|
On October 12 2014 07:12 VisceraEyes wrote: Like the only people who should be taking offense to that statement are mafia. You're not MAFIA are you DP? This post bugs me and I'm really unsure why. I'll figure it out later.
|
Regardless of the prime claim, hopeless looks pretty towny. I like how he pushes back on GB even though I think he might be wrong there.
|
Actually I think CR is reasonably better than to look this bad this early as mafia. His second or third post was interestingly paranoid in a towny way too. I'll switch him to my town pile and see how that shakes out.
On October 12 2014 08:15 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 08:07 DarthPunk wrote:On October 12 2014 08:04 Damdred wrote:On October 12 2014 08:00 DarthPunk wrote:On October 12 2014 07:59 Damdred wrote:On October 12 2014 07:55 DarthPunk wrote:On October 12 2014 07:52 Damdred wrote:On October 12 2014 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote: GB scummy for making no sense about DP and dodging geript townie for tryhard VE is buddying, null. How did GB dodgee? He seems to have answered every question i put to him about it, what do you think about all of his responses? What is his read on me?? Who is this directed at dp You. I think it boils down to leaning scum but you are to scummy to be scum. Does this make sense in any way to you? Either contextually with what you have seen me post in the thread. Or independently of your read of me? I'm not really understanding the read overall and want GB to elaborate on it a bit more. Everything you've done so far has looked pretty towny. This post is fucking terrible. Not all of DP's posts make him look towny; besides it's fucking DP and like VE pointed out nothing DP has posted he couldn't have posted from either alignment. I don't think I've seen Damdred semi-hard read a vet as town this early. Most likely mafia townreading a partner to help push agenda or townreading a town to look good.
Sqrt's return is especially lackluster. All of his reasons for scum reading people are trash. Kinda funny how he presumes that buddying is always mafia aligned. Not entirely sure what to think of that.
Barakos I want to post more but he's exceptionally lynchable as is. More importantly, I really like how VE approaches him. That was really towny.
I wish Sn0 would exude towniness like I know he can. Otherwise he's likely a coin flip.
Ritoky is quite possibly town for his stupid food posting. I think I've read him wrong before for doing silly stuff like this before as mafia but I have no clue as to which game it was.
Oats' reasons for people being mafia are really bad. He also defends DP in an odd way; ie he calls the reasons for thinking DP is mafia bad but doesn't really seem interested in looking at the people using bad reasoning at all. Scumpile for now.
|
Rayn why don't i have a townread on you yet? Can you please be super towny for me?
|
On October 13 2014 00:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 00:55 geript wrote: Rayn why don't i have a townread on you yet? Can you please be super towny for me? Probably not. GlowingBear. Where did your scumread on geript go? Why not? Did Barakos roll mafia and pee his pants?
|
On October 13 2014 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay Oats now confirmed town. what?
|
On October 13 2014 01:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 01:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Geript has said one thing, a question TO you about why he's not reading you town. It looks to me like he's trying to get a read on you > consistent with him trying to gather strong townies together.
DP has engaged with you regarding his sn0 read it looks like, > consistent with him trying to gather strong townies together.
I think they're both playing consistently with their play yesterday. I don't think geript has asked me anything for realz. He asked me to "be townie". What's that??? And said he isn't townreading me. Fair enough. Then he should do something about it. DP did do that, yes. I don't like his read on Sn0, and he isn't even voting for him so why would he not talk about ritoky if he thinks he is scum and i don't? My actual plan is to wait until I get a solid read on you either way and either lynch you or sheep you. You can do your thing until then.
|
Fwiw, I'm pretty sure Oats is mafia. I can't remember a townoats that has started off this terrible. Usually he's all bitchy about how someone is obviously scum and no one is pushing them; sometimes he's even right when doing that.
|
It's almost as if Oats is trying to pretend that he's palmer in his posts. It's like really weird and I don't think I've ever seen anything like this from town oats before. Plus, he has 3 pages of filter already. That's not unusual but I'd expect he'd have an actual read on someone or something that's worth my time reading his filter.
|
On October 13 2014 01:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 01:53 geript wrote:On October 13 2014 01:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 13 2014 01:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Geript has said one thing, a question TO you about why he's not reading you town. It looks to me like he's trying to get a read on you > consistent with him trying to gather strong townies together.
DP has engaged with you regarding his sn0 read it looks like, > consistent with him trying to gather strong townies together.
I think they're both playing consistently with their play yesterday. I don't think geript has asked me anything for realz. He asked me to "be townie". What's that??? And said he isn't townreading me. Fair enough. Then he should do something about it. DP did do that, yes. I don't like his read on Sn0, and he isn't even voting for him so why would he not talk about ritoky if he thinks he is scum and i don't? My actual plan is to wait until I get a solid read on you either way and either lynch you or sheep you. You can do your thing until then. So you've been looking forward to playing with me again but you don't really wanna play with me? Nah, we're both too prone to random stupidity in such a way that I don't think it melds well if we're both town. I'd rather get a read on you first. Why'd you say Oats is confirmed town?
