose in dota! I feel you posted this just to show you were reading in the right direction.
nope I'm still reading backwards herp
|
On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:34 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:31 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:30 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:28 wherebugsgo wrote:
[quote]
what does that even mean you know the part that came after the part you bolded? it explains it ^^ cool, yeah? so do you actually think he is town or not? oh this is gonna be fun ^^ let me break it down i think ls is town the "not town" part is my way of saying take it with a grain of salt BECAUSE (and this is the best part cause i love explaining myself five times) i have a tendency to townread him even when he's scum HOWEVER others who are better at reading him (i.e. damdy) also say town so i'm more comfortable with the read than i otherwise would be ^ the best part is all of that was in a much more concise package originally ^^ okay. can you tell me what you like about Dam? he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos-
it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification.
thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though.
##unvote
##vote rsoultin
|
On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:34 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
[quote]
so do you actually think he is town or not?
oh this is gonna be fun ^^ let me break it down i think ls is town the "not town" part is my way of saying take it with a grain of salt BECAUSE (and this is the best part cause i love explaining myself five times) i have a tendency to townread him even when he's scum HOWEVER others who are better at reading him (i.e. damdy) also say town so i'm more comfortable with the read than i otherwise would be ^ the best part is all of that was in a much more concise package originally ^^ okay. can you tell me what you like about Dam? he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote
##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely)
is this supposed to be a fake strong response?
I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting.
So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum.
|
On June 17 2015 10:05 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:02 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:
[quote]
okay.
can you tell me what you like about Dam?
he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote
##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely) is this supposed to be a fake strong response? I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting. So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum. -yawns- didn't someone say you were supposed to be good? there's a world of difference between no reasoning and no reasoning you approve of
Qualifying something as a tone read isn't a reason. It's a cop out.
For anyone reading this, take a look at the following.
Stuff like this
s town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/
Is a great example of responsibility deflection. This is what scum do when they want to give the appearance of having reads but do not want to entrench themselves in any one position because they don't want to get held accountable for them. There's no reason rsoultin here needs to make any sort of statement on LS, but even so why qualify it like this?
Let's say rsoultin actually thinks LS is town. This is not actually a reason to believe LS is town. All she is saying is that I think he's town now because other people think he's town, and providing a reason for not having a reason. "I think he's town but don't hold me to that cause I'm bad at reading him! hahaa but it's okay cause other people think he's town, right?"
The last part is a great way for rsoultin to get further thread sentiment about LS. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective to say something like this because townies will make the read for themselves and will only qualify what other people say when necessary. Here it just feels forced.
o.0 like...if we're taking a basic 3rd grade reading test you mean?
(he's beating out wbg though lol...
"you have no justification for your read"
"it's right there"
"no it's not"
"here it is"
"i think you're scum cause you quoted it"
"well aren't you the sharpest tool in the shed"
for more paraphrases from rsoul, leave a message after the beep )
and this
Yes, let's continue paraphrasing useless shit in an attempt to appear more townie. Repeating yourself by paraphrase is probably the worst way I've ever seen someone try to fake providing reads. You're digging yourself deeper every time you post.
|
On June 17 2015 10:56 rsoultin wrote:kk townreads at present: fidei damdy breshke gb ls in terms of certainty, and no, not all are strong, and no i haven't explained all of those anything else is leans
quality scumpost right here
|
On June 17 2015 11:03 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:01 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:05 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:02 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:
[quote]
umm what
why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment
ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote
##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely) is this supposed to be a fake strong response? I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting. So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum. -yawns- didn't someone say you were supposed to be good? there's a world of difference between no reasoning and no reasoning you approve of Qualifying something as a tone read isn't a reason. It's a cop out. For anyone reading this, take a look at the following. Stuff like this s town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ Is a great example of responsibility deflection. This is what scum do when they want to give the appearance of having reads but do not want to entrench themselves in any one position because they don't want to get held accountable for them. There's no reason rsoultin here needs to make any sort of statement on LS, but even so why qualify it like this? Let's say rsoultin actually thinks LS is town. This is not actually a reason to believe LS is town. All she is saying is that I think he's town now because other people think he's town, and providing a reason for not having a reason. "I think he's town but don't hold me to that cause I'm bad at reading him! hahaa but it's okay cause other people think he's town, right?" The last part is a great way for rsoultin to get further thread sentiment about LS. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective to say something like this because townies will make the read for themselves and will only qualify what other people say when necessary. Here it just feels forced.
o.0 like...if we're taking a basic 3rd grade reading test you mean?
