Handslaps and Fisticuff: A PYP Mini [M][T]
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
(1) I'm not a survivor. Either gumshoe or some other no-poster is OR we don't have one. OP says either 9/3 or 9/2/1, so it's not like there has to be an unclaimed survivor (saw a couple posts wondering who it was, there don't gots to be one). NOW TO BE CONTRADICTORY!!! (2) I don't love the idea of a super duper pick list. All roles that may be chosen are in the spoilers below. Roles may have additional alterations based on whether they are picked by Town, Mafia or Third Party. Players who draft these roles may or may not be informed of these alterations after receiving these roles. Roles may have additional alterations based on whether they are picked by Town, Mafia or Third Party. Players who draft these roles may or may not be informed of these alterations after receiving these roles. wait Roles may have additional alterations based on whether they are picked by Town, Mafia or Third Party. Players who draft these roles may or may not be informed of these alterations after receiving these roles. Even when all information is known, I don't think I've seen a full player list do what they were supposed to do based on picks and actions. Ever.In this case, we've been told we don't know EXACTLY what roles do. We also have been told we MAY NEVER KNOW what roles do, until we do stuff with them. So a proposal that relies upon specific people roleblocking x and y and some other folks shooting specific targets seems unreliable, EVEN IF THERE HAD EVER BEEN A GAME WHERE EVERYONE DID AS THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO. I like assigning numbers, dislike assigning roles within a system that requires PEOPLE to use roles as told and roles to work as expected. With that said, anyone picked an [8][x] yet? If yes, I'll take something towards the back. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 05 2014 13:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's like fakeclaim and die. Shoot someone and die. Roleblock someone you are not supposed to and die. If you are mafia DT then just rofl. ![]() this worries me. We've basically been TOLD things won't happen as expected. On March 05 2014 15:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: Trust me, this is really easy. If assassin takes an unaccounted shot, day/night vigi shoots them because they claim mafia. Same goes vice versa. Every time we decide on a shot the roleblocker and jailer target each other so the shot is guaranteed to go through. If they don't, they claim mafia. That way we control all the non-mafia factional KP in the game which is far better than leave it up for a chance that mafia picks KP-roles and we are fucked. Again, vigis, roleblockers, jailers, and all roles that we don't expect to have KP all have to work like we think they will. On March 05 2014 15:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: Assassin kills someone. They die. We know the assassin killed them. Assassin has to be the only silent insta-kill. scum day vigi can't work like that or scum vigis an important townie, we kill the assassin, things fall apart, etc. I LIKE THE THOUGHT BUT THIS RELIES ON US BEING IN A DIFFERENT GAME | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 08:54 Hopeless1der wrote: Eh?scum would need to be both the assassin and the dayvig for this to work, and then we can lynch them both... If roles are modified based on faction picking, a scum day vigi could be "type in thread and shoot that dude" "type in thread shoot different dude" "silent daykill" "something else" If the role doesn't work exactly as stated, say if it's silent or it hits someone else (which I guess is also silent), then things didn't work like the plan needs them to. I suppose if you hit someone else, that's not a very townie modification and we assume scum, but if day vigi can be modified to be silent, then when the day vigi shoots, we assume it's the assassin, and then we lynch the assassin. Whatever the assassin's alignment, he's gonna go "I didn't shoot that guy", but as far as we know, assassin is the only possible silent shot, so we think he's lying. Town or scum, a silent shot went off, assassin has the only silent shot we know of, therefore assassin did it and is lying, therefore lynch. It wouldn't require scum to have both? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 06:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Because LSB didn't understand something and his conclusion to it was that Rayn was scum. When you don't understand something, do you instantly call the person scum for it? If I recall correctly LSB tends to be fairly cautious in the start, so for him to open with a scumread on something as light as that seems suspicious. Artanis is this LSB-specific or general? Like, all people who jump to the THIS GUY IS SCUM conclusion after not understanding are mafia, or only certain ones, and LSB is in that set because normally he's cautious? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:00 Hopeless1der wrote: ?but we're supposed to know who has the dayvig and the assassin. If they are silent, tell them both to kill each other. Only one will succeed. We may or may not know if someone else is silent Even if that person knows, we may or may not know because that person might be mafia and lie If we have a silent shooter we don't know about, we lynch town (assuming mafia assassin would mean that mafia don't silent day shoot with another role cuz it would just lead to mafia getting lynched). If someone says "oh ya I'm silent too" then what...we have assassin vigi the claimer, assuming that a silent modification is scummy, and we hopefully hit scum, but then there's no reason for them to claim? The OP says roles will be modified and we may or may not know how. The SPECIFICS of this plan rely on roles working as posted in the OP. The OP essentially says "The basis for this plan is false." | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Why am I totally right about this? Why am I totally right about this but also wrong? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:25 Hopeless1der wrote: The OP explicitly states "SOME ROLES MIGHT CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE FACTION THAT GETS THEM. ALSO, THEY MIGHT CHANGE WITHOUT YOU EVEN KNOWING THAT THEY CHANGED"marv are austin's concerns about what I would essntially call bastard modding legit? I don't see his problems actually...being problems To the extent that "bastard modding" is "things don't work the way you expect" and not full on sniper kitty or whatever, I think this game is in a grey area because it explicitly says THINGS WON'T NECESSARILY WORK LIKE YOU EXPECT AND SOME ROLES WILL BE ALTERED WITHOUT YOU EVEN KNOWING IT. I dunno. I haven't seen a PYP mini. I can't fathom a PYP mini that could be balanced at 9/2/1 with a neutral survivor as the 1. If the game is balanced 9/2, that means, to me, that some of the modifications that can happen will not be happy for town. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:32 marvellosity wrote: I agree with this.If we know where KP roles are, that's a pretty massive step in working out what is going on in the game, that is for certain. I question our ability to know how exactly they will work. Like...in 4 KP roles if you count JOAT, something's likely funky for one faction or another. And if we don't know how they work, knowing where they are is...equally/less/not at all valuable, because we can act incorrectly based on our knowledge. I also hate the idea of stocking up on KP roles in general, would so much rather see NOBODY TAKE KP EVER and the leftover dude confirm that, and have it be town with defensive and investigative roles v. mafia. PYP KP roles seem to be town-seeking. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:33 marvellosity wrote: OP says 9-3 or 9-2-1I'd expect 8-3-1 given PYPness is a bonus for town, not mafia. or 9-3. This is a semi-open setup for 12 players. There will be either 9 Town and 3 scum or 9 Town, 2 Scum and 1 Third Party Survivor. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
But jeebus if we put the leftover dude as first pick, have him claim what is/isn't leftover, then shoot him D1 lolololol, we could be certain that we had no KP roles and the game was chock full of DTs and medics/JKs, and then we hope that scum medics don't poison or ... I dunno what other stuff. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:37 marvellosity wrote: If I'm one of the people running afoul of this, I think it's a silly request.by the way, people need to stop talking in generalities. Like "but if people don't cooperate" - say *which* people "but if a trigger happy townie..." - which trigger happy townie? "if town don't do this..." - who in town? Enough players, and important ones, have lent support for organisation that if you're going to bring up specific problems, bring them up in relation to specific players. I would say that based on past PYP games, SOMEONE won't cooperate. Palmar has stated he's not going to cooperate IF cooperating = Palmar doesn't get a gun (at least in some cases) We have multiple folks either lying about picking duplicate numbers or actually picking duplicate numbers, gumshoe and LSB. I can't really speculate as to WHO will do a certain thing, only that SOMEONE always seems to do something wonky, and in SOME cases the game has a lot of chatter over whether that's townie or scummy and it's never 100% one or the other (see the tryndamere bit in PYP:LoL, and....other examples that I don't have off the top of my head) On March 06 2014 09:37 marvellosity wrote: So you think EITHER the OP presents a lie (that the game could be 9-2-1) OR 9-2-1 would be imbalanced but is still an option?Ah. Well I think 9-2-1 is ridiculously imbalanced so I am going to assume there is no survivor. Like...then we're already either in a bastard game OR an imbalanced game is a fine setup, indicating that the roles would ACTUALLY shift a fairly decent amount to balance things | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 09:44 marvellosity wrote: But assuming the OP is true, either someone claims I AM A SURVIVOR LOLOLOL I WIN or nobody claims that, and we already know which world we're in.i just think it's very unlikely 9-2-1 would be chosen. i think it's there just to introduce uncertainty. I don't think it adds any uncertainty, because the survivor either claims or doesn't, and that should settle which world we're in | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Any 8s. GETCHER 8s. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Hopeless and prpl had their bit. yamato and marv i guess we'll let rayn and LSB square off gumshoe and artanis? OATSMASTER I CHALLENGE YOU TO BE MY NEMESIS. ALSO, WHY AM I RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 10:08 marvellosity wrote: That's just like, your opinion, man.you're rarely right about anything, never mind everything, dear. I'm always right about something I think? Maybe not that first FiveTouch game, and not my first newbie. But I'm certainly right that the OP says roles are gonna get tweaked and sometimes we'll know that and sometimes it will be a ... happy accident. And I'm certainly right that a plan requiring 7-8 roles to work as expected OR ELSE PEOPLE DIE is not my favorite plan, and shouldn't be yours. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 10:21 marvellosity wrote: I want to talk to oats and prplhz. Working on it.yes, you've made that point and obviously everything cannot be 100% regimented after all, can you do something cool like find some mafia now? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
rayn voting half the game within a couple hours is the thing that most points towards him being a thingy, and the thingy is town | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Do you believe rayn's plan to be the bee's knees? If no, but you had to follow it ALMOST exactly, what single modification would you make in order to create your own plan that you could sell to the voting public as entirely original and better than his? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 11:21 prplhz wrote: The besti'm not familiar with this "bee's knees" expression please explain | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Old-timey expression | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 08:15 marvellosity wrote: normal for you as either alignment.hey. i'm thinking about having you lynched. how's that? It's about time in D1 for you to be getting people to vote me. I'd say it's a bad idea though | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 08:19 marvellosity wrote: Liquid City, off the top of my head. I was afk D1, except for a small period, and you tried to get people to switch onto me at some point.when have i ever tried to lynch you as mafia? Not particularly hard maybe? I dunno. I mainly remember that game because of the stupid node wagon and then wankfiend stuff | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
LSB likely town. Hates rayn's plan. Lots of focus on JOAT. If he's mafia and wants to derail rayn's plan, he should be at least doing SOMETHING with me. He doesn't even INTERACT with me while I'm also explaining why relying on roles to work like you're told they may not is a bad idea. He dislikes my nemesis post, because he misreads it, but that's literally ALL HE DOES with my posts. Mafia could call me scummy. Mafia that thinks rayn's plan is bad for them can try to egg me on. He didn't. There's also this post: On March 06 2014 15:43 LSB wrote: This is like a...very reasonable response? Rayn's so caught up in his own silliness and calling anyone who doesn't agree mafia, and rayn is basically saying "If something goes wrong, it will be because I'm mafia rayn because my plan is 1000% foolproof, and then you guys lynch me after something goes wrong. Good for town!"How does that confirm you as town? This is a lose lose situation. If you are town and things go south, you get lynch, worse things happen If you are mafia and things go south, well you just pass a increadibly mafia favored plan so you guys are probably going to win anyways But this is such a ... good response. If rayn believes 100000% in his plan, and things go WRONG with the plan, then LSB is right. There's no upside. Either rayn is trying to get a townie lynched, or rayn is mafia AND THE WHOLE PLAN WAS CREATED BY MAFIA IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THAT'S PROBABLY NOT A GOOD THING. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 08:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: I can read or post. Also I don't think we've discussed anything. You were entirely gone while I was posting yesterday, and I was gone while you were initially posting.I am fucking tired of discussing this with you two because you have no idea what you are talking about. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 06 2014 22:21 Xatalos wrote: xatalos,Lol.... Dunno how I could miss that post. Phoneposting sucks etc. Well, that's good then. I picked 8 4 in the end. Seems like it wasn't such a good idea... There were less clashes than I thought. I also sent in my role choice, but apparently this choice isn't permanent, so it's not like it matters too much. A lot has happened while I was away. Mainly austin and gumshoe have come under new suspicion. Both resisted rayn's plan for bad reasons. Also LSB remains as a suspect. prphlz not so much anymore. I dunno about him, but at least he's pretty active in the discussion, so I'm not too fond of lynching him. I'm not truly sold on gumshoe. His stance against rayn here reminds me of his stance against me in GoT Mafia (I was pretty clearly townie and putting in a lot of effort, but he kept opposing me for dumb reasons). Then he pretty much went AFK and was town KP'd. On the other hand, as scum (granted it was a long time ago) he was a lot more passive and unnoticeable. Does he do this thing where he baits a lynch on himself as scum nowadays? austin... He's really focused on a pretty irrelevant topic (unlikely host speculation). I guess he does have a point, but it's not like all the roles will be greatly changed (maybe like DT, but probably not much else). I don't think it's that bad to talk about this topic in itself, but he hasn't really done anything else worthwhile. Most importantly he has done nothing to help with the D1 lynch and has just 100% focused on a pretty irrelevant branch of the PYP stuff. He's certainly null at best and slightly scummy at worst (for contributing in a way that's overall not helpful and even anti-town by distracting the discussion and undermining rayn's plan). LSB has also mostly attacked rayn's plan, but at least he had some slight contributions to scumhunting (rayn+austin+Hopeless). Although he seems VERY fast to jump to conclusions (rayn Mafia for shaky reasons, austin Mafia for one post (?), Hopeless Mafia for sheeping...). His crusade against rayn is also very tunnely and doesn't seem genuinely concerned about the best direction for town. It's more like he just wants to attack it for the sake of attacking it, not to determine if it's truly useful or not. His play is just pretty scummy and even at best it's just null. Hopeless seems to have dropped from the discussion entirely. He's an extreme sheep but I don't really think he's Mafia for it. More like just lazy/insecure. We'll see if he'll push anything of his own. I'm starting to feel pretty scum on yamato. True, he didn't pick 1 1 at the start, but even more worryingly he's become very antagonistic and useless. It's kinda like here (as scum): http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/423047-got-mafia-lords-and-liars?user=yamato77 On the other hand, as town, he usually feels quite townish (see http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/438132-tl-mafia-lxiv-a-game-of-intrigue?user=yamato77 - although it was a PM game so part of his contributions were in PM land). My preferred lynches would be yamato/LSB/austin atm. gumshoe doesn't really fit in my lynch candidates unless I'm convinced that this is scum gumshoe playing like this (against my experiences with him). Also someone pointed out that there isn't necessary a Survivor in this setup. And that seems to be the case currently, I guess. why did I "resist rayn's plans for bad reasons"? What are my reasons and why are they bad? How's the resisting bad, but then later you say I have a point, and it's not bad to talk about the topic. I know those aren't entirely non-congruent, but ... what reasons and why bad? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 08:48 Xatalos wrote: But you think that IF a shot happens that shouldn't, a RB happens wrong, etc. etc., then we should superkill whoever would have been responsible under the roles in the OP?Well basically you had a slight point about there being changes to the roles based on if the receiver is town/Mafia. It's certainly possible and worth some thought. But it's not a reason to shut down the plan and certainly not worth spending a ton of time on when clearly it's just unlikely that this branch of thought would have any major impact. Like...the plan is multi-stage here. Rayn wants all this set up IN PART because later, when anything goes sideways, he believes we'll know the cause of the sidewaysness, and can apply a bullet/lynch to it. See his posts re: joats, shots, anything and everything, roleblocks. BUT BESIDES THAT What's my bad reason? You say LSB is attacking the plan just to attack it, but I just have nebulous BAD REASONS. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 09:00 Xatalos wrote: Well, the bad reason is just that, that the host could change the roles after they're given out. Certainly there could be some slight changes, for example to DT (since otherwise it would be useless for Mafia), but that's just a bad reason to undermine the plan. But if you don't think I'm scum then why are you focusing so much on me? All roles that may be chosen are in the spoilers below. Roles may have additional alterations based on whether they are picked by Town, Mafia or Third Party. Players who draft these roles may or may not be informed of these alterations after receiving these roles. I still can't tell what you think my reasons were, and why they're bad.You think it's bad because the host wouldn't just change roles after they go out, even though the OP says there may be modifications and then goes on to add that you might or might not get notified of modifications, indicating that a couple different roles would change based on alignments (otherwise why make a notified/no notified distinction?)? Or it's bad to EVER undermine a plan that rayn comes up with? Or bad to undermine THIS plan? Like, when I read your post, it says that I, myself, have bad reasons for resisting. Scummy reasons or just not good reasons to question things? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 09:09 marvellosity wrote: Unsure. where's this going, austin? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 10:12 marvellosity wrote: Y'all is some wankers.I don't even understand why you're asking that. austin what's happening bro? It's...not making much sense when I type it out. Essentially, I have missed most of today. I'm not just gonna parrot what's already been said, that seems unhelpful and uninteresting. So I'm looking for interesting stuff. If I find something interesting and townie (LSB), then I should stop finding things townie and only find things scummy If I find nothing, urrbody disappointed (in a way that bodes less than well for my currently living body) So I should find scummy things, but only scummy things that haven't been brought up, or maybe ones that have been brought up but some people (I assume) will go "yup, thanks for repeating that, gg scum". For whatever reason, POST BUT ONLY POST IF SCUMHUNTING AND YOU CAN PROBABLY ONLY SCUMHUNT IF IT'S STUFF THAT NOBODY HAS TALKED ABOUT SO GO FIND THE STUFF THAT EVERYONE HAS MISSED BUT ALSO IT CAN ONLY POINT TO SOMEONE BEING SCUM NOT ANYONE BEING TOWN EVEN IF IT'S ACTUALLY WHAT YOU THINK AND NOVEL OR INTERESTING is not motivating to me tonight. It alters the way I'm looking at stuff, and it doesn't sit well. That's not how I want to play. So I'ma tell you that I think LSB is town. Then I'm gonna ask if anyone disagrees with that and why. I brought something to the table, whether you like it or not, it's my thought. I dunno. I work off of discussion, and back and forth, and questions. Or at least I've slided towards that. I'm not finding errand boy, but only go find certain things we want you to find but we're not going to say what those are and they're also different for different people, to be something that gets my mind going places. ? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 10:37 marvellosity wrote: The lynch is a ... secondary concern?basically you're just totally abdicating any responsibility for the lynch and bitching about it. that stinks. I don't have the pull to push a lynch right now, nor does it appear anything is going to happen except possibly a swap onto me. So I'm just not concerned about it. Not...bitching about the lynch, the lynch is just not a thing I can do much with in this situation. The bitching is totally separate from the lynch. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 10:38 Xatalos wrote: LSB is getting called scum for fighting the plan, and/or for choosing rayn's numbers.I'm not really sure how LSB ignoring you makes him totally town. As far as I can tell. Those mean that if LSB is mafia, he/mafia is trying to like...screw rayn over. There's some reason mafia want rayn to not get what he wants. I present him an opportunity to bolster his argument, or to try and build a resistance, or to do SOMETHING with. If mafia don't want rayn getting his way, then I'm doing what they want, and they at the very least interact with that somehow. They buddy, they encourage, whatever, but they don't just sit there and leave it alone. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 10:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Yeah.Austin, could you reply to my first post of the page? that LSB post is interesting to me. The bit from oats about him and mocsta picking same/similar numbers in PYP to mindgame people pops out.+ Show Spoiler + On March 06 2014 14:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Gumshoe is picking 2/1 because he thinks that Rayn is scary? Not even that Rayn is scum. And with Rayn's plan, if he shoots, he dies. So its a totally unfounded suspicion/paranoia. And Rayn wasnt even gonna pick a KP role. LSB is also throwing shit on it by focusing everything around the JOAT but Rayn's plan is that the RB's block vig and night vig so again, thats not a problem. Both scum. Game ez. On March 06 2014 14:20 Oatsmaster wrote: meh I still kinda like LSB for scum but i think they definitely both could be scum. On March 06 2014 14:28 Oatsmaster wrote: Nah me and Mocsta did that last Pyp and I gave some stupid shitty reason that everyone bought till I stopped playing. On March 06 2014 14:29 Oatsmaster wrote: Also it looks like LSB was absent so it couldve been a miscommunication since you cant actually change your numbers. On March 06 2014 14:34 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah but shit happens man, I think its totally possible that both LSB and gum are scum. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 07 2014 10:48 Xatalos wrote: It's 100% enough to townread LSB. Mafia would do this thing. He didn't do this thing. He's not mafia.Hm. That's a small piece of evidence that could have a point, but it's nowhere enough to townread LSB. Also it's not necessarily the only goal to mess with the plan - equally important could be to create fake contributions to appear like he's doing stuff. More importantly which players would you want to lynch? | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
poc elor but I'm definitely something similar | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
gg | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 10 2014 09:40 marvellosity wrote: I've never been THIS lurky, and by the time I got active the thread had already concluded that a bunch of people looked town 80% for activity and 20% for not being idiots.austin isn't really a lurky scumplayer tbf. town just too good palmar didn't even have to play It was difficult to attack people who were just townie for activity, because they HAD been active and also not idiots. And thread was so circle-jerky, even very early on, that it felt difficult to ... interfere with townies confirming each other. I couldn't find a great avenue to go after artanis, or to do more than poke you, or really rayn. I dunno, I played very, very poorly. It's actually the first game I've lost where I roll mafia from the start, and certainly my worst scum game. But we began so friggin' far behind and never got a cohesive strategy together. ALSO RAYN'S PLAN WAS BAD. ASSIGNING NUMBERS, GREAT. ASSIGNING ROLES, POSSIBLY GREAT. ASSUMING ROLES BARELY CHANGE EVEN THOUGH THE OP SAYS THEY'LL CHANGE AND THAT THE GAME CAN BE BALANCED IN A 9-2-1(neutral) SETUP IS RIDICULOUS. Like...if we'd not played ridiculously poorly, or played the game at all, Gumshoe's role and maybe one other might have given us a solid chance, because half of town would have been trying to aim a lynch based on roles, and half on play, and whatnot. | ||
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
At least from my point of view, being told that no roles would be mafia-useless was nice, but it's...without knowing exactly what roles do, it's kind of hard to value them. We didn't GET to value roles because our number picking was too conservative, but letting mafia actually know what roles do for them might get them to pick a little better, if that is something you want to tweak. Otherwise, I like splitting up the lynch and the picking. It gives mafia more time to do something, more time to read the thread and get a plan together, and it ... it gives them more time for someone to screw up in a lynchable way. Getting that first mislynch on someone who screws up would have been crucial to us, and SOME townie will always do something super scummy given more time. But honestly I don't know how much tweaking this needed. I would be interested to see whether, over the course of more PYP minis, there are more town plans put together. In a large game, enough people screw up plans/claims and whatnot that scum have a little more hiding room. With less players, a small group can essentially force everyone into a plan or a claim, even if the plan isn't particularly awesome. That MAY be something that happens..."too often" in mini PYPs, and causes things to get organized against scum too early. Dunno. I like the idea of trying to have PYP minis though, and felt it ran smooth. | ||
| ||