/in
Glory Seeker Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
/in | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
But I don´t understand why he said that he´s convinced about steve being mafia. So far we´ve only got an explanation for not voting Vivax. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:34 Oatsmaster wrote: This is a totally uninformed and useless comment that is taking what I said and twisting it to suit his purposes. I was not twisting anything to suit my purposes. I just think it´s stupid to state something as a fact, if you don´t know it for fact. I also don´t think it´s useless to point something out that I strongly disagree with. Even if Holy was scum, your case had absolutely nothing to back it up. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 08:57 Oatsmaster wrote: booom boom boom. Mderg is scum too ok for sure. Vivax was metaing me and all that so Im meh. I dont think Im playing too different from my scum games though. Although he isnt saying that I wasnt lying, hes saying that I didnt explain myself in a 'townie' way. Im just baffled at the amount of nonsense you say to the thread apparently believing in it. lying to lynch someone is fine. I wouldnt lie as scum though, too easy to get caught out. I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw. I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good. Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:22 Holyflare wrote: Well I just did dare! Answer me fooool! Mderg... I'm not going to lie I have no fooking clue. He was lynchbait in Cell mafia when I played with him and his activity has been low in the games I checked of him previously and in Cell. I liked that he was on you for a bit but I am biased because it's me. I'm not sure I can reconcile these things together though: He goes from saying that you are just making things up, thinks your play is poop and doesn't know if you are scum -> doesn't agree with me that you are scum because suddenly it could just be bad meta...? If he was reading he'd know you said: and would realise you made the entirety of it up so it shows that at least he isn't reading but unless he posts more it's still just a murky nullish for me. Why do I even bother reading this thread, if you´re saying I don´t read it anyway? I was saying that he´s not 100% scum for his case on you, not that he´s town. Just because I don´t read things the same way as you it doesn´t mean that I don´t read this thread. You´re really pissing me off this game. I don´t like koshi´s play. On May 06 2014 06:30 Koshi wrote: Oats D1 is always good. Either alignment. He can be in your face on D1. In PYP he had like 10 pages filter D1 & D2 and then 2 page filter in the next 4 days. This sounds like wanting to policy lynch Oats when there are actual leads that go somewhere, there are reads in the thread, so I don´t like the post. Also, what´s thrawn doing right now, I want to hear more from him. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 22:24 Holyflare wrote: This is a major overreaction to what I was saying. Like super overreaction. I said oats didn't have a case his case was based on lies and mderg then said that oats probably wasn't scum because of bad meta....? Oats didn't use bad meta he flat out lied which is what i pointed out about mderg not reading but then he gets all super hardcore pissed at me because i pointed out something that doesn't add up...? Mderg you still need to explain this. Are you saying you don't think oats lied or what..? Previously you said you had NO reads on other players when me and oats had been posting so when and why did that change for oats? Yeah, he lied. But a lie that obvious does not mean he´s scum. What I meant was that I don´t agree with jumping all over Oats for his case on you. I didn´t say that he probably wasn´t scum, I said that his case doesn´t necessarily make him scum. What´s so difficult to understand about that. My read on Oats didn´t change. He might be scum, he might not be scum. I doubt we can figure it out, if we just ride on that one case he made on you. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 23:16 Steveling wrote: Poofter must be scumming again. Definitely possible, we should wait for him to post something before anyone makes up his mind about him. He said that he´ll be scumhunting later today/tomorrow (I am bad with American timezones). | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
That´s a bad question. I am trying to figure it out. It´s just that the whole back and forth with you and holy made it more difficult for me. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 07 2014 00:28 Holyflare wrote: Wait what...? The only way to figure it out is WITH the back and forth. I asked you AFTER the back and forth what you thought of oats and you said no opinion. Then you changed it to he might be scummy but not just based off that one thing. Then you posted saying you were going to disagree with me that oats was scum but oats was making it hard to do that with his posts and now it's MORE difficult to figure anything out with the same information you had before? The only way to figure out is not with THE back and forth. For me that was just throwing the same shit at each other multiple times. No opinion and he might be scum is the same for me! I said he might be scum, he might not be scum, how is that any different from saying that I don´t know his alignment, yet?. I was going to disagree with you that he is 100% scum and his post (Surprisingly one that wasn´t all about you) seemed slightly scummy to me. I didn´t say that it´s now harder to figure out his alignment, I said that the back and forth made it harder for me to figure out his alignment. It´s kinda pushing everything else that might be important out of vision. So far you´ve succeeded at either misunderstanding everything I´ve said or twisting everything I´ve said to fit your agenda. I´m hoping for the first option. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 06 2014 09:12 mderg wrote: I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being certain scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw. I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good. Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though. I guess I forgot a word there. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 07 2014 01:04 Holyflare wrote: So when I said you didn't read the thread properly that was in fact correct? You said oats : when I just proved that wasn't the case You said that I wasn´t reading the thread, nothing about "properly". That´s what pissed me off. I think there´s a difference between lying to get someone lynched and to get a townie lynched by any means possible. He said that he thought something was off about your play and lied to convince others to get you lynched. That´s not using any means possible for a misslynch. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 07 2014 01:19 Holyflare wrote: Not reading properly is the same as not reading the thread. Arguably not reading properly is far worse because you start making up things you think to be true because you have a warped version compared to everyone else and then we reach this impass. If you can't convince someone to be lynched through normal means, resorting to lying is "using any means possible" that's not really a far stretch. Which is why it's more odd that you compare lying to using bad meta instead because the 2 are not equivalent at all. Unless you are implying they are. It´s not the same, one is intentional while the other isn´t. I agree with you that lying was uncalled for in that situation but imo "using any means possible" is exaggerated. On May 07 2014 02:21 Steveling wrote: Can you guys drop this, vivax is super towny. If he's scum he deserves to win. I can't read him as scum. Why is he towny? I agree with holy´s reasoning on Vivax. To me his play seems scummy. The Cav case seems baseless and I don´t like the reasoning behind it. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
I honestly can´t imagine why a townie would make these posts: On May 07 2014 19:48 Steveling wrote: Alright guys, let's do this. Let's prove how nonsensical this is. ##unbote ##vote:Vivax On May 07 2014 20:24 Steveling wrote: Come on guys, put your vote where your mouths are. Bote for bibax. On May 07 2014 20:25 Steveling wrote: Btw if we switch to oats I'll be very happy. Hard defending Vivax earlier is not really scummy, though the lack of reasoning for his vivax townread was strange. These posts however strike me as being incredibly indifferent about a townie being lynched. "Hammering" someone just to prove you were right just feels so wrong to me. The post after that also seems strange to me, if you´d be happy with an oats lynch, why not vote for oats? I don´t get the reasoning behind this. Am I right to assume that you went against your reads just to proof that we were wrong? The only thing speaking against steve being scum for me is that this is almost too obvious to be true. I´m also getting scummy vibes from koshi but I´m not sure why. Gonna go through his filter tomorrow to check that. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 08 2014 07:19 Tehpoofter wrote: Mderg what do you think of Koshi this game? I got a slight scummy vibe from him before, he seemed pretty townie on the last pages, though. His steve defense is not alignment indicative in my opinion. I really like this post On May 08 2014 20:29 Koshi wrote: Yes, that and the point he refuses to cooperate are decent. But how come you can't seem to grasp the bigger picture this game? You jump from target to target to target and always it is 100% sure. What about what I wrote about Poofter? Why not comment on that? I alsoo agree with the guys koshi wanted copchecked, if one of me, steve or poofter turn out as checked scum it would change the game quite a bit in favor of town. (pretty obvious copchecks tbh) What I don´t really like is him saying that scum is within poofter, me and hf. Seems like too much focus on the steve situation regarding steve when his scumminess is plain obvious. I´m leaning town on koshi, though, after reading the past few pages. On May 08 2014 20:20 Koshi wrote: mderg and poofter had me as town I think and now that I make a comment on poofter & HF during night suddenly they both flip their reads on me? kk I didn´t have you as town, just so you don´t continue under wrong assumptions. I kinda get the feeling that steve is acting as scummy as possible right now. I don´t know why he would do it but it seems to be the case. Maybe trying to seem "too scummy to be scum"? I don´t know. Why would you want the lynch to be as fast as possible? I know steve gave a reason but town needs additional time way more than scum does. That play doesn´t make any sense Right now I´m unsure who the second scum is besides steve who I really hope is scum. It might be one of hf and poofter, they´ve been strangely buddying quite a bit. Oats is also still far from cleared. I´m slightly leaning town on koshi. Cav has kinda been under my radar so he didn´t seem scummy but also not particularly townie. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 06:26 Holyflare wrote: Mderg you think Steveling is mafia, pretty obvious at that. So then you also think that me and poofter could also contain scum because of buddying. That therefore means we are super hardcore bussing scum buddy Steveling then? Is that what you're suggesting? Or are you presenting an alternate theory or what? Yes, that´s what I´m suggesting. It´s not that unlikely considering how obvious steve´s scumminess is. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 07:01 Holyflare wrote: Ok, that's just a pretty odd conclusion to have :p The buddying you mention between me and poofter, where does that occur? I know me and koshi were talking about him previously but what input do you have to that discussion? Do you agree with koshi that poofter mentioning vivax was town because of steve looking like mafia was a case of too much information on poofters part then? If steve is really obviously mafia, why is koshi defending him so much? not sure if buddying is the right word... you and poofter had the same view on about everything on the last few pages. No. Probably something along the lines of steve being "too scummy to be scum" | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 11:53 Tehpoofter wrote: @mderg what do you think about Oats? Do you agree with HF's town read on him? No, I´m unsure about him. His overall mindset doesn´t seem too bad but his early case on hf and hammering vivax make it impossible for me to read him as town. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 17:14 Steveling wrote: Especially after no one was apprehended for the bibax lynch. The only guy who got spanked for it was me and I was the only one to read him correctly. that´s because you read him correctly without giving proper reasons and still voted him. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 17:35 Oatsmaster wrote: Man poof keeps flipping from saying things from the perspective that steve is town to steve is scum. Its weird shit. mderg, why am I scummy for making a case on a townie and hammering a townie. It feels like you are looking too hard for reasons to avoid calling me town at this point. I didn´t like the reasoning for that case at all. It´s not that you made the case but how you made the case. Also you hammered vivax while there was still discussion going on about the lynch. So you reduced the time town had to figure things out. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 09 2014 19:38 Tehpoofter wrote: They could RB anyone or they could know there isn't a RB in the game... the important part of the quest was WHY HE BELIEVED YOU SO INSTANTLY. Maybe I'm just a suspicious guy but I don't believe shit like that I'd definitely say it as mafia for a number of reasons. I don´t think believing the rb claim makes him scummy in any way. On May 09 2014 23:53 Oatsmaster wrote: yo hf you wanna lynch poof instead? He says todays lynch is boring because he already knows steve's alignment. But when hes talking about steve, he keeps switching from steve is scum, therefore something something something to, steve is town, therefore something something something. ##vote Poof I don´t think you can deduct poofter being scum from him saying that todays lynch is boring. In a way it is boring because this is almost entirely focused on steve and the ones scumreading steve. On May 10 2014 02:34 Holyflare wrote: I'm swearing on my life that I'm town I really hate this post! This just seems like an asshole move. On May 10 2014 02:49 Holyflare wrote: Literally just "gambled" my life and now you selectively choose when it's cheating or not? Rofl. It´s not even close to what gumshoe did in cell mini. He was under heavy pressure and probably would have been lynched, if not for swearing on his life. This is just out of the blue swearing on your life without any emotion behind it. So of course this is not the same "cheating". Overall my reads didn´t change at all in the last hours. Seems like it´s about time to get this over with ##vote: steve | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 10 2014 08:10 Tehpoofter wrote: @mderg what do you think of Koshi/Steve/Oats a little bit Cav's push against me? Where do you sit with them? I saw you didn't agree with Oats' push but what do you think about the others? koshi´s push has too little solid reasoning behind it. I don´t like how he´s tunneling you, not even accomplishing much. steve I´m not sure what to think about his reads. He made almost no sense to me this game. So I can´t really comment on that. I can see where cav is coming from regarding his comment about you rolefishing. His push is too weak to warrant a lynch, though. If I´d have you as my top scumread his reasoning would reinforce my suspicion. As it stands now it´s just 1 or 2 small details that could just mean nothing. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