(he's beating out wbg though lol...
"you have no justification for your read"
"it's right there"
"no it's not"
"here it is"
"i think you're scum cause you quoted it"
"well aren't you the sharpest tool in the shed"
for more paraphrases from rsoul, leave a message after the beep )
and this Yes, let's continue paraphrasing useless shit in an attempt to appear more townie. Repeating yourself by paraphrase is probably the worst way I've ever seen someone try to fake providing reads. You're digging yourself deeper every time you post. aw cutie, you're not reading me at all if you think i don't have reads -amused- narratives bore me. when you're done writing fairytales, let me know
when you're done copping out I might consider unvoting you.
however, you can just ask LS how hard I will tunnel you to death. And right now I can guarantee you will flip red once I'm done.
|
On June 17 2015 11:08 Breshke wrote:
WBG let me explain this for you.
Rsoul used to think she had a good read on LS because she caught him scum in her first game but then basically townread him almost every game after that. She was obviously wrong eventually and realized her read was either wrong or LS changed his play. She still gets those frequent townreads on LS so when she was reading LS town this game she was hesitant about it but then because many others were also reading him town she felt less bad about it.
Now explain if the above thing is scummy or not because i ceebs you and rsoul going at it because she explained it in an rsoul way and you reacted to it in a bugs way
if this is common knowledge I can't see how it is at all alignment indicative.
We can even ignore the LS stuff, I asked her on more than one occasion for an elucidation of a read and I got back peanuts.
People who can't provide justifications are not townies.
|
On June 17 2015 11:08 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:06 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 11:03 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 11:01 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:05 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:02 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:
[quote]
no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them.
lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote
##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely) is this supposed to be a fake strong response? I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting. So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum. -yawns- didn't someone say you were supposed to be good? there's a world of difference between no reasoning and no reasoning you approve of Qualifying something as a tone read isn't a reason. It's a cop out. For anyone reading this, take a look at the following. Stuff like this s town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ Is a great example of responsibility deflection. This is what scum do when they want to give the appearance of having reads but do not want to entrench themselves in any one position because they don't want to get held accountable for them. There's no reason rsoultin here needs to make any sort of statement on LS, but even so why qualify it like this? Let's say rsoultin actually thinks LS is town. This is not actually a reason to believe LS is town. All she is saying is that I think he's town now because other people think he's town, and providing a reason for not having a reason. "I think he's town but don't hold me to that cause I'm bad at reading him! hahaa but it's okay cause other people think he's town, right?" The last part is a great way for rsoultin to get further thread sentiment about LS. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective to say something like this because townies will make the read for themselves and will only qualify what other people say when necessary. Here it just feels forced.
o.0 like...if we're taking a basic 3rd grade reading test you mean?
(he's beating out wbg though lol...
"you have no justification for your read"
"it's right there"
"no it's not"
"here it is"
"i think you're scum cause you quoted it"
"well aren't you the sharpest tool in the shed"
for more paraphrases from rsoul, leave a message after the beep )
and this Yes, let's continue paraphrasing useless shit in an attempt to appear more townie. Repeating yourself by paraphrase is probably the worst way I've ever seen someone try to fake providing reads. You're digging yourself deeper every time you post. aw cutie, you're not reading me at all if you think i don't have reads -amused- narratives bore me. when you're done writing fairytales, let me know when you're done copping out I might consider unvoting you. however, you can just ask LS how hard I will tunnel you to death. And right now I can guarantee you will flip red once I'm done. Can you not tunnel for a minute and give thoughts on other players?
nope
give me a good reason we shouldn't lynch rsoultin. You could also comment on the post I just made on her motivations as well. Do you think she has a town motivation this game? What makes you think yes/no?
|
On June 17 2015 11:12 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:06 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 11:05 Holyflare wrote:On June 17 2015 11:04 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 11:02 Holyflare wrote:On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote:
i'm not masons with ksc hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^ if you're gonna call me scum you better start early and directly, hf or you could give a rat's ass and play the game either or i don't see why you're so pissed at me for no reason? either i start playing or i don't i'm still waiting for the semblance of a contribution from you this game ^^ for someone who keeps being standoffish when people push her for responses, you sure are quick to notice a kettle.
man, I love that the biggest troll in the game is actually shaming all of you
this guy deserves some love
|
|
|
|
|
|
2071
410
51
EPT
