Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini

On October 04 2014 05:43 Holyflare wrote:


dont do this please, it's supposed to be a normal mini after all and the third parties are already borderline enough

On October 06 2014 22:45 Holyflare wrote:
Grack claims vt then says to random kill vt claims, oats claims vt then says it's not good to claim anything. The fuck?

##vote oats

On October 06 2014 22:53 Holyflare wrote:
also someone in this game needs to stop me going off on some policy tangent instead of chasing the people i'm actually scum reading, I nominate batsnacks to fulfill this job!

On October 06 2014 23:00 Holyflare wrote:


Hopeless and oats, oats because of what I said. He "jokingly" claimed VT because everyone is supposedly going to do the same thing and then when you reveal that you don't actually want people to claim he yells despite saying the same effective thing????

Hopeless because of his weird question which was asking how sure are you on a scum read that's in like the first hour of the game. Pretty weird thing to ask.

On October 06 2014 22:15 batsnacks wrote:


I never claimed. I don't think there's any benefit in claiming in this setup. We don't even know what/how many roles are in the game.

Noted: oats is being defensive

On October 06 2014 23:34 batsnacks wrote:


I agreed with HF a lot last game and he was town. I'm agreeing with him this game already so, tentatively town.

I'm voting you because I think you're scummy.

Also lol at "accidentally"

You claimed on accident now?

On October 07 2014 01:31 Holyflare wrote:
How can you be in this direction of thinking and be frustrated I don't get it.

"batsnacks plan is awful because it doesn't find scum!!! WHAT THE FUCK MAN WHY DO YOU THINK THATS GOOD"
"batsnacks is so fucking lucky his plan worked and found town"
"mafia aren't going to join in a mass claim so early!"
"man fuck batsnacks for finding townies, you so lucky batsnacks"

On October 06 2014 23:17 Grackaroni wrote:

if scum actually aren't going to claim first/second/third/fourth this strategy would be amazing for town hunting.

On October 06 2014 23:24 Grackaroni wrote:

lol actually no. I would probably wait to see if something like this ends up happening.

I'm just saying because you're so insistent that what Batsnacks did was shit for finding mafia and then you argued that the first people to join the claim would be town. Which should actually make Batsnack's plan helpful as now you're town reading people for claiming.

On October 07 2014 01:33 Holyflare wrote:


then please go ahead and prove otherwise

On October 07 2014 00:38 Oatsmaster wrote:

I was guessing. Sue me.

Slam, bats is lucky because although his plan didn't produce his desired result or any result he would've expected, it produced something that isn't useless. So he unintentionally helped us. Which makes him lucky.
It isn't a very big point, I don't know why you guys keep harping about it

On October 07 2014 01:38 Holyflare wrote:

hey look quotes now, maybe you should reread the filter before you have baseless denunciations of people!

On October 07 2014 12:43 Holyflare wrote:
i don't think he was insistent at all he asked me why i didn't vote oats despite saying i did and that was it

On October 07 2014 14:32 Holyflare wrote:
so you're telling me you come into the thread and can't be fucked to read any of the game whatsoever and then you start ranting at people and telling them how BH thing is null so that effectively leaves you with nothing and you didn't think it would be apt to comment on anything previous to the giant alignment null enigma that is BH!?!?!?

Only then to complain that nothing is happening and people are lazy only to be the one that hasn't read anything at all so even if we said something you wouldn't know what the fuck we are talking about?????

On October 07 2014 14:39 Holyflare wrote:


you aren't really scummy so no

On October 07 2014 14:45 Holyflare wrote:
I do need to follow up if you're trying to twist things into a false reality so that people don't believe it. I know how lazy people are at reading filters.

On October 07 2014 14:49 Holyflare wrote:


slam posts exactly what I said before I even elaborated on it so knows exactly what I mean, grack has also agreed with the sentiment, hopeless' post about me being silly didn't even make any sense and you are the person being scum read

On October 07 2014 08:53 batsnacks wrote:
Maybe some townies are worse than robots... point them out... that would be way more helpful.

On October 08 2014 00:49 StorrZerg wrote:
he isn't doing anything. And his actions are scummy. He responds to a direct question on who his scum are, and he makes a list post, with his scum being 2 "inactive players" and someone "who asks questions" yet doesn't "give information"

yeah thats super town pro thing to do MY BAD

On October 08 2014 00:34 Holyflare wrote:


totally misremembered what he said but I looked it up and it was that he has no idea what to do as scum and that the one time he played it he just bussed dp and did nothing else all game, I mixed it up with his general inactivity that game and voila! He's still a very good lynch though.