I think it´s between poofter/oats/hf. Right now I´m not sure what to think. Poofter looks slightly more scummy to me than the others. I don´t know why he waited to vote steve until he could hammer him. This is really difficult to decide, though, I have to wait to see who gets killed. Maybe that can clear some things up. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 11 2014 06:55 Tehpoofter wrote: Can you expand why I look scummier? Not saying I look clear I did call out Steve day 1 and push him day 2 but I was attempting to reach out to him he just kinda rolled over and complained never made other cases. I'm not one of those people who is going to say "he fucked up he should have not played so scummy" its partly on me for not realizing where his frustration was coming from. (although I would probably still lynch him again cause I would never want to be beaten by a scum that defends like that) It´s honestly just a gut feeling. There´s no solid case I can make. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
The oats kill is kinda strange. I don´t think there was any indication of him having a power role and he was one of the top lynch targets. Makes me feel like it´s poofter trying to divert attention by killing his biggest scumread. Why would scum kill their next and probably easiest lynch target? Because they seem slightly less scummy doing so. This is based on assumptions but definitely makes sense for me. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 03:32 Koshi wrote: Could you give your opinion on this? You have to know that Poofter at this moment got Steveling as 85% scum. Why does Poofter say that Oats is setting up tomorrows misslynch? 1) Doesn't this imply poofter knows today is a misslynch? As in 'tomorrow scum needs 1 more misslynch and Oats is making that happen". 2) Why would Poofter think he is going to get "misslynched" tomorrow when he is the one that pushed Steve? Does he know Steve is town and therefore after this lynch he will become a target? Looks like it. 1) This would be easier to judge, if I heard him say it, rather than seeing the text. 2) This seems solid. There would be no need to worry about getting lynched, if steve were to flip scum. On May 12 2014 03:41 Koshi wrote: Who is poofter his second scummer? WAIT Who is poofter his first scummer now that Steveling is dead? Nobody knows. He is letting it shine through that it is me. Give me 1 post Poofter has quoted from me and said it came from scum for x reason? Nothing. The only thing Poofter is calling me scum for is "Guys I am town, Koshi is scum for being so wrong" That's the only thing. Yeah, it didn´t seem like he had any clear scumreads besides steve and (after that oats). It´s odd but it could also just be that he didn´t have another clear sumread. I agree his reasoning for calling you scum is unconvincing. Overall there´s solid reasons why poofter could be scum. There´s nothing that makes him scum by itself but the small pieces together paint a scummy picture. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 06:18 Tehpoofter wrote: (Steve was my biggest scum read but still) just for clarification: I meant at the time of the night kill, when steve was already lynched | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 06:56 Tehpoofter wrote: Ok so did you think Oats was a scum read of mine from day 2? or only after the night kill? It didn´t seem like a clear scum read. It seemed like you thought he was suspicious but no clear scum read. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 07:09 Tehpoofter wrote: 1) The first thing wow that sounds really townie where you said that you would have to hear me say it rather than read it. That screams of objective thinking. That is very true. I do generally talk better than I type (its why I play video mafia more than forum) 2) The time that Oats made that post I thought his push on me was going to be the same regardless of the flip on Steve. The way he said it was "policy" to me read "I don't care we have to lynch steve just because then we go for poofter" so like in my eyes he thinks I'm scum either way. I will however concede that from your point of view you don't know I'm town so it might sound different to you. I don't understand how you can say the bolded green than red. Do I not have any clear scum reads or am I calling Koshi scum for unconvincing reasons. Like as far as I can tell having STeve as scum then Oats and Koshi as scum reads (even if you think they're bad reasons) is still HAVING SCUM READS So explain to me how you come to those conclusions. Not having a clear scum read was referring to the time before steve got lynched. At that time your only clear scum read was steve. Also the reasons why you called koshi scum were imo kinda weak. Not necessarily wrong but nothing that would instantly convince me. Thinking about it, after steve was lynched you made your scum reads clear. It seems like your play style has changed with the steve lynch and you´re now acting more like I´d expect a townie to act. So it´s definitely possible that you were just too focused on steve. That would explain the lack of another clear scum read before his lynch. I guess I´ll have to go through some filters tomorrow. I´m gonna sleep now. I don´t want to see any votes until I´m back. We also have to wait for Hf and cav. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:08 Holyflare wrote: tis cool, i'm out for most of the day anyway so talk amongst yourselves. All you should know is that mderg isn't getting hammered so he's mafia plan completed! it´s actually just proving that at least one of cav and poofter is town | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
