[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia - Page 122

On January 24 2014 01:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No, if Skan is town that means one townie vote is on Vayne.
If Vayne is town aswell mafia can vote for him and we have no way of lynching mafia because even if all townies vote together Vayne has 4 votes first and Skanjabs is not around.

So i have to believe one of Skan/Vayne is mafia to even possibly be able to lynch mafia.

On January 24 2014 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because for Koshi to be mafia Skanjabs has to be mafia.
One of Vayne and Skanjabs HAS to be mafia, other wise the town loses.

On January 26 2014 02:06 Hopeless1der wrote:
rayn didnt own the lynches. We all had to reach a consensus on who to vote and both grack and toad played in spectacularly antitown fashion that deserved to be lynched. Short of modconfirming them town, I'd lynch them every single time for the way they played. You have done precisely dick all game long Oats, which hasnt been actively harmful to town but I cant say what alignment you are with any confidence. Save your own life if you are town by proving to us that you can find scum and stop pawning the responsibility onto the one player who consistently gives a shit.

On January 26 2014 02:11 Cephiro wrote:
I'd like to remind you rayn was the only one that saw through my thinking as a fellow townie and enabled the thread to go from "omg ceph is scum from fakeclaiming SK" into lynching scum. There is no single player that causes a lynch. We made bad decisions as town, and some townies (looking at you Toad), decided it would be best to lynch themselves.

I am fairly sure all three players on Oats are town right now. 4th town player please step in and vote for Oats also.

As for Oats, why I don't believe you at all is because of your previous reactions that are so giving away. You also have been throwing suspicion and theories toward everyone for the whole duration of the game, but when asked to provide something, you again change the focus of the discussion into what you prefer it to be.

On January 17 2014 00:28 Sn0_Man wrote:

1) I generally enjoyed my town games more than my singular replacement into a maf game
2) dafuq would I know?
3) Depends is a horrible cop-out answer everybody puts forth. I usually just OMGUS cuz omgus. Or whine a lot.
4) Tears, tears everywhere

Aaaaand in other news I certainly hope you aren't counting on this or your romp through my filter as "contributions".

On January 17 2014 01:10 Sn0_Man wrote:

This sounds a lot like "I intentionally made a worthless case cuz its my town meta and I gotta match that".

Which sounds a lot like scum :/

On January 18 2014 04:06 Sn0_Man wrote:
Okay, but the whole thread is scummy how do i choose?

Toad is full of shit and being dumb
Grack outright refuses to do anything that might indicate towniness
Hopeless wont stop sniping from the sidelines and making accusations without substantiating cases or contributing
Vaynes all mysterious and awful
Mig still won't do anything other than call me scum
Koshis all Koshi

And thats without cephiro the utterly afk.

How do I choose who to lynch? I choose whoever I think isn't gonna become more readable and lynch the crap outta them. Today its grack.

On January 21 2014 00:38 Sn0_Man wrote:
After reading that little hate-fest and claim I understand toad even less than yesterday but I'm having a hard time calling him a good lynch. What kind of mafia fake-claims with like 2 votes on them and 12 hours to lynch?

Right now Oats and Skanjab are looking scummiest, I'd like to lynch one of them.

I promise this isn't pure OMGUS, but all Oats has done this last day is flame and discredit the shit outta rayn without actually trying to find scum. Then he's like "Lynch Sn0" without reasons simply cuz I'm not here to defend myself. Zero scumhunting or effort, just aiming for an easy target he can safely back off of once I'm back.

On January 21 2014 00:48 Sn0_Man wrote:

Because every time you pop in the thread its to be blendy and point out some irrelevancy without actually scumhunting.

Who is scum Skanjab? Oh right, its me the safe vote that your scumbuddy oats has already put on the table. Why? "Sheepiness pre vote" give me a break. If you want to accuse me, at least try to make a case. I wanted CONSOLIDATION in the lynch. Something that scum couldn't just pull whatever way they wanted.

Meanwhile the rest of your posts range from

to

So helpful in catching scum. Clearly that is your primary desire.

PS why did you drop your hopeless read? You were so certain he was scum post grack's flip. What changed?

None of that comes from town.

On January 21 2014 01:24 Sn0_Man wrote:

You guys have both spend the entire game posting 1-line snipes that are pretty much dedicated to starting flame-wars and self-defense. Zero scumhunting. There's nothing to quote from your filters because there's nothing in them. Skanjab's day 1 case is the only thing worth mentioning and it's ridiculous garbage built on nothing day 1. Doesn't count as scumhunting, does count as trying to look good.

You in particular oats, your main contributions were "huge flame war with thrawn" -> lurk "huge flame war with rayn". I fail to see how town!Oats does that exclusively instead of actually scumhunting. Your "lynch rayn" case boiled down to "he thinks i'm scum lol" no other reasons. Plus you dropped it in seconds as soon as I showed up.

Toad I still don't get but I don't want to lynch uncountered cop claim see above.
Hopeless does have a vet claim and his posts struck me as better going through the thread. If there's a serious push to lynch him as I mentioned I can go back and re-read his filter specifically. However, I don't feel the need to do that when you two are so clearly scum.

On January 21 2014 01:40 Sn0_Man wrote:

Couldn't decide who I thought was a better lynch, you or skanjab.

On January 26 2014 02:40 Oatsmaster wrote:

lol So why was I able to read both Grack and Toad as town?

On January 26 2014 02:47 Hopeless1der wrote:

easy there captain hindsight i might lynch you out of spite at this point.

On January 26 2014 02:52 Oatsmaster wrote:

I said they were town before they got lynched dude.

On January 26 2014 02:55 Hopeless1der wrote:

that does nothing to determine your alignment. if youre scum you know they arent scum. you didnt stop their lynch. you didnt substitute scum in place of their lynch. get over yourself. also vote skanjab1s if you arent already doing so.

On January 26 2014 02:57 Cephiro wrote:
Hope, do you suddenly think Oats is not scum? Why are you changing your vote when we're quite certain to have a scum with 3 votes up for lynch, if all three of us are town (You, Me, Sn0), then it's a guaranteed lynch since he's the first to three votes.

On January 26 2014 02:57 Cephiro wrote:
Hope, do you suddenly think Oats is not scum? Why are you changing your vote when we're quite certain to have a scum with 3 votes up for lynch, if all three of us are town (You, Me, Sn0), then it's a guaranteed lynch since he's the first to three votes.

On January 26 2014 02:59 Cephiro wrote:
Just because I agree with rayn on you being scum does not mean I am sheeping him.

Or do you think it's a better idea to vote for someone else than whom I think to be the most scummy person in the thread, to "not sheep"?

On January 26 2014 03:00 Hopeless1der wrote:

oats isnt game-mechanically confirmed scum like skan is.