|
|
|
On October 03 2013 08:29 WaveofShadow wrote:You mean better.
why is that better? higher probability for scum to shoot eachother?
|
On October 03 2013 08:40 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 08:35 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 03 2013 08:29 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 03 2013 08:16 VayneAuthority wrote:
worse, 8 to 5 You mean better. why is that better? higher probability for scum to shoot eachother? Better for RNG silly.
oh right. well ill be interested whether you choose to vote me or follow up on your FT case, either way I know where you will end up
this cycle will be magical
|
On October 03 2013 12:14 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2013 05:20 FirmTofu wrote:
Seriously, it's so fucking stupid how WRONG I've been about everything recently. I don't know what I'm doing wrong. It's fucking frustrating. Just going to take a hiatus before I just spiral.
fuck me Simply because of this post I will never lynch FT this game. It may be stupid of me, but this feels so genuine and real from what I've seen him post in previous games, and it's not reactive of a scum who may have simply failed to lynch another scum.
you need to read persona then, that's classic scum FT. he martyrs like a bitch as scum
|
![[image loading]](https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/7809702144/h8FF816DE/)
please no nonsense when I wake up, im holding pocket aces. good night friends
|
should we use the golden rule of whoever is pushing town vayne is scum? might as well call it a tradition at this point
|
actually it makes him scummier austin, but I still can't say anything. ffs...
|
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up.
|
On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him.
An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more.
|
On October 04 2013 09:05 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 09:04 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him. An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more. Ignore that for the most part, I'm more concerned with the Grack vote and the failure to actually push or prod me palmar or Grack . You voted Grack but never advocated for him.
grack was playing exactly the same way as in golden sun and this is only my 2nd game with him so I don't know his town game. Associated it with him being scum again, but it appears he plays both alignments similarly. The pushing thing is repetitive and boring, as stated multiple times it is not alignment indicative in the slightest.
|
On October 04 2013 09:12 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 09:09 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:05 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:04 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him. An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more. Ignore that for the most part, I'm more concerned with the Grack vote and the failure to actually push or prod me palmar or Grack . You voted Grack but never advocated for him. grack was playing exactly the same way as in golden sun and this is only my 2nd game with him so I don't know his town game. Associated it with him being scum again, but it appears he plays both alignments similarly. The pushing thing is repetitive and boring, as stated multiple times it is not alignment indicative in the slightest. So you're just going to vote someone and hope they get lynched? When you voted Grack you immediately got called out by two players, and never pushed him further. Palmar never got voted and only vote on me was by you.
well you miss the point on how I play town
I don't get people lynched, I just make sure I don't get lynched.
|
On October 04 2013 09:17 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 09:13 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:12 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:09 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 09:05 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 09:04 VayneAuthority wrote:On October 04 2013 08:54 Pandain wrote:On October 04 2013 08:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
if you want people to take you seriously Pandain, start by not being a hypocrite. You can't say my voting is scummy when we were both on town the entire game. It doesn't work like that.
A lot of the other stuff people are ignoring because that is my town meta whether you like it or not. You are basically just perfectly describing my town meta right now. So your case is kinda just helping me, as a heads up. I think you are playing a good scum game but your role speculation which isn't sensible and logical unless you have inside knowledge reveals you. Additionally your lack of pushing reveals you. It's day three and you say usually by now you're fitting pieces together and you're dangerous in the end-game. It's 8-5 town/scum ratio. Where's your end-game fitting in? All I see is an easy vote on FT. On October 04 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On October 04 2013 08:39 Pandain wrote:
Palmar besides that has been playing as town, I don't think he's as lurkery as you think. I don't mean to imply he's the lurkiest lurker that ever did lurk. But his posting is on subjects that I don't think matter. He's got a boatload of posts today on his VOTE yesterday. Palmar shouldn't care about his vote yesterday. Mislynches happen. Vote switches happen. He's not even getting serious votes or anything for it. But he spends forever going over the ins and outs of voting and bovine reproduction or whatever else. His activity, in cases like that, is about subjects that just don't matter as far as scumhunting goes. Plus again. You both have Pa- names. Someone gots to go. I'm not as concerned about Pa's due to the fact that I know what I post. I also think we should actually lynch scum, and my reasons for lynching Palmar are too policy oriented(although there are some good suspicions) to justify me voting him and to justify you voting him. An easy vote isn't necessarily wrong. It's easy for a reason. He martyred and left the game. As others have stated, if you martyr there is nothing else that will take my vote off of you. Some one else could claim scum in the thread and I would still have my vote on the martyr. Nothing else pisses me off more. Ignore that for the most part, I'm more concerned with the Grack vote and the failure to actually push or prod me palmar or Grack . You voted Grack but never advocated for him. grack was playing exactly the same way as in golden sun and this is only my 2nd game with him so I don't know his town game. Associated it with him being scum again, but it appears he plays both alignments similarly. The pushing thing is repetitive and boring, as stated multiple times it is not alignment indicative in the slightest. So you're just going to vote someone and hope they get lynched? When you voted Grack you immediately got called out by two players, and never pushed him further. Palmar never got voted and only vote on me was by you. well you miss the point on how I play town I don't get people lynched, I just make sure I don't get lynched. Then why even post at all? To me all your proving is that you should get policy lynched every day.
Spoken like true scum, pc3 im done here
|
On October 04 2013 10:11 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:On October 04 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 04 2013 08:34 austinmcc wrote:
wtf oats has 9 pages of filter. When did he make posts? This is exactly why Oats is scum. ALso I want to lynch FT despite Pandain's posting.Am I jerk? Why Dunno 'cause either FT is scum and I win, or he's town and I think it would be hilarious if we lynched a townie despite the biggest defense case I have ever seen anyone make. It's win-win.
you also know about that which cannot be named
|
It's like chezinu and marv had a baby?
|
pandain bores me, all of his reasons for lynching me are magnified in FT yet he is convinced he is town. makes sense it does not.
If you want to lynch a "hassle" or whatever how about you lynch the guy that refuses to contribute at all? at least you can call me out on my bullshit reads and stuff. FT isn't giving us anything to work with. If you want to see him in action as town go look at sicilian or nuclear. This is not it.
|
now now, no need to turn into
![[image loading]](http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/3232/a63.png)
you are getting all worked up over nothing and you're wrong just like he was.
|
I will give you the benefit of the doubt since you are trying to get me lynched instead of just shooting me, or do I give you too much credit in knowing that killing the other scum team gives an extra 0.5 KP?
|
on that note, thats a little speculation I left out. One of the scumteams got an 0.5 KP for dropping the cop. ruh roh! expect shenanigans.
and no I don't but I assume the weaker ones like walkie talkie and stuff are 0.5 KP and the stronger ones like medic protection are 1 KP. if protection was .5 KP they would just protect all their members every night.
|
On October 04 2013 12:29 Pandain wrote:
Can we also lynch VA for taunting me
daresay how I taunted you? you just wished death upon me lol seems a bit over the top
|
Look through sicilian and check out how SnB dealt with sloosh that game. If you see a huge disconnect between that and SnB/FT feel free to vote me. its very identical and thats what I am basing my read off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
