|
On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town.
Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game.
|
On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird.
I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now.
I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now.
|
On September 15 2013 01:15 Koshi wrote:
btw, arguing with Oats is terrible.
you're probably right, but we're the only 3 people in the thread so I think it's ok.
|
On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:
[quote]
Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack.
We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless.
|
On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:
[quote]
I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true.
i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum.
|
On September 15 2013 02:26 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:44 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:
[quote]
When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true. i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum. lol. This attitude. So scum.
I'm very confident that Pandain/Zealos are scum. I'm doing what I can to try to convince you, but you won't be convinced either because you are scum and defending your buddies or just dumb.
|
On September 15 2013 02:33 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 02:30 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 02:26 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:44 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:
[quote]
Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true. i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum. lol. This attitude. So scum. I'm very confident that Pandain/Zealos are scum. I'm doing what I can to try to convince you, but you won't be convinced either because you are scum and defending your buddies or just dumb. but you're wrong or scum.
Explain to me why my vote switch is scummy and Pandain's is not.
Pandain gave no good reason for his vote switch but you say Pandain's switch isn't scummy because Zealos is town for being Useless.
I gave my reasoning for switching my vote, and you say that BH is 3rd party, which is not scum aligned with a scum team so its basically the same thing as switching off of town. What are my motivations for switching the vote if not what I said they were?
Why is Pandain switching off of "town" ok but me switching off of BH, who for all intents and purposes to the mafia team is "town" considered scummy?
|
@Scum: Please shoot me tonight, thanks.
|
If I ever play as scum in a game with you I am going be completely useless and give absolutely no reason for anything I do and watch how you respond.
|
On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him
Yes Zealos is safer, I had Pandain down as very town until I reread his behavior in the last minutes before the deadline. If Zealos somehow ends up town then I'm a lot less suspicious of Pandain.
|
On September 15 2013 03:22 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Im confused why you didnt notice the vote before Grack pointed it out.
there was so much shit going down during that final 10 minutes that it was easy to miss things. I spent most of my time trying to figure out who actually died.
|
On September 15 2013 03:27 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him Yes Zealos is safer, I had Pandain down as very town until I reread his behavior in the last minutes before the deadline. If Zealos somehow ends up town then I'm a lot less suspicious of Pandain. I guess I can be suspicion free of Pan. Kill SnB tomorrow.
What do you mean?
|
@Debears, What do you think about Vayne?
|
Oh my god you guys are amazing. This game will go down in history as the game where BH claimed SQUM
|
On September 15 2013 04:46 Old Partner wrote:If I was SK i'd just claim SK, or even better, claim vigi (link) then later claim SK and nobody would lynch me. I could even direct my shots how you guys wanted and you wouldn't want to lynch me. HAHAHAHAHA, what I see in that post,"yup I'm the SK, please don't kill me I will shoot who you want." Shoot Zealos please.
|
You say nothing about the Q.
|
On September 15 2013 04:59 Old Partner wrote:
also i'm literally not the SK, or else i'd just claim Vigi. I'd say something like "I voted to save myself because I am the vigi and am valuable to town" and you suckers would eat that up like candy
What happened to you being busted by your last minute switch of lying about being unable to post at work and not having a phone. Nobody would believe that
|
On September 15 2013 04:59 Old Partner wrote:
also i'm literally not the SK, or else i'd just claim Vigi. I'd say something like "I voted to save myself because I am the vigi and am valuable to town" and you suckers would eat that up like candy
You lying SQUM
|
On September 15 2013 05:03 Old Partner wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 05:02 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 04:59 Old Partner wrote:
also i'm literally not the SK, or else i'd just claim Vigi. I'd say something like "I voted to save myself because I am the vigi and am valuable to town" and you suckers would eat that up like candy What happened to you being busted by your last minute switch of lying about being unable to post at work and not having a phone. Nobody would believe that i just claim Blazinghand, no problem. man you slow So you are BH the Vigi who lied about being unavailable to avoid posting? Ha
|
It's not silent night it's locked night actions but still talking
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