At least one of you and koshi is scum, possibly both of you. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:50 Holyflare wrote: Because this is endgame and one misplaced vote is game over?????????????? I´d rather reason out of this than just hope you unvote me just because I tell you to. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:54 Holyflare wrote: No, it's something I've ONLY used as medic. I was excited when you claimed a role because that made you town and I thought the game would be like 100% over but i had to make sure. The real OBVIOUS OBVIOUS reason is that there is a rber!!! Why would there be a roleblocker with nobody to roleblock. That´s exactly what I´m getting at. You´ve only used that as medic, so scum hf could use it to give a medic claim credibility later on. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:57 Holyflare wrote: If you were town. You have a medics vote on you, THATS INSTANT LOSE IF YOU ARE TOWN. I would yell and scream and tell me everything under the sun to get the vote off me in case scum were afk! As if screaming could help at all. How does it give me better chances of getting your vote off me than trying to reason out of this? | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 17:57 Holyflare wrote: So in your world the roleblocker blocks....? What if there is a rber but no power role? It would be unusual but not impossible. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 18:03 Holyflare wrote: Because that's a NORMAL towny reaction to have when you've invested so much time into the game trying to solve it! I don´t fucking get your logic! | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 18:07 Holyflare wrote: I don't think that makes.... Any sense? Not to mention my role has been in my profile a loooonnggggg time. Hence the psychic part, which i am not. You know that your role is in your profile, so you could use it to your advantage. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 18:12 Holyflare wrote: A normal person who has invested like 2 weeks of their time questioning people, making reads, expending energy to solve the game becomes generally very emotionally invested. So when 2 weeks of effort could be ended in 2 seconds by a rogue vote that would spark rage, anger desperation to do everything possible to get that vote off before the game is auto loss, wasting all that effort. You aren't doing that at all. Your first reaction is to not believe a medic claim that was backed up by crumbs, that was evident by thread behaviour and was used in a way to solve the game and makes sense with a rber. Your reaction isn't towny! It makes me scum, if I try to stay calm? | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
The reason why I´m scum reading you is because you read about everything wrong in this game and then proceed to put your vote on me in lylo without giving me a chance to defend myself. So you were either just completely wrong all game or you´re scum. Your powerrank position speaks against you being completely wroong all game. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 21:46 Koshi wrote: Look at this. Mderg has poofter as scum 24/7. He is buddying me, saying my cases are correct, having the EXACT SAME READS AS ME. EXACT SAME READS AS ME. For the entire game. Mderg had me as town 24/7. With EXACT the same reads as me, he believed last scum was between HF/Oats/Poofter. Then there is heat on him and it looks like he is going to get lynched with HF claiming blue and voting him. What happens? Now that HF goes after him I am suddenly the other scummer? Why not POOFTER? WHY??? cuz he is scum and slipped. He knows Poofter will back him up and is now incriminating town HF/Koshi. Did you really ask why not poofter? Really? The reasoning is as simple as it can get! To spell it out for you: Hf voted me, meaning that scum could hammer me at any time. Poofter and Cav were here at the same time, meaning that they would hammer me, if they were both scum. This leads to at least one of them being town. This also means that at least one of you and Hf have to be scum. That can´t be difficult to understand. It´s just based on logic. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