|
|
sqrt's reads are pretty fucking terrible and we can't expect more of him until day 2 at the least. Plus he claimed mafia. ezpz
|
FWIW, I've seen sn0 afk as both alignments pretty consistently. @DP I dont' really see that as a townslip by sqrt. To me that's more just not paying any attention to the game. If anything it means sqrt is unlikely to be mafia with rayn but meh.
|
On October 13 2014 09:56 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 09:52 geript wrote: FWIW, I've seen sn0 afk as both alignments pretty consistently. @DP I dont' really see that as a townslip by sqrt. To me that's more just not paying any attention to the game. If anything it means sqrt is unlikely to be mafia with rayn but meh. Do you think he just didn't open his qt for 12 hours or so? It certainly doesn;t make him confirmed town or anything but I don't want him to be lynched today at least. If you couldn't lynch sqrt who would you lynch geript? Oats
|
I'd like to point out and it got glossed over, Oat's start so far despite being reasonably active looks exceptionally different. He has no strong scum reads, which he tends to have by this point. He's been reasonably passive which is his scum play. He's called a billion people and a half people town it seems; people which btw are totes not clearly town. Like why I'm confused why we want to go on a policy lynch who has a history of going afk and flipping anything over a scummy oats.
|
btw, I'm loving pantheon jng. I really need to buy him.
|
@VE. How sure are you of that meta read on GB? Also what you think of oats?
|
I did. I agree it looks different but he gave a bunch of shitty reasons for calling people scum. Maybe not as bad as in this game. I'm torn honestly. Like there's lots of worlds where he could be this bad as town. I can't remember why I had a townread on him. But he's been super active. Has GB done that before as mafia?
Talk to me about oats. Do you agree with my read on him? You were the one that brought up how to read him is based off of the reasons for his reads. Like he has no good reasons I've seen. Plus no strong reads.
|
On October 14 2014 01:48 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2014 23:04 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 13 2014 22:14 GlowingBear wrote:On October 13 2014 22:03 Oatsmaster wrote: It makes me feel bad to lynch angry people. Can you go quietly to your death GlowingBear?
Btw, passivity is hardly a scumtell.
Passivity is mostly a scumtell I'm starting to not care anymore. 13 people in the game, only 5 or 6 are active. I'm wasting my breath with people that are already convinced I'm scum, even if I'm showing I'm not. I'm voting sqrt and I'm not taking my vote out of him unless if it is to lynch you or DP. I want to clarify anything that makes you guys say I'm mafia. But I can't even understand why are you reading me that way. Nobody pointed out a fluff of mine. I've already explained my blue tell/scum tell on DP. I'm constantly evaluating lynch options. I can't do more, really. You could make a slamdunk case on practically anyone in the game, be around a bit before deadline, post a shitton and convince either VE/rayn or DP not to lynch you but lynch the dude you posted about. Other than that, its a bit hard. What you said, 6-7 people are inactive therefore passive. not all of them are scum. At most 50% are. Therefore passivity isnt exclusive to scum and isnt a scumtell. I can't make a slamdunk case when I'm arguing that someone has a lack of posting. The hugest problem in sqrt is that he lacks posting AND when he posts he fakes contributing when he is not. So, regarding sqrt: 1) He is constantly lurking 2) When he comes to the thread, he doesn't contribute to he ongoing discussion. Just says hi and goes lurking. 3) When he posts reads, he does not explain motives behind it. Just makes a list and goes into lurking again 4) When inquired to explain reads, arguments are forced (CR trying to inflate filter was too much for my heart) 5) Votes on a townie and says won't be posting until day2 Come on... Geript, give me your impression on this read. I think it's terrible. I have no clue if lurking is alignment indicative for sqrt. Point 2 is ok-ish. Point 3 is wtf? List reads followed by lurking is bad play; but it's bad play from both alignments and not terribly specific. Point 4 is a supposition not an actual objective fact. Wasn't it Sn0 who said he wouldn't be posting until day 2?
|
On October 14 2014 01:54 VisceraEyes wrote:When did I say anything like that about Oats? I'm not sure what to think about Oats, historically I've had a hard time reading him. I will say though that from my experience with him he's posting a lot more freely than in games where he's mafia...leaving me thinking he's town this game. Your reasoning for townreading GB was ballsack dude, you referred back to a post where he's calling you out about tryharding and you're all "Oh this looks townie I guess, even though he made this post to begin with and I've known he made it, NOW it makes him town" Something a little bit like.... Show nested quote +On October 12 2014 15:30 geript wrote:On October 12 2014 06:33 GlowingBear wrote:On October 12 2014 06:27 geript wrote:On October 12 2014 06:26 Damdred wrote: Geript is now in my town circle because I never know how to take his plans.
GB if I said you might be scum what would you say? Why would you say he might be scum instead of just flat out calling him scum? I think you are trying hard here. 1st page of thread and you raise this kind of suspicion. Do you really believe he should be calling me scum instead saying I might be scum in the first page of the game? On my reread, I found this post interesting. GB doesn't call me mafia for my push on a weak read. Rather it comes off as semi-inquisitive which I like. Kinda seems like he might be thinking about the game. Sleightly towny. Once you brought that post back up I like the read again. Doesn't mean it's right. Why do you think that post would stick in my head as important on the first reading VE?
|
|
|
|