[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 135

On January 31 2014 10:23 marvellosity wrote:

Been checking through VE's filter for Prome thoughts. Possibly this is the strongest thing in there. I defended Prome on ego partly because I was totally convinced Fool was pushing for a mislynch, but this stuff nonetheless remains true. "there's no POP" is really an excellent description.

On January 31 2014 10:29 austinmcc wrote:
It's tough to pop while hiding

On January 31 2014 10:31 marvellosity wrote:
So I post and magically 3 people appeared. How lovely

On January 31 2014 10:30 marvellosity wrote:
Alright Wave, you're awesome. Happy? :p

Some of us are going back to relook for ourselves, now shoo.

Or talk to me about austin, up to you, i can't be up for much longer.

On January 31 2014 10:33 marvellosity wrote:
Reminding me makes no difference to anything, because i won't forget it, and you prodding me about it won't make me go look at it any faster

On January 31 2014 00:20 marvellosity wrote:
Wave, talk to me a bit about how you've ordered your reads. Primarily I'm not quite getting how you've lumped austin into town and I'm outrageously lumped into the remaining suspicious pile. Have you reconciled yourself with the weird shit that austin has done this game?

His, imo, unreasonably strong townread on Toad/Holy based on almost nothing. His attack on Prome for a really weird reason that still no-one has agreed with, and yet for some reason he's particularly suspicious of me for not agreeing with it. The fact he's always come in super-late to push any lynch, on every single day so far. His 100% absurd attack on me for when I said "vote your strongest read" when in context it was fucking obvious I was talking about day 3. I clarified and he continued the attack on the same basis. It's totally absurd that he's really trying to catch me out for being "hypocritical" for day 1 reads and voting compared to day 3 actions.

Anyways, tell me what you're seeing that makes you confident in his alignment, plox.

On January 31 2014 00:23 marvellosity wrote:

This is nonsensical.

On January 29 2014 07:14 marvellosity wrote:
Because day 3 is not day 1

Are you being purposefully obtuse?

You can find plenty of games of mine where I day 1 shenannie. No games where I am not voting my strongest read day 3. It's exceptionally simple to understand

On January 29 2014 11:18 austinmcc wrote:
Yeah, I understand completely.

That's why I'm actually explaining and not going "LOL WRONG" or "I changed my mind" or whatever. I think you have a legitimate point. I can give you SOME of the reasons, especially to that single post. I think if you look at my posting from that day as a whole, i DON'T have you as townie, but I certainly don't have you there with VE. MOST of the statements I make regarding your scumminess should be concern for other people being overly townie on you, which causes me to swing the other way, or be skeptical. I don't believe, however, that I freely post about why you're mafia or why you're super likely mafia, or whatever.

But yeah, it's perfectly fine if you're concerned. I'm also not super worried, because I don't think that I'm the lynch tomorrow under any normal circumstances, and i THINK that if things are falling into place for us and we lynch scum, you will be concerned with my play, confused with my play, but think that I have to be townie. I don't care if you question me or are worried by me, only that you give prome a real loo. Giving prome/marv a real look as a duo would be sexy as well, as giving OTHER people a real look would be further sexy.

On January 31 2014 10:40 austinmcc wrote:
If I'm gonna post serious though, then the non-prome mafia needs to figure out who to paint as the final scum and who to leave alive at endgame.

The sooner you take stances, even if you're just gonna go back on em or whatever, about who pairs well and who doesn't, blah blah, the better imo. That's one reason I'm particularly interested.

On January 31 2014 10:47 WaveofShadow wrote:
I actually understood to some degree what austin was getting at at the time to be honest. I also don't find the line of thought scummy in any way, really. He dropped when you explained it the best, here.

On January 31 2014 10:50 austinmcc wrote:
(He also was poking at sandroba D1, and sandroba responded to his posts, so either we were setting up action (against...prome?) or we can't talk in a QT. He was also willing to vote prome or sandroba D1, did not want to vote foolishness even when foolishness was seriously up for lynch)

(He also didn't drop that point. Marv's statement was that you vote the scummiest candidate, PERIOD. Not that you do so on D3, not that you do so sometimes, but that you do this, PERIOD. I think the D3 vs D1 stuff is as nonsensical as he thinks I'm being. If you believe you always vote the scummiest candidate, the day doesn't matter. If the day matters, then you don't actually believe you always vote the scummiest candidate)

On January 31 2014 10:51 marvellosity wrote:

I basically found it suspicious because it seemed so obvious what I was talking about, and it shouldn't have to require me shouting the really obvious context at him to make him stop going down that path. Apparently if you empathised and understood at the time, then it wasn't quite correct for me to find it that off. Ok.

On January 31 2014 10:54 marvellosity wrote:
Well don't do anything superdumb like not post definitively in resolution period (assuming we get that far trololol etc), because, ya know, it's not unlikely you'll be shot, methinks.