It can be Hf & poofter. I never said it couldn´t be hf and poofter. It´s just 99.9% safe to assume that 1 of cav and poofter is town and that 1 of hf and you is scum. That doesn´t mean that you are scum together. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 22:50 Koshi wrote: You got me as town for 99% of this game. You got Poofter as scum 99% of the game. Then somebody counterclaims named VT and another guy votes you. And you go: KOSHI IS SCUM GUYS I´m at a loss of words | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 22:51 Koshi wrote: I BOLDED IT IN RED. You say KOSHI IS SCUM WITH HF. Since when does "at least 1" mean "both"? | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 22:55 Koshi wrote: How am I not 100% town? Counterclaimed named VT Doc HF You got Poofter as scum entire game. How am I not 100% town? This is all pretty simple: 1 of cav and poofter is town. So either cav who counterclaimed my role is scum or poofter who seemed scummy the whole game is scum. That seems pretty difficult to decide. And 1 of you and hf is scum. I called hf scum because of OMGUS, his claim actually makes sense now that I had the time to think it through. So it´s more likely you than him, despite me reading you as town beforehand. Also I didn´t read you as town for the most part of the game. You were scummy to me at first and I switched my opinion to leaning town on you. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 23:07 Koshi wrote: You voted Steveling over poofter who looked the entire game as scum? you´re twisting words... it should be 100% clear what i meant to say. Considering that steve was town poofter´s whole play seemed scummy in retrospect. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 23:05 Koshi wrote: w.e I am now confirmed town when you flip. that´s nice when there´s more scum than town alive. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 23:24 Koshi wrote: That's all you have to say? what do you expect me to say? Also: that´s all you have to say? | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 23:26 Koshi wrote: Yes very townie. I´m glad we agree | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 04:36 Cavalinho wrote: @Mderg, who is scum and why? And I also noticed that mderg swore on his life. Are we gonna put any stock in that? Since you are confirmed town, it leaves koshi, hf and poofter. There comes the difficult part and I´m not 100% sure. Right now I´d go with koshi/poofter. Hf´s claim makes sense (even though I said otherwise in the heat of the moment). What´s interesting about koshi/poofter is that koshi had poofter as scum for a long time but interestingly enough he didn´t give any convincing reasons for poofter being scum. So poofter wasn´t actually in real danger to be lynched. It would also be reasonable for koshi to push a poofter lynch after day 2. It would assure that 1 of them looks townie after the lynch even, if the other could die. It just so happened that hf made a case and voted on me, so koshi took the opportunity to jump on it. If that turns out to be true we´re kinda screwed, though. If poofter comes back before hf comes back, he could just hammer me and it´s over. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 04:55 Holyflare wrote: No, he told me IN THIS GAME that when I said it that it meant nothing whatsoever and he said he hated that post and now he tried to say it IN HIS FAVOUR. I still think that it means absolutely nothing. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 05:35 Koshi wrote: Just look at the interactions between Poofter and Mderg. Look at how Poofter townreads Mderg. Look at how mderg has Poofter as scum entire game, except for when I pushed him and he swapped his reads for a brief second. Look at how mderg now got me as scum WITH POOFTER(?) suddenly. Even though there are 2 named VT and a medic... Mderg knows your vote = he dies. So he puts me as scum with Poofter. So that town HF and town Cav don't vote him. This is so obvious. There being 2 named VT´s says what? Cav is 100% confirmed town since he didn´t hammer me, when he had the opportunity. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:31 Tehpoofter wrote: Mderg is actually calling Cav confirmed town (I see this from his view point in that he hasn't hammered him) So why am I not confirmed town Mderg????????? now you are | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:36 Cavalinho wrote: I'm really curious about what the graveyard/obs has to say about this game. And also I'm really curious why mderg is saying TP isn't conf town with me. Like nothing he said has made sense. I'm probably going to hammer him. poofter is also confirmed town now! He wasn´t beforehand because he didn´t post anything after koshi voted me, until now. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:37 Cavalinho wrote: Nevermind, posted too late. I see it. Any last words? I'm about to vote. DON`T FUCKING DO THIS! | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:41 Holyflare wrote: look, imbalanced games just don't happen on this site because they go through filters of higher ups before they get posted, it's impossible unless the game is themed (which this isn't) This would be 100% speculation, if you were town. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
this is over | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 13 2014 06:41 Holyflare wrote: look, imbalanced games just don't happen on this site because they go through filters of higher ups before they get posted, it's impossible unless the game is themed (which this isn't) I think after this post it should have been obvious. Maybe I just think that because I knew who was scum, though | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
On May 12 2014 22:49 Koshi wrote: Also. Cav counterclaims named VT and you call Koshi/HF scum hahahahaha I think I should have realized at that exact point. There shouldn´t be any reason for koshi to read my posts as me calling hf/koshi scum, unless he knows that it is the truth. | ||
mderg
Germany1739 Posts
| ||
| ||