Golden Sun: The Broken Seal Mini Mafia - Page 33

On September 12 2013 16:08 Grackaroni wrote:
Lets get real, Kush playing anti-town is nothing new from him. He does it as both alignments. If he doesn't start contributing, we vig him and we move on. Lynches should be used on players we can actually analyze.

On September 13 2013 02:38 Grackaroni wrote:
@Blubbdavid, If onegu doesn't start playing then he is a solid vig shot as well. I've played with kush before and I doubt he is going to start playing at this point, but there's no way of reading him so it's a waste of a lynch. We don't use lynches on anti-town players we use them on scum players. If we pushed lynches on players such as kush who play anti-town regardless of alignment, then everybody would be in agreement and drop their vote on kush and we would have no information for day2

You are the only player I can remember arguing that kush is likely scum. Everybody else is voting for kush as a policy. To punish kush for playing the way he does and to discourage him from playing like that again in future games.

On September 13 2013 12:17 Old Partner wrote:
@Grackaroni #642 I am aware that the initial post I made today was poorly formatted. It took me much longer to read the thread than I expected, and I posted it without previewing it. It got fucked my notepad's Word Wrap function. I reposted it along with my scumreads, who I'm willing to lynch, and statements/questions clearly outside the spoiler.

You say I should be "engaging with the thread" and that's true, but right now the thread is basically just me. People have effectively bailed since I have posted my summary and questions. That being said, I will talk with you, since you are here. Is this still your position on Kush?



What happens if Kush is alive tomorrow because town has no vigis? Would you policy lynch him D2? You dont' think he's going to start playing, you think he's unreadable, and so you want to him to get vigged. We dont' know if there is a vig. If it turns out there isn't, then you MUST be onboard for a D2 kush policy lynch. Why not just lynch him today?

On September 13 2013 12:40 WaveofShadow wrote:
Sorry ladies. Busier than I thought today. I'll be able to post for a bit tonight and a few hours tomorrow pre-deadline before my aforementioned afk period.

If yall want to get all salty about my contributions by all means go ahead. I'm not going to be defending myself. Anyway finishing catching up---I remember thinking my Grack scumread is still justified but I have to recheck why.

On September 13 2013 12:45 WaveofShadow wrote:
Something along the lines of 'jumping on opportune targets basically all game,' I think.
I'll see if I have time to post another decent case or a rebuttal towards yours of mine earlier today (which I seem to remember thinking was pretty decent, actually), but I don't see any reason to move my vote anywhere atm.

On September 13 2013 12:29 Grackaroni wrote:


Your questions are really your main participation, nobody responds to your notes, and your only mention of me was why I didn't want to read your posts and many people have stated they don't want to read your posts. You mentioned before that my lack of engaging with people about my scum read is scummy so you must think that scum avoid doing that. (which you are avoiding)

I'm not actually concerned about Kush right now. Kush can readable as town but oftentimes he chooses not to and trolls. judging from the start of the game I thought this was going to be one of Kush's troll games but now I think its more likely after his last 2 posts that he will start showing his hand one way or another.
More concerned about Zealos/Onegu still being Mia if I was looking to lynch an unreadable.

On September 13 2013 12:50 Grackaroni wrote:

I think that came right out of the mouth of OP. Not sure if that's something I should read into.

Really reread the game again because I don't think that's what's been going on at all. I don't jump on others targets, I make the targets. I began the push on Pandain, I wasn't the first to vote blubbers but I expressed my concern on him before Vayne did and as for OP, most of my reasoning is coming from Rayn but I did say before my dislike of OP's posting and added in my own points.

On September 13 2013 12:47 kushm4sta wrote:
did you or did you not read the whole thread so far wos?

On September 13 2013 12:50 Old Partner wrote:


So you're basically saying that you expect Kush is gonna become readable. If he doesn't, (and he may not), and we don't have a vigi, then you MUST be planning to policy lynch him D2... which is terrible.

On September 13 2013 12:52 Old Partner wrote:


Imagine a scenarion in which Grack is scum: You expressed "concern" about BD, then when town opinion shifted onto him, you had an excuse to vote. If town opinion hadn't shifted, your concern would be forgotten. This is a common scum tactic. And your attack on me has no new information in it, you're just parroting Rayn, which is very different than coming up with ideas. Sure, maybe you attacked pandain first, but you have been opportunistically sheeping ever since.

On September 13 2013 12:54 WaveofShadow wrote:

Mabes.

On September 13 2013 12:55 Grackaroni wrote:

I think that lynches should be used on scummy players rather than anti-town players for 2 reasons,

1) they are more likely to be scum
2) their flip actually gives us information and something to analyze rather than, welp we all lynched kush and he flipped town. Least he's gone. Onegu next.

I'm not happy that we have these 3 anti-town players right now that town will have to deal with, but if I think there is a player who has a good chance of flipping scum (you) then I'm going to lynch him.

On September 13 2013 13:08 kushm4sta wrote:
@op the problem is if i flip town, that tells you nothing about the people who pushed OR defended my plynch.