On October 08 2014 01:15 Holyflare wrote:
his original scum reads were based on good reasons, people siding on the rng wagon and then doing nothing which he's subsequently updated and poe'd people down to those 3/4

On October 08 2014 01:24 Holyflare wrote:


so sue me, it's my read and i'm sticking to it

On October 08 2014 01:26 Holyflare wrote:
i literally do not care what you say i am not lynching him today over OO

On October 06 2014 22:53 Holyflare wrote:
also someone in this game needs to stop me going off on some policy tangent instead of chasing the people i'm actually scum reading, I nominate batsnacks to fulfill this job!

On October 08 2014 01:35 Blazinghand wrote:
I'd like everyone to bear in mind that I've presented a reason to lynch OO that is imo valid entirely independent of the fact that I RNGed him. Yes, I did RNG him so I was going to write a case on him anyways, but bear in mind that that doesn't change the facts, and the facts are: OO isn't playing this game.

On October 08 2014 01:26 Holyflare wrote:
i literally do not care what you say i am not lynching him today over OO

On October 06 2014 22:53 Holyflare wrote:
also someone in this game needs to stop me going off on some policy tangent instead of chasing the people i'm actually scum reading, I nominate batsnacks to fulfill this job!

On October 07 2014 15:03 Grackaroni wrote:



uhhhh I went back to the Hopeless interaction you keep mentioning and its raising further questions.

On October 08 2014 08:42 Grackaroni wrote:

He's trying to solve the game though. He goes through the thread and picks out the things that he finds alignment indicative and has come up with a bunch of town reads. He suspects the people who haven't been posting because he hasn't found reasons for them to be town. You may not like the way he's playing the game but it doesn't make him scum.

On October 08 2014 12:45 Holyflare wrote:
I actually want to cutabitch obi purely because his vote is in not only a useless spot lynching a towny but because he has no relevant information towards this OO wagon whatsoever and even now his target is not getting lynched he has said absolutely nothing towards pushing me whatsoever, he has returned at deadline to further say nothing despite a lot of pages happening since his last post, obi is most likely mafia.

On October 09 2014 02:54 Holyflare wrote:
why aren't you focusing on people off the oo wagon if those are the people you thought would be mafia obi...???

On October 09 2014 02:56 Grackaroni wrote:

You know BH doesn't choose who gets RNGed. That's kind of the whole point of RNG.

On October 09 2014 03:06 Holyflare wrote:
lian is an excellent cop check btw

On October 09 2014 03:11 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


Why do you think this?

On October 09 2014 12:54 Holyflare wrote:
i've put mafia in an awkward position, they can't kill me because the medic will save me and then i get my other shot off 100% tomorrow night because i can't die to 1kp tonight (this is pretty op btw geript) so they have to shoot someone peripheral to blue snipe

On October 09 2014 13:05 Holyflare wrote:
im waiting for the red check on hopeless

On October 09 2014 13:12 Holyflare wrote:


oh dude... that was a bad shot T_T

On October 09 2014 13:41 Holyflare wrote:
there is no reason to fly under the radar in friendly air space unless you are trying to hide something or are bad

On October 09 2014 16:53 Holyflare wrote:
Lian you keep saying you doubt things but don't provide any analysis on what happened with the mafia night kill and where it went. Who were they shooting and why didn't they die?

On October 09 2014 17:10 Holyflare wrote:


If you just see mafia killing oats then you should be voting grack for fake claiming vigilante

On October 09 2014 17:37 Holyflare wrote:
If you live in a world where a player that did nothing all game gets night killed over people that look towny and are pushing logical things then you literally have to be scum reading grackaroni right now. So whether you criticise my trolling or not the fact of the matter is that there is a game at hand.

If you live in my world where grackaroni is the vigilante then the mafia either stacked with him which is very very unlikely or they hit a veteran or medic save.

On October 09 2014 18:03 KelsierSC wrote:


or just read the thread, you know...play the fucking game maybe

On October 09 2014 18:19 Holyflare wrote:

So then are you calling grackaroni mafia or not??? Also i called obi town, only 1 or 2 called him mafia.

On October 09 2014 18:36 Holyflare wrote:


I changed my stance on him part way through day 1 but pressured him a lot more to make sure. How is that relevant? How does what grack did look anything like a fake claim at all?

On October 10 2014 04:51 batsnacks wrote:
Yeah obi is town

I don't know what you're doing keyser soze

On October 10 2014 05:06 Holyflare wrote:
You should probably explain your town read on me at least

On October 10 2014 06:06 Holyflare wrote:
Do you think a mafia obi would be this annoying instead of just trying to appease you and push a mislynch on hopeless?

On October 10 2014 06:59 Holyflare wrote:


Lynch hopeless

On October 10 2014 15:46 Holyflare wrote:
Anyone not on hopeless is claiming mafia and will be shot