EPTOn January 28 2014 00:32 Sn0_Man wrote:
I knew that interaction was weak but not much came of it. The key issue was that the OTHER option for my scumteam of 3 was also a scumbuddy.
So I played as if it was very clear to me that Skan/Oats were scum and then one of the other two, which gave me both a plausible reason to vote one of them if I had to, as well as a fine reason to ignore the reasons they looked scummy in favour of pushing my 2 (mis)lynch targets. Rayn managed to pick up on the read progression and train of thought that I was trying to project to the thread, which I was pleased about.
TBH if I was town I'm not sure I'd ever have been that "certain" about my reads.
And honestly, I do post "Well he could be scum but..." as town as well, even when the person flips scum. Although as town as soon as a scummer flips I like to think I re-evaluate based on that info. Especially votes and stuff. I clearly didn't do anything like that this game lol.
I knew that interaction was weak but not much came of it. The key issue was that the OTHER option for my scumteam of 3 was also a scumbuddy.
So I played as if it was very clear to me that Skan/Oats were scum and then one of the other two, which gave me both a plausible reason to vote one of them if I had to, as well as a fine reason to ignore the reasons they looked scummy in favour of pushing my 2 (mis)lynch targets. Rayn managed to pick up on the read progression and train of thought that I was trying to project to the thread, which I was pleased about.
TBH if I was town I'm not sure I'd ever have been that "certain" about my reads.
And honestly, I do post "Well he could be scum but..." as town as well, even when the person flips scum. Although as town as soon as a scummer flips I like to think I re-evaluate based on that info. Especially votes and stuff. I clearly didn't do anything like that this game lol.
This is my takeaway from this game. Well played sn0.
