| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Games just feel different then they were a while ago, I dunno why  .Grack played really well, but I shouldve picked up that Vayne was being way too careful with his vote and shit at the end of Lylo. He wouldnt have done that as town, asking for a case and all that. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On September 26 2013 07:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah and i know why we lost. Because Oats was thinking "i don't actually give a fuck if rayn is scum or not but i am going to vote for him because i don't wanna let him win if he happens to be scum". That's 100% not true. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On September 26 2013 09:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Umasi played good. Don't throw shit at him. Nobody EVER suspected him of being scum. You got mislynched, you played worse. Simple fact. And wtf is this bullshit you and debears have been spreading the last two games? Seriously. When Koshi died he had fucking more posts than i did. WHY THE FUCK IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO READ GAMES WHERE I POST ? Do you have some personal issues? Just come and say i am an asshole or something you fuckers! Seriously i am tired of this bullshit with you two. At least other people are trying to be constructive. You are just idiots. And that's what i think. I don't know why you are taking my comments so personally. Post less and read/think more is not at all confrontational. There are points in the game that you did flood the thread (see d1 with the SnB meta read). It does make the game incredibly hard to read for people like me. Not to mention, it's easier to follow your thought process when you have a step by step explanation in a post, rather than among a couple pages of filter. It also can keep your arguments more coherent (remember the part where you added to your SnB meta read about it being wrong, and I was confused about it because you had said it was accurate earlier?). The one person I think of as a successful mass poster is marv. But, the main difference I feel between you two is that marv keeps it better organized between posts (at least from my experience) and has better explanations. This is the last time I'm going to try to explain this to you. If you don't like it, that's fine and dandy. In any endeavor in life, you improve most by looking at where you failed, and why. A lot of times, the best way to see those failures is through what others say you failed at and what others say you need to improve on. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On September 26 2013 12:39 Oatsmaster wrote: bleh my bad..... Games just feel different then they were a while ago, I dunno why .Grack played really well, but I shouldve picked up that Vayne was being way too careful with his vote and shit at the end of Lylo. He wouldnt have done that as town, asking for a case and all that. You wanna help me do the thug life analysis? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On September 26 2013 12:47 debears wrote: You wanna help me do the thug life analysis? not really lol. Maybe Ill try something different for that game. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
We lost because I had a horrible game as an important role, and once my cover was blown I kept speculating on sks instead of looking at the more obvious non dual 3p game. We can put this game on me, it was pretty obvious who should have been lynched if I didn't freaking keep thinking about a sk Zealos + Sn0 = my 2 main lategame candidates for sk with confirmed town status Meanwhile we could have just lynched into Vayne, you/grack and won the game :/ If you would have pushed and really put in time after the OP lynch, you would have had a massive impact in the game. Unfortunately, when you put your first vote on scum like that, and then proceed to do little in terms of thread presence, it naturally raises red flags. Unfortunately, I feel like I did not stress vote analysis enough (vayne and grack would have both been caught in that regard and you would have been the third lynch after them). | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
You did fine debears. Maybe its cause you guys kept pushing my townreads? Haha. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9846 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
Does anyone even remember that game? I don't either lol haven't looked past that | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On September 26 2013 12:54 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont actually know why I didnt do anything really after day 1. You did fine debears. Maybe its cause you guys kept pushing my townreads? Haha. That is the reason why town's aren't winning right now. People gotta stop sugarcoating performances | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On September 26 2013 12:46 debears wrote: I don't know why you are taking my comments so personally. Post less and read/think more is not at all confrontational. There are points in the game that you did flood the thread (see d1 with the SnB meta read). It does make the game incredibly hard to read for people like me. Not to mention, it's easier to follow your thought process when you have a step by step explanation in a post, rather than among a couple pages of filter. It also can keep your arguments more coherent (remember the part where you added to your SnB meta read about it being wrong, and I was confused about it because you had said it was accurate earlier?). The one person I think of as a successful mass poster is marv. But, the main difference I feel between you two is that marv keeps it better organized between posts (at least from my experience) and has better explanations. This is the last time I'm going to try to explain this to you. If you don't like it, that's fine and dandy. In any endeavor in life, you improve most by looking at where you failed, and why. A lot of times, the best way to see those failures is through what others say you failed at and what others say you need to improve on. Okay i am at least trying to understand. I know i did present the SnB argument poorly in the first place. That was my mistake. I know i also made a mistake in arguing about it with you (that was because of my poorly presented argument -- which i now can see you didn't understand). I got frustrated when i actually went back and made a coherant points just for you you had already "ignored" me and wouldn't look back into it. As in you having played with me in Aperture and in Desert should have seen why the meta SnB brought up was wrong. Look at how Pandain handled the situation. He told me i might be right, and SnB might be wrong, and asked me how does that make him mafia. I argued with him about it for a while, and came into conclusion that i might be wrong. | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
#swag | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
Atleast I didn't mindlessly lynch SnB. gg | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25551 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
