EPTY r u playing like this dude....
Cultured Mini Mafia - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Y r u playing like this dude.... | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 15:03 geript wrote: Like it's super scummy but you have a freebie pass... You should be thanking me. One thing I can't reconcile with u is the constant reenforcement that newbies get a pass.. Scum team is based on list position not host wifom And why did u not comment that I am surprised u haven't said I'm town for moclogic. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Appealing to past performances is not a viable means of persuasion regarding this game. As for toad. I haven't noticed anything particular that is specific to a scum mindset. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
That was way too in sync De ja vu | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Can u pls confirm that toad is referring to the mysterious meta via post you made?? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
If its a good catch, how is it null? The direct implication of a goof catch is that its meaningful.... Co side ring this is your primary scumspect, I find the response weird | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 22:03 Vivax wrote: Ange7, can you tell me what you think of Mocsta's early aggression on suki in the early game banter around page 14? Like, he calls her for scum for overly wording a joke claim. On the other hand he's the first to call somebody out as scummy if I'm not mistaken. For someone that tried to come acros as Mr.Analytical in GSL, you are applying much hyperbole this game. I said specifically: Suki was teh scummiest player in the game *SO FAR*. Half the game had not posted. Its called pressure. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 24 2014 14:10 Mocsta wrote: /in Early wifom Request town pls Rayn you are an idiot and im sick of hearing you bitch about it. My first post in the game... not once have I insinuated I am town because of this. Drop it. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 21:10 Vivax wrote: Rayn tell me more about this moconfirmation stuff. It seems like horseshit to me. Also, I'm disappointed. Mocsta, you had a chyz, rayn and HF scumread back in ur list post. Now it's all Chyz and me when the votes seem to swing in my direction, one of them being one of your feel scumreads (fuck those feelreads). Post reasoning for me being scum. See Wave case. Are you going to say its scummy to sheep something solid? trololololol Chyz was my primary scum read from before i made that list post. I dont get what ya problem is, I wrote the names in the order of the player list, since I copy/pasted.. .its not rocket science. You are looking for extremely cheap reasons to validate your contributions + Waves case as above -- which I noted you did not address/acknowledge Personally i find town often do not address cases but  O* always acknowledge them.##Unvote ##Vote: Vivax | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: Can you do like marvesque catch up where you quote and comment on posts when you catch up? Like just a small comment like "i like this post", or "i disagree because [insert small reasoning]", or "this is scummy"? It would be valuable to know where you stand at each point of your catch up as by that way you are "reading the thread like everyone else is". No need to ask anything but just to comment on, to let people know where you stood at each point of the game and what your thoughts were at that time. If it does not suit your style then ignore this proposition.  Not that you care, but i like this post a lot from you. On the surface, the request is obviously a pro-town move any alignment can make. But the way you went about it, giving lots of detail and seem genuinely keen to hear feedback on an unknown seems very town-esque to me. I think a scum way of saying this would be: Can you do like marvesque catch up where you quote and comment on posts when you catch up? No need to ask anything but just to comment on, to let people know where you stood at each point of the game and what your thoughts were at that time. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 22:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't care man. Your post was a dick move. You know exactly how i deal with it regardless of what i say. so either be town or be a dick. I noted in BttB you held this position with me; that I should *know* how you respond to things. I clearly don't know. you take issue with a lot of things i don't expect you then, and don't do the things I do expect of you. e.g. I really expected you to try and connect with me early game. Maybe im too used to playing with Thrawn recently. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 22:20 Vivax wrote: Why is this being pointed as a note of relevance?If his meta wasn't so different from GSL I'd be still thinking that gum is scum. The post where he comes in to "moderate" between you and suki just feels super wrong. Also Moc you're pretty prickly for a normal question, but let me go into detail. Everyone was bantering, fake miller claims, harry potter. Off the bat townreads, you and geript were the most serious guys during that phase, geript for Toad's townread, you for suki's posting. Are you suggesting town can not be serious early game? Anyway, you commented on WoS post reading suki as town cause feels saying [/B]WoS says it's not sarcasm, ie town read serious. Next post you somehow manage to get the illusion that you are wave's scumread How do you explain that? I think it's telling that at such a stage you are already so much into lynch politics, going as far as to imagine people scumreading you when they didn't say anything. But maybe you can explain where you got that illusion. Going on with the fullgame reread in the meantime. I love the colourful language "illusion" Nice loaded question, Vivax Wave made a post prior calling out a scumslip from a previous game, and applying it to me. Maybe it was in jest, maybe it wasnt. I was trying to get Rayn involved in the game, and asked his opinion. Its funny how you are trying to justify by position by querying anything that sticks out to you as pounce-able. An extremely scum mindset approach to the game indeed. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Much like my question to Geript (about you), I used that post towards Rayn. Frankly, I was suspect of you at that time (for defending Suki), so the question was a win-win for me. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 26 2014 16:18 Vivax wrote: Vivax,What I don't like about this post is that he can't simply say what he thinks about suki, but feels like has to put a Mocsta townread in front of it. That reads to me like he feels pressured to overjustify for picking a side in the debate, which is something I could see scum doing in a town vs. town argument, after all you're always painfully aware that what you say just isn't right, so you need to create a story. And this looks like a story, the story of how you think suki could be scum ONLY after thinking that mocsta is town, which is something I don't see townies do at D1. Explanation: Gumshoe feels that he can't attack suki without supporting Moc cause he thinks that he would look like his lacking suspicion of Mocsta was unjustified. Like, in a hypothetical town vs town argument as scum you would think that you can't attack one townie without clearing the other. Moreover you can see that the part about Mocsta could be construed (in best-case scenario, ie gum town) as a justification for sheeping him ("but I feel good about his accusation not coming from a place of deceit"), but gumshoe doesn't exactly use Mocsta's arguments (tryhard looking posts, "why-not-vote-for-me-question") and brings his own, which strengthens the overjustification version of events. The last bit with the nostalgia is either overanalyzing (if town) or making stuff up (if scum), so I think it should be disregarded entirely for now (@ geript). _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Nitpicking from this case is strictly forbidden, either you address all points and give a conclusive opinion or your remarks will be ignored. what is the meaning of @geript? Is it related to: On February 26 2014 14:13 Vivax wrote: I'm impressed by the high post count just within 5 hours, currently just skimmed to see if geript has posted his townie seal. He hasn't. He's scum. Now back to reading. i.e. you are recanting the scum read? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 22:35 WaveofShadow wrote: Except I seem to also remember you simply backing down, saying: Why no mention of the 'implied' scum in that post earlier? Surely you could have said it was because of that post? (It was jest in the end I suppose, btw.) Explanation: thought he looked scummy, voted him. Yeah, i thought there was more posts than just that one. When i went looking for it and saw it, i realised it could have been in jest. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 22:34 Vivax wrote: [/B]So you thought Wave scumread you cause of ? Way to make the game confusing. no </b> In PYP, i posted twice where i bolded using <b> Rayn called me out for it, but somehow it got dropped lol Ahh, the funsies | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 26 2014 17:19 Vivax wrote: I find this post curious.Mocsta Not yet, but it's the scenario where a scum gumshoe is most likely to act that way imo. There's always the chance that suki is also scum (and gum picks your side and throws some soft suspicion onto suki to gain cred). I don't think that a scum gumshoe would act that way if you were scum though. *snip* I asked my question in the first place because: On February 26 2014 16:18 Vivax wrote: <About Gumshoe> That reads to me like he feels pressured to overjustify for picking a side in the debate, which is something I could see scum doing in a town vs. town argument, after all you're always painfully aware that what you say just isn't right, so you need to create a story. And this looks like a story, the story of how you think suki could be scum ONLY after thinking that mocsta is town, which is something I don't see townies do at D1. The entire premise of Vivax argument is based on Suki + Mocsta = town. Yet when queried about me being town I get "Not yet" with some nice doors opening to move onto Suki too. Which again conquers his gumshoe is scum argument. WoS, i cant remember ya case; did you touch on this stuff? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On February 27 2014 02:53 Vivax wrote: Jeez why couldn't I roll scum in this game. You guys are all so busy with fighting each other in such an unproductive way, and nobody called me out for not doing anything since I posted those points on gumshoe  Oh well back to lurking. I remember WoS touched on this. But I want to reemphasise how significant this post is towards a scum mindset. (1) Jeez why couldn't I roll scum in this game. Starts by belittling all the players as this infers everyone is playing terrible that scum can win ezpz (Town often do this when trying to shit on a specific player -- which is not what happened here) (2) You guys are all so busy with fighting each other in such an unproductive way Then identifies the issue with existing town atmosphere (3) and nobody called me out for not doing anything since I posted those points on gumshoe If the gumshoe read is solid, why would you call him out for noncontributing?This demonstrates a clear lack of conviction towards gumshoe. Further, point (2) suggests it would have been productive if town was questioning Vivax (and not his read Gumshoe). I can not correlate this mindset with that of a townie in any way, shape or form. (4) Oh well back to lurking. Hes admitting that unless called out, he has nothing he wants to input on. So why make this place in the first place... its basically a "I'm still alive guys" post. Nothing more, nothing less. Then you have the stuff that is missing: i.e. Gives zero direction on how to improve the situation Gives zero effort to campaign gumshoe further Gives zero deduction on whether the players fighting each other are town-town; town-scum; scum-scum Again, I can not correlate this mindset with that of a townie in any way, shape or form. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
If you are planning to vote for me for such a petty reasoning; at least have the decency to parse through my filter with your confirmation biased mindset and tell me why I am playing against my role PM. | ||
| ||
